About ASCE Journals

A core mission of ASCE has always been to share information critical to civil engineers. In 1867, then ASCE President James P. Kirkwood addressed the membership regarding the importance of sharing information as the organization’s members spread far outside the boundaries of New York City.

“Here, because we are so widespread… we shall find it more needful to create this other tie, and to maintain it by a regular distribution of so much of the proceedings of the general meetings as will be readable and valuable to the absent members.”—James P. Kirkwood

Volume 1 of the Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers was published in 1872 and contains technical papers read to the assembled members of the Society at various meetings. These papers explored new techniques, materials, and best practices. Kirkwood spoke of the importance of documenting and sharing failures in order to improve the practice.

By 1956, the members of the Society had grown and subdisciplines had emerged as divisions. The Transactions were now split into the journals of the original divisions.

Today, as in 1867, the journals of ASCE are the media through which civil engineers exchange technical and professional knowledge. Information published in the journals is the archival record of the technical advances of the profession.

ASCE publishes 36 journals across many civil engineering disciplines. Authors are ASCE members and nonmembers alike. The community surrounding each journal is international and multidisciplinary.

Responsibility for reviewing manuscripts submitted to ASCE for publication rests with the editors and editorial boards of each journal. The Executive Committee or Publications Committee of each division, council, and institute is responsible for the contents of their journals.

ASCE LIBRARY
The ASCE Library (ascelibrary.org) is the online home of journals, conference proceedings, e-books, and standards. All ASCE journals are available online.

ASCE journal content is highly discoverable and indexed in all the major services, including Google Scholar, Elsevier (Scopus and Engineering Village), Clarivate Analytics (Institute for Scientific Information, Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index, Science Citation Index), ProQuest, TRID, and EBSCO to maximize the discovery of author works.

Information about each journal, such as the aims and scope, editorial board, submission links, etc., can be found on the home page of each journal in the ASCE Library.

Types of Journal Content

Technical Papers — Technical Papers are full-length manuscripts of value and interest to civil engineers. They must be original reviews of past practice, present information of current interest, or probe new fields of civil engineering activity. They should report results of thought-provoking studies that contribute to the planning, analysis, design, construction, management, or maintenance of civil engineering works. Technical Papers should include a practical applications section whenever possible; theoretical manuscripts should indicate areas of additional research to implement technology transfer. Practical papers are strongly encouraged. Technical Papers must not exceed 30 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions (see Manuscript Submission and Revision Requirements).

Technical Notes — Technical Notes present (1) original, practical information; (2) preliminary or partial results of research; (3) concisely presented research results; and (4) innovative techniques to accomplish design objectives. Technical Notes must not exceed 7 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions.

Case Studies — Case Studies describe a method or application that illustrates a new or existing principle or presents an innovative way to solve a problem. Ideally, results should have broad implications and not be specific to only the case presented. Case Studies are judged with the same rigor as technical papers and Notes. Case Studies must not exceed 30 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions.

State-of-the-Art Reviews — State-of-the-Art Review articles are full-length papers that provide timely, in-depth treatment of a specific issue relevant to the journal topics. These reviews must provide a complete survey of the state of practice being examined and leave the reader feeling as though they are up to date on the current practices in the field on the given topic. A State-of-the-Art Review should include an extensive literature review of the most recent and relevant studies as well as perspective on the history of practice and the importance of the field. State-of-the-Art Reviews must not exceed 45 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions. Authors planning to submit State-of-the-Art Review articles must first submit a proposal for the article to be reviewed by the chief editor or member of the editorial board, and if approved, authors will be invited to submit the full article to be peer reviewed. See Appendix I for proposal guidelines.

Companion Papers — Companion manuscripts are discouraged, as all papers published must be able to stand on their own. Justification must be provided to the editor if an author feels as though the work must be presented in two parts and published simultaneously. Given the length of time required to review two manuscripts, there is no guarantee that companions will be reviewed by the same reviewers.

Data Papers — A Data Paper is a peer-reviewed article that concisely describes the data, methods, and instrumentation used to acquire the data, associated metadata, data validation, and potential opportunities for reuse. The article must include a link to the complete data set archived at a publicly accessible repository.

Discussions — Discussions present significant comments or questions about the technical content of a Technical Paper, Technical Note, or Case Study published in an ASCE journal. Discussions may be submitted during a 5-month period following the date of online publication of the paper and may not exceed 4 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions. Discussions should not contain matter readily found elsewhere, advocate special interests, contain obvious commercial intent, controvert established fact, or be purely speculative.

Discussions follow the requirements for other manuscripts except that they do not have abstracts, introductions, or conclusions. Separate Discussions must be submitted for companion papers (a study presented as multiple parts in the same issue). The title of the Discussion should begin with “Discussion of” followed by the title of the original paper. The DOI of the original paper should be included below the title. Numbering of author footnotes, figures, tables, and equations should begin with one (1) and continue sequentially, making it clear when a table, figure, or equation being discussed is from the original paper or the Discussion or Closure. Discussions and Closures should be submitted in Microsoft Word format only.

Closures — Closures are responses written by the author(s) of the original manuscript in response to one or more accepted discussions. The author(s) addresses and clarifies issues raised in Discussions and provides conclusions to the issues. Closures and Discussions are published together. Guidelines for formatting a Closure are the same as for discussions. Please make sure that those authors involved in the writing of the Closure are included in the byline. Not all the original authors need to be listed.

Book Reviews — Book Reviews assess new books whose content is judged important. They summarize the work, illuminate its strengths and weaknesses, and place it in context with existing literature. Book Reviews are limited to 3 double-spaced manuscript pages. Please note that not all ASCE journals publish book reviews.

The first page of a Book Review must contain the following information: book title, author(s)/editor(s), publisher and publisher location, publication year, ISBN, total number of pages, and price in US dollars. The reviewer’s name and affiliation must also be provided.

Editorials — An Editorial is a brief opinion piece concerning the scope, content, direction, or philosophy of the journal or a policy issue concerning engineering research or its application. Editorials are occasionally invited and may be subject to peer review. Contributions are usually short, not exceeding 4 double-spaced manuscript pages, and rarely contain tables, figures, or references. Editorials require a title and author byline with current affiliations.

Forums — A Forum is a thought-provoking opinion piece or essay founded in fact, sometimes containing speculation, on a civil engineering topic of general interest and relevance to the readership of the journal. Its purpose is to stimulate discussion rather than document an advance in research or its application. A Forum is subjected to either partial or full peer review, depending on the subject matter and recommendation of the editor. Forums must not exceed 8 double-spaced manuscript pages, including references, figures, tables, and captions. Tables, figures, and references are often included but an abstract is not allowed. Forums require a title and author byline with current affiliations.

Corrections

Errata: Corrections of published errors. If errors are serious enough to impair understanding or mislead readers, authors should submit errata through the submission website for review by the managing editor and production manager. Errata are published in the earliest available issue.

Notice of Redundant Publication: Notification to the readers that significant content in the paper may have already been published in the authors’ previous published work.

Expression of Concern: Notification to the readers that the paper is being investigated.

Retraction: Notification that the paper is no longer considered a viable contribution to the journal. Retracted papers are noted with the word “Retraction” added to the title. Retracted papers are not removed from ASCE publications.

Additional Content Types
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

The Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering contains these additional article types:

Technical Breakthrough Abstract — Short contributions that present original, concise, and practical information regarding an important new breakthrough relevant to geotechnical engineering. Technical Breakthrough Abstracts may contain figures, tables, and references but may not exceed one published page (single side) in the journal, which corresponds to a length of approximately 800 words or word equivalents.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

The Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction contains the following article types:

Scholarly Papers — Scholarly Papers are original, well-researched, referenced, and analyzed papers typically ranging from 4,250 to 9,750 words. Papers address the subject matter’s impact on the execution of engineering and construction projects. Articles discussing jurisprudence fall into this category.

Legal Notes — Legal Notes emphasize the specific practice and application of laws. They are usually 2,250 to 9,000 words in length.

Features — Feature articles describe a subject of current public interest and are written to apprise the readership of the main issues and developments in this matter. Features are typically 3,500 to 8,500 words in length.

Letters to the Editor — Short Letters to the Editor range from 400 to 1,500 words; longer letters are up to 4,000 words. Letters should meet a high technical and scientific standard and be referenced, where possible, especially the longer letters.

Synopses of Court Verdicts — Synopses are write-ups on a recent court verdict, typically ranging from 1,500 to 3,500 words, which trace the history, developments, and outcome of the court verdict and explain its effect on contract administration. These can be considered as a shorter version of the Case Study type of articles.

Conference Reviews — Conference Reviews are short yet full accounts or descriptions of any conference, seminar, or symposium on law and dispute resolution. This review must discuss a recent event. The length of such articles must be between 750 and 3,000 words.

ASCE will consider Discussions and Closures for any of the following article types in the Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction: Features, Scholarly Papers, Case Studies, and Legal Notes.

Journal of Civil Engineering Education

The Journal of Civil Engineering Education has the following definitions and requirements for the journal:

Technical Papers include (1) traditional research papers, (2) educational intervention studies, and (3) systematic literature reviews. All Technical Papers must:

•  Include a robust review of related literature, including a clear description of the gap that the paper seeks to address.

•  Pose relevant research question(s) and/or goal(s).

•  Utilize appropriate research methodologies that address the research question(s)/goal(s).

•  Produce generalizable and/or transferable findings.

• Include discussion, conclusions, and limitations that stem from the results.

1. Traditional research papers may use qualitative or quantitative methods to answer research question(s) related to civil engineering education. These studies leverage established and validated methodologies and measurement tools appropriately. Results advance the field of civil engineering education by adding new knowledge or validating previous studies in a new context. Papers that utilize case study methodologies fit within traditional research papers. Case study methodologies align with the broad definitions adopted in other disciplines such as history, sociology, or education. Technical paper case studies are in-depth investigations of a particular case (a person, a group, an organization) that utilize multiple data collection types and points to provide in-depth descriptions and explanations of the case and the context surrounding the case.

2. Educational intervention studies can describe any type of educational intervention, including such examples as implementing a research-based strategy (e.g., problem based learning or interactive engagement) in the classroom, or broad changes to curriculum. These studies must include a clear description of the intervention such that the reader could implement the intervention at their institution, and a logical explanation of why the intervention would lead to the measured outcome(s). For example, frequent interactive engagement could lead to improved technical communication skills based on students working together on problems in a classroom setting. Research on the efficacy of the intervention must rely on established and validated methodologies, including surveys, interview protocols, and analysis procedures.

3. Systematic literature reviews are summaries of best practices that adhere to appropriate methodologies. Systematic literature reviews must be done using established methodologies and incorporate research done in and describe the specific relevance to civil engineering education.

All technical papers must utilize the growing body of engineering education literature. Literature reviews for research papers should consist of how the phenomenon/topic/intervention has been studied before, and how the present study is differentiable.

The methods section should include a thorough description of all aspects of study methods, including but not limited to scales or validated surveys utilized, sampling strategy, response rates, descriptions of participants, statistical analyses performed and rationale for doing so, interview protocols, and qualitative data analysis techniques. If the authors utilize a survey instrument, it either must be a previously developed and fully validated instrument or the authors must use an accepted procedure for development.

Authors should present their results and discuss the ways in which they can be useful to civil engineering educators or other audiences. As part of this discussion, the limitations and assumptions made in the study should be addressed including but not limited to sample size, data collection methodologies, tools, and the context of the study. The aim of the results and discussion is to present findings in such a way that they could be replicated and built upon by future researchers.

The structured abstract for a traditional research technical papers must include the following:

• Background - Briefly describe the context and motivation for the study and the research gap.

• Purpose/Hypothesis- Summarize the research question/proposition(s) addressed.

• Design/Method - Provide an overview of the research design, methods of data collection, and analysis.

• Results - Summarize the key findings.

• Conclusions - State the key conclusion(s) based on the findings.

The structured abstract for an educational intervention technical paper must include the following:

• Background - Briefly describe the context and motivation for the study and the research gap.

• Purpose/Hypothesis- Summarize the research question/proposition(s) addressed.

Design/Method - Provide an overview of the intervention design and research design, methods of data collection, and analysis:

• Results - Summarize the key findings.

• Conclusions - State the key conclusion(s) based on the findings.

The structured abstract for a systematic literature review must include the following:

• Background - Briefly describe the context and motivation for the review.

• Purpose/Hypothesis- Summarize the research question addressed.

• Design/Method - Provide an overview of the methods of data collection, and analysis.

• Results - Describe the key results of the review.

• Conclusions - State the key conclusion(s) based on the review.

Case Study

Case Studies are defined for all ASCE journals as papers that “describe a method or application that illustrates a new or existing principle or presents an innovative way to solve a problem.” JCEE applies this definition to the education setting and considers a Case Study to be the description of an innovative educational method (tool, curriculum, etc.). Case Studies have two primary components: a) a deep grounding in the education literature and b) the ability for the study to reasonably be replicated by readers. Case Studies should be grounded in the literature through evidence based educational practices (EBIP), similarly termed research based instructional strategies (RBIS). EBIP, and RBIS are practices that have been demonstrated in a preponderance of research findings to support students’ learning and development. Case Studies will provide detailed descriptions of the application or intervention that incorporates one or more EBIP or RBIS. Case Studies are not focused solely on the use of new technology in the classroom (e.g., BIM or VR). The use of new technology must be tied to education best practice literature. Case Studies must provide enough detail so that the reader could implement the method described in a unique and innovative way. Case Studies should be well written and easy to follow while findings suggest outcomes specific to the context under investigation. Authors are encouraged to include the improvements to their educational method that occurred during implementation and revision, as these may guide the reader in their own in-context application.

Research on the effectiveness of an innovative educational method may be designated as an educational intervention technical paper if all qualifications are met. Educational intervention technical papers are appropriate for research studies on the effectiveness of an innovative educational method.

The structured abstract for a Case Study must include the following:

• Background - Briefly describe the context and motivation for the innovative educational method.

• Purpose - Summarize the purpose of developing/implementation of the educational method.

