Technical Papers
Dec 6, 2021

Resilient Posttensioned Bridge Bent with Buckling Restrained Brace

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 2

Abstract

A new method for building seismically resilient bridges is investigated using Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) technologies. A hybrid two-column bridge bent with posttensioned precast concrete columns and a diagonal buckling restrained brace (BRB) as an external energy dissipation device was tested under cyclic loads. The design of the initial posttensioning force and selection of BRB tensile yield strength is presented. The connection design at the footing and cap beam of the diagonal BRB considering column-free rocking is described. The experimental performance of the bridge bent subjected to cyclic loads is discussed. The performance of the bridge bent was enhanced in terms of hysteretic energy dissipation until fracture of the BRB steel core at a 5.0% drift ratio. The two unbonded posttensioned (PT) bars of one column yielded shortly after fracture of the BRB steel core. The columns of the hybrid bridge bent underwent rocking and remained undamaged up to a 6.0% drift ratio, at which point the longitudinal mild steel column bars yielded. The gusset assemblies at the cap beam and footing remained elastic throughout the test. The BRB could be replaced after an earthquake, and the proposed system is promising for constructing resilient bridges using ABC technologies in seismic regions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Mountain-Plains Consortium under project MPC-588, and the Graduate School of the University of Utah. Special thanks are extended to Dipen Thapa, Duc Quang Tran, Dylan Briggs, and Mark Bryant for their untiring efforts and support during the experiments. The authors are grateful to Corebrace for the supply of BRB, to Forterra Structural Precast for the concrete and formwork, and to the BASF for the polyurethane plates. The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with Brandt Saxey of Corebrace and Carl Wright of Forterra Structural Precast. The authors thank the reviewers for their comments which improved the quality of the paper.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
APT
area of PT bars;
ABRB
area of steel core of BRB;
BRBF
Buckling-Restrained Brace Frame;
C
adjusted BRB strength in compression;
cb
depth of neutral axis at the bottom of the column;
ct
depth of neutral axis at the top of the column;
d
diameter of the column;
dPT
distance between PT bars;
Eso
strain energy;
ED
hysteretic energy;
EBRB
modulus of elasticity of steel core of BRB;
EPT
modulus of elasticity of PT bars;
FAF
axial force;
FPT
posttensioning force;
FBRB_C
strength of BRB in compression;
FBRB_T
strength of BRB in tension;
FBRB_U
ultimate strength of the BRB;
FBRB_Y
yield strength of the BRB;
FPT_U
ultimate strength of PT-Bent;
FPT_Y
yield strength of PT-Bent;
FPT_BRB_U
ultimate strength of hybrid bent;
FPT_BRB_Y
yield strength of hybrid bent;
Fz_ec
vertical reaction forces in the east column;
Fz_wc
vertical reaction forces in the east column;
H
column height;
Hb
beam height;
Hf
footing height;
KBRB
BRB stiffness;
KPT
PT-Bent stiffness;
KPT_BRB
hybrid bridge bent stiffness;
L
center-to-center distance between columns;
LBRB
length of the yielding steel core of the BRB;
LPT
length of PT bars;
Ms
bending moment from energy dissipator;
MN
bending moment due to gravity load;
MPT
bending moment from PT bars;
Mtot
total bending moment;
Pmax
maximum BRB compressive force;
Pysc
actual yield strength of steel core;
Ry
ratio of expected yield stress to specified minimum yield stress;
Tmax
maximum BRB tensile force;
T
adjusted BRB strength in tension;
TPT
initial posttensioning forces;
Z1
distance from the edge of the column toe to the first PT bar;
Z2
distance from the edge of the column toe to the second PT bar;
uo
maximum displacement;
α
ratio of the yielding force of the BRB to the yielding force of the PT-Bent;
α0
material overstrength factor;
β
compressive adjustment factor;
βmax
maximum value of compressive adjustment factor;
γ
angle at which BRB is inclined in the bent with respect to the horizontal axis;
ΔBRB_Y
yield displacement of the BRB;
ΔD
difference in the yield displacement of the PT-Bent and the BRB;
ΔPT_Y
yield displacement of the PT-Bent;
ΔPT_BRB_Y
yield displacement of the PT-BRB bent;
ɛBRB
BRB strain;
θb
rotation of column at the bottom;
θt
rotation of column at the top;
θr
equal rotation of column at the top and bottom;
θr_BRB_U
rotation of column at which BRB fractures;
θPT,y
rotation at which the PT bars yield;
θT
design target rotation;
λ
moment contribution ratio;
ξeq
equivalent viscous damping ratio;
ω
strain hardening adjustment factor; and
ωmax
maximum value of strain hardening adjustment factor.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. AISC 341. Chicago, IL: AISC.
Ameli, M. J., D. N. Brown, J. E. Parks, and C. P. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (5): 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688755.
Ameli, M. J., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678.
Ameli, M. J., J. E. Parks, D. N. Brown, and C. P. Pantelides. 2015. “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column–to–cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.” PCI J. 60 (2): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for high-strength steel bars for prestressed concrete. A722/A722M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bazaez, R., and P. Dusicka. 2016. “Cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge bent retrofitted with buckling restrained braces.” Eng. Struct. 119: 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.010.
Billington, S. L., and J. K. Yoon. 2004. “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353).
California Department of Transportation. 2013. Seismic design criteria. Version 1.7. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
Cheng, C.-T. 2008. “Shaking table tests of a self-centering designed bridge substructure.” Eng. Struct. 30 (12): 3426–3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.017.
Chi, H., and J. Liu. 2012. “Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel self-centering moment resisting frame.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 78: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.005.
Chopra, A. 2007. Dynamics of structures: 561 theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
El-Bahey, S., and M. Bruneau. 2011. “Buckling restrained braces as structural fuses for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete bridge bents.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.027.
Elettore, E., F. Freddi, M. Latour, and G. Rizzano. 2021. “Design and analysis of a seismic resilient steel moment resisting frame equipped with damage-free self-centering column bases.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 179: 106543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106543.
ElGawady, M. A., and A. Sha’lan. 2011. “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (3): 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000174.
Fahnestock, L. A., J. M. Ricles, and R. Sause. 2007. “Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (9): 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1205).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2013. Post-tensioning tendon installation and grouting manual. FHWA-NHI-13-026, Version 2, Washington, DC: FHWA.
Freddi, F., C. A. Dimopoulos, and T. L. Karavasilis. 2017. “Rocking damage-free steel column base with friction devices: Design procedure and numerical evaluation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (14): 2281–2300. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2904.
Freddi, F., C. A. Dimopoulos, and T. L. Karavasilis. 2020. “Experimental evaluation of a rocking damage-free steel column base with friction devices.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (10): 04020217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002779.
Freddi, F., E. Tubaldi, A. Zona, and A. Dall’Asta. 2021. “Seismic performance of dual systems coupling moment-resisting and buckling-restrained braced frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (2): 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3332.
Guerrini, G., J. I. Restrepo, M. Massari, and A. Vervelidis. 2015. “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.
Jia, J., K. Zhang, M. S. Saiidi, Y. Guo, S. Wu, K. Bi, and X. Du. 2020. “Seismic evaluation of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomeric pads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128: 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105868.
Kawashima, K. 1997. “The 1996 Japanese seismic design specifications of highway bridges and the performance based design.” In Proc., seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, 371–382. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema.
Khaleghi, B., E. Schultz, S. Seguirant, L. Marsh, O. Haraldsson, M. Eberhard, and J. Stanton. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington state: From research to practice.” PCI J. 57 (4): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, D. Bull, and A. Palermo. 2008. “Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions.” Bull. N Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 41 (2): 90–103. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. 2009. “Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857.
Mashal, M., and A. Palermo. 2019. “Low-damage seismic design for accelerated bridge construction.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001406.
Mazzoni, S., F. Mckenna, and G. Fenves. 2005. OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Motaref, S., M. S. Saiidi, and D. Sanders. 2014. “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518.
Ou, Y.-C., P.-H. Wang, M.-S. Tsai, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2010. “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000110.
Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and D. Marriott. 2007. “Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).
Pampanin, S., D. Marriott, and A. Palermo. 2010. PRESSS design handbook. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Concrete Society.
Pang, J. B. K., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2010. “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000081.
Routledge, P. J., M. J. Cowan, and A. Palermo. 2016. “Low-damage detailing for bridges—A case study of Wigram–Magdala bridge.” Proc., New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 2016 Conf., 1–8. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014. “Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (10): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605.
Upadhyay, A., C. P. Pantelides, and L. Ibarra. 2019. “Residual drift mitigation for bridges retrofitted with buckling restrained braces or self-centering energy dissipation devices.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109663.
Wang, Y., L. Ibarra, and C. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic retrofit of a three-span RC bridge with buckling-restrained braces.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (11): 04016073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000937.
Xie, Q. 2005. “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (6): 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005.
Xu, W., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Strong-axis and weak-axis buckling and local bulging of buckling-restrained braces with prismatic core plates.” Eng. Struct. 153: 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 2February 2022

