Technical Papers
Jan 10, 2023

Numerical Modeling of Column Piers with Recessed Spliced Sleeves and Intentional Debonding for Accelerated Bridge Construction

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 3

Abstract

The grouted splice sleeve (GSS) connection is considered to be an effective bending moment–resisting connection between precast RC members. This connection type has been used extensively in nonseismic regions. The application of such a connection type in moderate or high seismic regions has been investigated and considered for multistory moment frame buildings and highway bridges. A computational modeling strategy is proposed at local and global levels for developing an appropriate computational model for such a connection type using a recessed GSS connection with intentional debonding. A computational model capable of predicting the structural response under cyclic loading was developed using established material models and a forced-based beam-column element considering low-cycle fatigue of reinforcing bars, bar-slip, intentional debonding of reinforcing bars, and plastic hinge length. The proposed model for recessed GSS connections with intentional debonding was experimentally validated. The proposed model was subsequently used to obtain the seismic response of a three-column bridge bent to near- and far-field earthquakes in terms of the overall maximum drift ratio and the drift ratio at the maximum seismic force.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Mountain Plains Consortium through Grant No. MPC-638. The authors also thank Ryan Barton, Duc Quang Tran, Dipen Thapa, and Mark Bryant for their assistance during the experiments and Anurag Upadhyay for his support in developing the numerical model. The authors are grateful to Ijan Dangol and Sayal Shrestha for their input. The authors want to acknowledge the reviewers for their helpful comments, which improved the paper.

References

AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ameli, M. J., D. N. Brown, J. E. Parks, and C. Pantelides. 2016. “Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (5): 1021. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688755.
Ameli, M. J., and C. P. Pantelides. 2017. “Seismic analysis of precast concrete bridge columns connected with grouted splice sleeve connectors.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2): 04016176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001678.
Ameli, M. J., J. E. Parks, D. N. Brown, and C. P. Pantelides. 2015. “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column–to–cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.” PCI J. 60 (2): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103.
Bartlett, S. F. 2004. Ground response analysis and design spectra for UDOT bridges on soft soil sites. Salt Lake City, UT: Univ. of Utah.
Barton, R. D., M. J. Ameli, and C. P. Pantelides. 2022. “Precast concrete bridge column-footing connections with recessed grouted splice sleeve connectors.” ACI Struct. J. 119 (1): 215–226. https://doi.org/10.14359/51734218.
Caltrans (California Dept. of Transportation). 2019. Seismic design criteria. Version 2.0. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
Dahal, P. K., and M. Tazarv. 2020. “Mechanical bar splices for incorporation in plastic hinge regions of RC members.” Constr. Build. Mater. 258 (Oct): 120308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120308.
Dangol, I., and C. P. Pantelides. 2022. “Resilient posttensioned bridge bent with buckling restrained brace.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (2): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001823.
Dangol, I., D. Thapa, and C. P. Pantelides. 2022. “Experimental evaluation of post-tensioned bridge bent under cyclic loads and comparison to hybrid bridge bents.” Eng. Struct. 256 (Apr): 113962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113962.
Deng, X., S. Wang, J. Chen, F. X. Ding, Q. Zhang, and P. Xiang. 2022. “Experimental investigation on the effect of local debonding of longitudinal reinforcement on seismic performance of precast concrete columns.” J. Build. Eng. 46 (Apr): 103131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103131.
Dhakal, R. P., and K. Maekawa. 2002. “Modeling for postyield buckling of reinforcement.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (9): 1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1139).
Elsayed, W. M., M. A. N. Abdel Moaty, and M. E. Issa. 2016. “Effect of reinforcing steel debonding on RC frame performance in resisting progressive collapse.” HBRC J. 12 (3): 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.02.005.
Haber, Z. B. 2013. Precast column-footing connections for accelerated bridge construction in seismic zones. Rep. No. CCEER 13-08. Reno, NV: Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada.
Haber, Z. B., M. S. Saiidi, and D. H. Sanders. 2014. “Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (3): 639–650. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686624.
Haber, Z. B., M. Saiid Saiidi, and D. H. Sanders. 2015. “Behavior and simplified modeling of mechanical reinforcing bar splices.” ACI Struct. J. 112 (2): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687455.
Khaleghi, B., E. Schultz, S. Seguirant, L. Marsh, O. Haraldsson, M. Eberhard, and J. Stanton. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington state: From research to practice.” PCI J. 57 (4): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49.
Kunnath, S. K., Y. Heo, and J. F. Mohle. 2009. “Nonlinear uniaxial material model for reinforcing steel bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (4): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:4(335).
Kurama, Y. C., S. Sritharan, R. B. Fleischman, J. I. Restrepo, R. S. Henry, N. M. Cleland, S. K. Ghosh, and P. Bonelli. 2018. “Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (4): 03118001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Manson, S. S. 1965. “Fatigue: A complex subject—Some simple approximations.” Eng. Mech. 5 (4): 193–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321056.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Melo, J., C. Fernandes, H. Varum, H. Rodrigues, A. Costa, and A. Arêde. 2011. “Numerical modelling of the cyclic behaviour of RC elements built with plain reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.005.
Panagiotakos, T. B., and M. N. Fardis. 2001. “Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (Mar): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.14359/10181.
Pang, J. B. K., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2010. “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000081.
Pantelides, C. P., J. P. Ward, and L. D. Reaveley. 2004. “Behavior of R/C bridge bent with grade beam retrofit under simulated earthquake loads.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (1): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1646163.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2020. “NGA-West 2 database flat file.” Accessed December 1, 2022. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/databases/.
Popovics, S. 1973. “A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 3 (5): 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Scott, M. H. 2011. Numerical integration options for the force-based beam-column element in OpenSees. Covallis, OR: Orgeon State Univ.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2015. “UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 99 (Sep): 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.018.
Tazarv, M., and M. S. Saiidi. 2016. “Low-damage precast columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000806.
Thapa, D., and C. P. Pantelides. 2021. “Self-centering bridge bent with stretch length anchors as a tension-only hysteretic hybrid system.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (10): 04021163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003146.
Upadhyay, A., C. P. Pantelides, and L. Ibarra. 2019. “Residual drift mitigation for bridges retrofitted with buckling restrained braces or self centering energy dissipation devices.” Eng. Struct. 199 (Nov): 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109663.
Wehbe, N. I. 1997. “Effects of confinement and flares on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge columns.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nevada.
Wehbe, N. I., M. S. Saiidi, and D. H. Sanders. 1999. “Seismic performance of rectangular bridge columns with moderate confinement.” ACI Struct. J. 96 (2): 248–258. https://doi.org/10.14359/616.
Wu, R. Y., and C. P. Pantelides. 2019. “Seismic evaluation of repaired multi-column bridge bent using static and dynamic analysis.” Constr. Build. Mater. 208 (May): 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.027.
Zhao, J., and S. Sritharan. 2007. “Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (2): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.14359/18525.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Jun 16, 2022
Accepted: Nov 7, 2022
Published online: Jan 10, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 10, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Suman Neupane [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
M. J. Ameli, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-3488. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Post-Tensioned Concrete Columns Reinforced with Steel–GFRP Bars and GFRP Spirals, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6715, 29, 8, (2024).
  • Cyclic Tests and Analysis of Corroded Precast Concrete Column-to-Footing Connections Constructed with Accelerated Bridge Construction Methods, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6632, 29, 6, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share