• Design/Method - Provide a detailed description of the design and implementation of the educational method and how it incorporates educational best practices. Also include processes to improve the method as appropriate.

• Conclusions - State the key conclusion(s) from the development/implementation effort.

Select a Journal

Identify the right ASCE journal for your research. ASCE publishes 35 journals across many civil engineering disciplines. Papers published in ASCE Journals have influence as shown in important citation metrics. Our full list of journals is included in the table below along with key topics and Journal Impact Factors.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Editor: Michael Beer, M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: risk, disaster and failure-related challenges related to civil engineering projects

ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering
Editor: Ertugrul Taciroglu, Ph.D., F.EMI, M.ASCE
Topics: practical solutions to global grand challenges

International Journal of Geomechanics
Editor: Marco Barla, Ph.D. | Meet the Editor
Topics: mining and geological engineering, underground structures, geophysics, geothermal energy, lunar and planetary engineering, ice mechanics

Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Editor: Wieslaw Binienda, Ph.D., F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: aerodynamics, computational fluid dynamics, wind tunnel testing, aerospace structures

Journal of Architectural Engineering
Editor: Ali M. Memari, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: acoustics, sustainable construction, construction management, electrical engineering and systems, indoor environmental quality

Journal of Bridge Engineering
Editor: Sriram Narasimhan, Ph.D., P.Eng (Ontario), M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: bridge engineering design, construction, management, and safety

Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Editor: Shane Brown, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: connecting civil engineering education to professional practice

Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
Editor: Zhaohui Joey Yang, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Topics: ice engineering, construction on permafrost, cold weather construction, engineering in cold regions

Journal of Composites for Construction
Editor: Fabio Matta, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Topics: fiber-reinforced composite materials, continuous synthetic fibers and composite materials in stand-alone forms

Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Editors: Yong K. Cho, Ph.D., M.ASCE and Nora El-Gohary, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: artificial intelligence, parallel processing, distributed computing, graphics and imaging, information technology

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Editor: Jesus M. de la Garza, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: construction material handling, equipment, production planning, cost and quality control, labor productivity, construction management

Journal of Energy Engineering
Editor: Chung-Li Tseng, Ph.D., M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: generation of electric power, nuclear power, energy planning, energy policy and economics

Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Editor: Franz-Josef Ulm, Ph.D., P.E., F.EMI, M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: computational mechanics, computer-aided engineering, dynamics of structures, fluid mechanics, probabilistic methods

Journal of Environmental Engineering
Editor: Volodymyr V. Tarabara, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Topics: impacts of wastewater collection and treatment, contaminants, nonpoint-source pollution, hazardous waste, air pollution and solid waste facilities

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Editor: Catherine O’Sullivan, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Topics: foundations, retaining structures, soil dynamics, behavior of soil and rock, slope stability, earthquake engineering

Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Editor: Rao Y. Surampalli, Ph.D, P.E, D.WRE, DEE, F.AAAS, Dist.M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: research, planning, and oversight of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste

Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, English Edition
Editor: Chen Guojing
Topics: road, bridge, tunnel and traffic engineering, transport economics

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Editor: Fabian Bombardelli, Ph.D. | Meet the Editor
Topic: flows in closed conduits to free-surface flows, environmental fluid dynamics

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Editor: Xuefeng Chu, Ph.D., F.EWRI, A.M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: analytical, numerical, and experimental methods for the investigation and modeling of hydrological processes

Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Editor: Sue McNeil, Ph.D., P.E (NJ), Dist. M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: managing, sustaining, enhancing, and transforming civil infrastructure systems

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Editor: David Arthur Chin, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: irrigation, drainage, engineering hydrology, watershed management, groundwater

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Editor: Amarjit Singh, Ph.D., P.Eng, C.Eng. F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: legal issues and litigation pertaining to all areas of engineering and construction (e.g. contract law, liability, arbitration, workers' compensation)

Journal of Management in Engineering
Editor: Young Hoon Kwak, Ph.D., M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: contract and project management, partnering, professional development, financial management, ethics, strategic planning, globalization, teamwork

Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Editor: Antonio Nanni, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: development, processing, evaluation, applications, and performance of construction materials

Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Editor: Norbert Delatte, P.E., Ph.D., F.ACI, F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: failures, methods of investigation of failures, special techniques for failure investigations, reconstruction and repair, issues of ethics

Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Editor: Ahmad Habibian, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: pipeline systems planning, design, construction, renewal, safety, operation and maintenance

Journal of Structural Engineering
Editor: John W. van de Lindt, Ph.D., F.ASCE, F.SEI | Meet the Editor
Topics: structural modeling and design, maintenance, rehabilitation and monitoring of existing structures

Journal of Surveying Engineering
Editor: Sergio Baselga, Ph.D., M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: construction and control surveys, photogrammetric mapping, engineering layout, satellite positioning, digital mapping

Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Editor: Allen P. Davis, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, F.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: sustainable stormwater management, watershed management, urban streams, sewer overflow

Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Editor: Chris T. Hendrickson, Ph.D., Hon.M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: road, bridge and transit management, traffic management technology, automous vehicle impact, highway & railway engineering

Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Editor: Karim Chatti, Ph.D., F.ASCE
Topics: pavement design, materials, modeling, maintenance and performance, interaction of pavements and vehicles

Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Editor: Gang-Len Chang, Ph.D., M.ASCE | Meet the Editor
Topics: environmental assessment, land use, infrastructure management, transportation planning, coordinating public works and utilities

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Editor: Meghna Babbar-Sebens, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
Topics: use and conservation of water, wild and scenic river use

Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering
Editor: Andrew Kennedy, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Topics: interaction of ocean, coastal, and riverine waters with adjacent built and natural environments; development and operation of offshore facilities; ocean resource utilization

Natural Hazards Review
Editors: Nasim Uddin, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE, F.ASCE and Louise K. Comfort, Ph.D.
Topics: interdisciplinary and partnered approaches to loss reduction and long-term disaster resiliency, across engineering, social and behavioral sciences, and physical sciences

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Editor: Soliman Khudeira, Ph.D., P.E., S.E | Meet the Editor
Topics: solutions to structural design problems and construction challenges

* Journal of Architectural Engineering, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, English Edition, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, and Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment are now indexed by Web of Science | Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI). The journals reviewed and selected by the ESCI editorial team enable discovery of new areas of research in emerging fields.



ASCE Publication Policies

Peer Review Policies
Internal Review
If the author(s)’ employer or funding agency requires an approval process prior to a paper being published, those approvals must take place before submitting a paper to the journal. Likewise, any required approvals for revised manuscripts must be completed during the author review period. ASCE will not allow extensive changes or delays for papers postacceptance. Papers with extensive revisions will be withdrawn and sent back through the review process.
 
Journal Articles
Technical Papers, Technical Notes, and Case Studies must be reviewed by at least two competent reviewers. The editor must receive an agreeing review from one of the reviewers in order to render a decision of accept or decline. ASCE’s goal is to have manuscripts complete their initial review within 30 days. Revisions and rereview are frequently required conditions of acceptance.
 
Discussions, Closures, Editorials, and Forums only require a review by the editor. Corrections are reviewed by the managing editor and production manager.
 
Practice Periodical Articles
Manuscripts submitted to ASCE’s Practice Periodical of Structural Design and Construction only require one review to accept or decline a manuscript. The review is performed by either an editor or a qualified individual selected by the editor.
 
Previously Published Content
ASCE only considers original manuscripts that have not been previously published and are not under consideration with other journals. “Previously published” includes papers in print and available online and may include conference proceeding papers, posters, and preprints on institutional repositories, preprint servers, or other internet sites. Special considerations are taken for posted theses and dissertations, as well as government reports required by federal funding agencies.
 
Conference Proceedings
ASCE will consider manuscripts based on conference papers if the following requirements are met:
 
1. The conference paper must not be under copyright at any other institution. If the paper is under copyright elsewhere, it is the author’s responsibility to obtain permission from the copyright holder to submit and publish the paper with ASCE prior to submission.
 
2. The author must answer “yes” to the submission question about whether the paper was presented at a conference. The author must disclose the name and date of the conference.
 
3. The conference paper must contain new and expanded information, methodology, interpretation, and conclusions from the conference paper. Whether the conference paper meets these criteria is up to the judgment of the journal’s editor. Authors must provide a description of how the journal paper is different from the conference paper. ASCE reserves the right to request a copy of the conference for comparison purposes.
 
4. The conference paper must be cited in the submitted journal article.
 
Preprint Servers
ASCE recognizes that it is customary for researchers to post papers on preprint servers prior to peer review. ASCE does not consider papers on preprint severs as previously published, as long as copyright can be transferred to ASCE. Should the paper be accepted, authors must do the following:
 
Post the full citation and DOI of the published paper on the preprint server paper.
 
Post the ASCE copyright notice on the preprint server paper. If the author opts for the Open Access option, then the author retains copyright. A note indicating as much should be put on the preprint paper in lieu of the ASCE copyright notice.
 
Government Reports
ASCE will consider papers that are based on government reports. Authors must disclose that their paper is based on a government report and provide the citation and link for the report upon submission. The paper in question must be based on a report that is funded and carried out by a local, state, or federal authority or direct branch thereof, or its equivalent.
 
Theses and Dissertations
ASCE does not consider the online posting of theses and/or dissertations to be prior publication if the degree-granting institution requires that the final version be posted as a requirement for an undergraduate, Master’s, or Ph.D. degree. Postings may be made in open institutional repositories or on ProQuest UMI, provided posting is a requirement of obtaining a degree.
 
If a thesis or dissertation has been posted online prior to submitting a journal article, authors must disclose this in the submission questions and provide the URL or DOI permalink.
 
It is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the submitted paper has all copyright permission and authorship approvals. Authors should take care in revising their academic work to best suit publication in a journal.
 
Reuse of Journal Articles in Theses or Dissertations
In certain cases, a thesis or dissertation may consist of already published journal articles. ASCE regularly grants permission to include published journal articles in a print thesis or dissertation. For online publication of the thesis or dissertation, only the accepted manuscript version of the paper may be posted online with a citation and link to the DOI of the published version. Under no circumstances should the final published PDF be posted online.
 
Posting Papers on the Internet
After the paper has been published in the ASCE Library, authors may post the final draft of their work on open, unrestricted internet sites or deposit it in an institutional repository when the draft contains a link to the bibliographic record of the published version in the ASCE Civil Engineering Database. “Final draft” means the version submitted to ASCE after peer review and prior to copyediting or other ASCE production activities; it does not include the copyedited version, the page proof, or a PDF of the published version.
 
Authors may post a PDF of the ASCE-published version of their work in their employers’ intranet site, as long as it is password protected (not available to the public). The following statement should appear with the paper: “This material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers.”
 
Authors may deposit the final draft of their work in an institutional repository or in their funding body’s designated archive upon publication in an ASCE Journal, provided the draft contains a link to the published version at ascelibrary.org, and may request public access 12 months after publication.
 
Authors may post the final draft of their work on open, unrestricted internet sites 12 months after publication in an ASCE Journal, provided the draft contains a link to the published version at ascelibrary.org.
 
Authors are permitted to provide the final ASCE-published PDF to individuals by request. Authors are not permitted to post the final ASCE-published PDF on file-sharing sites such as DropBox or Evernote and then share the link with large groups of people.
 
Materials Sharing and Data Availability
Recognizing that science and engineering are best served when data are made available during the review and discussion of manuscripts and journal articles, and to allow others to replicate and build on work published in ASCE journals, all reasonable requests by reviewers for materials, data, and associated protocols must be fulfilled. ASCE must be informed of any restrictions on sharing of materials (Materials Transfer Agreements or patents, for example) applying to materials used in the reported research. Any such restrictions should be indicated in the related submission question at the time of submission, and each individual author will be asked to reaffirm this at the time the final version of the manuscript is submitted. The nature of the restrictions should be noted in the paper. Data not shown and personal communications cannot be used to support claims in the work. Authors are encouraged to provide data as Supplementary Materials to show all necessary data (see Supplemental Materials). Unreasonable restrictions may preclude publication.
 
Author Data Archiving and Sharing
ASCE encourages all authors to make the data, code, computational models, and other materials that were collected, used, and/or derived in the preparation of a submitted paper publicly available. Data and code should be easy to discover online, cited, and specified in a Data Availability Statement.
 
For all journals, authors are required to specify the availability of data, computational models, code, and other electronic materials used in manuscripts submitted to the journals. When submitting a revised manuscript, authors must include a section titled “Data Availability Statement” before the Acknowledgments or before the References if no Acknowledgments section is present. For formatting and Data Availability Statements, see the Manuscript Submission and Revision Requirements.
 
Available data and code must be cited in the References section. Authors may update or change their statement if information changes during the course of peer review. NOTE: Changes to the Data Availability Statement cannot be made after acceptance.
 
Where should data go? Data associated with a paper may appear in the following places:
 
Within the text of the paper
 
As Supplemental Materials to a paper, which will be posted in the ASCE Library
 
In a data repository
 
Authors have many choices for where they deposit data. Ideally, the repository chosen will provide authors with a DOI for the data. DOIs provide a persistent link to the data and avoid link rot.
 
Many academic institutions have data repositories and may have policies requiring authors to deposit the data there. Authors should check with their institutions.
 
There are subject-area specific repositories as well. The Registry of Research Data Repositories offers a searchable list by data type and subject area. ASCE will publish supplemental materials along with a paper; however, the file types are limited and not appropriate for large data sets or code. Further, Supplemental Materials do not have their own DOI and cannot be cited on their own. Access to Supplemental Materials is the same as for the paper attached to it. If the author chooses to publish their paper as Open Access, then the Supplemental Materials will also be available free to all readers. Otherwise, the materials are only available to subscribers.
 
What about code? ASCE encourages authors to share all related code used to analyze data in a published paper. Sharing data is meant to aid users in replicating results. Replicating results typically requires code. The following services are available to house data and the related code:
 
Code Ocean: codeocean.com
 
GitHub: github.com
 
Both services provide a DOI for the code. Code should be cited the same way that datasets are cited.
 
