Chapter
Feb 24, 2022
Chapter 3

Receiving Water Quality Models

Publication: Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources

Abstract

This chapter presents a review of some of the most widely used receiving water quality models for total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) to simulate eutrophication processes including carbon and nutrient cycling, phytoplankton dynamics, dissolved oxygen, and fate and transport of toxic chemicals and mercury. ICM can simulate water quality responses to point and nonpoint source loads and can be used as part of TMDL modeling. The Water Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) was initially developed as a transport code with water quality subroutines. The WASP model is typically coupled to hydrologic and hydrodynamic models to simulate complex large-scale ecosystems. The Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) is a surface water model with hydrodynamic and water quality modeling capabilities. The EFDC model has been widely used in more than 100 modeling studies of aquatic ecosystems around the world and in multiple TMDL studies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

References

ADEM (Alabama Department of Environmental Management). 2006. Final nutrient total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for the Cahaba River Watershed. Montgomery, AL: Alabama Dept. of Environmental Management.
Allison, J., D. S. Brown, and K. J. Novo-Gradac. 1991. MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, a geochemical assessment model for environmental systems: Version 3.0 user's manual. Washington, DC: EPA.
Ambrose, R. B., S. B. Vandergrift, and T. A. Wool. 1986. WASP3, A hydrodynamic and water quality model—Model theory, user's manual and programmer's guide. Athens, GA: USEPA.
ASCE. 2017. Total maximum daily load analysis and modeling: Assessment of the practice. Prepared by TMDL Analysis and Modeling Task Committee of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute of ASCE. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Borah, D. K., E. Ahmadisharaf, G. Padmanabhan, S. Imen, and Y. M. Mohamoud. 2019. “Watershed models for development and implementation of total maximum daily loads.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (1): 03118001.
Bowen, J., and J. Hieronymus. 2003. “A CE-QUAL-W2 model of neuse estuary for total maximum daily load development.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 129 (4): 283–294.
Camacho, R. A., Z. Zhang, and X. Chao. 2019. “Receiving water quality models for TMDL development and implementation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (2): 04018063.
Cantrell, W. 2013. Total maximum daily load revision Charleston Harbor, Cooper, Ashley, and Wando Rivers. Prepared for the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. Columbia. SC: South Carolina Dept. of Health and Environmental Control.
Cerco, C. F., and T. Cole. 1993. “Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay.” J. Environ. Eng. 119 (6): 1006–1025.
Cerco, C. F., and M. R. Noel. 2013. “Twenty-one-year simulation of Chesapeake Bay water quality using the CE-QUAL-ICM eutrophication model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 49 (5): 1119–1133.
Cerco, C. F., M. R. Noel, and S.-C. Kim. 2006. “Three-dimensional management model for Lake Washington, Part II: Eutrophication modeling and skill assessment.” Lake Reservoir Manage. 22 (2): 115–131.
Cerco, C. F., M. R. Noel, and L. Linker. 2004. “Managing for water clarity in Chesapeake Bay.” J. Environ. Eng. 130 (6): 631–642.
Chao, X., M. Altinakar, and R. Marsooli. 2016. “Numerical modeling of the fate and transport of contaminants due to a coal ash spill accident in the Dan River.” In Proc., ASCE World Water & Environmental Resources Cong. West Palm Beach, Florida. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chao, X., Y. Jia, F. D. Shields, S. S. Wang, and C. M. Cooper. 2007. “Numerical modeling of water quality and sediment related processes.” Ecol. Modell. 201 (3): 385–397.
Chao, X., Y. Jia, S. S. Wang, and A. A. Hossain. 2012. “Numerical modeling of surface flow and transport phenomena with applications to Lake Pontchartrain.” Lake Reserv. Manage. 28 (1): 31–45.
Chapra, S. C. 2003. “Engineering water quality models and TMDLs.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 129 (4): 247–256.
Chapra, S. C. (2008). “Surface water-quality modeling.” Waveland press.
Chapra, S.C., Pelletier, G.J., 2003. “QUAL2K: A modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality: documentation and users manual.” Tufts University, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept.
Cole, T. M., and S. A. Wells. 2016. CE-QUAL-W2: A two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, version 4.0. Portland, OR: Portland State University, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Cook, A. 2012. “Development of an integrated surface and subsurface model of Everglades National Park.” FIU Electronic Thesis, University Graduate School. Accessed November 17, 2021. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/
Cope, B., T. Shaikh, R. Parmar, S. Chapra, and J. Martin. 2020. Literature review on nutrient-related rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling. USEPA/600/R-19/241. Washington, DC: USEPA.
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute). 2021. MIKE+: River Networks. Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/products/mikeplus/river-networks.
