Technical Papers
Aug 6, 2021

Self-Centering Bridge Bent with Stretch Length Anchors as a Tension-Only Hysteretic Hybrid System

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Accelerated bridge construction (ABC) incorporates innovative techniques to reduce construction time and traffic disruption. The objective of the research was to design, build, and test a seismically resilient bridge bent using ABC methods, which can self-center, thus remaining functional after a large earthquake with minimal repairs. The design criteria were to achieve a drift ratio of 2.0% without concrete damage, mild steel reinforcement yielding, or post-tensioned (PT) bars yielding. A tension-only hybrid system was designed and tested with similar characteristics to conventional hybrid systems. The distinguishing feature of the system is that the hysteretic component consists of stretch length anchors (SLA) designed to elongate and dissipate hysteretic energy only in tension. SLAs are intentionally built, so they do not experience compression forces, do not need to be protected against buckling, and have a long fatigue life; moreover, they do not impede recentering because hysteretic energy dissipation occurs only under tensile stress. SLAs are readily available; they are affordable and are easy to replace after an earthquake. A two-column precast concrete bridge bent was tested under quasi-static cyclic loads. Unbonded post-tensioned (PT) bars were used to connect the reinforced concrete cap-beam, columns, and footings for recentering the structural system. Column mild steel reinforcement did not cross the column-to-footing or column-to-cap-beam interfaces. SLAs were attached at the top and bottom of the column externally and were constructed so they could be replaced easily after an earthquake. SLAs yielded and elongated in tension at a 1.2% drift ratio; the PT bars and gravity load were effective in self-centering the structural system. The specimen met the design criteria, with a maximum residual drift ratio of 1.1% at a maximum imposed 6.0% drift ratio, while the structural system experienced repairable damage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Mountain-Plains Consortium through Project MPC-545. The authors acknowledge Forterra Structural Precast for their assistance during construction and BASF for donating polyurethane materials. The authors acknowledge Mr. Mark Bryant, Ijan Dangol, Duc Tran, and Anurag Upadhyay of the University of Utah for their support. The authors acknowledge the comments made by the reviewers, which improved the quality of the paper.

References

AASHTO. 2011. AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2013. Guide for testing reinforced concrete structural elements under slowly applied simulated seismic loads. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2013. Welded tanks for oil storage. Washington, DC: API.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for carbon and alloy steel nuts. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for anchor bolts, steel, 36, 55, and 105-ksi yield strength. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Billington, S. L., and J. K. Yoon. 2004. “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353).
Chou, C. C., and Y. C. Chen. 2006. “Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (2): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.512.
Christopoulos, C., A. Filiatrault, and B. Folz. 2002. “Seismic response of self-centring hysteretic SDOF systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (5): 1131–1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.152.
Dawood, H., M. ElGawady, and J. Hewes. 2012. “Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (5): 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000252.
ElGawady, M. A., and H. M. Dawood. 2012. “Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes.” Eng. Struct. 38 (May): 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.001.
ElGawady, M. A., and A. Sha’lan. 2011. “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (3): 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000174.
El-Sheikh, M. T., R. Sause, S. Pessiki, and L. W. Lu. 1999. “Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast frames.” PCI J. 44 (3): 54–88. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.54.71.
FEMA. 2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2011. Accelerated bridge construction: Experience in design, fabrication and excretion of pre-fabricated elements and systems. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2013. Post-tensioning tendon installation and grouting manual. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Finnson, G. 2013. “Unbonded pre-tensioned bridge columns with hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete shells.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Guerrini, G., J. I. Restrepo, M. Massari, and A. Vervelidis. 2015a. “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.
Guerrini, G., J. I. Restrepo, A. Vervelidis, and M. Massari. 2015b. Self-centering precast concrete dual-steel-shell columns for accelerated bridge construction: Seismic performance, analysis, and design. Berkley, CA: Univ. of California.
Hewes, J. 2007. “Seismic tests on precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded tendons.” Bridge Struct. 3 (3): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480701520352.