What should be shared? Authors should share all code, data, mathematical models, and materials that were used to develop the results and conclusions in the paper. In many cases, the data used in a paper may be a subset of data collected. Data used to generate figures or tables should be included. Only the data analyzed as part of the paper need to be included; however, authors should review the requirements of their institutions and funders to determine if a broader data sharing policy is required.
 
All data deposited in a repository should contain enough metadata to explain to a user what the data are, how the data were generated, and how a reader can reproduce the work. Authors should also ensure that they have the rights to share the data publicly. Citation information should also be included in the metadata.
 
Ideally, authors should review the FAIR Data Principles and try to comply with those recommendations.
 
Will data or code be peer reviewed? No. If authors make data, models, and code available, reviewers and editors may or may not review those files and provide feedback. Nowhere should authors lead users to believe that the data were reviewed and approved by ASCE.
 
How should data be cited? References for data sets should include author name, year of publication, titles (followed by edition or version number) in quotation marks, publisher or distributor, access date, and electronic identifier (DOI or URL). Examples include:
 
Ansolabehere, S., M. Palmer, and A. Lee. 2014. “Precinct-level election data. V1.” Harvard Election Data Archive. Accessed January 20, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YN4TLR.
 
Thernstrom, S. 1986. “Boston mobility study, 1880.” ICPSR 7550. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Accessed November 28, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07550.
 
What if data is proprietary? All proprietary data should be identified in the Data Availability Statement as proprietary. The statement should further describe restrictions on use and/or reuse. ASCE understands that there are times when data are used that may be proprietary to the authors’ organizations or funding institutions. Authors may not claim that data are proprietary just because they do not want to share it. ASCE encourages authors who enter agreements to collect or analyze proprietary data to negotiate terms for making the data used in a paper available to readers (e.g., publish anonymously or without identifying information).
 
Disclaimer
All work appearing in the print and online versions of ASCE journals is subject to the following disclaimer:
 
Any statements expressed in these materials are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ASCE, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein. No reference made in this publication to any specific method, product, process, or service constitutes or implies an endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by ASCE. The materials are for general information only and do not represent a standard of ASCE, nor are they intended as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal document. ASCE makes no representation or warranty of any kind, whether expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or utility of any information, apparatus, product, or process discussed in this publication, and assumes no liability therefor. This information should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application. Anyone utilizing this information assumes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infringement of any patent or patents.
 
Copyright
ASCE requires authors to respond to the Copyright Transfer Agreement questions in Editorial Manager when submitting the revised manuscript as a condition of publication.
 
By answering the submission questions, all authors on the manuscript consent to transfer, to the extent that there is copyright to be transferred, the exclusive copyright interest of the manuscript in the present and all subsequent editions of the work (to include closures and errata), and in derivatives, translations, or ancillaries, in English and in foreign translations, in all formats and media of expression now known or later developed, including electronic, to ASCE subject to the following:
 
The authors retain the right to revise, adapt, prepare derivative works, present orally, or distribute the work, provided that all such use is for the personal noncommercial benefit of the author(s) and is consistent with any prior contractual agreement between the authors and their employer(s).
 
No proprietary right other than copyright is claimed by ASCE.
 
If the manuscript is not accepted for publication by ASCE or is withdrawn by the author prior to publication (online or in print), the transfer will be null and void.
 
Exceptions to the copyright transfer policy exist in the following circumstances:
 
Work prepared by US Government employees in their official capacities is not subject to copyright in the United States. Such authors must place their work in the public domain, meaning that it can be freely copied, republished, or redistributed. In order for the work to be placed in the public domain, all authors must be official US Government employees. If at least one author is not a US Government employee, copyright must be transferred to ASCE by that author.
 
Whereby a work is prepared by officers of the Crown Government in their official capacities, the Crown Government reserves its own copyright under national law. If all authors on the manuscript are Crown Government employees, copyright cannot be transferred to ASCE; however, ASCE is given the following nonexclusive rights: (1) to use, print, and/or publish in any language and any format, print and electronic, the aforementioned work or any part thereof, provided that the name of the author and the Crown Government affiliation is clearly indicated; (2) to grant the same rights to others to print or publish the work; and (3) to collect royalty fees. All authors must be official Crown Government employees in order to claim this exemption in its entirety. If at least one author is not a Crown Government employee, copyright must be transferred to ASCE by that author.
 
Privately employed authors who have prepared works in their official capacity as employees must also transfer copyright to ASCE; however, their employer retains the rights to revise, adapt, prepare derivative works, publish, reprint, reproduce, and distribute the work provided that such use is for the promotion of its business enterprise and does not imply the endorsement of ASCE. In this instance, an authorized agent from the author’s employer must sign the form.
 
Work prepared by authors under a contract for the US Government (e.g., US Government labs) may or may not be subject to copyright transfer. Authors must refer to their contractor agreement. For works that qualify as US Government works by a contractor, ASCE acknowledges that the US Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the work for US Government purposes only. This policy does not apply to work created with US Government grants.
 
Work published via the ASCE Open Access option appears under a Creative Commons license. Any signed copyright transfer form will be nullified if the author chooses this option.
 
Open Access Options and Rights
ASCE offers two options for authors to publish their papers Open Access. ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering is a Gold Open Access journal. All papers accepted in this journal will be published Open Access. For all other ASCE journals, which operate under a hybrid model, authors have the option to select Open Access for their accepted manuscript. More information on article processing charges for ASCE OPEN and ASCE’s hybrid journals can be found on our Open Access Options and Rights page. Individuals or companies may also sponsor papers to be freely available under certain circumstances.
 
Permission and Reuse of Material
As a reputable publisher of scientific and technical material, ASCE respects the copyright ownership of others—whether they be individuals, publishers, or engineering firms. Authors are required to obtain permission for ASCE to republish any material that they did not create or that they do not own.
 
Using Material from an ASCE Journal or Book
Authors of ASCE journal articles do not need to ask ASCE for permission to reuse content. Authors are responsible for ensuring that ASCE actually holds copyright to the material. For example, if the material was used in an ASCE journal with permission from another publisher, authors cannot reuse that material in an ASCE publication without getting permission from the original copyright holder. ASCE uses Copyright Clearance Center to handle permissions requests.
 
Credit Lines
Whether permission is needed or not, authors must include a credit line for all material being reused in a paper. If the author is reusing their own figure that was previously published in an ASCE publication, the credit line must indicate the original source. If the original source is not an ASCE publication, permission may be required. See Manuscript Submission and Revision Requirements for more information regarding credit lines.
 
Using Copyright Clearance Center for Obtaining Permission
Most commercial technical publishers and many nonprofit publishers use Copyright Clearance Center to handle permissions requests. Copyright Clearance Center simplifies the process of obtaining permissions. When a publisher uses Copyright Clearance Center, the permissions link goes directly from the publisher’s website to the article record in Copyright Clearance Center. Authors can complete the online form and find out immediately what permission is available and how much it will cost.
 
Copyright Clearance Center request forms vary from publisher to publisher (and from whether a record is accessed from the publisher’s website or directly from RightsLink). When the form is completed and “get price” clicked, Copyright Clearance Center will show what price, if any, the publisher will charge for permission to reproduce its content. Decide whether to accept the price (often it will be $0) and complete all the screens until Copyright Clearance Center serves up a license. Be sure to save or print the license, so it can be included as part of a final manuscript’s permission documents. Authors are responsible for paying all license or reuse fees associated with a permission request.
 
ASCE is a member of a consortium of scientific, technical, and medical publishers known as STM Signatories. STM Signatories agree to allow each other use of a limited number of figures, tables, and text extracts with no fees (the limit is usually three tables/figures from a single publication). STM Signatory privileges are not always an option when the permission request originates in RightsLink, so it is better to begin a permission request on the publisher’s website and then be directed to RightsLink.
 
Obtaining Permission from a Business Entity or Photographer
When the source of a figure or table is an engineering firm or other business entity, permission must be obtained from the firm.
 
Because most businesses do not have online permissions request services, permission is most easily obtained by email. For large companies, permissions requests may be handled by the marketing department. For other companies, permissions requests may be addressed by a principal or senior manager.
 
For some photographs, permission must be requested from the photographer. The photographer could be an individual who wishes to retain copyright to the photograph. In other cases, if the photograph appeared in a newspaper or magazine article, the photographer, rather than the publisher, owns copyright of the photo.
 
Email permission from the business entity or photographer is acceptable, as long as the full name and title of the grantor is included, along with the grantor’s email address. Be sure to save the email, so it can be included as part of a final manuscript’s permission documents.
 
Consent Forms from People in Photographs
When a photograph contains a recognizable living person—that is, a clear view of a person’s face—that person must give permission to reproduce their likeness. This can be managed in several ways:
 
Permission to use photos of employees at work can often be provided by the employer (a business entity).
Professional photographers can often provide model release forms for people in their photos.
The person in the photo can sign the ASCE Photography Consent Form.
Forms and releases should be included in the permissions documents for the final manuscript.
 
Reuse of Content under Creative Commons License
Creative Commons includes several different license options and terms for reuse. Authors wanting to reuse content under the following licenses must understand the restrictions:
 
Creative Commons Attribution Only (CC BY): Authors do not need permission to reuse the material (modified or not) but they must give credit to the creator.
 
Creative Commons NonCommercial (CC BY-NC): ASCE Journals are a commercial activity and as such, permission must be obtained from the creator of the material to include the material in an ASCE journal article.
 
Creative Commons No Derivatives (CC BY-ND): Authors do not need permission to reuse the material, as long as there are no modifications made to the materials and credit is given to the creator.
 
Creative Commons Share Alike (CC BY-SA): Authors do not need permission to reuse the material, as long as they make the material available under the same terms.
 
Please note that the original creator may choose several of these licenses for their work, such as CC BY-NC-ND. In those cases, all the requirements for each license are expected. In rare cases, authors may want to reuse content under a CC0 license, which allows all reuse with no permission or credit necessary. ASCE requires a link to the original source for verification.


Peer Review Process

Once an article is submitted for review, it will be evaluated by ASCE journal staff to ensure it meets our technical requirements for submission. Once the manuscript passes our technical check, the manuscript will be sent to the chief editor of the journal to begin the review process.

ASCE employs a single anonymous peer review process for review. When the manuscript is sent to an editor, the chief editor performs an initial review of the article to ensure it fits the aims and scope of the journal. Authors can review each journal’s aims and scope on the journal home page at ascelibrary.org.

If a manuscript fits within the journal’s scope, the chief editor may send the article to an associate editor who will invite reviewers and make a decision on the manuscript. Once the associate editor submits their recommendation and the reviews, the chief editor will review the recommendation and make a final decision.

Guidelines for Publication

To be acceptable for publication, a manuscript must:

• Be of value and interest to civil engineers.

• Be an original review of past practice, present information, or probe new fields of civil engineering activity.

• Contribute to the planning, analysis, design, construction, management, or maintenance of civil engineering works.

• Contribute to the advancement of the profession by using the journals as a forum for the exchange of experiences by engineers.

• Include a Practical Applications section whenever possible; theoretical manuscripts should indicate areas of additional research to implement technology transfer.

• Be free of evident commercialism or private interest but must not obscure proper names when they are required for an understanding of the subject matter.

• Be free of personalities, either complimentary or derogatory.

• Not be readily available elsewhere—it should not have been published previously by ASCE (including a proceeding) or other professional or technical societies, federal agencies, or commercial publishers.

• Be clear and transparent on authorship; ASCE will not review or publish any manuscripts whose authorship is in dispute.

• Be consistent with the purpose of the Society and not contain purely speculative matter, although it can use scientific evidence to challenge current concepts or propose new ideas that will encourage progress and discussion.

ASCE Review Decisions

Upon initial review of a submitted manuscript, the editor is permitted to take the following actions:

• Send the paper out for review.

• Return the paper without review and suggest a transfer of the paper to another ASCE journal.

• Return the paper without review because the paper is outside the scope of the journal.

• Return the paper without review because the grammar is substandard.

• Return the paper without review because the technical content is insufficient.

• Return the paper without review because the paper grossly exceeds the length limitations.

Reviewers are experts who critically read and provide detailed reviews to improve the paper. Editors review the comments and will often provide a summary for the authors. The decisions available after review are:

• Accept.

• Revise.

• Decline.

Upon submitting revisions to the journal, authors are required to submit a rebuttal to the reviewer comments. Authors should note the page and line number and fully address all reviewer comments. Even if an author does not agree with the change requested, the author should explain the rationale in the rebuttal. If an editor feels that an author has ignored reviewer comments, the editor may reject the revised manuscript.

Appeal of Review Decisions

An author who disagrees with a review decision may appeal it by contacting the Journal’s Editorial Coordinator within 12 months from the decision date. The Coordinator will forward the appeal to the Managing Editor of the journal who will consult with the Chief Editor of the journal to determine if the appeal is valid. If the appeal is deemed valid, the Managing Editor will send the submission back to the authors through the Editorial Manager system to upload their appeal letter with their original submission to be rereviewed. If it is again declined, the decision may be appealed to the appropriate division, council, or institute. The division, council, or institute’s decision is final.

The Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering has its own appeal process. All appeals for this journal should be sent to the Chief Editor with a copy to the ASCE managing editor. The Chief Editor will review the appeal and if they deem it appropriate, the appeal will be sent to the Ombudsman who will review the paper, reviews, and responses. The Ombudsman will make the decision on the appeal after conferring with the Chief Editor.

Manuscript Submission and Revision Requirements

Manuscripts must be submitted through the journal’s Editorial Manager website. Links to the submission page can be found on the journal home page in the ASCE Library. ASCE will not review any manuscripts sent via email or mail.

ASCE is proud to offer authors a LaTeX template through a partnership with Overleaf. Overleaf provides ASCE authors with an online collaborative tool that allows users to toggle between LaTeX and Rich Text Format. The template can be found here: https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/tagged/asce#.V0R387NVhBc.

A Word document template can be found here: ASCE Word Template

When submitting a manuscript for an initial review, please ensure the following are completed before approving your PDF copy (see Appendix II for author checklists):

• The manuscript title, author byline, and abstract are on the first page of your manuscript text. Authors should make sure the byline listed on the manuscript matches what they have entered in Editorial Manager.