Di Toro, D. M. 1983. Documentation for water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) and model verification program (MVP). 600/3-81-044. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Edinger, J. E., and E. M. Buchak. 1975. A hydrodynamic, two-dimensional reservoir model: The computational basis. Cincinnati, Ohio: US Army Engineer Division, Ohio River.
Gustafsson J. P. 2013. Visual MINTEQ. http://vminteq.lwr.kth.se/. Accessed November 11, 2021.
Hamrick, J. M. 1992. A three-dimensional environmental fluid dynamics computer code: Theoretical and computational aspects. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Science.
Inthasaro, P. 2010. “A one-dimensional aquatic ecology and ecotoxicology model in river system.” Ph.D. thesis, National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, University of Mississippi.
Jia, Y., X. Chao, Y. Zhang, and T. Zhu. 2013. Technical manual of CCHE2D, Version 4.1. NCCHE-TR-02-2013. University, MS: University of Mississippi.
Liang, J., Q. Yang, T. Sun, J. Martin, H. Sun, and L. Li. 2015. “MIKE 11 model-based water quality model as a tool for the evaluation of water quality management plans.” J. Water Supply: Res. Technol.-Aqua 64 (6): 708–718.
Long, S. 2014. “Simulating Everglades National Park hydrology and phosphorus transport under existing and future scenarios using numerical modeling.” FIU electronic thesis, University Graduate School. Accessed November 17, 2021. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/
Mandel, R., S. Kim, A. Nagel, J. Palmer, C. Schultz, and K. Brubaker. 2008. The TAM/WASP Modeling Framework for Development of Nutrient and BOD TMDLs in the Tidal Anacostia River. ICPRB Rep. 000-7. Washington, DC: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Modeling.
Mark, D. J., N. W. Scheffner, H. L. Butler, B. W. Bunch, and M. S. Dortch. 1993. Hydrodynamic and water quality modeling of Lower Green Bay, Wisconsin. Vol. 1. Main Text and Appendixes A–E. Tech. Rep. CERC-93. Rep. E-83-11. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Martin, J. L., D. Tillman, C. Cerco, J. Hendrickson, and M. Dortch. 2002. “A three-dimensional water quality model for estimating TMDLs in a Blackwater river estuary, the lower St. Johns River, FL.” In Estuarine and Coastal Modeling (2001), edited by M. L. Spaulding, 227–245. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Martin, J. L., and T. Wool. 2002. A dynamic one-dimensional model of hydrodynamics and water quality EPD-RIV1, Version 1.0. Atlanta, Georgia: Course Materials prepared by ASCI Corporation for Robert Olson NRE.
O'Donnell, S., R. Gelda, S. Effler, and D. Pierson. 2011. “Testing and application of a transport model for runoff event inputs for a water supply reservoir.” J. Environ. Eng. 137 (8): 678–688.
Ohio EPA. 2009. Total maximum daily loads for the Blanchard River Watershed. Columbus, OH: Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water.
Ohio EPA. 2013. Total maximum daily loads for the Ottawa River (Lima Area) Watershed. Columbus, OH: Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water.
PSU (Portland State University). 2021. Water Quality Research Group – CE-QUAL-W2: Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model. Accessed November 11, 2021. http://www.ce.pdx.edu/w2.
Runkel, R. L., and B. A. Kimball. 2002. “Evaluating remedial alternatives for an acid mine drainage stream: Application of a reactive transport model.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (5): 1093–1101.
Runkel, R. L., B. A. Kimball, D. M. McKnight, and K. E. Bencala. 1999. “Reactive solute transport in streams: a surface complexation approach for trace metal sorption.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (12): 3829–3840.
Shoemaker, L., T. Dai, J. Koenig, and M. Hantush. 2005. TMDL model evaluation and research needs. Washington, DC: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA.
Singleton, V., B. Jacob, M. Feeney, and J. Little. 2013. “Modeling a proposed quarry reservoir for raw water storage in Atlanta, Georgia.” J. Environ. Eng. 139 (1): 70–78.
Smith, D. L., T. L. Threadgill, and C. E. Larson. 2012. Modeling the hydrodynamics and water quality of the Lower Minnesota River using CE-QUAL-W2: A report on the development, calibration, verification, and application of the model. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Sørensen, H. R., T. V. Jacobsen, J. T. Kjelds, J. Yan, and E. Hopkins. 1999. “Application of MIKE SHE and MIKE 11 for Integrated Hydrological Modelling in South Florida.” In Proc., 3rd DHI Software Conf. Helsingør, Denmark.
Sullivan, A. B., H. I. Jager, and R. Myers. 2003. “Modeling white sturgeon movement in a reservoir: the effect of water quality and sturgeon density.” Ecol. Modell. 167 (1–2): 97–114.
Tetra Tech. 2005. A hydrodynamic and water quality model for the Lower Charles River Basin, Massachusetts. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Tetra Tech. 2009. Model configuration and results Klamath River model for TMDL development. Washington, DC: USEPA Region 9, USEPA Region 10, North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Tetra Tech. 2010. Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors and San Pedro Bay hydrodynamic and sediment-contaminant transport model report. Washington, DC: USEPA Region 9 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Threadgill, T. L., D. F. Turner, L. A. Nicholas, B. W. Bunch, D. H. Tillman, and D. L. Smith. 2017. Temperature modeling of lost creek lake using CE-QUAL-W2: A report on the development, calibration, verification, and application of the model. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 2014. CE-QUAL-ICM (ICM). US Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center, Published October 29, 2014. Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.erdc.usace.army.mil/Media/Fact-Sheets/Fact-Sheet-Article-View/Article/547416/ce-qual-icm-icm/.
