Abstract

Traditionally, civil engineering infrastructures have been represented through two-dimensional (2D) drawings, which can lead to interpretation errors and jeopardize engineers’ understanding of complex projects. However, with the development of building information modeling (BIM) methodology, civil engineering projects can now be virtually modeled in three-dimensional (3D), offering a more accurate representation. Augmented reality (AR) tools can be linked to BIM models for educational purposes, allowing for a more immersive and interactive learning experience. While previous studies have focused on improving the visualization of mechanical and civil engineering drawings, this study presents the development of a low-cost AR tool for visualizing BIM models and its application in civil engineering courses. To achieve this, the main state-of-the-art AR software was compared for their characteristics and functionalities, and the software, Unity, was selected to develop an AR visualization tool. The application of this tool was then presented, along with an analysis of its benefits when introduced into two civil engineering courses at the University of Castilla La Mancha (UCLM) in Spain: Descriptive geometry, and Design work of a structure. Overall, the results of the study suggest that the integration of AR tools into civil engineering education can enhance students’ learning experience and improve their understanding of complex projects.

Practical Applications

Based on the insights from this study, the following practical recommendations for educators and researchers were obtained: Firstly, integration of AR tools in Civil Engineering educational curriculum: The positive appreciation of the students in the analyzed courses shows the potential benefits of implementing AR tools in other civil engineering courses to enhance the visualization of complex engineering concepts, ultimately improving students’ understanding and engagement. In this context, this study serves as an invitation to civil engineering educators to consider the use of visualization tools, like AR, into their subjects. Secondly, customized AR solutions: Educators and researchers should explore the development of customized AR solutions tailored to their specific course objectives. This customization of AR solutions with the methodology for the development of the AR app proposed in the section “AR App” is a straightforward task. Thirdly, continuous assessment: Regularly assess the effectiveness of AR tools through surveys and feedback from students. This continuous assessment allows for ongoing refinement and improvement of the tools to optimize the learning experience. Finally, dissemination of best practices: Share experiences and best practices in implementing AR tools in civil engineering education with the broader academic community. Collaboration and knowledge sharing can promote innovation and advancement in this field. By adhering to these practical recommendations, educators and researchers can harness the potential of AR technology to create a dynamic and enriching educational environment for students, fostering deeper comprehension and engagement with complex civil engineering concepts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial support of Project PID2021-126405OB-C32 funded by MICIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and FEDER funds A way to make Europe. The support of Prof. R. Hindi from Saint Louis University (US) providing the blueprints of the studied bridge is also greatly appreciated.