• All authors have separate affiliation statements. The corresponding author should be noted. An email address is required for the corresponding author and encouraged for all authors.

• The manuscript is in a double-spaced, single-column format with continuous line numbering.

• All figures and tables are included.

• Initial submissions may be in Microsoft Word, LaTeX, or PDF.

• All required submission questions must be answered.

• Funding for the research must be declared accurately via the funder selection tool provided in Editorial Manager, as well as in the Acknowledgments.

• Authors are encouraged to have an ORCID and supply it with the submission. All ORCIDs submitted should be “fetched” via the instructions on the site. ORCIDs that are typed or cut and pasted into the box will not be validated and therefore, not used. Unauthenticated ORCIDs entered as text in the manuscript will not be published.

When submitting a revised manuscript, ensure that the following requirements are met:

• All aforementioned requirements listed for new submissions apply to revised manuscripts.

• Manuscript file is in Microsoft Word or LaTeX format.

○ When using LaTeX, ASCE can accept PDF files upon revision. Please see LaTeX at Revision instructions.

• Figures are uploaded as separate files and in BMP, EPS, PDF, PS, or TIF/TIFF formats.

• Tables are in Microsoft Word or LaTeX.

• All permissions are uploaded with the manuscript files.

Preparing the Manuscript

Length

For most ASCE journals, the maximum length for technical papers and Case Studies is 30 double-spaced manuscript pages including references, figures, tables, and captions; 7 double-spaced manuscript pages for Technical Notes; and 4 double-spaced manuscript pages for Discussions and Closures. The editor may waive these restrictions to encourage manuscripts on topics that cannot be treated within these limitations. Authors are no longer required to upload a Manuscript Sizing Sheet; however, grossly overlength papers may be returned prior to review.

General Flow of the Paper

Sections of the article should not be numbered and should use word headings only. Article sections should appear in the following order:

• Title page (includes title, author byline, affiliation(s), and abstract)

• Practical Applications (optional)

• Introduction

• Main text sections

• Conclusion

• Appendix(es)

• Data Availability Statement

• Acknowledgments (to include any funders)

• Disclaimer

• Notation

• Supplemental Materials

• References

Title

The title of a paper is the first “description” of a paper found via search engines. Authors should take care to ensure that the title is specific and accurately reflects the final, peer-reviewed version of the paper. Authors should try to include relevant search terms in the title of the paper to maximize discoverability online.

Titles should not begin with “A,” “An,” “The,” “Analysis of,” “Theory of,” “On the,” “Toward,” etc.

Author Bylines

Under the title of the manuscript, the full name of each author and their affiliation and academic or professional designation, if applicable, must be included. One ASCE membership grade (e.g., “M.ASCE”) may also accompany an author’s name. The following academic and professional designations are currently acceptable for all journals: Ph.D., Dr.Tech., Dr.Eng., D.Sc., Sc.D., J.D., P.E., S.E., D.WRE, Hon.D.WRE, D.GE, D.CE, D.OE, D.PE, D.NE, NAE, DEE, P.Eng., CEng., L.S., P.L.S., G.E., P.G., P.H., RA, AICP, CPEng.

Author Affiliations

Each author must have an affiliation that includes their title (optional), place of affiliation, and current address. An email address is required for the corresponding author and optional for all other authors.

Former affiliations are permissible only if an author’s affiliation has changed after a manuscript has been submitted for publication. If a coauthor has passed away, include the date of death in the affiliation line. Any manuscript submitted without a separate affiliation statement for each author will be returned to the corresponding author for correction.

Change in Author Byline

Authors are not permitted to change the byline of their paper once the manuscript has been accepted for publication by ASCE. Changing the author byline during review is permissible but subject to the following requirements:

• If the author order changes from the initial submission, the corresponding author must provide evidence of approval by all the authors.

• If an author is added after the initial submission, the corresponding author must provide an explanation of the addition, as well as approval by all the initial authors and approval by the author being added.

• If any authors who were included in the initial submission are removed, the corresponding author must provide approval from all remaining author(s) and written permission from the author(s) being deleted. Without explicit permission to remove them, those names will remain in the byline.

The “Change in Author Byline Form” found in Appendix III must be completed with the explanation for the byline change and signatures from all authors as evidence of approval. This form should be uploaded to Editorial Manager as a “Permissions” file item when submitting the revised manuscript.

Change in Corresponding Author

If the corresponding author changes from the initial submission, permission for this change must be obtained from both the previous corresponding author and the new corresponding author (the “Change in Corresponding Author Form” can be found in Appendix IV). The appropriate information must be updated in Editorial Manager, and the new corresponding author may need to register an account in the system if one does not already exist.

Abstract

The Abstract should be a single paragraph (250-300 words long) written in plain language that includes a summary of the key conclusions of the manuscript. It should clearly state the purpose of the work, scope of the effort, procedures used to execute the work, and major findings. The Abstract is the second most important online search discovery element, after the title. Authors should review the Abstract to ensure that it accurately reflects the revised paper and should strive to include any applicable keywords that would likely be used during an online search.

Mathematics and references are not permitted in the abstract and will be removed by the copyeditors.

Practical Applications

The Practical Applications section is a valuable tool in helping your research reach a wider audience. The Practical Applications section is a concise plain-language summary (150-200 words) of the paper written for nonacademic or practitioner audiences to identify the results, relevance, or potential applications the research describes. While the author’s paper’s Abstract is written with other subject area specialists in mind, the Practical Applications section should be written for broader audiences who may be interested in key results of the study but may not be fully involved in the research community.

The structure of the Practical Applications section should aim to answer the question of why someone should read the article and summarize key takeaways in a straightforward and jargon-free manner. The author may wish to make connections between their research and the broader goals/challenges of the area of study. Including real-world examples or big-picture takeaways can be helpful to contextualize the findings of the study. Avoid using abbreviations, acronyms, symbols, etc.—and instead use plain language to outline the impact of the research to try to reach a wide audience. Plain language is clear, well-organized text which concisely conveys the author’s message.

The Practical Applications section should be placed directly after the Abstract within the manuscript and should be between 150-200 words.

Gender-Specific Words

Authors should avoid “he,” “she,” “his,” “her,” and “hers.” Alternatively, words such as “author,” “discusser,” “engineer,” and “researcher” should be used.

Tense

Use the past tense to report what happened in the past: what the authors did, what someone reported, what happened in an experiment, and so on. Use the present tense to express general truths, such as conclusions (drawn by the authors or by others) and facts not limited by time (including information about what the paper does or covers). Reserve the future tense for perspectives: what will be done in the coming months or years.

Typically, most sentences will be in the past tense, some will be in the present tense, and very few, if any, will be in the future tense.

• Past tense

○ We collected samples from …

○ Groves et al. (2009) determined the growth rate of …

○ Consequently, astronomers decided to rename …

○ The plots in Group A developed, on average, twice as much …

○ The sun rose at 6:23 a.m. on …

○ The conversion rate was close to 95% …

• Present tense

○ Mesh size and choice of model parameters have a profound influence on …

○ The Reynolds number provides a measure of …

○ Smoking increases the risk of coronary heart disease …

○ The sun rises in the east …

○ This paper presents the results of …

• Future tense

○ In a follow-up experiment, we will study the role of …

Footnotes and Endnotes

Footnotes and Endnotes

Footnotes and endnotes are not permitted in the text. Authors must incorporate any necessary information within the text of the manuscript.

Exception — Endnotes are only permitted and encouraged for use in the Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction and should be presented as follows:

7Idle capacity; because of delay, staff are not fully engaged in productive work for the delayed project during the delay period.

Repeated references to the same case may be stated in the text by using an endnote number. In the endnote, the author must list the case, as shown in the following:

27Excavation-Construction, Inc., v. United States, op cit.

Mathematics
Special characters and sub/superscripts should be clearly typed. Symbols used in the paper should be listed alphabetically in a section called “Notation” at the end of the manuscript (preceding the references). When possible, set all math using MathType or Microsoft Word’s Equation Editor. Math should never be submitted as graphic files.

Authors should take care to ensure that ambiguous characters (such as prime) and lookalike characters (lowercase “ell” and numeral one; capitalized “oh” and zero; "zee" and two; "vee" and Greek nu; and "double you" and lowercase Greek omega) are clear for the copyeditor and typesetter to identify. Unambiguous characters, such as uppercase Greek delta, need not be identified.

Dimensionless numbers, such as Froude (F), Mach (M), Reynolds (R), Richardson (Ri), Strouhal (S), Weber (W), Péclet (P), Prandl (Pr), and Schmidt (Sc), must be identified. Identifying these in text or in a Notation list is acceptable.

Use italics for all variables, including variables that are subscript and superscript.

Use roman type for all numerals and Greek characters, subscripts, and superscripts (if they are not variables), and mathematical operators.

Matrices, tensors, and vectors should be typed either in boldface or placed consistently within brackets and italicized (e.g., X or [X]). Alternately, an arrow above the character can be used to indicate vectors, as in 𝑋⃗ .

In the text, single-level expressions must be typed as such [e.g., 1/(a + b)], not stacked or built-up. In numbered (displayed) equations, authors must stack numerators over denominators. All displayed equations should be numbered sequentially throughout the entire manuscript, including Appendixes. Equations should be in the body of a manuscript; complex equations in tables and figures are to be avoided, and numbered equations are never permitted in figures and tables.

Convert E notation to scientific notation. This is particularly important in tables. For example:

1.23E7, 1.23e07, 1.23E+7 should be 1.23 × 107

1.23E-7, 1.23e-07, 1.23E-7 should be 1.23 × 10−7

SI Units
The use of Système International (SI) units as the primary units of measure is mandatory. Other units of measurement may be given in parentheses after the SI unit if the author desires. More information about SI units can be found from NIST at: physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/index.html.

The symbols for the base units of SI are as follows: A, cd, K, kg, m, mol, and s. For SI supplementary units, the symbols are rad and sr. The symbols for SI-derived units are Bq, C, F, Gy, H, Hz, J, 1m, 1x, N, Pa, S, Sv, T, V, W, Wb. The SI multiplying prefixes are a, c, d, f, n, p, m. Other units used with SI in civil engineering include C, day, h, ha, L, min, t, and year. Scientific notation with SI units (for example, 2.4 × 106 m) is acceptable.

Conversion Factors from US Customary to SI Units
Sample Table 1
Table 1. Holocene sites used to develop VS-based CRR chart

Table 1: Conversion Factors from US Customary to SI Units

Sample Table 2
Table 2. True stress-strain data for FEA

Table 2: True stress-strain data for FEA

Sample Table 3
Table 3. Geometric properties of subassemblage specimens

Table 3: Geometric properties of subassemblage specimens

Figures

Figure Captions
Brief figure captions (which serve as identifying labels) must be double-spaced and placed at the end of the manuscript (before the tables) or uploaded as a separate Word file. Figure captions should be short and to the point; they need not include a complete explanation of the figure. Each caption should begin with the abbreviation “Fig.” followed by an Arabic number, followed by a period:

Fig. 1. Plan view

Fig. 2. Percentage breakdown of practitioner responses: Year 1 and Year 2.

Figure Files
Figures should be uploaded as separate files in BMP, EPS, PDF, PS, or TIF/TIFF formats. If using PDF format, authors must ensure that all fonts are embedded before uploading to the Editorial Manager website. Every figure must have a figure number and be cited sequentially in the text.

Color Figures
Figures submitted in color will be published in color in the online journal at no cost. Color figures provided must be suitable for printing in black and white. Color figures that are ambiguous in black and white and mentions of figure colors in the text will be returned to the author for revision and will delay publication. Authors wishing to have figures printed in color must indicate this in the submission questions. There is a fee for publishing color figures in print.

Figure, Table, and Text Permissions
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for each figure, photograph, table, map, material from a Web page, or significant amount of text published previously or created by someone other than the author(s). Permission statements must indicate permission for commercial use online, as well as in print.

ASCE will not publish a manuscript if any text, graphic, table, map, or photograph has an unclear permission status. Authors are responsible for paying any fees associated with permission to publish any material. If the copyright holder requests a copy of the journal in which their figure is used, the corresponding author is responsible for obtaining a copy of the journal.

A brief summary of copyright rules is as follows:

• Anything published before January 1, 1923, is now in the public domain.

• Works published between 1923 and 1963 are under copyright if copyright was renewed.

• Works published from 1964 to 1977 have copyright protection for 95 years from first publication.

• Works published from 1978 on follow the “life plus 70” rule: copyright holds for the remainder of the author’s life, plus 70 years.

Even “unpublished” works enjoy copyright protection. The copyright term for unpublished works is the life of the author plus 70 years. If the author’s date of death is unknown, the copyright term is 120 years from the date of creation. The copyright term for unpublished works created before 1978 that were published after December 31, 2002, is life of the author plus 70 years, or December 31, 2047, whichever results in a longer term.

Material from a Website— Material from a website is considered to be published on the website, even if it has not been published elsewhere. The fact that material was taken from a website means neither that it is in the public domain nor that authors can use it without permission. Many websites include copyright notices. Unless the website explicitly indicates that material on the site is in the public domain or under a license that allows reuse without permission (such as certain Creative Commons licenses), authors of journal articles must secure permission to use any figures, photographs, tables, or maps that they obtained from a website.

Materials Produced by the US Government— In general, works produced by the US Government are in the public domain and authors can use them; however, the author must cite the source (for example, “Reprinted from US Army Corps of Engineers 2009”). If, however, the original source of the material is not in the public domain, the author must obtain permission from the original copyright holder. Note that not all materials produced by state governments are in the public domain; check with the relevant agency for details.

Reuse of Content under Creative Commons Licenses— Creative Commons includes several different license options and terms for reuse. Information on the restrictions can be found in the ASCE Publication Policies section of this guide. Content used under allowable licenses must credit the copyright holder. Permission from the creator may be required depending on the Creative Commons license and the reuse. Credit Lines for Figures and Tables For materials previously published, complete reference information for the source must be included in the References section. If the copyright holder does not provide an author with a specific credit line, the author/date text citation, and the words “with permission” should be used (e.g., “Reprinted from Jones 2008, with permission”). For figures, the credit line should appear at the end of the figure caption; for tables, the credit line should appear in an unlettered footnote, preceded by “Source:”

If the material comes from an ASCE publication, the author/date citation, and the abbreviation ASCE should be used (e.g., “Reprinted from Jones 2008, © ASCE”).

