Technical Papers
Feb 2, 2023

Urban Sustainability Assessment Tool for Hillside Planning, Design, and Development

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 2

Abstract

Hillside planning, design, and development require an intensive understanding of human habitats, man–environment interaction, hill environment sensitivities, spatial planning, and design issues to ensure contextually appropriate development. Although numerous tools, techniques, and frameworks have been developed and implemented to assess urban sustainability, these have not been applied to environmentally sensitive hilly areas, nor have their appropriateness been determined. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a new urban sustainability assessment tool (USAT) named the “Sustainable Urban Development of Environmentally Sensitive Hilly Areas Suitability IndeX (SUDESHA-SIX)” to evaluate the sustainability of hillside settlements using an analytical hierarchy process. The methodology combines descriptive and deductive analytical techniques and geographic information systems-based statistical methods. SUDESHA-SIX was first developed some years back and was applied to the New Tehri Township as it received the National Award for Excellence in planning and design in hills in the year 2000 by the then Prime Minister of India. The results showed that out of the six broad factors, “site suitability” was ranked as the most critical factor of environmentally sensitive hilly areas, followed by “built environment,” “environment and ecology,” “climate and energy,” “transportation and connectivity,” and “visual resources.” When applied to existing projects, the developed tool provided a more objective and detailed information on the urban sustainability of hilly areas, which could help architects, planners, designers, and decision-makers develop strategies to improve the overall urban sustainability of hilly regions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR) and the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) of India [Grant no. 33197/2015/E.III(A) dated February 18, 2015] for their assistance in conducting this study. They would also like to thank experts for selecting indicators for the sustainable development of hill areas.