Hewes, J. T., and M. J. N. Priestley. 2002. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge column. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Kawashima, K. 1997. “Japanese seismic design specifications of highway bridges and the performance based design.” In Proc., Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Makris, N., and Y. Roussos. 1998. Rocking response and overturning of equipment under horizontal pulse-type motions. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Mander, J. B., and C. T. Cheng. 1997. Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design. New York: Univ. at Buffalo.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. 2009. “Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857.
Marriott, D., S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. 2011. “Biaxial testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (15): 1723–1741. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1112.
Mashal, M., and A. Palermo. 2019. “Low-damage seismic design for accelerated bridge construction.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001406.
Mashal, M., A. Palermo, and Z. Chegini. 2014. “Quasi-static cyclic tests of half-scale fully precast bridge bents incorporating emulative and post-tensioned low damage solutions.” In Proc., 2nd European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Istanbul, Turkey: European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Motaref, S., M. S. Saiidi, and D. Sanders. 2014. “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518.
Moustafa, A., and M. A. Elgawady. 2018. “Shaking table testing of segmental hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (5): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001238.
New Zealand Concrete Society Inc. 2010. PRESS design handbook. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Concrete Society Inc.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2017. “Resilient bridge rocking columns with polyurethane damage-resistant end segments and replaceable energy-dissipating links.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001069.
Nikoukalam, M. T., and P. Sideris. 2019. “Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of polyurethanes for structural applications, accounting for damage, hysteresis, loading rate and long term effects.” Eng. Struct. 198 (3): 109462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109462.
Ou, Y.-C., M. Chiewanichakorn, A. J. Aref, and G. C. Lee. 2007. “Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636).
Ou, Y.-C., M.-S. Tsai, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2010a. “Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 (11): 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.986.
Ou, Y.-C., P.-H. Wang, M.-S. Tsai, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2010b. “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000110.
Palermo, A., and M. Mashal. 2012. “Accelerated bridge construction (ABC) and seismic damage resistant technology.” Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthquake Eng. 45 (3): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.45.3.123-134.
Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and G. M. Calvi. 2005. “Concept and development of hybrid solutions for seismic resistant bridge systems.” J. Earthquake Eng. 9 (6): 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350571.
Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and D. Marriott. 2007. “Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with post-tensioned dissipating connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (11): 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).
Pampanin, S. 2000. “Alternative design philosophies and seismic response of precast concrete buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Technical Univ. of Milan.
Parks, J. E., C. P. Pantelides, L. Ibarra, and D. Sanders. 2017. “Seismic anchorage of dry storage casks.” In Proc., 16th Word Conf. on Earthquake 16WCEE 2017, 135–138. Kanpur, India: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Parks, J. E., C. P. Pantelides, L. Ibarra, and D. H. Sanders. 2018. “Stretch length anchor bolts under combined tension and shear.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (5): 1317–1328. https://doi.org/10.14359/51702236.
Parks, J. E., C. P. Pantelides, L. Ibarra, and D. H. Sanders. 2020. “Cyclic tests and modeling of stretch length anchor bolt assemblies for dry storage casks.” ACI Struct. J. 117 (6): 225–236. https://doi.org/10.14359/51728072.
Priestley, M. J. N., and G. A. MacRae. 1996. “Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons.” PCI J. 41 (1): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011996.64.81.
Priestley, M. J. N., S. S. Sritharan, J. R. Conley, and S. Pampanin. 1999. “Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building.” PCI J. 44 (6): 42–67. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67.
Restrepo, J. I., and A. Rahman. 2007. “Seismic performance of self-centering structural walls incorporating energy dissipators.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (4): 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1560).
Restrepo, J. I., M. J. Tobolski, and E. E. Matsumoto. 2011. Development of a precast bent cap system for seismic regions. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Roh, H., and A. M. Reinhorn. 2010. “Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3394–3403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.013.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014a. “Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking posttensioned segmental bridge system.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (6): 04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000961.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2014b. “Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (10): 04014036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605.
