Comparing Exam Performance in a Reinforced Concrete Design Course with Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146, Issue 1
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to investigate the cognitive Bloom’s taxonomy levels achieved in an introductory reinforced concrete design course, determine if the Bloom’s levels assigned to the same exam questions by different professors varied, characterize student performance in relation to Bloom’s levels, and quantify the Bloom’s level achieved during assessment. The authors taught the course at three different universities and used the same exam questions. They independently assigned a Bloom’s cognitive level to each question, which resulted in general agreement on the Bloom’s level of each question, and a range of results from 1.0 to 4.33. The Bloom’s levels did not correlate with performance, however students performed better on topics that had been presented multiple times. Based on the results of this study, students achieved an average cognitive Bloom’s level of 3 in an introductory design course and needed an additional educational experience that reinforced the topics in order to achieve a Bloom’s level of 4 or greater by graduation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2018. “Student competitions.” Accessed November 19, 2018. https://www.concrete.org/students/studentcompetitions.aspx.
Anderson, L. W., and D. R. Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York: Longman.
Black, P. 1998. Testing, friend of foe? The theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: Falmer Press.
Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers.
BOK2 (Body of Knowledge). 2008. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
BOK3 (Body of Knowledge). 2019. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. 3rd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Carroll, C. 2013. “Competition based learning in the classroom.” In Proc., 120th ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Çepni, S. 2003. “An analysis of university science instructors’ examination questions according to the cognitive levels.” Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract. 3 (1): 78–84.
Chandio, M. T., S. M. Pandhiani, and S. Iqbal. 2016. “Bloom’s taxonomy: Improving assessment and teaching-learning process.” J. Educ. Educ. Dev. 3 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1034.
Chang, W. C., and M. S. Chung. 2009. “Automatic applying bloom’s taxonomy to classify and analysis the cognition level of English question items.” In Proc., Joint Conf. on Pervasive Computing (JCPC). New York: IEEE.
Davila, K., and V. Talanquer. 2009. “Classifying end-of-chapter questions and problems for selected general chemistry textbooks used in the United States.” J. Chem. Educ. 87 (1): 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8000232.
Dorodchi, M., N. Dehbozorgi, and T. K. Frevert. 2017. “I wish I could rank my exam’s challenge level!: An algorithm of bloom’s taxonomy in teaching CS1.” In Proc., IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE). New York: IEEE.
Dymond, B. Z., and M. K. Swenty. 2017. “Horizontal integration of the same design project in multiple structural engineering courses.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Dymond, B. Z., M. K. Swenty, and J. C. Carroll. 2018. “The Influence of grading bias on reinforced concrete exam scores at three different universities.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Dymond, B. Z., M. K. Swenty, and S. Ojard. 2019. “Longitudinal integration of the same design project in multiple structural engineering courses.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Estes, A. C., and T. A. Lenox. 2014. “New civil engineering program criteria: How the sausage is being made.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Estes, A. C., T. A. Lenox, and R. O. Anderson. 2015. “New civil engineering program criteria: The rest of the story.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Hoffmann, M. 2008. “Using bloom’s taxonomy of learning to make engineering courses comparable.” In Proc., 19th Annual Conf. European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE) Conf. New York: IEEE.
Jirsa, J. O. 2000. “Structural engineering: Education and global issues.” In Proc., ASCE Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Johnson, C. G., and U. Fuller. 2006. “Is bloom’s taxonomy appropriate for computer science?” In Proc., 6th Baltic Sea Conf. on Computing Education Research. New York: ACM.
Jones, K. O., R. Bartlett, J. Harland, and J. M. Reid. 2009. “Relationship between examination questions and bloom’s taxonomy. In Proc., 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf. New York: IEEE.
Karaali, G. 2011. “An evaluative calculus project: Applying bloom’s taxonomy to the calculus classroom.” PRIMUS 21 (8): 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511971003663971.
Karns, J. M., G. E. Burton, and G. D. Martin. 2014. “Learning objectives and testing: An analysis of six principles of economics textbooks, using bloom’s taxonomy.” J. Econ. Educ. 14 (3): 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1983.10845021.
Kastberg, S. E. 2003. “Using bloom’s taxonomy as a framework for classroom assessment.” Math. Teach. 96 (6): 402–405.
Kocakaya, S., and S. Gönen. 2010. “Analysis of Turkish high-school physics-examination questions according to bloom’s taxonomy.” Asia-Pac. Forum Sci. Learn. Teach. 11 (1): 14.
Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. “A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview.” Theory Pract. 41 (4): 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
Kruskal, W. H., and W. A. Wallis. 1952. “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47 (260): 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
Lister, R., and J. Leaney. 2003. “Introductory programming, criterion-referencing, and bloom.” In Proc., 34th SIGCSE Technical Symp. on Computer Science Education, 143–147. New York: ACM.
Lovell, M. D. 2018. “Board 44: Defining and assessing competencies in an undergraduate reinforced concrete design course.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. and Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Mastascusa, E. J., W. J. Snyder, and B. S. Hoyt. 2011. Effective instruction for STEM disciplines: From learning theory to college teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2005. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NCEES (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying). 2019. FE civil exam specifications. Clemson, SC: NCEES.
Oliver, D. J., T. Dobele, M. Greber, and T. Roberts. 2004. “This course has a bloom’s rating of 3.9.” In Vol. 30 of Proc., 6th Australasian Conf. on Computing Education, 227–231. Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
Seaman, M. 2011. “Bloom’s taxonomy: Its evolution, revision, and use in the field of education.” Curriculum Teach. Dialogue 13 (1&2): 29–43.
Seddon, G. M. 1978. “The properties of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives for the cognitive domain.” Rev. Educ. Res. 48 (2): 303–323. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048002303.
Seo, Y. J., H. S. Kim, and H. K. Chae. 2010. “Analysis of the end-of-chapter questions in chemistry II according to revised bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.” J. Korean Chem. Soc. 54 (3): 329–337. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.3.329.
Ursani, A. A., A. A. Memon, and B. S. Chowdhry. 2014. “Bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical model for signals and systems.” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 51 (2): 162–173. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.51.2.7.
Wilcoxon, F. 1945. “Individual comparisons by ranking methods.” Biom. Bull. 1 (6): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146 • Issue 1 • January 2020
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 3, 2019
Accepted: Aug 13, 2019
Published online: Oct 9, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 9, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.