Early Exposure to FEM to Enhance Undergraduate Engagement in Geotechnical Engineering
Publication: Geo-Congress 2023
ABSTRACT
Undergraduate geotechnical engineering courses are generally focused on theoretical aspects of soil mechanics and traditional design methods, most of which are based on limit equilibrium analysis. In current practice, however, thanks to advances in hardware, software, and soil material modeling, geotechnical engineers routinely rely on numerical modeling for analysis and design. To best prepare future engineers for the profession, exposure to computational methods and to software used in industry is therefore desirable at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. In addition, numerical modeling programs can be effectively used to illustrate fundamental concepts, to rapidly explore the impact of soil properties and design parameters, and to provide exposure to realistic geotechnical engineering design problems, thus enhancing students’ learning and classroom experience. This paper presents the experience of incorporating a finite element method (FEM) software used in industry into the undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering I course offered at Purdue University, through two laboratory modules built around key topics covered in the course. Feedback was collected from the students at the end of the semester through an anonymous survey designed to assess different aspects of student engagement (behavioral, emotional, cognitive, agentic). The survey results showed that the FEM labs improved student attention and promoted a deeper interaction among team members. Students also felt that the FE analyses were effective in bringing concepts to life compared to paper-based exercises, and appreciated the opportunity to work on a problem that had ties to an actual case history.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abbo, A. J., Fityus, S. G., and Mackenzie, S. (2012). Dunmore Bridge Case Study: An introduction to geotechnical engineering via finite element analysis. Shaking the foundations of geo-engineering education, Taylor & Francis Group, London. 171–176.
Caicedo, B. (2000). Geotechnical centrifuge applications to foundations engineering teaching. Proc., Geotechnical Engineering Education and Training, Sinaia, Romania.
Craig, W. H. (1989). The Use of a Centrifuge in Geotechnical Engineering Education. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 12(4), 288–291.
Dewoolkar, M. M., Goddery, T., and Znidarcic, D. (2003). Centrifuge Modeling for Undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering Instruction. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 26(2).
Mitchell, R. J. (1994). Centrifuge Modeling as a Teaching Tool. Geotechnical News, 12(3), 30–31.
Wirth, X., Jiang, N.-J., da Silva, T., Della Vechia, G., Evans, J., Romero, E., and Bhatia, S. K. B. (2017). Undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering Education of the 21st Century. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 143(3).
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., and Lombardi, D. (2015). The Challenge of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13.
Vitali, O. P. M., Getchell, A., and Santagata, M. C. (2021). Development of FEM laboratory modules for an introductory undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering course. Lyles School of Civil Engineering Education and Instruction Resources. Purdue University E-Pubs.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 23, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.