Technical Papers
May 23, 2022

Machine Learning–Driven Model to Analyze Particular Conditions of Contracts: A Multifunctional and Risk Perspective

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38, Issue 5

Abstract

Contracts can serve three functions—Control, Coordination, and Adaptation—to mitigate different risks. This multifunctional perspective based on the development of contract theory has been introduced in construction industries to analyze how general conditions of contracts deal with risks. However, the particular conditions of contracts present specific requirements closely related to projects, which can generate additional risks for both parties. To fill in the gap, this study analyzes nine particular conditions from nine projects with good performance respectively based on the Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC) 1999 Silver Book and explores what aspects good particular conditions focus more on to avert risks when modifying the general conditions. We built machine learning–based classification models to conduct a content analysis of complete contracts (containing both general conditions and particular conditions) to measure the functions of contracts. The optimal model was proved to be acceptable and then used for efficiently coding more particular conditions of the FIDIC 1999 Silver Book. The results indicate that good particular conditions roughly follow the functional distribution of general conditions and no significant difference is found in functional distribution between a whole complete contract and its underlying general conditions. It also suggests minor revisions should be made to the Adaptation function, and particular conditions should concentrate more on explicitly illustrating both parties’ obligations and tasks prudently to mitigate potential risks. These findings can practically assist contract managers to analyze particular conditions and identify the potential risks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871154 and 72031008) for its financial support. Further, the research team would like to thank all the respondents and interviewees who participated in the survey.

