Examining the Effects of an Immersive Learning Environment in Tertiary AEC Education: CAVE-VR System for Students’ Perception and Technology Acceptance
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150, Issue 2
Abstract
The cave automatic virtual environment (CAVE) can provide a large-scale immersive and interactive virtual reality (VR) learning environment, which is suitable for the navigation of visualized learning objects and communication among teachers and students. Its applications have gained attention in the field of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC). This empirical study aimed to examine the effects of the CAVE-VR learning environment on enhancing students’ perception of essential building elements compared with the traditional learning environment and explore the factors influencing students’ technology acceptance of this teaching innovation. Initially, the study developed teaching materials related to essential building elements on the CAVE-VR system and implemented the teaching innovation in an undergraduate course, Introductory Construction Technology and Materials. A two-round comparison was adopted in this study to evaluate the effects of the innovative learning environment created by the CAVE-VR system and the traditional learning environment using slides projected on the whiteboard. Two in-class quizzes were designed to test students’ comprehension of essential building elements; a questionnaire survey, which was devised based on the cognitive load theory and technology acceptance model, was utilized to evaluate students’ attitudes toward the learning experience. According to the descriptive and statistical analysis of the quiz results and questionnaire survey responses, the findings of this empirical study are as follows: (1) for the first-round implementation, it was found that students learning through the proposed CAVE-VR environment attained an enhanced perception of the building elements compared with students learning through the slides; for the second-round implementation, it was detected that the perception of building elements of students learning through the CAVE-VR environment for a second time was significantly enhanced compared with students learning through the CAVE-VR environment for the first time; (2) based on the descriptive analysis of students’ responses to the questionnaire survey, most students held a positive technology acceptance attitude toward the immersive CAVE-VR learning environment and experienced a moderate level of cognitive workload to complete their learning tasks, facing few difficulties in interactive operations; and (3) according to the statistical analysis of the feedback of students from different learning programs, Higher Diploma students experienced a significantly lower degree of time pressure, effort demand, and sense of accomplishment than Bachelor students in the CAVE-VR learning environment; at the same time, students from both learning programs considered that the perceived usefulness had a direct impact on their intention to use the CAVE-VR learning environment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Teaching Development Grant of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Nos. LTG19-22/SS/BRE4 and BRE5). The authors also acknowledge and thank the internal funding support from the Undergraduate Research and Innovation Scheme (URIS) of the university (No. P0038463).
References
Alizadehsalehi, S., A. Hadavi, and J. C. Huang. 2020. “From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry.” Autom. Constr. 116 (May): 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254.
Allen, E., and J. Iano. 2019. “Making buildings.” In Fundamentals of building construction: Materials and methods, 3–32. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Armougum, A., E. Orriols, A. Gaston-Bellegarde, C. Joie-La Marle, and P. Piolino. 2019. “Virtual reality: A new method to investigate cognitive load during navigation.” J. Environ. Psychol. 65 (Mar): 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101338.
Buchner, J., K. Buntins, and M. Kerres. 2021. “A systematic map of research characteristics in studies on augmented reality and cognitive load.” Comput. Educ. Open 2 (Apr): 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100036.
Chin, J., and S. C. Lin. 2015. “Investigating users’ perspectives in building energy management system with an extension of technology acceptance model: A case study in Indonesian manufacturing companies.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 72 (Jan): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.102.
Cohen, J. 1992. “Statistical power analysis.” Curr. Directions Psychol. Sci. 1 (3): 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783.
Colligan, L., H. W. W. Potts, C. T. Finn, and R. A. Sinkin. 2015. “Cognitive workload changes for nurses transitioning from a legacy system with paper documentation to a commercial electronic health record.” Int. J. Med. Inf. 84 (7): 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.003.
Cruz-Neira, C., D. J. Sandin, A. T. DeFanti, R. V. Kenyon, and J. C. Hart. 1992. “The CAVE: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment.” Commun. ACM 35 (6): 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/129888.129892.
Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Q.: Manage. Inf. Syst. 13 (3): 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Dayarathna, V. L., S. Karam, R. Jaradat, M. A. Hamilton, M. Nagahi, S. Joshi, J. Ma, O. Ashour, and B. Driouche. 2020. “Assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of virtual reality teaching module: A gender-based comparison.” Int. J. Eng. Educ. 36 (6): 1938–1955.
de Back, T. T., A. M. Tinga, and M. M. Louwerse. 2021. “CAVE-based immersive learning in undergraduate courses: Examining the effect of group size and time of application.” Int. J. Educ. Tech. Higher Educ. 18 (Dec): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00288-5.
Dunteman, G. H. 1989. Principal components analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Febiyani, A., A. Febriani, and J. Ma’sum. 2021. “Calculation of mental load from e-learning student with NASA TLX and SOFI method.” J. Ind. Syst. Manage. 5 (1): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v5i1.2789.
Fogarty, J., J. McCormick, and S. El-Tawil. 2018. “Improving student understanding of complex spatial arrangements with virtual reality.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 144 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000349.
Gonçalves, A., and S. B. I. Badia. 2018. “KAVE: Building kinect based CAVE automatic virtual environments, methods for surround-screen projection management, motion parallax and full-body interaction support.” In Proc., ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. New York: ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229092.
Granić, A., and N. Marangunić. 2019. “Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50 (5): 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
Hart, S. G. 2006. “NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later.” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 50 (9): 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909.
Hart, S. G., and L. E. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research.” Adv. Psychol. 52 (C): 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.
Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics. 2009. “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing.” Adv. Int. Mark. 20 (Mar): 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
Hollender, N., C. Hofmann, M. Deneke, and B. Schmitz. 2010. “Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (6): 1278–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031.
Kaiser, H. F. 1974. “An index of factorial simplicity.” Psychometrika 39 (1): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Kim, K., M. Z. Rosenthal, D. J. Zielinski, and R. Brady. 2014. “Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses.” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 113 (3): 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.12.024.
Lee, Y. H., Y. C. Hsieh, and C. Y. Ma. 2011. “A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 24 (3): 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005.
Li, X., W. Yi, H. L. Chi, X. Wang, and A. P. C. Chan. 2018. “A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety.” Autom. Constr. 86 (Feb): 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003.
Manjrekar, S., S. Sandilya, D. Bhosale, S. Kanchi, A. Pitkar, and M. Gondhalekar. 2014. “CAVE: An emerging immersive technology: A review.” In Proc., UKSim-AMSS 16th Int. Conf. on Computer Modelling and Simulation, UKSim 2014, 131–136. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSim.2014.20.
Maskey, R., J. Fei, and H. O. Nguyen. 2018. “Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research.” Asian J. Ship. Logist. 34 (2): 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006.
Mayr, S., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and F. Faul. 2007. “A short tutorial of GPower.” Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 3 (2): 51–59. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p051.
Norris, M., and L. Lecavalier. 2009. “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research.” J. Autism Dev. Disord. 40 (1): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0816-2.
Opiła, J. 2019. “Role of visualization in a knowledge transfer process.” Bus. Syst. Res. 10 (1): 164–179. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2019-0012.
Papachristos, N. M., G. Ntalakas, and I. Vrellis. 2018. “A virtual environment for training in culinary education: Immersion and user experience.” In Research on e-Learning and ICT in education, 367–380. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95059-4.
Partala, T., and T. Saari. 2015. “Understanding the most influential user experiences in successful and unsuccessful technology adoptions.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 53 (Dec): 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.012.
Prit Kaur, D., A. Mantri, and B. Horan. 2019. “Design implications for adaptive augmented reality based interactive learning environment for improved concept comprehension in engineering paradigms.” Interact. Learn. Environ. 30 (4): 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674885.
Ronchi, E., D. Mayorga, R. Lovreglio, J. Wahlqvist, and D. Nilsson. 2019. “Mobile-powered head-mounted displays versus cave automatic virtual environment experiments for evacuation research.” Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds 30 (6): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1873.
