Determining Contract Requirements for Quality Assurance Program in Innovative Project Delivery
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
As innovative project delivery methods, such as design-build (DB) and public–private partnership (P3), become more common, many state departments of transportation (state DOTs) have implemented alternative quality assurance programs (QAPs). These programs shift quality assurance responsibility from the DOT to the private sector in DB projects, but this transition can be a challenge, creating a gap between DOT expectations and the construction industry’s actual implementation. It is crucial to ensure that DOTs have clear requirements defined for quality assurance programs for innovative delivery projects. It is also critical for the construction engineering and inspection (CEI) industry to understand DOT’s quality assurance expectations in the innovative delivery environment. The major objectives of this research are to identify the state of practice in QAPs and characterize the variability among state DOTs’ DB and P3 projects. This study conducts content analysis and comparative analysis of QAPs across the population of US DOTs. This involves comparatively examining 35 DOTs’ QAPs and analyzing 98 documents such as requests for qualifications, requests for proposals, and quality management manuals to understand different DOT’s expectations for DB and P3 projects. The study identifies five essential criteria representing each DOT’s unique quality assurance requirements and compiles primary similarities and differences in QAPs across the DOTs. This research contributes to the body of knowledge on the core criteria of quality assurance requirements and DOTs’ expectations specified in DB and P3 contract documents. The findings will help practitioners understand alternative QAPs better and increase the quality of performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Ashuri, B., Jallan, Y., and Lee, J. H. (2018). Materials Quality Management for Alternative Project Delivery. Atlanta, GA.
Ashuri, B., Mistur, E., Lee, J. H., and Liu, L. (2021). Strategies and Resources for Strengthening the Implementation of the Construction Quality Acceptance Firm (CQAF) Model in the Innovative Project Delivery Environment. Atlanta, GA.
Beard, J., Loulakis, M., and Wundram, E. (2001). Design-build: planning through development. McGraw Hill Professional, New York.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). (2021). “DBIA State Maps.” Design-Build Institute of America, <https://dbia.org/advocacy/state/>(Aug. 1, 2021).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2006). Design-Build Effectiveness Study. Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2012). Techbrief: construction quality assurance for design-build highway projects. McLean, VA.
Gransberg, D., Datin, J., and Molenaar, K. (2008). “: quality assurance in design-build projects.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Gransberg, D., and Molenaar, K. (2004). “Analysis of owner’s design and construction quality management approaches in design/build projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(October), 162–169.
Huges, C. S. (2005). “: state construction quality assurance programs.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Jallan, Y., Lee, J. H., and Ashuri, B. (2018). “Synthesis of quality assurance practices of state DOTs for highway construction projects using alternative delivery.” Construction Research Congress 2018: Infrastructure and Facility Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018.
Kraft, E., and Molenaar, K. R. (2013). “Project Quality Assurance Organization Selection for Highway Design and Construction Projects.” Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 29–36.
Kraft, E., and Molenaar, K. R. (2015). “Quality assurance organization selection factors for highway design and construction projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5).
Lee, J. H., Jallan, Y., and Ashuri, B. (2020). “Key Issues and Differences in Practical Components of Quality Management in Design-Build Highway Projects.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 12(1), 04519029.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, London.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications.
Scott, S., and Molenaar, K. (2017). “: guidelines for optimizing the risk and cost of materials QA programs.” Washington, DC.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). (2006). Design-build: A quality process. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.