If the material comes from a public domain source, the source should be credited (e.g., “Reprinted from US Army Corps of Engineers 2009”).

If reused materials are under a Creative Commons license, the source may need to be credited, e.g., “Courtesy of Casey 2016” if under an attribution only license (CC BY) and “Reprinted with permission from Casey 2016” if under a Creative Commons license that requires permission.

If material has been adapted, the words “adapted from” or “modified from” should be included along with the author/date citation (e.g., “Adapted from Jones 2008” or “Modified from Jones 2008”). Similarly, if the data are from a previous source and the author has created a figure or a table from that data, the words “data from” and the author/date citation should be included (e.g., “Data from Jones 2008”).

The following guidelines should be used for crediting photography:

• Include the photographer’s name whenever possible.

• Use “image by author(s)” (for all authors) if the photo was taken by an author of the paper.

• Use “image by [individual name(s)]” when it is one author of many and ensure that the author name(s) matches the byline in the manuscript.

• Use "Reprinted from [referenced source], with permission" if the images are from a published/referenced source. Here, "referenced source" should be replaced with the referenced name(s) and date, like an in-text citation. Complete reference should be included in the References section.

If the material is from an unreferenced third party, use “image courtesy of [unreferenced third party].” The text “unreferenced third party” should be replaced by the name, organization name, location, and date.

Other Manuscript Elements

The Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction also allows for the manuscript elements below. These reference elements should be in the following order: (1) List of Cases, (2) List of Statutes, (3) Endnotes, (4) Bibliography, and (5) Works Cited. Authors do not need to use all these categories. They should all be preceded with a single “References” heading.

List of Cases — When plaintiff vs. defendant information is mentioned in text, use italics, as shown in the following examples:

Excavation-Construction, Inc., v. United States

Community Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc., v. Kelso

The list of cases should include the full citation at the end of the paper: Excavation-Construction, Inc., v. United States, ENG BCA 3851 (1984). Community Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc., v. Kelso, 987 F.2d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

List of Statutes— The list of statutes gives specific state or federal statutes pertaining to legislation, as shown in the following:

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).

Endnotes— May include commentary and other remarks. See Footnotes and Endnotes for more information.

Bibliography— Contains uncited references.

Works Cited— The traditional references that are cited in the paper.

 

 

 

Ethical Standards

Obligations of Authors

An author’s central obligation is to present a concise account of their research, work, or project completed with an objective discussion of its significance.
 
Submitted manuscripts should contain detail and reference to public sources of information to allow the author’s peers to repeat the work or otherwise verify the accuracy. All reasonable requests by editors or reviewers for materials, data, and associated protocols should be fulfilled. Authors should clearly note any data sharing restrictions in the submission questions when submitting (see Materials Sharing and Data Availability).
 
The manuscript must not contain plagiarized material or falsified research data. ASCE is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). As a member, ASCE follows the guidelines recommended by COPE outlined at publicationethics.org. Fragmentation of research papers should be avoided. An engineer or scientist who has done work on a several related systems should organize publications so that each manuscript gives a complete account of a particular aspect of the general study (see Redundant Publication or Fragmentation of Research).
 
ASCE will not review or publish manuscripts that have been previously published in print or online. “Previously published” generally means content that is under copyright of another entity or widely available in print or electronic formats.
 
Authors should refrain from criticizing another manuscript by personally attacking the author.
 
To protect the integrity of authorship, only persons who have significantly contributed to the research or project and manuscript preparation should be listed as coauthors. The corresponding author will attest to the fact that any others named as coauthors have seen the final version of the paper and agreed to the submission for publication.
 
It is inappropriate to submit manuscripts with obvious commercial intent.
 
It is inappropriate for an author to either write or coauthor a discussion on their own published manuscript, except in the case of a closure to the discussion.
 
Obligations of Editors
 
The primary responsibility of an ASCE journal editor is to ensure an efficient and fair review process of manuscripts submitted for publication, and to establish and maintain high standards of technical and professional quality.
 
Criteria of quality are originality of approach, concept, and/or application; profundity; and relevance to the civil engineering profession.
 
An editor shall give unbiased consideration to all manuscripts offered for publication and shall judge each on its merits without regard to any personal relationship or familiarity with the author(s), or to the race, age, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, professional association, or political philosophy of the author(s).
 
The editor and editorial staff shall disclose no information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than those from whom professional advice regarding the publication of the manuscript is sought. The names of reviewers shall not be released by the editors or editorial staff.
 
An editor who authors or coauthors a manuscript submitted for consideration to the journal with which that editor is affiliated shall not review that work. If after publication, the editor-author's work merits ongoing scientific debate within the journal, the editor-author shall accept no editorial responsibility in connection therewith.
 
An editor shall avoid conflicts of interest and/or the appearance thereof. An editor shall not send a manuscript to reviewers who are known to have personal bias in favor of or against the author or the subject matter of that manuscript.
 
Unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations contained in a submitted manuscript are confidential and shall not be used in the research of an editor or associate editor or otherwise disseminated except with the consent of the author and with appropriate attribution.
 
If an editor is presented with convincing evidence that the substance, conclusions, references, or other material included in a manuscript published in an ASCE journal are erroneous, the editor, after notifying the author(s) and allowing them to respond in writing, shall facilitate immediate publication of an erratum. If possible, an editor shall also facilitate publication of appropriate comments and/or papers identifying any errors.
 
If an editor is presented with convincing evidence that a manuscript or published paper contains plagiarized material or falsified research data, the editor shall forward such evidence to the managing editor for investigation.
 
ASCE, and by extension all ASCE appointed editors, are members of COPE. ASCE generally follows the guidelines and recommendations published by COPE.
 
Obligations of Reviewers
 
Because qualified manuscript review is essential to the publication process, all engineers and scientists have an obligation to do their fair share of reviews.
 
If a reviewer feels inadequately qualified or lacks the time to fairly judge the work reported, the reviewer shall decline the invitation to review in a timely manner.
 
A reviewer shall objectively judge the quality of a manuscript on its own merit and shall respect the intellectual independence of the author(s). Personal criticism is never appropriate.
 
A reviewer shall not suggest unnecessary revisions to add content or citations to works authored by the reviewer and/or associates of the reviewer. Excessive self-citation in reviews will cause the review to go back to the reviewer for correction. Reviewers will also be flagged in the submission system, and future reviews will be carefully read through.
 
A reviewer shall avoid conflicts of interest and/or the appearance thereof. If a manuscript submitted for review presents a potential conflict of interest or the reviewer has a personal bias, the reviewer shall return the manuscript promptly without review and so advise the editor.
 
If a reviewer receives for review a manuscript authored or coauthored by a person with whom the reviewer has a personal or professional relationship, the existence of this relationship shall be promptly brought to the attention of the editor.
 
A reviewer shall treat a manuscript received for review as a confidential document and shall neither disclose nor discuss it with others except, as necessary, to persons from whom specific advice may be sought; in that event, the identities of those consulted shall be disclosed to the editor. The review submitted to ASCE remains confidential and should not be shared publicly on any platform regardless of the final decision of the paper.
 
Reviewers shall explain and support judgments adequately so that the editor and author(s) may understand the basis for their comments. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported shall be accompanied by the relevant citation.
 
A reviewer shall call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity between the manuscript under consideration and any published paper, or any manuscript submitted concurrently to another journal.
 
A reviewer shall not use or disclose unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations contained in a manuscript under consideration, except with the consent of the author and with appropriate attribution.
 
If a reviewer has convincing evidence that a manuscript contains plagiarized material or falsified research data, the reviewer shall notify the editor and ASCE journals staff immediately. The reviewer should not contact the author directly.
 
Authorship

ASCE uses CRediT taxonomy to define who can be considered an author. CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) is high-level taxonomy, including 14 roles, which can be used to represent the roles typically played by contributors to scientific scholarly output. The roles describe each contributor’s specific contribution to the scholarly output. Each author can have multiple authorship roles. More information on CRediT can be found here: https://casrai.org/credit/
 
ASCE defines an author as a person who has:
 
Made significant contributions to the conception, design, development, and execution of an experiment or study.
 
Made intellectual contributions to the writing, revising, and editing of a paper that has resulted from the experiment or study.
 
Approves of and accepts responsibility for the paper and the information, data, and inferences presented therein.
 
Contributorship vs. Authorship
 
Contributors differ from authors in the way that they do not meet the specific criteria for authorship, but they have provided their time and energy to bring the study and resulting paper to fruition. Contributors are not involved in the conception or design of a study, nor do they interpret data or participate in the final presentation. Contributors provide writing support and technical assistance. Authors can include the names of contributors in the Acknowledgments section of their papers.
 
Ghost, Guest, and Gift Authorship
 
Ghost Authorship: Ghost authorship is when a person participates in the conception, research, data collection, and writing of a paper but their name is not included in the byline or in the Acknowledgments section. Any person who significantly contributes to the creation of a manuscript should be acknowledged. Please see the section on ASCE’s Authorship Definition and CRediT taxonomy. If the person in question meets these criteria for authorship, they should be included in the byline of the paper.
 
Guest Authorship: Guest authorship is when an author is included in the byline of a paper because of the assumption that their name recognition will increase the chances of the paper being published. The guest author makes no contribution to the research or writing of a paper and thus does not meet the criteria for true authorship. Guest authors are sometimes included in the byline without their knowledge or consent.
 
Gift Authorship: Gift authorship is when a person is included in the byline of a paper who has only tenuous connection to the study that took place, or the research or writing of a paper.
 
ASCE prohibits the practice of ghost, guest, and gift authorship.
 
Byline changes
 
Authorship should be determined before a manuscript is submitted to the editorial office. The byline of a paper cannot be changed once a paper is accepted. ASCE does allow authors to change a byline once a paper is in review, but this practice is discouraged. To change the byline while the paper is in review, the corresponding author must obtain the signatures of all authors indicating that they agree to the byline change. The corresponding author will be asked to share the reason why the byline will be changed. The form to change the byline of a paper can be obtained by emailing the editorial coordinator of the journal. (The form can also be found in Appendix III of this author guide.) The corresponding author will be asked to fill out CRediT taxonomy for the new author in Editorial Manager. Editors and ASCE editorial staff reserve the right to request and receive a declaration of authorship for any paper submitted to ASCE Journals.
 
Similarity Check
 
ASCE is a member of Crossref and employs the Similarity Check tool, powered by Turnitin, to evaluate the originality of work submitted to the journals. Similarity Check evaluates the text of a submitted paper against a large database of published journal content and non-journal content on the internet. A similarity report is provided to ASCE staff and the editors in evaluating the originality of work. Any manuscript with more than a 30% overlap will be returned to authors.
 
Papers that are found to have excessive overlap with the author(s)’ previous work may be returned to the author with a request to revise the overlap and/or verbatim sections. (Please see the section about text recycling.)
 
Papers that are found to have excessive and unattributed overlap with published works authored by others will be subject to review by the editors and possibly the corresponding author’s institution.
 
PRIOR PUBLICATION
 
Text Recycling
Text recycling is defined as “the reuse of textual material (prose, visuals, or equations) in a new document where (1) the material in the new document is identical to that of the source (or substantively equivalent in both form and content), (2) the material is not presented in the new document as a quotation (via quotation marks or block indentation), and (3) at least one author of the new document is also an author of the prior document” (textrecycling.org).
 
Text recycling is ethically and morally ambiguous, depending on the context in which it occurs. Text recycling is generally acceptable if it does not violate copyright agreements, is used to build from existing works, and is employed to clearly communicate ideas. Text recycling is generally unacceptable if it infringes copyright agreements, violates publishing contracts, or hinders communication.
 
ASCE considers text recycling acceptable if the author:
 
Creates a new work using unpublished sources.
 
Reuses previously published content to create a paper that is novel in its contribution to the body of knowledge.
 
Reuses previously published material to produce a paper that might not necessarily be novel in its contributions to the body of knowledge but does so make the material presentable for a different genre or audience.
 
Conference Papers
ASCE will consider manuscripts based on conference papers if the following requirements are met:
 
The conference paper must not be under copyright at any other institution. If the paper is under copyright elsewhere, it is the author’s responsibility to obtain permission from the copyright holder to submit and publish the paper with ASCE prior to submission.
 
The author must answer “yes” to the submission question about whether the paper was presented at a conference. The author must disclose the name and date of the conference.
 
The conference paper must contain new and expanded information, methodology, interpretation, and conclusions from the conference paper. Whether the conference paper meets these criteria is up to the judgement of the journal’s editor. Authors must provide a description of how the journal paper is different from the conference paper. ASCE reserves the right to request a copy of the conference for comparison purposes.
 
The conference paper must be cited in the submitted journal article.
 
NOTE: Papers included in the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting Compendium are considered published and cannot be submitted to ASCE for publication without significant additions and revisions. Authors who intend to submit a TRB conference paper to an ASCE journal must opt-out of inclusion in the compendium.
 
Preprint Servers
ASCE recognizes that it is customary for researchers to post papers on preprint servers prior to peer review. ASCE does not consider papers on preprint severs are previously published, as long as copyright can be transferred to ASCE. Should the paper be accepted, authors must do the following:
 
Post the full citation and DOI of the published paper on the preprint server paper.
 
Post the ASCE copyright notice on the preprint server paper. (If the author opts for the Open Access option, then the author retains copyright. A note indicating as much should be put on the preprint paper in lieu of the ASCE copyright notice.)
 
Government Reports
ASCE will consider papers that are based on government reports. Authors must disclose that their paper is based on a government report and provide the citation and link for the report upon submission. The paper in question must be based on a report that is funded and carried out by a local, state, or federal authority or direct branch thereof, or its equivalent.
 