Salloum, S. A., A. Q. M. Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. A. Monem, and K. Shaalan. 2019. “Exploring Students’ acceptance of E-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model.” IEEE Access 7 (Sep): 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
Sanro, J. 2012. “10 things to know about the single ease question (SEQ).” Accessed November 22, 2023. https://measuringu.com/seq10/.
Sharifzadeh, M. S., C. A. Damalas, G. Abdollahzadeh, and H. Ahmadi-Gorgi. 2017. “Predicting adoption of biological control among Iranian rice farmers: An application of the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2).” Crop Prot. 96 (Jun): 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.014.
Sharples, S., S. Cobb, A. Moody, and J. R. Wilson. 2008. “Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems.” Displays 29 (2): 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005.
Somrak, A., I. Humar, M. S. Hossain, M. F. Alhamid, M. A. Hossain, and J. Guna. 2019. “Estimating VR Sickness and user experience using different HMD technologies: An evaluation study.” Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 94 (May): 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.11.041.
Souchet, A. D., S. Philippe, D. Lourdeaux, and L. Leroy. 2021. “Measuring visual fatigue and cognitive load via eye tracking while learning with virtual reality head-mounted displays: A review.” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 38 (9): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1976509.
Stanney, K. M., M. Mollaghasemi, L. Reeves, R. Breaux, and D. A. Graeber. 2003. “Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): Identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design.” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58 (4): 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00015-6.
Sutherland, I. E. 1965. “The ultimate display.” In Proc., IFIP Congress, 506–508. New York: International Federation for Information Processing.
Sweller, J., J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, and F. G. W. C. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive architecture and instructional design.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10 (3): 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.
Sweller, J., J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 2019. “Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 31 (2): 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.
Tcha-Tokey, K., E. Loup-Escande, O. Christmann, and S. Richir. 2017. “Effects on user experience in an edutainment virtual environment: Comparison between CAVE and HMD.” In Proc., ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Series, 1–8. New York: ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121284.
Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.” Decis. Sci. 39 (2): 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.” Manage. Sci. 46 (2): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Vesga, J. B., X. Xu, and H. He. 2021. “The effects of cognitive load on engagement in a virtual reality learning environment.” In Proc., 2021 IEEE Conf. on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2021, 645–652. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00090.
VotanicXR. 2020. “Votanic 2020 API Reference.” Accessed November 22, 2023. https://votanic.github.io/VotanicXR2020/api/index.html.
Wang, P., P. Wu, J. Wang, H. L. Chi, and X. Wang. 2018. “A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (6): 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204.
Wilkins, B., and J. Barrett. 2000. “Virtual construction site: A web-based teaching/learning environment in construction technology.” Autom. Constr. 10 (1): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00075-3.
Zhang, C., Y. Lu, R. Xu, X. Ye, Y. Shi, and P. Lu. 2017. “An educational tool based on virtual construction site visit game.” Mod. Appl. Sci. 11 (8): 47. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v11n8p47.
Zhang, H., L. Yu, M. Ji, Y. Cui, D. Liu, Y. Li, H. Liu, and Y. Wang. 2020. “Investigating high school students’ perceptions and presences under VR learning environment.” Int. Learn. Environ. 28 (5): 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1709211.
Zhang, M., L. Shu, X. Luo, M. Yuan, and X. Zheng. 2022. “Virtual reality technology in construction safety training: Extended technology acceptance model.” Autom. Constr. 135 (Dec): 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104113.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150 • Issue 2 • April 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 16, 2023
Accepted: Oct 6, 2023
Published online: Dec 6, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 6, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Buildings
- Case studies
- Caves
- Comparative studies
- Construction engineering
- Education
- Engineering education
- Engineering fundamentals
- Geohazards
- Geotechnical engineering
- Karst
- Methodology (by type)
- Practice and Profession
- Research methods (by type)
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Students
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Nur Laily, Hindah Mustika, Sukma Irdiana, Rusdiyanto Rusdiyanto, Marto Silalahi, Antecedents of knowledge management: The case of professional employees in Indonesia, Knowledge and Performance Management, 10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.04, 8, 1, (49-62), (2024).