CMAR Procurement in US Public Projects: Qualifications-Driven Processes and Criteria
Publication: Construction Research Congress 2022
ABSTRACT
Construction manager at risk (CMAR) emerged as an alternative project delivery method for efficient delivery of construction projects. In CMAR, the design is not completed when the contractor is selected; therefore, a price-focused contractor selection based on the lowest bid is often not appropriate. Instead, qualifications-driven processes are used. The objective of this paper is to identify the current practices of multi-stepped qualifications-based selection (QBS) processes while also uncovering the major qualification criteria used for CMAR projects. A total of 33 CMAR requests for qualifications (RFQs) and request for proposals (RFPs) were collected from 30 states. Patterns were discovered in the selection processes along with qualification criteria, prioritizing firm experience, key personnel, past performance, and the contractor’s approach to the project, which all rose to the top of the criteria list for CMAR projects. This research supports project owners developing RFQs and RFPs by informing a successful CMAR selection process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.
REFERENCES
Abkarian, H., El Asmar, M., and Underwood, S. (2017). “Impact of alternative project delivery systems on the international roughness index: Case studies of transportation projects in the western United States.” Transportation Research Record, 2630(1), 76–84.
Alleman, D., Papajohn, D., Gransberg, D. D., El Asmar, M., and Molenaar, K. R. (2017a). “Exploration of early work packaging in construction manager–general contractor highway projects.” Transportation Research Record, 2630(1), 68–75.
Alleman, D., Antoine, A., Gransberg, D. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (2017b). “Comparison of qualifications-based selection and best-value procurement for construction manager–general contractor highway construction.” Transportation Research Record, 2630(1), 59–67.
Best, R. D. (2020). “U.S. Public Construction - Statistics & Facts.” Statista, https://www.statista.com/topics/1256/public-construction/#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20spending,on%20new%20public%20construction%20alone. (April 29, 2021).
Best, R. D. (2021). “Public construction spending on highway and street projects in the U.S. from 2009 to 2020(in billion U.S. dollars).” Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/238570/us-public-construction-spending-on-highway-and-street-projects/ (April 29, 2021).
Chen, Q., Jin, Z., Xia, B., Wu, P., and Skitmore, M. (2016). “Time and cost performance of design–build projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2), 04015074.
Christodoulou, S., Griffis, F., Barrett, L., and Okungbowa, M. (2004). “Qualifications-based selection of professional A/E services.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(2), 34–41.
Cho, N., El Asmar, M., Underwood, S., and Kamarianakis, Y. (2020). “Long-Term Performance Benefits of the Design-Build Delivery Method Applied to Road Pavement Projects in the US.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1–11.
Drexler, J. A., and Larson, E. W. (2000). “Partnering: Why project owner–contractor relationships change.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 293–297.
El Asmar, M., and Bearup, W. (2021). “Qualification-Driven Procurement”. Book Chapter. In Press.
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” Journal of construction engineering and management, 132(3).
Feghaly, J., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2020). “State of professional practice for water infrastructure project delivery.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(3), 04020018.
Fellows, R., and Liu, A. (2003). Research methods for construction. 2nd Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Francom, T., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2014). “Using alternative project delivery methods to enhance the cost performance of trenchless construction projects.” In Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network (pp. 1219–1228).
Francom, T., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2016a) “Schedule Performance of Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Delivery on Pipeline Engineering and Construction Projects.” Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 569–578.
Francom, T., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2016b). “Performance analysis of construction manager at risk on pipeline engineering and construction projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(6), 04016016.
Francom, T., El Asmar, M., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2017). “Longitudinal study of construction manager at risk for pipeline rehabilitation.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 8(2), 04017001.
Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2010). “Construction manager-at-risk project delivery for highway programs.” Transportation Research Board.
Gransberg, N. J., and Gransberg, D. D. (2020). “Public project construction manager-at-risk contracts: Lessons learned from a comparison of commercial and infrastructure projects.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(1), 04519039.
Kenig, M. E. (2011). Project Delivery Systems. AGC of America.
Lingard, H., Graham, P., and Smithers, G. (2000). “Employee perceptions of the solid waste management system operating in a large Australian contracting organisation: Implications for company policy implementation.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(4), 383–393.
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. (2012). “GLX CM/GC PROCUREMENT 25 MANUAL for the Green Line Extension Project.” https://docplayer.net/34930622-Cm-gc-glx-cm-gc-procurement-manual-for-the-green-line-extension-project-construction-manager-general-contractor.html.
Mayring, P. (2000). “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” Journal of management in engineering, 15(2), 54–62.
Papajohn, D., El Asmar, M., and Molenaar, K. R. (2019). “Contract administration tools for design-build and construction manager/general contractor highway projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(6), 04019028.
Papajohn, D., El Asmar, M., Molenaar, K. R., and Alleman, D. (2020). “Comparing contract administration functions for alternative and traditional delivery of highway projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(1), 04019038.
Rojas, E. M., and Kell, I. (2008). “Comparative analysis of project delivery systems cost performance in Pacific Northwest public schools.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(6), 387–397.
Shalwani, A., Lines, B. C., and Smithwick, J. B. (2019). “Differentiation of evaluation criteria in design-build and construction manager at risk procurements.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 04019017.
Shrestha, P. P., Batista, J., and Maharjan, R. (2016). “Risks Involved in Using Alternative Project Delivery (APD) Methods in Water and Wastewater Projects.” Procedia Engineering, 145, 219–223.
Shrestha, P. P., Davis, B., and Gad, G. M. (2020). “Investigation of legal issues in construction-manager-at-risk projects: case study of airport projects.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(3), 04520022.
State of Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority. (2017). “Request for Qualifications for Construction Management at Risk (CMAR) Contractor.”.
State of Washington Department of Natural Resources. (2016). “Qualification for Contract Harvesting Services Eligible Bidder Pool.”.
Sullivan, J., El Asmar, M., Chalhoub, J., and Obeid, H. (2017). “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” Journal of construction engineering and management, 143(6), 04017009.
Weber, R. P. (1990). “Basic content analysis” (No. 49). Sage Publications. Newburry Park, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Construction Research Congress 2022
Pages: 189 - 199
History
Published online: Mar 7, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.