References

Alvarez-Marin, A., and J. A. Velazquez-Iturbide. 2021. “Augmented reality and engineering education: A systematic review.” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 14 (6): 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356.
Amin, D., and S. Govilkar. 2015. “Comparative study of augmented reality Sdk’s.” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 5 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5102.
ARKI app. 2023. “Design, darf.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.darfdesign.com/arki.html.
Atencio, E., P. Araya, F. Oyarce, R. F. Herrera, F. Muñoz-La Rivera, and F. Lozano-Galant. 2022. “Towards the integration and automation of the design process for domestic drinking-water and sewerage systems with BIM.” Appl. Sci. 12 (18): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189063.
AUGmentecture. 2023. “Zarik Boghossian.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.augmentecture.com/.
Aumentaty. 2023. “Creator.” Accessed November 10, 2023. http://www.aumentaty.com/index.php.
AUTODESK. 2023. “AUTODESK revit.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.autodesk.es/.
Azraff Bin Rozmi, M. D., G. S. Thirunavukkarasu, E. Jamei, M. Seyedmahmoudian, S. Mekhilef, A. Stojcevski, and B. Horan. 2019. “Role of immersive visualization tools in renewable energy system development.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 115 (Nov): 109363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109363.
Bacca, J., S. Baldiris, R. Fabregat, S. Graf, and Kinshuk. 2014. “International forum of educational technology & society augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications.” Educ. Technol. 17 (4): 133–149.
Baek, F., I. Ha, and H. Kim. 2019. “Augmented reality system for facility management using image-based indoor localization.” Autom. Constr. 99 (Dec): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.034.
Behzadan, A. H., S. Dong, and V. R. Kamat. 2015. “Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure system applications.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 29 (2): 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.03.005.
Bellido-Montesinos, P., F. Lozano-Galant, F. J. Castilla, and J. A. Lozano-Galant. 2019. “Experiences learned from an international BIM contest: Software use and information workflow analysis to be published in: Journal of Building Engineering.” J. Build. Eng. 21 (Sep): 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.012.
Bouchlaghem, D., H. Shang, J. Whyte, and A. Ganah. 2005. “Visualisation in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC).” Autom. Constr. 14 (3): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.012.
Bouchlaghem, N., W. Sher, and N. Beacham. 2000. “Computer imagery and visualization in civil engineering education.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 14 (2): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:2(134).
Chang, Y. S., K. J. Hu, C. W. Chiang, and A. Lugmayr. 2020. “Applying mobile augmented reality (AR) to teach interior design students in layout plans: Evaluation of learning effectiveness based on the ARCS model of learning motivation theory.” Sensors 20 (1): 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010105.
Chen, H., K. Feng, C. Mo, S. Cheng, Z. Guo, and Y. Huang. 2011. “Application of augmented reality in engineering graphics education.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Symp. on IT in Medicine and Education. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITiME.2011.6132125.
Collao, J., F. Lozano-Galant, J. A. Lozano-Galant, and J. Turmo. 2021. “BIM visual programming tools applications in infrastructure projects: A state-of-the-art review.” Appl. Sci. 11 (18): 8343. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188343.
Dang, N., and C. Shim. 2019. “BIM-based innovative bridge maintenance system using augmented reality technology.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure, 1217–1222. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_195.
da Silva, M., J. Teixeira, P. Cavalcante, and V. Teichrieb. 2019. “Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: A systematic review.” J. Braz. Comput. Soc. 25 (3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-019-0084-8.
de Ureña Dean, J. M., J. M. Menéndez, C. L. Mancha, and J. M. Coronado. 2003. “Project/problem based learning in civil engineering: The Ciudad real (Spain) experience.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Education. New York: IEEE.
Dinis, F. M., A. Guimaraes, B. R. Carvalho, and J. P. Pocas Martins. 2017. “Virtual and augmented reality game-based applications to civil engineering education.” In Proc., IEEE Global Engineering Education Conf. (EDUCON). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7943075.
Dong, S., C. Feng, and V. R. Kamat. 2013. “Sensitivity analysis of augmented reality-assisted building damage reconnaissance using virtual prototyping.” Autom. Constr. 33 (Jun): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.005.
El Ammari, K., and A. Hammad. 2019. “Remote interactive collaboration in facilities management using BIM-based mixed reality.” Autom. Constr. 107 (Jan): 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102940.
Fraile-Fernández, F. J., R. Martínez-García, and M. Castejón-Limas. 2021. “Constructionist learning tool for acquiring skills in understanding standardised engineering drawings of mechanical assemblies in mobile devices.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3305. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063305.
Gao, Y., V. A. Gonzalez, and T. W. Yiu. 2019. “The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review.” Comput. Educ. 138 (May): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003.
Giasiranis, S., and L. Sofos. 2017. “Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR.” Educ. Technol. Soc. 20 (4): 78–88.
Heldal, I. 2007. “Supporting participation in planning new roads by using virtual reality systems.” Virtual Reality 11 (2–3): 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0061-3.
