ABSTRACT

Geotechnical engineering requires the application of engineering judgment to successfully interpret field conditions and come to an appropriate decision. To practice engineering judgment, engineers evaluate their initial impressions when presented with new information and learn from past failures. This much is implicitly understood, but how engineers accrue engineering judgment is highly debated and is a research area still in its adolescence. Members of industry posit that engineering experience is essential for competent engineering practice, but traditional engineering education practices need to be updated with opportunities to acquire such experience. Internships help some students obtain relevant experience that entry-level engineers need. Unfortunately, not all students have the opportunity to experience hands-on internships, especially during the pandemic. Defining engineering judgment in the context of practicing engineering does not always map to a useful tool for educators to generate curricular designs that target development of this skill in the classroom. This prompted the need for a new paradigm regarding engineering judgment in undergraduate learning. Using a qualitative systematic review, we identified an emergent theoretical framework for engineering judgment that is comprised of seven emergent competencies. This paper presents the use of this emergent framework to design, implement, and assess a design project in a sophomore-level introductory geotechnical engineering course at a small private research institute in the Northeast of the United States. If we want students to learn the competencies included within engineering judgment, we need an explicit definition. If we want to support faculty as they respond to evolving ABET criteria, we need evidence of the use of these assessment tools for a range of student products. This paper presents the use of a research-based instructional strategy for utilizing student-centered goals, activities, products, and assessments (GAPA) aimed at developing engineering judgment in an undergraduate classroom.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

REFERENCES

AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (2019). Levers for Change: An assessment on changed STEM instruction. Report prepared by Sandra Laursen.
ABET. (2020). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2019-2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020 from <https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020>.
Atman, C., Adams, R., Cardella, M., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. J. of Eng. Ed., October.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review. 84 (2): 191–215.
DiBiagio, E., and Flaate, K. (2000). Ralph B. Peck, engineer, educator, a man of judgement. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.
Eder, W. (1995). Introduction to Engineering Design – based on Design Science. Fourth World Conference on Engineering Education October 15-20, 1995.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.
Gainsburg, J. (2007). The Mathematical Disposition of Structural Engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 38, No. 5.
MacRobert, J. (2018). Introducing Engineering Judgment through Active Learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice.
Reynolds, T. (1992). The Education of Engineers in America before the Morril Act of 1862. History of Education Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4.
Richtarek, A. (2021). Beginning to Develop and Assess Engineering Judgment through Mixed Reality Game-Based Learning. Masters Thesis, RPI, Troy, NY.
Romkey, L., and Cheng, Y. L. (2009). The development and assessment of critical thinking for the global engineer. 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Stolk, J., and Martello, R. (2018). Reimagining and Empowering the Design of Projects: A Project-Based Learning Goals Framework. 2018 Frontiers in Edu. (FIE) Conference.
Wulf, W. (1998). The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform. The Bridge, Vol. 28, No. 1.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geo-Congress 2023
Geo-Congress 2023
Pages: 554 - 562

History

Published online: Mar 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ryan Carkin, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
1Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Email: [email protected]
Victoria Bennett, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
2Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Email: [email protected]
Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D. [email protected]
3Olin College, Needham, MA. Email: [email protected]
Alyssa Richtarek [email protected]
4Technical Services Unit, CDM Smith, Inc., Boston, MA. Email: [email protected]
Casper Harteveld, Ph.D. [email protected]
5Game Design, College of Arts, Media, and Design, Northeastern Univ., Boston, MA. Email: [email protected]
Tarek Abdoun, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
6Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$118.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$118.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share