Resilient Posttensioned Bridge Bent with Buckling Restrained Brace
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 2
Abstract
A new method for building seismically resilient bridges is investigated using Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) technologies. A hybrid two-column bridge bent with posttensioned precast concrete columns and a diagonal buckling restrained brace (BRB) as an external energy dissipation device was tested under cyclic loads. The design of the initial posttensioning force and selection of BRB tensile yield strength is presented. The connection design at the footing and cap beam of the diagonal BRB considering column-free rocking is described. The experimental performance of the bridge bent subjected to cyclic loads is discussed. The performance of the bridge bent was enhanced in terms of hysteretic energy dissipation until fracture of the BRB steel core at a 5.0% drift ratio. The two unbonded posttensioned (PT) bars of one column yielded shortly after fracture of the BRB steel core. The columns of the hybrid bridge bent underwent rocking and remained undamaged up to a 6.0% drift ratio, at which point the longitudinal mild steel column bars yielded. The gusset assemblies at the cap beam and footing remained elastic throughout the test. The BRB could be replaced after an earthquake, and the proposed system is promising for constructing resilient bridges using ABC technologies in seismic regions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Mountain-Plains Consortium under project MPC-588, and the Graduate School of the University of Utah. Special thanks are extended to Dipen Thapa, Duc Quang Tran, Dylan Briggs, and Mark Bryant for their untiring efforts and support during the experiments. The authors are grateful to Corebrace for the supply of BRB, to Forterra Structural Precast for the concrete and formwork, and to the BASF for the polyurethane plates. The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with Brandt Saxey of Corebrace and Carl Wright of Forterra Structural Precast. The authors thank the reviewers for their comments which improved the quality of the paper.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- APT
- area of PT bars;
- ABRB
- area of steel core of BRB;
- BRBF
- Buckling-Restrained Brace Frame;
- C
- adjusted BRB strength in compression;
- cb
- depth of neutral axis at the bottom of the column;
- ct
- depth of neutral axis at the top of the column;
- d
- diameter of the column;
- dPT
- distance between PT bars;
- Eso
- strain energy;
- ED
- hysteretic energy;
- EBRB
- modulus of elasticity of steel core of BRB;
- EPT
- modulus of elasticity of PT bars;
- FAF
- axial force;
- FPT
- posttensioning force;
- strength of BRB in compression;
- strength of BRB in tension;
- ultimate strength of the BRB;
- yield strength of the BRB;
- ultimate strength of PT-Bent;
- yield strength of PT-Bent;
- ultimate strength of hybrid bent;
- yield strength of hybrid bent;
- vertical reaction forces in the east column;
- vertical reaction forces in the east column;
- H
- column height;
- Hb
- beam height;
- Hf
- footing height;
- KBRB
- BRB stiffness;
- KPT
- PT-Bent stiffness;
- hybrid bridge bent stiffness;
- L
- center-to-center distance between columns;
- LBRB
- length of the yielding steel core of the BRB;
- LPT
- length of PT bars;
- Ms
- bending moment from energy dissipator;
- MN
- bending moment due to gravity load;
- MPT
- bending moment from PT bars;
- Mtot
- total bending moment;
- Pmax
- maximum BRB compressive force;
- Pysc
- actual yield strength of steel core;
- Ry
- ratio of expected yield stress to specified minimum yield stress;
- Tmax
- maximum BRB tensile force;
- T
- adjusted BRB strength in tension;
- TPT
- initial posttensioning forces;
- Z1
- distance from the edge of the column toe to the first PT bar;
- Z2
- distance from the edge of the column toe to the second PT bar;
- uo
- maximum displacement;
- α
- ratio of the yielding force of the BRB to the yielding force of the PT-Bent;
- α0
- material overstrength factor;
- β
- compressive adjustment factor;
- βmax
- maximum value of compressive adjustment factor;
- γ
- angle at which BRB is inclined in the bent with respect to the horizontal axis;
- yield displacement of the BRB;
- ΔD
- difference in the yield displacement of the PT-Bent and the BRB;
- yield displacement of the PT-Bent;
- yield displacement of the PT-BRB bent;
- ɛBRB
- BRB strain;
- θb
- rotation of column at the bottom;
- θt
- rotation of column at the top;
- θr
- equal rotation of column at the top and bottom;
- rotation of column at which BRB fractures;
- θPT,y
- rotation at which the PT bars yield;
- θT
- design target rotation;
- λ
- moment contribution ratio;
- ξeq
- equivalent viscous damping ratio;
- ω
- strain hardening adjustment factor; and
- ωmax
- maximum value of strain hardening adjustment factor.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC 341. Chicago, IL: AISC.
Ameli, M. J., D. N. Brown, J. E. Parks, and C. P. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (5): 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688755.
Ameli, M. J., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678.
Ameli, M. J., J. E. Parks, D. N. Brown, and C. P. Pantelides. 2015. “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column–to–cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.” PCI J. 60 (2): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for high-strength steel bars for prestressed concrete. A722/A722M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bazaez, R., and P. Dusicka. 2016. “Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge bent retrofitted with buckling restrained braces.” Eng. Struct. 119: 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.010.
Billington, S. L., and J. K. Yoon. 2004. “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353).
California Department of Transportation. 2013. Seismic design criteria. Version 1.7. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
Cheng, C.-T. 2008. “Shaking table tests of a self-centering designed bridge substructure.” Eng. Struct. 30 (12): 3426–3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.017.
Chi, H., and J. Liu. 2012. “Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel self-centering moment resisting frame.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 78: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.005.