Herpich, F., R. L. M. Guarese, and L. M. R. Tarouco. 2017. “A comparative analysis of augmented reality frameworks aimed at the development of educational applications.” Creative Educ. 8 (9): 1433–1451. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.89101.
Hussein, H. A. A. 2022. “Integrating augmented reality technologies into architectural education: Application to the course of landscape design at Port Said University.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 12 (4): 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2021-0132.
John Samuel, I., O. Salem, and S. He. 2022. “Defect-oriented supportive bridge inspection system featuring building information modeling and augmented reality.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 7 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00847-3.
Juan, C., Y. Wang, D. Tjondronegoro, and W. Song. 2018. “Construction of interactive teaching system for course of mechanical drawing based on mobile augmented reality technology.” Int. J. Emerging Technol. Learn. 13 (2): 126–139. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7847.
Kashyap, D. 2016. Impact of visualization on engineers—A survey. Tampa, FL: Univ. of South Florida.
Kim, B., K. T. Tse, A. Yoshida, Z. Chen, P. Van Phuc, and H. S. Park. 2019. “Investigation of flow visualization around linked tall buildings with circular sections.” Build. Environ. 153 (Apr): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.021.
Komary, M., S. Komarizadehasl, N. Tosik, I. Segura, J. A. Lozano-Galant, and J. Turmo. 2023. “Low-cost technologies used in corrosion monitoring.” Sensors 23 (3): 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031309.
Lai, N. Y., K. H. Wong, L. J. Hu, and H. S. Kang. 2020. “Virtual reality (VR) in engineering education and training: A bibliometric analysis.” In Proc., WSSE ’20: 2nd World Symp. on Software Engineering, 161–165. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425329.3425360.
Leite, F., Y. Cho, A. H. Behzadan, S. Lee, S. Choe, Y. Fang, R. Akhavian, and S. Hwang. 2016. “Visualization, Information modeling, and simulation: Grand challenges in the construction industry.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 04016035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000604.
Li, X., S. H. Han, M. Gül, and M. Al-Hussein. 2019. “Automated post-3D visualization ergonomic analysis system for rapid workplace design in modular construction.” Autom. Constr. 98 (Feb): 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.012.
Li, Y., J. Shen, H. Lin, and Y. Li. 2023. “Optimization design for alkali-activated slag-fly ash geopolymer concrete based on artificial intelligence considering compressive strength, cost, and carbon emission.” J. Build. Eng. 75 (100): 106929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106929.
Liu, S., W. Cui, Y. Wu, and M. Liu. 2014. “A survey on information visualization: Recent advances and challenges.” Vis. Comput. 30 (12): 1373–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-013-0892-3.
Liu, Z. J., V. Levina, and Y. Frolova. 2020. “Information visualization in the educational process: Current trends.” Int. J. Emerging Technol. Learn. 15 (13): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14671.
Lozano, F., J. C. Jurado, J. A. Lozano-Galant, A. de la Fuenta, and J. Turmo. 2023. “Integration of BIM and value model for sustainability assessment for application in bridge projects.” Autom. Constr. 152 (Aug): 104935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104935.
March, S. T., and G. F. Smith. 1995. “Design and natural science research on information technology.” Dec. Support Syst. 15 (4): 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
Matsutomo, S., T. Manabe, V. Cingoski, and S. Noguchi. 2017. “A computer aided education system based on augmented reality by immersion to 3-D magnetic field.” IEEE Trans. Magn. 53 (6): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2665563.
Mobaraki, B., F. Lozano-Galant, R. Soriano, and F. J. C. Pascual. 2021. “Application of low-cost sensors for building monitoring: A systematic literature review.” Buildings 11 (8): 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080336.
Moreu, F. 2019. Transportation consortium of south central states augmented reality enhancing the inspections of transportation infrastructure: Transportation consortium of South Central States. Baton Rouge, LA: Transportation Consortium of South Central States.
Motejlek, J., and E. Alpay. 2021. “Taxonomy of virtual and augmented reality applications in education.” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 14 (3): 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3092964.
Navarro, I. J., V. Penadés-Plà, D. Martínez-Muñoz, R. Rempling, and V. Yepes. 2020. “Life cycle sustainability assessment for multi-criteria decision making in bridge design: A review.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (7): 690–704. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.13599.
Polhmann, T., D. Parras-Burgos, F. Cavas-Martinez, F. J. Canavate, J. Nieto, and D. G. Fernandez-Pacheco. 2020. “Augmented reality and mobile devices as tools to enhance spatial vision in graphic representations.” In Advances in design engineering. INGEGRAF 2019. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering, edited by F. Cavas-Martínez, F. Sanz-Adan, P. Morer Camo, R. Lostado Lorza, and J. Santamaría Peña. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_46.
Puppala, A., S. Sarat, C. Congress, T. V. Bheemasetti, and S. Caballero. 2018. “Geotechnical data visualization and modeling of civil infrastructure projects.” In Proc., GeoShanghai 2018 Int. Conf.: Transportation Geotechnics and Pavement Engineering, 1. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0011-0.
Radianti, J., T. A. Majchrzak, J. Fromm, and I. Wohlgenannt. 2020. “A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda.” Comput. Educ. 147 (Dec): 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778.
