Chapter
Feb 24, 2022
Chapter 4

Integrated Modeling Systems and Linked Models

Publication: Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of integrated modeling systems and linked models used in total maximum daily load (TMDL) studies. A widely used integrated modeling system called the Better Assessment Science Integrating point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS) is presented with descriptions of its origin and history, tools and models included, and a listing of example TMDLs in which each of the included models was applied. The chapter summarizes two widely used integrated modeling systems: USEPA's BASINS and the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Watershed Modeling System with listings or brief descriptions of some of the applications. BASINS modeling system has four data categories: base cartographic, environmental background, environmental monitoring, and point source data. There are many examples where multiple models are dynamically linked for applications in TMDL and water quality studies. The chapter presents an application of linked models, which provides an exchange of information between the models through common linkages.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

Acknowledgments

Reviews, edits, and comments provided by Deva K. Borah in this chapter are greatly appreciated.

References

ADEM (Alabama Department of Environmental Management). 2008. Final total maximum daily load nutrients & OE/DO. Pepperell Branch (AL03150110-0201-700; Nutrients) and Sougahatchee Creek Embayment (Yates Reservoir) (AL03150110-0204-101; Nutrients & OE/DO). Montgomery, AL: ADEM.
Ames, D. P., C. Michaelis, A. Anselmo, L. Chen, and H. Dunsford. 2008. “MapWindow GIS.” In Encyclopedia of GIS, (Eds.) Shekhar S. and Xiong, H. 633–634. New York, New York: Springer.
Aquaveo, Inc. 2020. “Watershed modeling system v11.0.” https://www.aquaveo.com/software/wms-watershed-modeling-system-introduction.
Argent, R. M. 2004. “An overview of model integration for environmental applications—Components, frameworks and semantics.” Environ. Modell. Software 19 (3): 219–234.
Battin, A. T., R. Kinerson, and M. Lahlou. 1998. “EPA's better assessment science integrating point and non-point sources (BASINS)- A powerful tool for managing watersheds.” In Proc., GISHydro98, 1998 ESRI User Conf. Washington, DC: EPA, Office of Water-Office of Science and Technology.
Bharati, L., C. Rodgers, T. Erdenberger, M. Plotnikova, S. Shumilov, P. L. G. Vlek, et al. 2008. “Integration of economic and hydrologic models: Exploring conjunctive irrigation water use strategies in the Volta Basin.” Agric. Water Manage. 95 (8): 925–936.
Bicknell, B. R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, A. S. Donigian, and R. C. Johanson. 2011. Hydrologic simulation program—FORTRAN, HSPF version 12 user's manual. Reston, VA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Water Resources Discipline, US Geological Survey.
Cerco, C. F., and T. Cole. 1993. “Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay.” J. Environ. Eng. 119 (6): 1006–1025.
Costanza, R., A. Voinov, R. Boumans, T. Maxwell, F. Villa, L. Wainger, and H. Voinov. 2002. “Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River watershed, Maryland.” Ecol. Monogr. 72 (2): 203–231.
Dellman, P. N., C. E. Ruiz, C. T. Manwaring, and E. J. Nelson. 2002. Watershed modeling system hydrological simulation program; watershed model user documentation and tutorial. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Lab.
DiToro, D. 2001. Sediment flux modeling. New York: Wiley.
Downer, C. W., E. J. Nelson, and A. Byrd. 2003. Primer: Using watershed modeling system (WMS) for gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) data development—WMS 6.1 and GSSHA 1. 43C. Vicksburg, MS: Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Lab.
Dubois, G., M. Schulz, J. Skøien, L. Bastin, and S. Peedell. 2013. “eHabitat, a multi-purpose Web Processing Service for ecological modeling.” Environ. Modell. Software 41: 123–133.
Elewa, H. H., and A. A. Qaddah. 2011. “Groundwater potentiality mapping in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt, using remote sensing and GIS-watershed-based modeling.” Hydrogeol. J. 19: 613–628.
Erturk, A., M. Gurel, M. A. Baloch, T. Dikerler, E. Varol, N. Akbulut, et al. 2006. “Application of watershed modeling system (WMS) for integrated management of a watershed in Turkey.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 41 (19): 2045–2056.
Geller, G. N., and W. Turner. 2007. “The model Web: a concept for ecological forecasting.” In Proc., 2007 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., 2469–2472. New York: IEEE.
Haith, D. A., and L. L. Shoemaker. 1987. “Generalized watershed loading functions for stream-flow nutrients.” Water Resour. Bull. 23: 471–478.
Johnson, B. H., K. W. Kim, R. E. Heath, B. B. Hsieh, and H. L. Butler. 1993. “Validation of three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 119 (1): 2–20.
Krause, P., D. P. Boyle, and F. Bäse. 2005. “Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment.” Adv. Geosci. 5: 89–97.
Linker, L. C., G. W. Shenk, R. L. Dennis, and J. S. Sweeney. 2000. “Cross-media models of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and airshed.” Water Qual. Ecosyst. Model. 1 (1–4): 91–122.