Chopra, A. 2007. Dynamics of structures: 561 theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
El-Bahey, S., and M. Bruneau. 2011. “Buckling restrained braces as structural fuses for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete bridge bents.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.027.
Elettore, E., F. Freddi, M. Latour, and G. Rizzano. 2021. “Design and analysis of a seismic resilient steel moment resisting frame equipped with damage-free self-centering column bases.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 179: 106543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106543.
ElGawady, M. A., and A. Sha’lan. 2011. “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (3): 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000174.
Fahnestock, L. A., J. M. Ricles, and R. Sause. 2007. “Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (9): 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1205).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2013. Post-tensioning tendon installation and grouting manual. FHWA-NHI-13-026, Version 2, Washington, DC: FHWA.
Freddi, F., C. A. Dimopoulos, and T. L. Karavasilis. 2017. “Rocking damage-free steel column base with friction devices: Design procedure and numerical evaluation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (14): 2281–2300. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2904.
Freddi, F., C. A. Dimopoulos, and T. L. Karavasilis. 2020. “Experimental evaluation of a rocking damage-free steel column base with friction devices.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (10): 04020217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002779.
Freddi, F., E. Tubaldi, A. Zona, and A. Dall’Asta. 2021. “Seismic performance of dual systems coupling moment-resisting and buckling-restrained braced frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (2): 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3332.
Guerrini, G., J. I. Restrepo, M. Massari, and A. Vervelidis. 2015. “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.
Jia, J., K. Zhang, M. S. Saiidi, Y. Guo, S. Wu, K. Bi, and X. Du. 2020. “Seismic evaluation of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomeric pads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128: 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105868.
Kawashima, K. 1997. “The 1996 Japanese seismic design specifications of highway bridges and the performance based design.” In Proc., seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, 371–382. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema.
Khaleghi, B., E. Schultz, S. Seguirant, L. Marsh, O. Haraldsson, M. Eberhard, and J. Stanton. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington state: From research to practice.” PCI J. 57 (4): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, D. Bull, and A. Palermo. 2008. “Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions.” Bull. N Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 41 (2): 90–103. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. 2009. “Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857.
Mashal, M., and A. Palermo. 2019. “Low-damage seismic design for accelerated bridge construction.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001406.
Mazzoni, S., F. Mckenna, and G. Fenves. 2005. OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Motaref, S., M. S. Saiidi, and D. Sanders. 2014. “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518.
Ou, Y.-C., P.-H. Wang, M.-S. Tsai, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2010. “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000110.
Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and D. Marriott. 2007. “Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).
Pampanin, S., D. Marriott, and A. Palermo. 2010. PRESSS design handbook. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Concrete Society.
Pang, J. B. K., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2010. “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000081.
Routledge, P. J., M. J. Cowan, and A. Palermo. 2016. “Low-damage detailing for bridges—A case study of Wigram–Magdala bridge.” Proc., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 2016 Conf., 1–8. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014. “Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (10): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605.
Upadhyay, A., C. P. Pantelides, and L. Ibarra. 2019. “Residual drift mitigation for bridges retrofitted with buckling restrained braces or self-centering energy dissipation devices.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109663.
Wang, Y., L. Ibarra, and C. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic retrofit of a three-span RC bridge with buckling-restrained braces.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (11): 04016073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000937.
Xie, Q. 2005. “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (6): 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005.
Xu, W., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Strong-axis and weak-axis buckling and local bulging of buckling-restrained braces with prismatic core plates.” Eng. Struct. 153: 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.017.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 7, 2021
Accepted: Oct 26, 2021
Published online: Dec 6, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 6, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Duc Q. Tran, Chris P. Pantelides, Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Post-Tensioned Concrete Columns Reinforced with Steel–GFRP Bars and GFRP Spirals, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6715, 29, 8, (2024).
- Suman Neupane, M. J. Ameli, Chris P. Pantelides, Numerical Modeling of Column Piers with Recessed Spliced Sleeves and Intentional Debonding for Accelerated Bridge Construction, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11769, 149, 3, (2023).
- Huailei Qin, Kaiming Bi, Huihui Dong, Qiang Han, Xiuli Du, Shake Table Tests on RC Double-Column Bridge Piers with Self-Centering Energy Dissipation Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6069, 28, 8, (2023).
- Ijan Dangol, Chris P. Pantelides, Seismic Analysis of Posttensioned and Hybrid Bridge Bents with Buckling Restrained Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5764, 28, 2, (2023).
- Chao Li, Yiwei Xiang, Chenzhi Cai, Performance of a seismic-resilient precast segmental column with UHPC segments and CFRP tendon, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115833, 282, (115833), (2023).
- Junxian Zhao, Jiaguang Zhang, Jiayu Song, Yun Zhou, Jiulin Bai, Haichao Yu, Sliding gusset connections for improved seismic performance of BRB-RC frame: Damage-control design and subassemblage tests, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115828, 282, (115828), (2023).
- Kaiming Bi, Chao Li, Hong Hao, State-of-the-art review of the seismic performance of precast segmental columns, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00058-x, 3, 1, (2022).
- Huihui Dong, Jianian Wen, Qiang Han, Kaiming Bi, Yulong Zhou, Xiuli Du, A Novel Self-centering Braced Double-column Rocking Bent for Seismic Resilience, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10.1080/13632469.2022.2061643, (1-22), (2022).
- Shuangshuang Jin, Pupeng Ai, Jianting Zhou, Jiulin Bai, Seismic performance of an assembled self-centering buckling-restrained brace and its application in arch bridge structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107600, 199, (107600), (2022).