A Gamified Method for Construction Engineering Education: Learning through Guided Active Exploration
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150, Issue 2
Abstract
Experiential learning through active exploration can play a vital role in fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills in engineering education. However, the complex nature of the construction industry in the 21st century cannot afford an education through trial and error in a real environment. This case study aims to promote experiential learning in construction engineering education by designing, implementing, and empirically evaluating a novel gamified pedagogy that directs students to discover systematic solutions for fundamental construction engineering problems. The game-based pedagogy was implemented in the context of construction project scheduling. The proposed pedagogical method and its gamified elements are designed based on the constructivism learning theory and are grounded in state-of-the-art literature through research-based instructional strategies and conceptual frameworks. A scenario-based interactive game, called Zebel, was developed using the Unity game engine. Using a series of preassessment and postassessment instruments, the method was implemented and evaluated in a graduate-level course for construction planning and scheduling to collect empirical data. The outcomes of this case study indicated that the pedagogy successfully guided students with no background and prior knowledge in construction scheduling to discover the fundamental concepts and systematic solutions for the given problems. Although the focus of this study is on construction scheduling, the proposed pedagogy based on active exploration in an interactive game environment can be adopted in other contexts in construction education.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants EEC-2106257 and EEC-2106261. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
References
Abrams, E. M. 1994. How the Maya built their world: Energetics and ancient architecture. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Ausubel, D. P., and F. G. Robinson. 1969. School learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York: Rinehart Winston.
Boothby, T. 2018. Empirical structural design for architects, engineers and builders. London: Institute of Civil Engineers Publishing.
Boud, D., R. Cohen, and D. Walker. 1993. Using experience for learning. Milton Keynes, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bruner, J. S. 1966. Vol. 59 of Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dalgarno, B. 1996. “Constructivist computer assisted learning: Theory and techniques.” In Proc., ASCILITE96 Conf., 127–148. Tugun, Australia: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
Dennen, V. P. 2004. “Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies.” In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 804–819. New York: Routledge.
Deshpande, A. A., and S. H. Huang. 2011. “Simulation games in engineering education: A state-of-the-art review.” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 19 (3): 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20323.
Dicheva, D., C. Dichev, G. Agre, and G. Angelova. 2015. “Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study.” J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 18 (3): 75–88.
Driscoll, M. P. 1994. Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Duffy, T. M., and D. J. Cunningham. 1996. “Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction.” In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, edited by D. H. Jonassen. New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
Dweck, C. S. 1986. “Motivational processes affecting learning.” Am. Psychologist 41 (10): 1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
Eiris Pereira, R., and M. Gheisari. 2019. “360-degree panoramas as a reality capturing technique in construction domain: Applications and limitations.” In Proc., 55th ASC Annual Int. Conf. Cheyenne, WY: Associated Schools of Construction.
ElGewely, M., and W. Nadim. 2020. “Immersive virtual reality environment for construction detailing education using building information modeling.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 101. Berlin: Springer.
Garris, R., R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell. 2002. “Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model.” Simul. Gaming 33 (4): 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607.
George, A. K., M. L. McLain, K. Bijlani, R. Jayakrishnan, and R. R. Bhavani. 2016. “A novel approach for training crane operators: Serious game on crane simulator.” In Proc., 2016 IEEE Eighth Int. Conf. on Technology for Education (T4E), 116–119. New York: IEEE.
Goedert, J. D., R. Pawloski, S. Rokooeisadabad, and M. Subramaniam. 2013. “Project-oriented pedagogical model for construction engineering education using cyber infrastructure tools.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 139 (4): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000165.
Guerra, M., and T. Shealy. 2018. “Teaching user-centered design for more sustainable infrastructure through role-play and experiential learning.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 144 (4): 05018016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000385.
Hargis, J. 2001. “Can students learn science using the internet?” J. Res. Comput. Educ. 33 (4): 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782328.
Holzmann, V., H. Weisz, and D. Zitter. 2018. “Simulating advanced project management decision making processes with PMZONE board game.” In Proc., ECGBL 2018 12th European Conf. on Game-Based Learning, 240. Reading, UK: Academic Conference & Publishing International.
Ilbeigi, M., D. Bairaktarova, and A. Morteza. 2023. “Gamification in construction engineering education: A scoping review.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 149 (2): 04022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000077.
Jonassen, D. H., and J. Strobel. 2006. “Modeling for meaningful learning.” In Engaged learning with emerging technologies, 1–27. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Josiek, S., S. Schleier, T. Steindorf, R. Wittrin, M. Heinzig, C. Roschke, and M. Ritter. 2020. “Game-based learning using the example of finanzmars.” In Proc., 2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), 7–14. New York: IEEE.