Sideris, P., A. J. Aref, and A. Filiatrault. 2015. “Experimental seismic performance of a hybrid sliding-rocking bridge for various specimen configurations and seismic loading conditions.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (11): 04015009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000742.
Soules, J. G., R. E. Bachman, and J. F. Silva. 2016. Chile earthquake of 2010: Assessment of industrial facilities around Concepcion. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Stanton, J., W. C. Stone, and G. S. Cheok. 1997. “A hybrid reinforced precast frame for seismic regions.” PCI J. 42 (2): 20–23. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011997.20.23.
Thonstad, T., I. M. Mantawy, J. F. Stanton, M. O. Eberhard, and D. H. Sanders. 2016. “Shaking table performance of a new bridge system with pretensioned rocking columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 04015079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000867.
Trautner, C., T. Hutchinson, M. Copellini, P. Grosser, R. Bachman, and J. Silva. 2017. “Developing ductility using concrete anchorage.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (1): 101–112. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689152.
Trautner, C., T. Hutchinson, P. Grosser, and J. Silva. 2016. “Effects of detailing on the cyclic behavior of steel baseplate connections designed to promote anchor yielding.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001361.
Trautner, C. A., T. C. Hutchinson, and P. R. Grosser. 2014. “Cyclic behavior of structural base plate connections with ductile fastening failure: Component test results.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Trono, W. D. 2014. “Earthquake resilient bridge columns utilizing damage resistant hybrid fiber reinforced concrete.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Upadhyay, A., and C. P. Pantelides. 2020. “Seismic performance assessment of bridges with post-tensioned concrete column bents.” In Proc. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Annual Meeting. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Upadhyay, A., C. P. Pantelides, and L. Ibarra. 2019. “Residual drift mitigation for bridges retrofitted with buckling restrained braces or self-centering energy dissipation devices.” Eng. Struct. 199 (2): 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109663.
Wang, J.-C., Y.-C. Ou, K.-C. Chang, and G. C. Lee. 2008. “Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (12): 1449–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.824.
White, S. 2014. “Controlled damage rocking systems for accelerated bridge construction.” MS thesis, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
White, S., and A. Palermo. 2016. “Quasi-static testing of posttensioned nonemulative column-footing connections for bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000872.
Yamashita, R., and D. H. Sanders. 2009. “Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (6): 821–830. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663183.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Jun 22, 2020
Accepted: Jun 4, 2021
Published online: Aug 6, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dipendra Thapa, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-3488. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Development of a Novel Anchorage System for Shape Memory Alloy Bars in Self-Centering Structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12480, 150, 5, (2024).
  • Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Post-Tensioned Concrete Columns Reinforced with Steel–GFRP Bars and GFRP Spirals, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6715, 29, 8, (2024).
  • Cyclic Tests and Analysis of Corroded Precast Concrete Column-to-Footing Connections Constructed with Accelerated Bridge Construction Methods, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6632, 29, 6, (2024).
  • Enhanced Strategies for Seismic Resilient Posttensioned Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers: Experimental Tests and Numerical Simulations, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11831, 149, 3, (2023).
  • Numerical Modeling of Column Piers with Recessed Spliced Sleeves and Intentional Debonding for Accelerated Bridge Construction, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11769, 149, 3, (2023).
  • Shake Table Tests on RC Double-Column Bridge Piers with Self-Centering Energy Dissipation Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6069, 28, 8, (2023).
  • Seismic Analysis of Posttensioned and Hybrid Bridge Bents with Buckling Restrained Braces, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5764, 28, 2, (2023).
  • Performance of a seismic-resilient precast segmental column with UHPC segments and CFRP tendon, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115833, 282, (115833), (2023).
  • Cyclic load tests and finite element modeling of self-centering hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 10.1016/j.aej.2023.03.001, 70, (301-314), (2023).
  • State-of-the-art review of the seismic performance of precast segmental columns, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00058-x, 3, 1, (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share