Accusations of Scientific Misconduct or Violations of ASCE Policies
 
ASCE is a member of COPE and, as a general rule, follows the guidelines set forth by COPE regarding issues of scientific misconduct. This section provides insight into the process that ASCE staff and editors employ when issues arise, or accusations are sent to ASCE.
 
Manuscripts submitted to ASCE are considered confidential and will not be shared. If a paper is under investigation for possible misconduct, ASCE may share the manuscript with editors of ASCE and non-ASCE journals also investigating the matter.
 
Dual Submission
Definition — Dual submission is when a paper is submitted to two different journals or publishers at the same time. ASCE will not review papers that are being reviewed elsewhere. ASCE performs a duplicate submission check that looks for similar papers throughout the ASCE journal database. If ASCE discovers that a paper in review is also in review elsewhere, the paper will be rejected.
 
Action —If a paper in review appears to be in review at another non-ASCE journal, ASCE will ask the author for an explanation and, barring an honest mistake, likely reject the paper in review.
 
Dual Publication
Definition — Dual publication is when the same material is published more than once. ASCE does not review or publish material that has been published already. This includes publication in other ASCE journals, books, and proceedings. ASCE expects that all submissions are novel and original to the author (see Redundant Publication or Fragmentation of Research).
 
Action — The papers in question will be evaluated for similarity. The authors will be asked for an explanation. The publisher of the similar paper will be contacted. If the investigation by ASCE finds that the paper meets the definition of dual publication, the paper may be retracted, and the author’s institution notified of the action. Authors who are members of ASCE who are found to be in violation of ASCE policies may also be subject to investigation by the ASCE Committee on Professional Conduct.
 
Redundant Publication or Fragmentation of Research
Definition —Fragmentation of research is when an author creates two or more different papers from a single experiment or study, when the scientific record would be better served by creating only one comprehensive paper. Authors are encouraged to build on previous work and submit new papers, as long as the submitted paper offers novel information not presented in previous works.
 
Action — Fragmentation of research is not acceptable. Papers in review that are found to contain excessive overlap to other papers either published or in review will be evaluated using Similarity Check, as well as an editor evaluation. Authors will be asked to provide an explanation on the differences between the papers in question. If an editor feels as though the submitted manuscript is redundant to already published materials, the paper will be rejected. Published papers that are found to contain excessive overlap are subject to a Notice of Redundant Publication. If the published overlap finds ASCE in violation of another publisher’s copyright, ASCE may retract the paper. The author(s)’ institution may be notified.
 
Fabrication and Falsification of Data
Definition — According to the US Office of Research Integrity, fabrication of data is “making up data or results and recording or reporting them,” and falsification is “manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record” (ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct).
 
Action — Fabricating or falsifying data is a major violation of proper scientific conduct. Authors accused of either violation will be asked to supply all supporting data and results for evaluation. If ASCE and its editors find cause for further investigation, the issue may be referred to the author(s)’ institution and/or funding agency for investigation. Authors who are members of ASCE may also be reported to the ASCE Committee on Professional Conduct. ASCE journals may issue an Expression of Concern during any investigation. If wrongdoing is determined, the offending paper(s) will be rejected or retracted, and the authors may be banned from publishing with ASCE in the future.
 
Plagiarism
Definition — “Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit” (ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct).
 
Action — ASCE journals use iThenticate, powered by Turnitin, to compare submitted papers with already published works. Authors may be asked to explain similarities. Follow-up investigation and action depends on the nature of the offense. If a paper is found to have deliberately plagiarized works of another, the paper will be rejected or retracted and the author(s)’ institution will be notified. Authors who are members of ASCE may also be reported to the ASCE Committee on Professional Conduct.
 
Correcting the Literature
 
ASCE has a responsibility to the engineering profession and the scientific community to ensure that known errors or misrepresentations are corrected in the literature.
 
Minor errors of fact or omission may be corrected by publishing an erratum. An erratum must be submitted within 24 months from the data of publication and approved by the managing editor and will be reserved for errors that will impede the readers’ understanding of the text. Minor typographical errors are typically not worthy of an erratum. Once approved, the erratum will be published online in the next available issue. The erratum and the original article will be linked in the ASCE Library under the “Editorially Related” section.
 
Major errors may result in the retraction of a paper. A retraction tells the readers to disregard the original work. Retracted papers are still available to readers. The title of the original paper will be appended with the word “Retracted.” The PDF will also be watermarked with the word “Retracted.” An explanation will be published and digitally linked to the paper. ASCE strives to be precise in explaining why a paper has been retracted. Retractions that lack specificity will not be permitted. ASCE will always consult with authors prior to retracting a paper, but in cases where wrongdoing has been confirmed or ASCE faces potential legal repercussions, a retraction may be published without the author(s)’ consent.
 
All corrections published are included in feeds to all abstracting and indexing services, allowing for quick updates. All corrections are published online and in print and are available for readers for free (no subscription or registration required).
 
Crossmark
As a member of Crossref, ASCE participates in Crossmark, a multipublisher initiative to provide a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. The appearance of the Crossmark logo on a document indicates that ASCE is committed to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.
 
Clicking the Crossmark logo on a document will tell the author its current status and may provide additional publication-record information about the document. If an update exists, the status information will include a Crossref DOI link to the updated document and any associated documents such as Errata, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions.
 
Alerting ASCE of Possible Misconduct
 
ASCE keeps confidential the names and affiliations of individuals who report possible misconduct related to the authors, editors, and reviewers associated with ASCE journals. Individuals wishing to make a report should contact the ASCE managing editor at [email protected]. Accusations must be specific in order to allow for ample investigation.

ASCE Policies on Artificial Intelligence and Automated Tools

Artificial Intelligence and Authorship

ASCE is a member of COPE, the Committee on Publication Ethics. As such, ASCE follows COPE Guidelines on artificial intelligence and authorship. Our policy is that AI software cannot be listed as an author on a paper.

ChatGPT and similar software is not human, and for this reason cannot independently design studies, create and critique methodologies, interpret data, or be held responsible for the outcomes and implications of the study in question. For this reason, ChatGPT and similar software should be treated as a tool, not an author. For more information on COPE’s guidance on AI and authorship, please visit the COPE website.

Artificial Intelligence and Automated Tools

ASCE policies on the use of AI and automated tools are the following:

  • ASCE will not review or accept manuscripts written by nonhuman authors. Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools should not be listed in a byline for any reason.
  • Authors are required to disclose whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools were used in the creation and preparation of their manuscripts. ASCE reserves the right to ask for and receive detailed information on how LLMs and AI were used in the creation of a manuscript.
  • Reviewers shall not use LLMs or AI tools when reviewing manuscripts or preparing comments to authors.
  • Future developments: ASCE will continue to monitor the ethical implications of using AI tools and automation as they evolve and change.

More information about COPE’s guidelines and recommendations regarding AI tools and automation can be found here.



LaTex User Guide for Editorial Manager

The purpose of this section is to provide helpful information in uploading LaTeX manuscripts to Editorial Manager for ASCE Journals. Users of this document should consider submitting additional tips or directions that will assist LaTeX users. ASCE encourages authors to use the Overleaf template for preparing LaTeX files. The platform and use of the template are free. The template is available here: overleaf.com/latex/templates/tagged/asce-official#.WueOedKPKM8.

Authors have two options when submitting LaTeX manuscripts:

1) Submit a PDF manuscript as an initial submission and then build the PDF in Editorial Manager at the revision stage, using the main .tex file and all the supporting files. Going this route requires that the author submit all LaTeX files as “manuscript” files. A PDF is produced in Editorial Manager. All ASCE’s regular formatting and figure guidelines apply. This is the process that ASCE has used for many years.

2) Submit a PDF document as the manuscript file at *both* new and revised submission stages. If an author opts for this, the author MUST use Overleaf to produce that PDF. The author is NOT allowed to use a compiler on their own machine.

The steps (and troubleshooting) for both these options are outlined in the following section.

Building the PDF in Editorial Manager
First and foremost, all LaTeX files must be submitted as “Manuscript” files. Style files and auxiliary .bbl file (if using BibTeX) are all part of the manuscript. These additional files are not Supplemental files. Supplemental files are multimedia video, audio, spreadsheet, or database files that are supplemental to the manuscript itself but are peer reviewed. If style and other LaTeX files are uploaded as Supplemental files, the manuscript will not build properly in Editorial Manager.

The generated PDF should be carefully reviewed for error messages that may indicate the exact problem (e.g., missing style files or figures in the wrong format).

Question marks in the references of the PDF most likely mean that the .tex file(s) are in subdirectories. All associated files must be in one directory for the submission to build.

The Comprehensive TeX Archive Network (CTAN) website provides an “ascelike” style file template for authors to use on their local computer. The Editorial Manager system also contains the “ascelike” style file, so users do not have to upload it with their submissions. If not using “ascelike,” authors will need to upload the style files, as previously described. In addition, ASCE has partnered with Overleaf for a template that has been built and tested for maximum interoperability with Editorial Manager.

Bibliography management should be done through BibTeX; ASCE has not verified if the .bst provided as part of the “ascelike” template is compatible with BibLaTeX. When using BibTeX, authors must upload the auxiliary .bbl file (not the .bib file of references) as a “Manuscript” file.

Figures or images should not be added to the document itself. Images must be uploaded into Editorial Manager as separate files (figures) in BMP, EPS, PDF, PS, or TIF/TIFF formats. They will automatically be placed at the end of the manuscript, which is where they will need to be after acceptance.

Large or cutoff images need to be resized to fit on one 8.5 × 11 in. page. When there is a problem caused by not resizing PostScript files (the images are cut off), the author will either need to resize the images or save the files in a format that Editorial Manager can recognize as an image. Please note that EPS files are the best choice for image files in LaTeX submissions.

The “amsmath” package, included in the MiKTeX installation, is an acceptable extension to Math Mode.

Captions should not be introduced using the “subcaption” package. Continuous line numbering is required for all manuscript submissions.

To do this in LaTeX, authors should use the “lineno” package. Documentation for this can be found on the CTAN website. NOTE: The “lineno” package does not work well with the “ascelike” package unless equation environments are wrapped with {linenomath*}.

For example:

\begin{linenomath*}    

\begin{equation}    

y = ax + b    

\end{equation}

\end{linenomath*}

LaTeX Revision Process I: Building the PDF from TeX files in Editorial Manager
1) The most common error when building a PDF in Editorial Manager out of LaTeX source files is that authors upload their .bst, .cls, .bib, .bbl as Supplemental files. They must be uploaded as “Manuscript” files in order to successfully build a PDF in the system.
 
2) Figures, Response to Reviewers Comments, and other files should be uploaded as their relevant submission item (i.e., a figure is uploaded as the “figure” file type).
 
3) All ASCE’s revision guidelines apply. Figures must be uploaded as separate files, line numbering is required, and Response to Reviewer Comments is required, among others.
 
Other Tips if the Resulting PDF produces errors:
1) If using BibTeX, you will need to upload the auxiliary .bbl file (not the .bib file of references) as a “Manuscript” file.
 
2) All figures must be included in EPS or PDF format. Other formats will not build properly. If using PDF figures with the \includegraphics command, authors must use the .pdf extension (i.e., \includegraphics{alld.pdf} instead of \includegraphics{alld}).
 
3) If the Editorial Manager PDF does not build properly, check the PDF for error messages. This will often lead to the problem (i.e., missing style files or figures in the wrong format).
 
4) Images cannot be referenced in subfolders. Make sure accompanying files are referenced correctly in the .tex file.
 
a. An example of a correctly referenced image: \epsfig{figure=alld.eps,width=.5\textwidth}.
 
b. An example of an incorrectly referenced image: \epsfig{figure=images/alld.eps,width=.5\textwidth}.
 
5) If question marks are present in the references of the PDF, most likely the .tex file(s) are in subdirectories. TeX submissions cannot include subdirectories for the submission to properly build. All associated files must be in one directory for the submission to build.
 
6) For large or cutoff images, resize the image to fit on one 8.5 x 11 in. page.
 
LaTeX Revision Process II: Submitting an Overleaf PDF
1) To submit a PDF at the revision stage, authors must use the ASCE Overleaf Template to create their PDF: overleaf.com/latex/templates/tagged/asce#.V0R387NVhBc.
 
2) Authors must include their name in the date stamp in the document preamble so that a date stamp is produced in the resulting PDF. ASCE will check that the date stamp matches the submission date in Editorial Manager on every revision. There cannot be a date stamp of 01/01/2022 and a submission date of 03/01/2022. There is no other way for ASCE to verify that the LaTeX source files match the PDF that is being uploaded, and they absolutely must match. The paper will be sent back for correction if the dates do not match.
 
Date Stamp on the PDF:
3) There must be no compile errors in the Overleaf system. Compile errors must be fixed before the resulting PDF is submitted to ASCE. For questions about compile errors in Overleaf, please contact ASCE staff.
 
4) Once all errors are corrected and the PDF meets ASCE submission guidelines, the author must download the Overleaf PDF and the LaTeX submission files (these will download in a Zip file).
 
a. Click on “Project.”
 
b. Click on “Download as Zip” under the files.
 
c. Click on “PDF” to download the PDF.
 
5) Upload the PDF as a “Manuscript” file in Editorial Manager.
 
6) Upload the .tex, .cls, .bst, .bib (and/or .bbl) as “Overleaf Companions to PDF” files in Editorial Manager. These files will not build into the PDF. They will be available to the Production Department if needed. Every revision must include a date-stamped PDF, a LaTeX file with a matching “modified” date, and a matching submission date. The paper will be sent back to the author if these three dates do not match.
 
7) Figures in JPEG or TIFF format are not allowed in this process. Figures must be submitted as EPS, PS, or PDF.
 
8) Figures, Response to Reviewer Comments, and other files are uploaded as their relevant submission item (i.e., a figure as a figure).
 
9) All ASCE’s revision guidelines apply. Figures must be uploaded as separate files, line numbering is required, a Response to Reviewer Comments is required, and so on.
 