History

Received: Jul 7, 2021
Accepted: Oct 26, 2021
Published online: Dec 6, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ijan Dangol, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-3488. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Post-Tensioned Concrete Columns Reinforced with Steel–GFRP Bars and GFRP Spirals, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6715, 29, 8, (2024).
  • Numerical Modeling of Column Piers with Recessed Spliced Sleeves and Intentional Debonding for Accelerated Bridge Construction, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11769, 149, 3, (2023).
  • Shake Table Tests on RC Double-Column Bridge Piers with Self-Centering Energy Dissipation Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6069, 28, 8, (2023).
  • Seismic Analysis of Posttensioned and Hybrid Bridge Bents with Buckling Restrained Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5764, 28, 2, (2023).
  • Performance of a seismic-resilient precast segmental column with UHPC segments and CFRP tendon, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115833, 282, (115833), (2023).
  • Sliding gusset connections for improved seismic performance of BRB-RC frame: Damage-control design and subassemblage tests, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115828, 282, (115828), (2023).
  • State-of-the-art review of the seismic performance of precast segmental columns, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00058-x, 3, 1, (2022).
  • A Novel Self-centering Braced Double-column Rocking Bent for Seismic Resilience, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10.1080/13632469.2022.2061643, (1-22), (2022).
  • Seismic performance of an assembled self-centering buckling-restrained brace and its application in arch bridge structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107600, 199, (107600), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share