References

Al Qady, M., and A. Kandil. 2010. “Concept relation extraction from construction documents using natural language processing.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (3): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000131.
Benaroch, M., Y. Lichtenstein, and L. Fink. 2016. “Contract design choices and the balance of ex-ante and ex-post transaction costs in software development outsourcing.” MIS Q. 40 (1): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2016/40.1.03.
Ben-Shahar, O., and J. White. 2005. “Boilerplate and economic power in auto manufacturing contracts.” Michigan Law Rev. 104 (5): 953–982. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.883681.
Bodea, C.-N., and A. Purnus. 2016. “FIDIC contracts: Analysis of the impact of general and particular conditions on the financial risk management in Romanian infrastructure projects.” Juridical Tribune 6 (2): 165–181.
Cao, Z., Y. Li, J. Jayaram, Y. Liu, and F. Lumineau. 2018. “A meta-analysis of the exchange hazards-interfirm governance relationship: An informal institutions perspective.” J. Int. Bus. Stud. 49 (3): 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0144-2.
Chen, Y., Y. Chen, Z. Liu, and H. Yao. 2018a. “Influence of prior ties on trust in contract enforcement in the construction industry: Moderating role of the shadow of the future.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000584.
Chen, Y., W. Wang, S. Zhang, and J. You. 2018b. “Understanding the multiple functions of construction contracts: The anatomy of FIDIC model contracts.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 36 (8): 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1449955.
Cheung, S. O., L. Zhu, and K. W. Lee. 2018. “Incentivization and interdependency in construction contracting.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000601.
Choi, K., Y. T. Yin, D. Goehl, and H. D. Jeong. 2021. “Alternative contracting methods: Modeling and assessing the effects of contract type on time-cost-change performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (1): 04020096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000863.
Choi, S., and G. Gulati. 2004. Innovation in boilerplate contracts: An empirical examination of sovereign bonds: California legal working paper series, 53. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of Southern California Law School.
Choi, S. J., M. Gulati, and E. A. Posner. 2013. “The dynamics of contract evolution.” N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 88 (1): 1–50.
Easley, D., and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761942.
El-Hoteiby, A. I., O. A. Hosny, and A. F. Waly. 2017. “Particular conditions to cover potential risks of construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 05017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000223.
Ezeldin, A. S., and A. Abu Helw. 2018. “Proposed force majeure clause for construction contracts under civil and common laws.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000255.
Faraji, A., M. Rashidi, and S. Perera. 2021. “Text mining risk assessment–based model to conduct uncertainty analysis of the general conditions of contract in housing construction projects: Case study of the NSW GC21.” J. Archit. Eng. 27 (3): 04021025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000489.
FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils). 1999a. Conditions of contract for construction. Geneva: FIDIC.
FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils). 1999b. Conditions of contract for EPC/Turnkey projects. Geneva: FIDIC.
FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils). 2017a. Conditions of contract for construction (Second Edition 2017). Geneva: FIDIC.
FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils). 2017b. Conditions of contract for EPC/Turnkey projects (Second Edition 2017). Geneva: FIDIC.
FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils). 2017c. Conditions of contract for plant and design-build (Second Edition 2017). Geneva: FIDIC.
Hassan, F. U., and T. Le. 2020. “Automated requirements identification from construction contract documents using natural language processing.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (2): 04520009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000379.
Kahan, M., and M. Klausner. 1997. “Standardization and innovation in corporate contracting (or ‘the economics of boilerplate’).” Virginia Law Rev. 83 (4): 713–770. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073747.
Kar, R. B., and M. J. Radin. 2019. “Pseudo-contract and shared meaning analysis.” Harvard Law Rev. 132 (4): 1135–1219.
Khalef, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2021. “Automated identification of substantial changes in construction projects of airport improvement program: Machine learning and natural language processing comparative analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (6): 04021062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000959.
Lawrence, M. 2017. “Nomination of subcontractors in the UAE.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manage. Procure. Law 170 (4): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.16.00044.
Lee, C.-Y., H.-Y. Chong, Q. Li, and X. Wang. 2020a. “Joint contract-function effects on BIM-enabled EPC project performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (3): 04020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001766.
Lee, J., Y. Ham, J.-S. Yi, and J. Son. 2020b. “Effective risk positioning through automated identification of missing contract conditions from the Contractor’s perspective based on FIDIC contract cases.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 05020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000757.
Lee, J., J.-S. Yi, and J. Son. 2019. “Development of automatic-extraction model of poisonous clauses in international construction contracts using rule-based NLP.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 33 (3): 04019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000807.
Lu, W., L. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2016. “Effect of contract completeness on contractors’ opportunistic behavior and the moderating role of interdependence.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (6): 04016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001110.
Luo, Y. 2002a. “Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures.” Strategies Manage. J. 23 (10): 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.261.
Luo, Y. 2002b. “Partnering with foreign firms: How do Chinese managers view the governance and importance of contracts?” Asia Pac. J. Manage. 19 (1): 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014895724927.
Marotta-Wurgler, F., and R. Taylor. 2013. “Set in stone? Change and innovation in consumer standard-form contracts.” N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 88 (1): 240–285. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2106875.
McNamara, A. J., and S. M. E. Sepasgozar. 2021. “Intelligent contract adoption in the construction industry: Concept development.” Autom. Constr. 122 (Feb): 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103452.
Mellewigt, T., C. Decker, and B. Eckhard. 2012. “What drives contract design in alliances? Taking stock and how to proceed.” Z. Betriebswirtschaft 82 (7): 839–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-012-0591-y.
Nabi, M. A., and I. H. El-adaway. 2021. “Understanding the key risks affecting cost and schedule performance of modular construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000917.
Reuer, J. J., and A. Ariño. 2007. “Strategic alliance contracts: Dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity.” Strategies Manage. J. 28 (3): 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.581.
Salem, S., A. Siam, W. El-Dakhakhni, and M. Tait. 2020. “Probabilistic resilience-guided infrastructure risk management.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 04020073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000818.
Schepker, D. J., W.-Y. Oh, A. Martynov, and L. Poppo. 2014. “The many futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation.” J. Manage. 40 (1): 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313491289.
Schilke, O., and F. Lumineau. 2018. “The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance.” J. Manage. 44 (7): 2827–2858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316655872.
Schwartz, A., and R. E. Scott. 2003. “Contract theory and the limits of contract law.” Yale Law J. 113 (3): 541–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657531.
Sokolova, M., and G. Lapalme. 2009. “A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks.” Inf. Process. Manage. 45 (4): 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.
Wang, W., Y. Chen, S. Zhang, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Contractual complexity in construction projects: Conceptualization, operationalization, and validation.” Project Manage. J. 49 (3): 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818770589.
Wang, Y., Y. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Chen, and M. Jin. 2019. “Revisiting the relationship between contract governance and contractors’ opportunistic behavior in construction projects.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2945551.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Xu, N., L. Ma, L. Wang, Y. L. Deng, and G. D. Ni. 2021. “Extracting domain knowledge elements of construction safety management: Rule-based approach using Chinese natural language processing.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (2): 04021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000870.
Xu, W., Y. Chen, C. Coleman, and T. F. Coleman. 2018. “Moment matching machine learning methods for risk management of large variable annuity portfolios.” J. Econ. Dyn. Control 87 (Feb): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2017.11.002.
Yang, L., J. M. Lou, and X. B. Zhao. 2021. “Risk response of complex projects: Risk association network method.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 05021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000916.
Yao, H., Y. Chen, Y. Chen, and X. Zhu. 2019. “Mediating role of risk perception of trust and contract enforcement in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001604.
Yao, H., Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, and B. Du. 2021. “Contractual and relational enforcement in the aftermath of contract violations: The role of contracts and trust.” Int. J. Manage. Project Bus. 14 (6): 1359–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2020-0202.
You, J., Y. Chen, Y. Hua, and W. Wang. 2018. “The efficacy of contractual governance on task and relationship conflict in inter-organisational transactions.” Int. J. Conflict Manage. 30 (1): 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2018-0061.
Zhou, K. Z., and L. Poppo. 2010. “Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability.” J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41 (5): 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38Issue 5September 2022

History

Received: Oct 31, 2021
Accepted: Mar 25, 2022
Published online: May 23, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Jianxiong Yang [email protected]
Master’s Student, Dept. of Construction Management, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Yongqiang Chen [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Construction Management, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-5554. Email: [email protected]
Bingxin Zhang [email protected]
Master’s Student, Dept. of Construction Management, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Multifunctional Analysis of Construction Contracts Using a Machine Learning Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5604, 40, 2, (2024).
  • A Classification Model Using Personal Biometric Characteristics to Identify Individuals Vulnerable to an Extremely Hot Environment, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5495, 40, 2, (2024).
  • Role of National Conditions in Occupational Fatal Accidents in the Construction Industry Using Interpretable Machine Learning Approach, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5516, 39, 6, (2023).
  • Role of Shapley Additive Explanations and Resampling Algorithms for Contract Failure Prediction of Public–Private Partnership Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5492, 39, 5, (2023).
  • Comparing Subjective and Objective Measurements of Contract Complexity in Influencing Construction Project Performance: Survey versus Machine Learning, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5331, 39, 4, (2023).
  • Using Images to Detect, Plan, Analyze, and Coordinate a Smart Contract in Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5121, 39, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share