Rautenbach, V., S. Coetzee, and D. Jooste. 2016. “Results of an evaluation of augmented reality mobile development frameworks for addresses in augmented reality.” Spatial Inf. Res. 24 (3): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0022-1.
Redondo Domínguez, E., A. Sánchez Riera, D. Fonseca Escudero, and I. Navarro Delgado. 2014. “Geo-elearning for urban projects. New educational strategies using mobile devices.” Archit. City Environ. 8 (24): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.8.24.2714.
Restivo, M. T., J. Rodrigues, M. F. Chouzal, P. Menezes, and J. Almacinha. 2013. “Online systems for training the evaluation of deviations of geometrical characteristics.” Supplement, Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng. 9 (S8): 16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v9iS8.3355.
Sampaio, A. Z. 2018. “Education in engineering: BIM and VR technologies improving collaborative projects.” In Proc., EUCEET 2018—4th Int. Conf. on Civil Engineering Education: Challenges for the Third Millennium, 48–57. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE Congress Bureau.
Sampaio, A. Z., M. M. Ferreira, D. P. Rosário, and O. P. Martins. 2010. “3D and VR models in Civil Engineering education: Construction, rehabilitation and maintenance.” Autom. Constr. 19 (7): 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.05.006.
Sánchez-Cambronero, S., J. A. Lozano-Galant, F. J. Castilla, E. Poveda, Á. Galán, R. Porras, I. Gallego, and R. López-Moya. 2021. “Introducing high school students into the multidisciplinary world of bridge construction using project-based learning.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 147 (1): 05020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000022.
Savela, N., A. Oksanen, M. Kaakinen, M. Noreikis, and Y. Xiao. 2020. “Does augmented reality affect sociability, entertainment, and learning? A field experiment.” Appl. Sci. 10 (4): 05020006. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041392.
Savery, J. R. 2015. “Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions.” In Vol. 9 of Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 5–15. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Sepasgozar, S. M. E. 2020. “Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for online education: A case of construction management and engineering.” Appl. Sci. 10 (13): 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134678.
Shanbari, H., N. Blinn, and R. R. A. Issa. 2016. “Using augmented reality video in enhancing masonry and roof component comprehension for construction management students.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 23 (6): 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0028.
Shore, J., A. V. Ravindaran, V. A. Gonzalez, and N. Giacaman. 2023. “Using augmented reality in AEC tertiary education: A collaborative design case.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 149 (1): 04022009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000069.
Soa, E. J., R. A. Aguilar, J. I. Lopez, and O. Gomez. 2021. “Educational software based on augmented reality: A systematic literature review.” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 11 (4): 1324–1329.
Suchart, N. 2004. The effects of visual-based information logistics in construction. Raleigh, NC: NC State Repository.
Turkan, Y., R. Radkowski, A. Karabulut-Ilgu, A. H. Behzadan, and A. Chen. 2017. “Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 34 (Sep): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.09.005.
Unitear. 2023. “UniteAR.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.unitear.com/.
Unity. 2023. “Unity.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://unity.com/.
Unrealengine. 2023. “Unrealngine.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.unrealengine.com/.
Urban, H., G. Pelikan, and C. Schranz. 2022. “Augmented reality in AEC education: A case study.” Buildings 12 (4): 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040391.
Videnovik, M., V. Trajkovik, L. V. Kiønig, and T. Vold. 2020. “Increasing quality of learning experience using augmented reality educational games.” Multimedia Tools Appl. 79 (33–34): 23861–23885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09046-7.
WakingAPP. 2023. “Autodesk.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://apps.autodesk.com/en/Publisher/PublisherHomepage?ID=X6EKR8ZEAVCX.
Wang, C., H. Li, and S. Y. Kho. 2017. “VR-embedded BIM immersive system for QS engineering education.” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 26 (Apr): 626–641. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wang, P., P. Wu, J. Wang, H. L. Chi, and X. Wang. 2018. “A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (6): 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204.
Xiong, C., X. Lu, M. Hori, H. Guan, and Z. Xu. 2015. “Building seismic response and visualization using 3D urban polygonal modeling.” Autom. Constr. 55 (May): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.023.
Yan, W., C. Culp, and R. Graf. 2011. “Integrating BIM and gaming for real-time interactive architectural visualization.” Autom. Constr. 20 (4): 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.013.
Zappar. 2023. “Zapvision.” Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.zappar.com/.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 150Issue 3July 2024

History

Received: Apr 7, 2023
Accepted: Jan 5, 2024
Published online: Apr 15, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 15, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

F. Lozano-Galant [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Projects, Univ. of Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-2928. Email: [email protected]
B. Mobaraki [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Bioengineering Institute of Technology, Universität Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona 08198, Spain. Email: [email protected]
F. Calderón [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-0765. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of de Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0741-0566. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share