References

Bahadure, S., and R. Kotharkar. 2018. “Framework for measuring sustainability of neighbourhoods in Nagpur, India.” Build. Environ. 127: 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.034.
Berardi, U. 2013. “Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 15 (6): 1573–1591. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9462-0.
Bhatt, V., and P. P. Julia. 2005. “Water crisis in Uttarakhand | Hindi water portal, a report by ‘Research foundation for science, technology and ecology’ for national commission for women.” Accessed February 16, 2020. https://hindi.indiawaterportal.org/content/water-crisis-uttarakhand/content-type-page/53108.
Bisht, T. C. 2009. “Development-Induced displacement and women: The case of the Tehri Dam, India.” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol. 10 (4): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210903271312.
CGWB Report. 2011. “Ground water brochure, district Uttarakashi: District at a glance.” Accessed February 12, 2020. http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/Uttarakhand/UTTARAKASHI.pdf.
Dangwal, V. 2012. “Geological assessment of the alignment proposed for Chamund link motor road: District-Tehri Garhwal.” Accessed February 12, 2020. http://forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Addinfo/0_0_11117122112131IMG_0022.pdf.
Ding, Y., and J. Peng. 2018. “Impacts of urbanization of mountainous areas on resources and environment: Based on ecological footprint model.” Sustainability 10 (3): 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030765.
DKS. 2000. Spatio-economic development record. New Tehri Town, Baurari, UP.
Dung-Gwom, J., and A. S. Jugu. 2017. “Characteristics and planning challenges of hilltop settlements in Jos Metropolis, Nigeria.” Urban Plann. Landscape Environ. Des. 2 (2): 129–149.
Garg, P., and H. Kaur. 2019. “Sustainability issues in context of Indian hill towns.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings, 629–639. Singapore: Springer.
Giordano, S. 2012. The environmental sustainability evaluation of logistic settlements. Torino, Italy: Politechnico Di Torino, Facolta Di Architettura.
Government of Uttarakhand. 2005. “New Tehri master plan.” Town and Country Planning Department. Accessed October 9, 2018. https://tcp.uk.gov.in/files/new_tehri_2003.jpg.
GRID-A. 2022. “GRID-arendal: Mountains & SDGs.” Accessed June 17, 2022. https://www.grida.no/activities/332.
Hodge, R. A., P. Hardi, and D. V. J. Bell. 1999. “Seeing Change through the Lens of Sustainability” Paper for the Workshop “Beyond Delusion: Science and Policy Dialogue on Designing Effective Indicators of Sustainable Development.” Accessed February 9, 2020. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.195.2422.
Hughes, C., and R. Lupton. 2021. “Understanding inclusive growth at local level: Changing patterns and types of neighbourhood disadvantage in three English city-regions.” Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 14 (1): 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa035.
Kamal, A., and N. Proma. 2017. “Spatial modeling for sustainable residential infill in Texas peri-urban communities.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 143 (2): 04016036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000372.
Kamruzzaman, M., S. Washington, D. Baker, W. Brown, B. Giles-Corti, and G. Turrel. 2016. “Built environment impacts on walking for transport in Brisbane, Australia.” Transportation 43 (1): 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9563-0.
Kaur, H., and P. Garg. 2019. “Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 210: 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009.
Kaur, H., and P. Garg. 2020. “City profile: New Tehri.” Cities 102: 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102718.
Kaur, H., and P. Garg. 2022. “Case-based assessment of planned hill town using existing urban sustainability assessment tools.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 24 (3): 4413–4433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01585-9.
King, A. D. 1976. Colonial urban development culture, social power and environment. London: Routledge & Kenag Paul.
Kotharkar, R., A. V. Pallapu, and P. Bahadure. 2019. “Urban cluster–based sustainability assessment of an Indian city: Case of Nagpur.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 145 (4): 04019018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000527.
Kumar, A., and Pushplata. 2013. “Building regulations for environmental protection in Indian hill towns.” Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2 (2): 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.04.003.
Lu, C., C. Wang, W. Zhu, H. Li, Y. Li, and C. Lu. 2015. “GIS-based synthetic measurement of sustainable development in loess plateau ecologically fragile area—Case of Qingyang, China.” Sustainability 7 (2): 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021576.
Mahat, T. J. 2004. Issues in sustainable mountain development: The Himalayan experience. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD).
Mateus, R., and L. Bragança. 2011. “Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT-H.” Build. Environ. 46 (10): 1962–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.023.
Moneim, S. A., and E. Ariane. 2012. Neighborhood urban quality of life guidelines for urban planning and development of new assessment tool. Giza, Egypt: Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University.
Nardo, M., M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, A. Hoffman, and E. Giovannini. 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Ispra, Italy: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Nilsson, C., and G. Grelsson. 1995. “The fragility of ecosystems: A review.” J. Appl. Ecol. 32 (4): 677. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404808.
Niti.gov.in. 1992. 8th Five Year Plan (Vol-2): Hill Areas Development Programme (HADP). Accessed July 18, 2021. https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/plans/planrel/fiveyr/8th/vol2/8v2ch17.htm.
Price, M. F., L. Jansky, and A. A. Iatsenia. 2006. “Key issues for mountain areas.” Accessed February 13, 2020. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:2448/pdf9789280811025.pdf.
Sharifi, A., and A. Murayama. 2013. “A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38: 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006.
T.D.Utt. 2019. “Tehri District Uttarakhand, Information Updates of Tehri District Uttarakhand Uttaranchal India.” Accessed February 26, 2020. https://www.euttaranchal.com/uttarakhand/tehri.
UNESCO Report. 2015. “Policy brief on mountains and the sustainable development goals.” Accessed July 20, 2021. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/SDGs_and_mountains_water_EN.pdf.
URDPFI Guidelines. 2014. “Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation & Implementation Guidelines.” Accessed May, 2021. https://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/URDPFI%20Guidelines%20Vol%20I(2).pdf.
Wallbaum, H., S. Krank, and R. Teloh. 2011. “Prioritizing sustainability criteria in urban planning processes: Methodology application.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (1): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000038.
Wang, H., Q. Shen, and B.-s. Tang. 2015. “GIS-based framework for supporting land use planning in urban renewal: Case study in Hong Kong.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141 (3): 05014015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000216.
Watanabe, K., K. Gotoh, and K. Tachiiri. 2006. “Route selection for a new transportation system in hillside urban areas: A case study in Nagasaki, Japan.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 132 (2): 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:2(89).
Yigitcanlar, T., M. Kamruzzaman, and S. Teriman. 2015. “Neighborhood sustainability assessment: Evaluating residential development sustainability in a developing country context.” Sustainability 7 (3): 2570–2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032570.
Yihdego, Y., C. Danis, and A. Paffard. 2017. “Groundwater engineering in an environmentally sensitive urban area: Assessment, landuse change/infrastructure impacts and mitigation measures.” Hydrology 4 (3): 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4030037.
Zhang, J. H., L. Z. Jia, Y. Wang, and Z. H. Zhang. 2017. “Tillage erosion effect on soil hydrological properties in a hilly landscape.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 22 (9): 4017034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001565.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 2June 2023

History

Received: Mar 5, 2021
Accepted: Oct 24, 2022
Published online: Feb 2, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Planning and Design, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-4602. Email: [email protected]
Pushplata Garg [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share