For additional help with LaTeX, please visit the following resources:
 
Overleaf— A collaborative authoring platform for creating LaTeX files for submission to publisher submission systems. The Getting Started guide provides helpful information as well as the video tutorials. NOTE: There is an ASCE LaTeX template available in Overleaf.
 
Beginner’s Guide to TeX— This introduction to TeX contains links to a basic explanation of TeX, a more-thorough overview, and FAQs, as well as user help, documentation, sample documents, and a list of recommended reference books.
 
The Comprehensive TeX Archive Network (CTAN) — To learn about what TeX is and where it came from, visit the CTAN article titled “What is CTAN?” There is a search function for files and documentation on the site, as well as links to sign up for TeX user groups and announcements lists.
 
LaTeX Encyclopedia— The online LaTeX “encyclopedia” site contains a Table of Contents, with links to information on documentation, installation, typography, and a Navigator for the site.
 
LaTeX Math Guide— The American Mathematical Society’s Short Math Guide for LaTeX.
 
Submitting the Final Version of the Manuscript
Microsoft Word is ASCE’s preferred file format for manuscript text and tables. LaTeX is also acceptable; however, the corresponding author must review page proofs very carefully to ensure that special characters, equations, and other technical material appear correctly. Authors using LaTeX may want to use the ASCE Overleaf template.
 
All text, including the Abstract and References list, should be prepared in single-column and double-spaced format. Indent or add extra space between all paragraphs. Use a clear, readable font, such as Times New Roman, in 10, 11, or 12-point type. Do not submit any manuscript text smaller than 10 points.
 
Place tables and double-spaced figure captions on separate pages at the end of the manuscript. Verify that the final version is complete and that all pages are numbered correctly, including figures and tables. Do not include blank pages to separate sections.

 

Guide to Figures

The three most common types of figures that will be reproduced in ASCE journals are line art, halftone, and photos.
 
LINE ART
This type of figure contains only lines and text, with no images.
 
HALFTONE
A halftone figure contains color or black-and-white gradients, which produce a continuous color tone within the image. Halftone images are usually computer-generated.
 
PHOTOS
Photos can be in color or black and white.
 
Each image type has a different set of technical specifications. Examples of each type of image, along with minimum and preferred specifications, appear in the table below:

Figure Table

Tips on Preparing Photographs
 
Photographs require a little extra care to prepare, whether the submission includes original artwork, scans, or images from a digital camera. The following tips apply to all photographs:
 
Select photographs that show only what is important to the text. Crop out blank areas, clutter, and unrelated objects.
 
Select photographs in sharp focus and with good contrast; photos tend to lose some detail during reproduction.
 
If taking original photographs, make sure the subject is adequately lighted. Use plain backgrounds for objects and consider adding an element to indicate scale. Take several shots from different angles and with different settings to find the best image.
 
Avoid including company logos unless the point of the photograph is to show a specific piece of equipment.
 
If a photograph has a recognizable face, a Photography Consent Form from the person/people in the photo may be required.
 
Images taken with a digital camera should be done using a camera with at least 5 megapixels—preferably with 8 megapixels or more. Select a setting to collect at least 600 ppi.


Practical Applications

The Practical Applications section is a valuable tool in helping your research reach a wider audience. While your paper’s abstract is written with other subject area specialists in mind, the Practical Applications section should be written for broader audiences who may be interested in key results of your study but may not be fully involved in the research community. Authors provide a concise plain-language summary (150-200 words) of the paper written for non-academic or practitioner audiences to identify the results, relevance, or potential applications the research describes.

Instructions for writing Practical Applications:

The structure of the Practical Applications section should aim to answer the question of why someone should read the article and summarize key takeaways in a straightforward and jargon-free manner. You may wish to make connections between your research and the broader goals/challenges of the area of study. Including real-world examples or big-picture takeaways can be helpful to contextualize the findings of your study. Avoid using abbreviations, acronyms, symbols, etc.—and instead use plain language to outline the impact of your research to try to reach a wide audience. Plain language is clear, well-organized text that concisely conveys your message.

The images displayed show practical application samples for online and print. Click on the image to view the paper.

Practical Application example


Practical Application example


Postacceptance Information

Production and Page Proofs
Once a manuscript is accepted for publication, it will be sent to ASCE’s Production Department, which will perform a style and technical check. ASCE’s Production Department specifically checks figures, tables, references, and permissions. Authors are encouraged to have any issues with these cleared before acceptance so that manuscripts can be moved to the compositor as quickly as possible. After a manuscript passes the style and technical check, it will be moved forward to composition.

At the compositor, the manuscript will be copyedited and formatted. Authors are sent an email notifying them when the formatted proof is available for review and approval. The email includes instructions on downloading the proof and submitting corrections.

NOTE: The copyedited manuscript contains queries for the author. Authors must review the edited manuscript and answer all questions on the page proofs. Instructions will be provided on how changes should be returned to the compositor. The following changes will not be permitted at the proof stage:

• Any changes to the author byline

• Adding new figures and tables

• Making changes that do not conform with ASCE style

• Adding large portions of text

Any substantial changes made to the paper (including text, figures, and tables) at the proof stage will be sent back to the chief editor for review and are subject to an editor review.

Upon the return and implementation of proof corrections, articles will be published online in their final form. No additional corrections are accepted after a paper has been published online. (See Correcting the Literature.)

NOTE: ASCE will not publish a paper until the corresponding author has approved page proofs. If there is no response after several attempts to reach the authors listed on the paper, the paper will be withdrawn. Once a paper is withdrawn, it must be submitted and reviewed as a new manuscript in order to be considered. There are no guarantees that the paper will be accepted a second time.

Promoting Journal Articles
There are several ways and benefits to promoting published articles:

• Press Release — Authors should check with their institution’s public relations office to see if they are willing to write and distribute a press release on the author’s behalf. The press release should not be sent until the paper is available online. All press releases should include the journal citation and a link to the Abstract page in the ASCE Library.

• Social Media — Researchers and science journalists are using social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to stay abreast of new research. Having an active presence, particularly on LinkedIn and Twitter, can greatly expand exposure for authors. The ASCE Library offers the ability to share a link to many different social sharing sites directly from the Abstract page. NOTE: ASCE recommends that authors use the DOI Permalink provided on the Abstract page for all linking URLs. The DOI is designed to be permanent and persistent.

• Blogs — More and more universities are encouraging researchers to discuss their work on blogs. While authors are not permitted to cut and paste their entire paper into a blog post, they are permitted to discuss their findings after the paper has been published online. Authors should include a link to the abstract page of the paper.

• Research-Specific Social Sharing Sites — Sites such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu are popular for researchers who wish to join an online community. Keeping author profiles up to date with new publications helps to promote the work. Although these sites may encourage authors to share their papers, ASCE does not permit authors to post the final published PDF. Authors are permitted to post the final draft of their accepted manuscript after the paper is published in the ASCE Library. The draft version of the paper does not include any changes resulting from ASCE copyediting or production, and it must include a link to the final published paper.

“Following” Journal Articles
Keeping track of what happens after publication is important. Registered users of the ASCE Library can sign up for a citation alert for any paper. The alert sends the user an email any time the paper is cited by another journal from the Crossref indexed publications. In addition, these citations will be listed on the Abstract page for any given article.

Postpublication Name Changes
Authors who wish to correct their publication record owing to a name change should contact the Editorial Office via email with their name-change request. ASCE will deliver the updated metadata to its indexing services partners and revise the PDF online with the requested name change in an expeditious manner; ASCE will not update any previously printed materials. ASCE recognizes authors may wish to change their name following publication for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, gender affirmation, marriage, divorce, or religious reasons. To protect the privacy of authors making such a request, ASCE will not publish a correction or notify coauthors of the name change; however, the author may wish to inform coauthors themselves (e.g., so that the coauthors can adjust the way they cite the publication in the future). Last, ASCE encourages authors to have an ORCID, a persistent digital identifier that links their research output regardless of name changes.

 

State-of-the-Art Review Proposal Process

ASCE staff surveyed the chief editors of all the journals to provide guidelines to authors regarding State-of-the-Art Review proposals. These guidelines follow:

Format:

• Proposals should be only one page.

• The proposal should list the title of the State-of-the-Art Review and include a list of authors and their affiliations.

• The proposal should be in a single-column format.

Content:
A State-of-the-Art Review proposal should define the field being covered and represent a new perspective to the readers. Authors should explain their expertise and the depth and breadth of coverage in the article they hope to write. The following items should be addressed in the proposal:

• Define the area of the field covered.

• Does this review represent a new perspective?

• Explain expertise of authors on the topic/define knowledge area.

• Explain depth and breadth of coverage that you expect to summarize.

• Does the review discuss future applications of the area covered?

• Is the review organized by members of a task committee?

Article Description:
State-of-the-Art Review articles are full-length papers that provide timely, in-depth treatment of specific issues relevant to the journal topics. These reviews must provide a complete survey of the state of practice being examined as, well as leave the reader feeling as though they are up to date on the current practices in the field on the given topic. A State-of-the-Art Review should include an extensive literature review of the most recent and relevant studies as well as perspective on the history of practice and the importance of the field.

Authors submitting State-of-the-Art Review articles must submit a proposal for the article initially to be reviewed by the chief editor or a member of the editorial board, and if approved, authors will be invited to submit the full article to go through peer review.



Form and Checklists

New Submission Checklist

Line Numbering Options

Word 2003
1. On the File menu, click Page Setup, and then click the Layout tab.
2. In the Apply to box, click Whole document.
3. Click Line Numbers.
4. Select the Add line numbering check box, and then select the options you want.

Word 2007 and Later
1. On the Page Layout or Layout tab, click Line Numbers.
2. In the drop down menu click Continuous.
3. Click Save.

How to Fix Problems With Line Numbering Running Into Text
1. Open the Word file.
2. Press <Ctrl>A to select all, and <Ctrl>C to copy.
3. From the File menu, select New ‐> Blank Document.
4. Paste and save.

This fixes the problem most of the time, though authors should always review the new document after the paste operation to ensure nothing strange has happened. If using a DOC file, the new document should also be saved in DOC format (that is, avoid going from DOC ‐> DOCX or DOCX ‐> DOC during this operation).

ASCE Change in Author Byline Request Form

ASCE Change of Corresponding Author Request Form



Open Access Options and Rights

OPEN ACCESS FOR JOURNAL ARTICLES
ASCE offers several options for authors to make their papers Open Access and freely available to the public.

Gold Open Access
ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering is a Gold Open Access journal. All accepted submissions will be published Open Access. Authors pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover publication fees, and their article is made freely available online at the time of publication. APC fees for ASCE OPEN are $2,000 per article. Authors will retain copyright of their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

Hybrid Open Access
ASCE’s specialty journals operate under a hybrid model. (This includes all ASCE journals except ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering). Authors have the option to select Open Access for their accepted manuscript and pay an APC of $2,500. Authors choosing hybrid Open Access will retain copyright of their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

LICENSING
The CC BY license allows authors to retain copyright but licenses the use of the article to ASCE as the publisher. Others may use all or portions of the content of the paper without seeking permission from ASCE or the author. Any such use must contain an attribution to the original author.

Once a submitted manuscript has been accepted for publication, the corresponding author will have the option to request that his or her paper be Open Access. Open Access papers will be published online and will be accessible without a subscription to anyone who accesses the paper at ascelibrary.org. The paper will be open immediately upon online publication. Authors who choose this option will retain copyright and be asked to accept a licensing agreement following Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).

APC fees must be received before a paper will be published. Authors may pay directly or request an invoice if their Institution or a sponsor is making the payment.

ASCE believes researchers should have the broadest choice of publication venues to best disseminate their work—including fully Open Access (OA) journals. Therefore, ASCE offers an APC-waiver program to support authors looking to publish in ASCE OPEN. Researchers interested in applying for funding waivers to publish in ASCE OPEN qualify based first on their geographic location, and second if they have no access to other funding sources. If you qualify on both counts, submit an Open Access Waiver request.

PERMISSION TO REUSE ASCE CONTENT

Information about gaining permission to reuse ASCE content is available. Please note that ASCE does not permit digital reuse of entire articles, chapters or books.

To sponsor Open Access of an article, email your request to us.

ASCE SPONSORED ACCESS: AVAILABLE FOR JOURNAL ARTICLES, CONFERENCE PAPERS, AND CIVIL ENGINEERING MAGAZINE ARTICLES

For papers that have already been published online, ASCE offers Sponsored Access. Any party that wishes to allow access to content to the general public may request that ASCE lift subscription restrictions to an article. Under this arrangement, the sponsor may link to the open article but may not post the PDF or the full-text HTML on an external site. Email your request to Sponsor an article or paper.

ASCE will retain copyright per the copyright transfer agreement signed by the author prior to publication. No changes to the copyright agreement will be permitted.

Journal Articles: The fee for this service is $1000.00 and is only available for articles that are 24 months past online publication. A Free Access icon will appear with the paper to indicate that it is freely available.

Conference Papers: The fee for this service is $500.00 and is available for articles immediately upon online publication. A Free Access icon will appear with the paper to indicate that it is freely available.

Civil Engineering Magazine Articles: The fee for this service is $1000.00 and is only available for articles that are posted in the ASCE Library. A Free Access icon will appear with the paper to indicate that it is freely available.


Data Sharing

ASCE is taking steps to improve the availability and reproducibility of work published in its journals. ASCE is introducing a new policy requiring authors to specify the availability of data, computational models, code, and other electronic materials used in work submitted for publication. The new policy is intended to (1) make it easier for readers and others to use, reproduce, and extend published work; (2) increase the quality of submissions; and (3) further encourage people to use work published in the ASCE Journals and cite that work. This new policy is a step forward to allow readers, authors, and our field to practice more open and reproducible science (Rosenberg, D.E.., D. W. Watkins 2018) (Govindaraju, R.S., M Hantush, X. Chu 2019) .

When submitting a new manuscript, authors will include a new section titled “Data Availability Statement” before the “Acknowledgments.” Within this section, authors will select one or more of the following statements verbatim, with the inclusion of all citations to data, code, or models.

  • Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
  • All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.
  • No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
  • Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.
  • Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies.
  • Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgements.