Mohamoud, Y. M. 2007. “Enhancing hydrological simulation program–FORTRAN model channel hydraulic representation.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43 (5): 1280–1292.
Mohamoud, Y. M., and L. M. Prieto. 2011. “Effect of temporal and spatial rainfall resolution on HSPF predictive performance and parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (3): 377–388.
Mohamoud, Y. M., A. C. Sigleo, and R. S. Parmar. 2009. Modeling the impacts of hydromodification on water quantity and quality. EPA/600/R-09/116 (NTIS PB2010-104718). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
Mohamoud, Y., and H. X. Zhang. 2019. “Applications of linked and nonlinked complex models for TMDL development: Approaches and challenges.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (1): 04018055.
Moriasi, D., M. W. Gitau, N. Pai, and P. Daggupati. 2015. “Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria.” Trans. ASABE 58 (6): 1763–1785.
Ritter, A., and R. Muñoz-Carpena. 2013. “Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments.” J. Hydrol. 480: 33–45.
Rosegrant, M. W., C. Ringler, D. C. McKinney, X. Cai, A. Keller, and G. Donoso. 2000. “Integrated economic-hydrologic water modeling at the basin scale: The Maipo River basin.” Agric. Econ. 24 (1): 33–46.
Ross, M., J. Geurink, A. Aly, P. Tara, K. Trout, and T. Jobes. 2004. Integrated hydrologic model (IHM) Vol. 1: Theory manual. Tampa, FL: Water Resource Group, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida.
Rossman, L. A. 2010. Storm water management model, user's manual, version 5. EPA/600/R-05/040. Cincinnati, OH: Water Supply and Water Resources Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Agency.
Shirmohammadi, A., I. Chaubey, R. D. Harmel, D. D. Bosch, R. Munoz-Carpena, C. Dharmasri, et al. 2006. “Uncertainty in TMDL models.” Trans. ASABE 49 (4): 1033–1049.
Shoemaker, L., T. Dai, J. Koenig, and M. Hantush. 2005. TMDL model evaluation and research needs. EPA/600/R-05/149. Cincinnati, OH: USEPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory.
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Ambient water quality criteria recommendations, information supporting the development of state and tribal nutrient criteria, rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion XI. EPA 822-B-00-020. Washington, DC: EPA.
USEPA. 2001. Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources BASINS version 3.0 user's manual. EPA-823-B-01-001. Washington, DC: Office of Water.
USEPA. 2005. TMDL model evaluation and research needs. EPA/600/R-05/149. Prepared by L. Shoemaker, T. Dai, and J. Koenig. Washington, DC: EPA.
USEPA. 2009. BASINs 4.0 climate assessment tool (CAT). Supporting Documentation and User's Manual (Final Rep.). EPA/600/R-08/088. Washington, DC: EPA.
USEPA. 2010a. Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2010b. Chesapeake Bay phase 5 community watershed model. Section 11: Riverine simulation EPA 903S10002—CBP/TRS-303-10. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program Office, EPA.
USEPA. 2012. Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources (BASINS Version 4.1). EPA-823-C-07-001. Washington, DC: Office Water.
USEPA. 2015. TMDL modeling toolbox. Washington, DC: EPA.
USEPA. 2019. Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources (BASINS version 4.5). Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/ceam/basins-download-and-installation. Accessed November 11, 2021.
USEPA Region 2 and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 2019. “Total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Phosphorus in Conesus Lake Livingston County, New York.” https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/conesuspres.final.pdf.
van Delden, H., J. van Vliet, D. T. Rutledge, and M. J. Kirkby. 2011. “Comparison of scale and scaling issues in integrated land-use models for policy support.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 142 (1): 18–28.
van Evert, F. V., D. Holzworth, R. M. Muetzelfeldt, A. E. Rizzoli, and F. Villa. 2005. “Convergence in integrated modeling frameworks.” In Proc., MODSIM 2005 Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 745–750.
VIMS (Virginia Institute of Marine Science). 2009. Development of hydrodynamic and water quality models for the Lynnhaven River System. Special Rep. No. 408, Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Virginia Beach.
Voinov, A., and C. Cerco. 2010. “Model integration and the role of data.” Environ. Modell. Software 25 (8): 965–969.
Whittemore, R. C., and J. Beebe. 2000. “EPA's BASINS model: Good science or serendipitous modeling.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 36: 493–499.
Wool, T. A., R. B. Ambrose, J. L. Martin, E. A. Comer, and T. Tech. 2006. Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP). User's manual, Version 6. Washington, DC: EPA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation
Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources
Pages: 107 - 134
Editors: Harry X. Zhang, Ph.D., Nigel W.T. Quinn, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-4763, Deva K. Borah, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-9390, and G. Padmanabhan, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-1379
ISBN (Print): 978-0-7844-1594-8
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8382-4

History

Published online: Feb 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share