Jumaat, N. F., Z. Tasir, N. D. A. Halim, and Z. M. Ashari. 2017. “Project-based learning from constructivism point of view.” Adv. Sci. Lett. 23 (8): 7904–7906. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9605.
Kerka, S. 1997. Constructivism, workplace learning, and vocational education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
Khah, F. S., Z. K. Rybkowski, A. R. Pentecost, J. P. Smith, and R. Muir. 2019. “Development and testing of an innovative architectural programming simulation as a precursor to target value design.” In Proc., 27th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Dublin, Ireland: International Group for Lean Construction.
Kiili, K. 2007. “Foundation for problem-based gaming.” Br. J. Educ. Technol. 38 (3): 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00704.x.
Kiili, K., and H. Ketamo. 2007. “Exploring the learning mechanism in educational games.” J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 15 (4): 319–324. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001139.
Kolb, D. A. 2014. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Kuh, G. D., J. Kinzie, J. H. Schuh, and E. J. Whitt. 2011. Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Somerset, UK: Wiley.
Lynch, D. R., and J. S. Russell. 2009. “Experiential learning in engineering practice.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 135 (1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(31).
Maturana, H. R. 2006. “Self-consciousness: How? When? Where?” Constructivist Found. 1 (3): 91–102.
Montgomery, D. C., and G. C. Runger. 2010. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Newstetter, W. C., and M. D. Svinicki. 2014. “Learning theories for engineering education practice.” In Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, 29–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholson, S. 2012. “Completing the experience: Debriefing in experiential educational games.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Society and Information Technologies, 117–121. Winter Garden, FL: Florida International Institute of Informatics and Systemic.
Obikwelu, C., and J. C. Read. 2012. “The serious game constructivist framework for children’s learning.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 15 (Jan): 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.055.
Patil, Y. M., and P. D. Kumbhar. 2021. “Learning by gamification: An effective active learning tool in engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ. Transform. 34 (Sep): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157194.
Pelling, N. 2011. The (short) prehistory of gamification. Funding Startups (& other impossibilities), August 9, 2011.
Piaget, J. 1952. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W. W. Norton.
Pietrafesa, E., R. Bentivenga, P. Lalli, C. Capelli, G. Farina, and S. Stabile. 2020. “Becoming safe: A serious game for occupational safety and health training in a WBL Italian experience.” In Proc., Int. Conf. in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 264–271. Berlin: Springer.
Pütz, C., C. Heins, M. Helmus, and A. Meins-Becker. 2020. “Gamification and BIM: Teaching the BIM method through a gamified, collaborative approach.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 272–277. Washington, DC: International Association on Automation and Robotics in Construction Publications.
Rogora, A. 2021. “New proposals for sustainable design: The imitation game as an experience of shared co-design.” In Sustainability in energy and buildings 2020, 527–537. Singapore: Springer.
Sharma, P., and M. Hannafin. 2005. “Learner perceptions of scaffolding in supporting critical thinking.” J. Comput. Higher Educ. 17 (Sep): 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960225.
Smith, K. A., S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. 2005. “Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices.” J. Eng. Educ. 94 (1): 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.
Statistica. 2022. “Value added by the construction industry as a share of gross domestic product in the United States from 2000 to 2021.” Accessed March 4, 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/192049/value-added-by-us-construction-as-a-percentage-of-gdp-since-2007/.
Tagliabue, L. C., S. M. Ventura, J. Teizer, and A. L. Ciribini. 2021. “A serious game for lean construction education enabled by internet of things.” In Ludic, co-design and tools supporting smart learning ecosystems and smart education, 225–233. Berlin: Springer.
Tobias, S. 2010. “Generative learning theory, paradigm shifts, and constructivism in educational psychology: A tribute to Merl Wittrock.” Educ. Psychologist 45 (1): 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433612.
Torrente, J., E. J. Marchiori, and A. Blanco. 2011. Production of creative game-based learning scenarios: A handbook for teachers. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023. “Economic News Release: Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail.” Accessed March 4, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm.
Violatti, C. 2018. “Neolithic period. Ancient history.” Accessed October 14, 2023. https://www.ancient.eu/Neolithic/.
Weimer, M. 2013. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Wiley.
Werbach, K., and D. Hunter. 2012. For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.
Zidane, Y. J. T., and B. Andersen. 2018. “The top 10 universal delay factors in construction projects.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 11 (3): 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-05-2017-0052.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150 • Issue 2 • April 2024
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 29, 2023
Accepted: Aug 31, 2023
Published online: Nov 17, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 17, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Yenny Alejandra Aguirre Alvarez, María Juliana Vargas Bermúdez, Mauricio Montoya Peláez, Motorcycle Time: Una lúdica vivencial en el campo de la ingeniería industrial y afines, Revista Andina de Educación, 10.32719/26312816.2023.7.1.12, 7, 1, (007112), (2024).