Available data and code must be cited in the reference section. Authors may update or change their statement if information changes during the course of peer review. It may not be changed after the paper is accepted.

References
Rosenberg, David E., and David W. Watkins 2018, “New Policy to Specify Availability of Data, Models, and Code”, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 2018, 144(9): 01618001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000998.
Govindaraju, Rao S., Mohamed Hantush; and Xuefeng Chu, “New Policy for Transparency of Data, Models, and Code”, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2019, 24(3): 01618001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001785

All authors are required to make data and materials available to the editors and reviewers during the peer review process if requested.

Where should my data go?

Data associated with a paper may appear in the following places:

  • Within the text of the paper
  • As Supplemental Materials to a paper as posted in the ASCE Library
  • In a data repository

Authors have many choices for where they deposit data. Ideally, the repository chosen will provide authors with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) for the data. DOIs provide a persistent link to the data and avoids link rot.

Many academic institutions have data repositories and may have policies requiring authors to deposit the data there. Authors should check with their institutions.

There are subject-area specific repositories as well. The Registry of Research Data Repositories offers a searchable list by data type and subject area.

More general data repositories include:

Some of these services require a subscription or author usage fees. Others are free for basic services. All of these services provide a DOI for datasets.

ASCE will publish Supplemental Materials along with a paper; however, the file types are limited and not appropriate for large data sets or code. Further, Supplemental Materials do not have their own DOI and cannot be cited on their own. Access to Supplemental Materials is the same as for the paper attached to it. If the author chooses to purchase Open Access, then the Supplemental Materials will also be available free to all readers. Otherwise, the materials are only available to subscribers.

What about code?

ASCE encourages authors to share all related code used to analyze data in a published paper. Sharing data is meant to aid users in replicating results. Replicating results typically requires code. The following services are available to house data and the related code:

Code Ocean provides a DOI for the code, and Zenodo can provide a DOI for code housed on Github. Code should be cited the same way that datasets are cited.

What should we share?

Authors should share all code, data, mathematical models, and materials that were used to develop the results and conclusions in the paper. In many cases, the data used in a paper may be a subset of data collected. Data used to generate figures or tables should be included. Only the data analyzed as part of the paper need to be included; however, authors should review the requirements of their institutions and funders to determine if a broader data sharing policy is required.

All data deposited in a repository should contain enough metadata to explain to a user what the data is and, how it was generated, and how a reader can reproduce the work. Authors should also ensure that they have the rights to share the data publicly. Citation information should also be included in the metadata.

Ideally, authors should review the FAIR Data Principles and try to comply with those recommendations.

Will my data or code be peer reviewed?

No. If authors make data, models, and code available, reviewers and editors may or may not review those files and provide feedback. Nowhere should authors lead users to believe that the data was reviewed and approved by ASCE.

How should I cite data and code?

References for data sets should include author name, year of publication, titles (followed by edition or version number) in quotation marks, publisher or distributor, access date, and electronic identifier (DOI or URL).

Examples:

Ansolabehere, S., M. Palmer, and A. Lee. 2014. “Precinct-level election data. V1.” Harvard Election Data Archive. Accessed January 20, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21919.

Thernstrom, S. 1986. “Boston mobility study, 1880.” ICPSR 7550. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Accessed November 28, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07550.

What if my data is proprietary?

All proprietary data should be identified in the data availability statement as proprietary. The statement should further describe restrictions on use and/or reuse. ASCE understands that there are times when data is used that may be proprietary to the authors’ organization or the funding institution. Authors may not claim that data is proprietary just because they do not want to share it. ASCE encourages authors who enter agreements to collect or analyze proprietary data to negotiate terms for making the data used in a paper available to readers (e.g., publish anonymously or without identifying information).

English-Language Editing Services

ASCE has partnered with Editage to provide English Editing Services for ASCE Authors

Benefit from their expert guidance to assist you in every step of your academic journey.

English language editing 
Polish your manuscript with two thorough checks for grammar, language, paper structure, and impactful communication of your research. Internationally certified editors help you ready your paper for successful submission in international journals 

Translation with editing 
Senior language experts and a multi-layered quality process deliver high-quality translations and well-edited manuscripts that match the language standards of international journals. 



Awards Information

Richard R. Torrens Award | Associate Editor Award | Journal Best Paper Awards

Richard R. Torrens Award

The Subcommittee on Technical Advancement is pleased to announce that Dr. R. Raymond Issa, is the recipient of the 2023 Richard R. Torrens Award for outstanding performance as editor of the Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering.

The Richard R. Torrens Award was created to honor the memory of Richard Torrens, who served the Publications Department for 17 years and was Manager of Professional and Technical Publications.

The award is made in recognition of Torrens’ distinguished service and honors volunteer journal editors who have made outstanding contributions to the ASCE journals’ program. Achievements in categories such as journal competitiveness, turnaround time, growth, and creativity and innovation shown by the editor are recognized among other measures of accomplishment.

The Subcommittee on Technical Advancement offers Dr. R. Raymond Issa its sincere congratulations upon his receiving this award.


Headshot of R. Raymond Issa

R. Raymond Issa, Ph.D., J.D., P.E., F.ASCE, API is an engineer, lawyer and computer scientist and UF Distinguished Professor and Director of the Center for Advanced Construction Information Modeling (CACIM), Rinker School of Construction Management, University of Florida. Raymond specializes and teaches in the areas of Cognitive Digital Twins, BIM/VDC, industrialized construction, and construction law and is an advocate for technology integration in the AECO industry.

Dr. Issa has served as chief editor of the Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering since January of 2016.
He was instrumental in establishing new bylaws and reorganizing the management structure of JCCE with an Executive Editorial Board, attracting new Associate Editors, and expanding the author and audience base and diversity and quality of the manuscripts published. Under his leadership, the JCCE impact factor increased substantially, with the one year impact factor increasing for 1.855 in 2016 to 6.9 in 2022. The percentage of papers under review for more than 100 days is held at an impressive zero percent. Dr. Issa has been instrumental in mentoring two newly selected editors through the year 2023 to ensure a sustainable leadership position of JCCE in the civil engineering domain across the world.

Associate Editor Award

The Associate Editor award recognizes an Associate Editor who has provided consistent and exemplary service to a particular journal or practice periodical, or a substantial unique contribution to the enhancement of ASCE’s publication activities.


Headshot of John McCartney

Dr. John McCartney, is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.

While all of this year's nominations were very strong, what stood out to the selection committee this year was Dr. McCartney’s sustained focus and dedication to the journal over a long period of time. To date, he has handled over 1,100 manuscripts as an Associate Editor. He joined the journal’s editorial board in 2012. Dr. McCartney has helped the journal achieve record turnaround times while still faithfully assessing all papers for both rigor and novelty. The nomination of Dr. McCartney also stressed his wide breadth of experience with multiple topics that fall under the umbrella of geotechnical engineering.

John S. McCartney is a Professor in the Department of Structural Engineering at the University of California San Diego, specializing in Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. His research interests include unsaturated soil mechanics, geosynthetics engineering, and energy geotechnics. He has received several research awards, including the Walter L. Huber Research Prize from ASCE in 2016, the Arthur Casagrande Professional Development Award from ASCE in 2013, the J. James R. Croes medal from ASCE in 2012, the 2019 R.M. Quigley award from CGS in 2020, the DFI Young Professor Award in 2012, the NSF Faculty Early Development (CAREER) Award in 2011, and the IGS and Young IGS Awards from the International Geosynthetics Society in 2018 and 2008, respectively.

He is currently the chair of the ASCE GeoInstitute Committee on Unsaturated Soils and the Past-President of the North American Chapter of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS-NA). He is an editor of ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (JGGE), an editor of Computers and Geotechnics, an associate editor of Canadian Geotechnical Journal and serves on the editorial boards of ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal (GTJ), Geosynthetics International, Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, and the Journal of GeoEngineering. He received BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder in 2002 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007.


Headshot of Ehsan Noroozinejad

Dr. Ehsan Noroozinejad is an Associate Editor of the Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction.

Ehsan has been an Associate Editor of the journal for four years, and in that time has handled over 150 manuscripts as associate editor, and has also served as a reviewer in the past. He has helped to promote the journal at an international level through his close collaborations with top universities and research centers in Europe, Asia and Australia.

In addition, Dr. Noroozinejad has served as an editor for a special collection that has been widely successful, entitled “Application of Vibration Control in Structures and Infrastructures Toward more Resilient Cities.” His success and influence with this special collection spurred more members of the editorial board to create their own special collections.

Dr. Noroozinejad is a tenured faculty member at the Graduate University of Advanced Technology. Concurrently, he is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Southeast University (SEU) and a Senior Researcher at the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada. He has been the Founder and Chief Editor of the International Journal of Earthquake and Impact Engineering, the Associate Editor of the ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, the Engineering Editor of the ASCE Natural Hazards Review, and many more.

Dr. Noroozinejad has also been an active member of the ASCE Risk and Resilience Measurements Committee, the ASCE Civil Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems Committee, the ASCE Emerging Technologies Committee, the FIB Commission on Resilient RC Structures, and also the ASME Earthquake Safety Committee.

Journal Best Paper Awards

The ASCE Best Paper Award is a distinguished honor that acknowledges the significant contributions of an author(s) to a specific field through a paper published in a journal within a calendar year. This award is typically given to an author(s) who has demonstrated technical excellence, innovation, and impact in their work.

Visit each journals landing page to see the individual journal awards.

Call for Papers

The following journal(s) have issued a call for papers:


ASCE Journal Covers

Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Constrained Guidance and Control in Aerospace Applications: From Analytical to Learning

Journal of Architectural Engineering
BIM and Digital Technologies in Architectural Engineering: Advances and Innovative Solutions

Circular Economy and Regenerative Buildings

Construction 3D Printing: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects

Innovations in Architectural and Structural Glass

Structural Fire Engineering in Urban Interface

ASCE OPEN: Multidisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering
February 2023 Türkiye Earthquakes

Impacts of Climate Change on Resilience of Civil Structures and Infrastructural Systems

Towards Equitable and Effective Flood Risk Adaptation

Journal of Bridge Engineering
Challenges in New Design, Repair, and Strengthening, or Widening of Unusual Bridges

Climate Change Impacts on Bridges

Computer Vision for Inspection and Monitoring of Bridges: Advancements and Field Applications

Journal of Civil Engineering Education
General Call for Papers

Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
Damages to Infrastructure in Permafrost Regions Under Climate Warming: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Countermeasures

Disaster Prevention and Sustainable Development in Cold Regions

Risks and Reliability of Civil Infrastructures in Cold Regions

Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Mechanobiological Engineering for Health

Nanomechanics and Micromechanics

Journal of Environmental Engineering
Emerging and Innovative Technologies in Environmental Engineering

Emerging Pollutants: Global Challenges and Engineering Solutions

Managing Stormwater Hydrologic and Contaminant Load Phenomena Through Natural and Constructed Infrastructure Using State-of-the-Science Methods and Tools

Membrane Science and Technology for Sustainable Future: Towards UN Sustainable Development Goal 6 “Clean Water and Sanitation”

Nutrient Removal and Recovery from Wastewater Towards Carbon Neutrality

Outstanding New Investigators in Environmental Engineering

Recovery of Critical and Precious Metals from Wastewater and Brine

Total Maximum Daily Load Analysis and Modeling Advances: Connecting Climate Resilience, Socio-Environmental Systems, and Holistic Watershed Management

Virus Monitoring and Removal in Natural and Built Systems

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
30 Years of Acoustic Doppler Velocity Measurements

Recent Advances in the Observation of Air-Water Flows

Two-Phase Flows in Urban Water Systems

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Advancing Flood Characterization, Modeling and Communication

AI/ML for Hydroclimatic Extremes in the Context of Hydraulic Design

Compound Hydroclimatic Extremes in a Changing Climate

Impact of Agriculture on Hydrology Under Changing Environment

Upcoming Challenges in Watershed/Field Scale Modeling

Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Infrastructure Preparations for the Emerging Era of Transformative Transportation Technologies – Automated, Connected, and Electric

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Design and Performance of Green Drainage Systems

Sustainable Irrigation Management

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
International Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution Workshop

Journal of Management in Engineering
General Call for Papers

Natural Hazards Review
Applying Machine Learning to Improve Natural Hazards Prediction and Mitigation

Book Review Essays

Managing Wildfires as an Escalating Global Threat

Urban Disaster Resilience: A Dialogue Between Engineering and Society

Urban Resilience Governance in the Background of Major Public Health Emergencies

Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Advances in Performance Assessment and Design of Timber and Hybrid Buildings

Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Advances in Pipeline Transportation Engineering for Energy Sector

Developing Integrated Asset Management and Resilience Programs for Pipeline Systems

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems
General Call for Papers

Risk and Reliability Analysis of Resilient Civil Engineering Structures with Vibration Control Devices

Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Engineering

Vulnerability Analysis, Risk Management, and Uncertainty Modeling Analysis

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Application of Vibration Control Technologies in Structures and Infrastructures Toward More Resilient Cities

Building and Facade Inspection to Prevent Failure

Construction Safety Culture and Climate Influence on Overall Site Safety: Concepts, Metrics, and Practices

Interdependence between Structural Engineering and Construction Management

International Conference on Creative and Innovative Solutions in Civil Engineering

Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring Techniques and Applications

Risk Analysis and Safety of Complex Structures and Components

Strengthening Critical Civil Infrastructure: Advancing Resilience in the Face of Climate Change, Urbanization, and Natural Hazards

Strengthening, Retrofitting, and Rehabilitation of Structures

Structures under Blast and Impact Loading

Theory and Applications of Performance-Based Seismic Design of Structures

Unmanned Aerial Systems in Construction and the Built Environment: Innovative Concepts, Methods, and Practices

Journal of Surveying Engineering
General Call for Papers

Precision Surveying and Alignment

Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
Joint ASCE Special Collection on Water Equity

Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Connected and Automated Transportation (CAT)

Emerging Technologies and Methodologies in Multimodal Transportation

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Battle of Intermittent Water Supply (BIWS)

Joint ASCE Special Collection on Water Equity

Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Modeling of Liquefaction Around Marine Structures