USEPA (US Environmental Protections Agency). 1991. Guidance for water quality-based decisions: The TMDL process. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2002. Metals and pH total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for the West Fork River Watershed, West Virginia. Philadelphia: USEPA.
USEPA. 2007. Total maximum daily load for nitrogen in the peconic estuary program study area, including waterbodies currently impaired due to low dissolved oxygen: The Lower Peconic River and Tidal Tributaries; Western Flanders Bay and Lower Sawmill Creek; and Meetinghouse Creek, Terrys Creek and Tributaries. Yaphank, NY: Peconic Estuary Program, Suffolk County Depaartment of Health Services, Office of Ecology.
USEPA. 2009. Proposed total maximum daily loads for the Sawgras Lake WBID 28931 nutrients and dissolved oxygen. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2010. Total maximum daily load for dissolved oxygen in Savannah Harbor Savannah River Basin. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2020. Environmental Modeling Community of Practice: Multimedia Models to Assess Exposures. Accessed November 11, 2021. http://www2.epa.gov/exposure-assessment-models/multimedia.
USEPA. 2021. Environmental Modeling Community of Practice: Surface Water Models to Assess Exposures. Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.epa.gov/exposure-assessment-models/surface-water​-models-assess-exposures.
USGS. 2016. One-Dimensional Transport with Equilibrium Chemistry (OTEQ): A Reactive Transport Model for Streams and Rivers. Accessed November 11, 2021. http://water.usgs.gov/software/OTEQ.
Wells, S. A., and C. J. Berger. 2016. “Modeling the response of dissolved oxygen to phosphorus loading in Lake Spokane.” Lake Reserv. Manage. 32 (3): 270–279.
Wilson Engineering. 2021. Georgia EPD: Environmental Software. Accessed November 11, 2021. http://epdsoftware.wileng.com/.
Wool, T. A., S. R. Davie, Y. M. Plis, and J. Hamrick. 2003a. The development of a hydrodynamic and water quality model to support TMDL determinations and water quality management of a stratified shallow estuary: Mobile Bay, Alabama. Washington, DC: USEPA-Region 4.
Wool, T. A., S. R. Davie, and H. N. Rodriguez. 2003b. “Development of three-dimensional hydrodynamic and water quality models to support total maximum daily load decision process for the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina.” J. Environ. Eng. 129 (4): 295–306.
Wu, W., and D. A. Vieira. 2002. One-dimensional channel network model CCHE1D 3.0-Technical manual. Tech. Rep. No. NCCHETR-2002-1. University, MS: University of Mississippi.
Zhang, H., D. A. Culver, and L. Boegman. 2008. “A two-dimensional ecological model of Lake Erie: Application to estimate dreissenid impacts on large lake plankton populations.” Ecol. Modell. 214 (2–4): 219–241.
Zhang, Y. 2013. CCHE-GUI – Graphical users interface for NCCHE model quick start guide—Version 4.x. NCCHE-TR-2013-03. University, MS: University of Mississippi.
Zhang, Z., and B. E. Johnson. 2014. Application and evaluation of the HEC-RAS—Nutrient simulation module (NSMI). Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Zhang, Z., and B. E. Johnson. 2016a. Aquatic contaminant and mercury simulation modules developed for hydrological and hydraulic models. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Zhang, Z., and B. E. Johnson. 2016b. Aquatic nutrient simulation modules (NSMs) developed for hydrologic and hydraulic models. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Zhang, Z., and B. E. Johnson. 2017. Hydrologic engineer center-river analysis system (HEC-RAS) water temperature models developed for the Missouri River recovery management plan and environmental impact statement. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Zhang, Z., B. Sun, and B. E. Johnson. 2015. “Integration of a benthic sediment diagenesis module into a two-dimensional hydrodynamic and water quality model—CE-QUAL-W2.” Ecol. Modell. 297 (2015): 213–231.
Zhu, T. 2006. “A depth-averaged two-dimensional water quality model as a research and management tool.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Mississippi.
Zou, R., S. Carter, L. Shoemaker, A. Parker, and T. Henry. 2006. “Integrated hydrodynamic and water quality modeling system to support nutrient total maximum daily load development for Wissahickon Creek, Pennsylvania.” J. Environ. Eng. 132 (4): 555–566.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation
Total Maximum Daily Load Development and Implementation: Models, Methods, and Resources
Pages: 85 - 106
Editors: Harry X. Zhang, Ph.D., Nigel W.T. Quinn, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-4763, Deva K. Borah, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-9390, and G. Padmanabhan, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-1379
ISBN (Print): 978-0-7844-1594-8
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8382-4

History

Published online: Feb 24, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Rene A. Camacho-Rincon

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Chapter
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$150.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share