Abstract

Developing a reliable, cost-effective liquefaction triggering procedure for characterizing the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils based on in situ penetration testing has always been a great challenge for geotechnical engineers and researchers. Typical correlations based on the standard penetration test (SPT) and the cone penetration test (CPT) are affected by large-size gravel particles, which can lead to erroneous results. The Becker Penetration Test, well known for gravelly soil characterization, is cost-prohibitive for routine projects and is not available in most of the world. With a cone diameter of 74 mm the Chinese dynamic cone penetration test (DPT) is superior to smaller penetrometers and can be economically performed with conventional drilling equipment. DPT has previously been directly correlated to field performance data, and probabilistic liquefaction resistance curves were developed based on one earthquake and geologic environment in China; however, the use of these data in other tectonic and geologic environments was not validated. In this study, 137 data points from 10 different earthquakes and different depositional environments in seven countries have been used to develop probabilistic liquefaction resistance curves. The data set was expanded by performing DPT soundings at sites around the world where gravelly soil did or did not liquefy in past earthquakes. Based on the expanded DPT database, a new set of magnitude-dependent probabilistic triggering curves has been developed using logistic regression analysis. The new triggering curves are better constrained by data and the spread between the 85% and 15% probability curves is reduced. Liquefaction resistance is shifted upward at lower DPT values. A new magnitude scaling factor (MSF) curve has also been developed specifically for gravel liquefaction which was found to be consistent with previous curves for sand.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These data include electronic versions of the gravel liquefaction database listed in Table S1.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by Grant No. G16AP00108 from the US Geological Survey Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program, Grant Nos. CMMI-1663288 and CMMI-1663546 from the National Science Foundation, and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 51968015. This funding is gratefully acknowledged. However, the opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the sponsors. We are grateful to Gerhart-Cole, Inc. for donating the PDA equipment used in this study. We also express sincere appreciation to Tiffany Krall, Professor Misko Cubrinovski, and Rick Wentz for arranging access for DPT testing at Centreport in Wellington, New Zealand; to David Hemstreet and Tim Weiss at the Alaska DOT for providing drilling equipment and access to sites for DPT testing in Alaska; Professor Kevin Franke and Donald Anderson for arranging a DPT test in Japan; Luca Minerelli for help in arranging access for DPT testing at sites in Italy; and to Professor George Athanasopoulos for arranging access for DPT testing at sites in Cephalonia, Greece.

References

Andrus, R. D. 1994. “In situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe. 1997. Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity: Report to the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance (9/18/97 version). Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. ASTM D6951/D6951M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., D. Zekkos, K. M. Rollins, J. Hubler, J. Higbee, and A. Platis. 2019. “Earthquake performance and characterization of gravel-size earthfills in the ports of Cephalonia, Greece, following the 2014 Earthquakes.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering: Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, edited by F. Silvestri and N. Moraci, 1212–1219. Rome: Associazione Geotecnica Italiana.
Baratta, M. 1910. La Catastrofe Sismica Calabro-Messinese (28 dicembre 1908). Roma: Società Geografica Italiana.
Bardet, J. P., K. O. Cetin, W. Lettis, E. Rathje, G. Rau, R. B. Seed, and D. Ural. 2000. “Chapter 7. Soil liquefaction, landslides and subsidence.” Earthquake Spectra 16: 141–162.
Bindi, D., F. Pacor, L. Luzi, R. Puglia, M. Massa, G. Ameri, and R. Paolucci. 2011. “Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9 (6): 1899–1920.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2015. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
BSI (British Standard Institution). 2012. Geotechnical investigation and testing: Field testing: Part 2: Dynamic probing. BS EN ISO 22476-2:2005+A1:2011. London: BSI.
Cao, Z., K. M. Rollins, X. Yuan, T. L. Youd, M. Talbot, J. Roy, and S. Amoroso. 2019. “Applicability and reliability of CYY formula based on Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils.” Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 41 (9): 1628–1635. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201601018.
Cao, Z., T. L. Youd, and X. Yuan. 2011. “Gravelly soils that liquefied during 2008 Wenchuan, China Earthquake, Ms = 8.0.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (8): 1132–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.001.
Cao, Z., T. L. Youd, and X. Yuan. 2013. “Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation in gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1320–1333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000857.
Cao, Z., X. Yuan, T. L. Youd, and K. M. Rollins. 2012. “Chinese dynamic penetration tests (DPT) at liquefaction sites following 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, 1499–1504. London: Taylor & Francis.
Chen, L., X. Yuan, Z. Cao, R. Sun, W. Wang, and H. Liu. 2018. “Characteristics and triggering conditions for naturally deposited gravelly soils that liquefied following the 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake, China.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (3): 1091–1111.
Chinese Design Code. 2001. Design code for building foundation of Chengdu region. [In Chinese.]. Chengdu, China: Administration of Quality and Technology.
Chu, B. L., S. C. Hsu, S. E. Lai, and M. J. Chang. 2000. Soil liquefaction potential assessment of the Wufeng Area after the 921 Chi-Chi earthquake. [In Chinese.]. Taipei, Taiwan: National Research Council of Taiwan.
Coulter, H. W., and R. R. Migliaccio. 1966. Effect of the Earthquake of March 22, 1964 at Valdez, Alaska. Washington, DC: USGS.
Cubrinovski, M., J. Bray, C. de la Torre, M. Olsen, B. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, and L. Wotherspoon. 2017. “Liquefaction effects and associated damages observed at the Wellington CentrePort from the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 50 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.152-173.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, C. Christopher de la Torre, M. Olsen, B. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, L. Wotherspoon, and T. Krall. 2018. “Liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamations at CentrePort, Wellington.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108 (3B): 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170246.
Daniel, C. R., J. A. Howie, and A. Sy. 2003. “A method for correlating large penetration test (LPT) to standard penetration test (SPT) blow counts.” Can. Geotech. J. 40 (1): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-094.
DeJong, J. T., M. Ghafghazi, A. P. Sturm, D. W. Wilson, J. den Dulk, R. J. Armstrong, A. Perez, and C. A. Davis. 2017. “Instrumented Becker penetration test. I: Equipment, operation, and performance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001717.
DeJong, J. T., A. P. Sturm, and M. Ghafghazi. 2016. “Characterization of gravelly alluvium.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 91 (Dec): 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.032.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, J. Bray, and C. de la Torre. 2020. “Liquefaction assessment of reclaimed land at Centreport, Wellington.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 53 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.53.1.1-12.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, C. de la Torre, and J. Bray. 2019. “Site characterization for liquefaction assessment of gravelly reclamations at CentrePort, Wellington.” In Vol. 20 of Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, edited by F. Silvestri and N. Moraci, 2102–2110. Rome: Italian Geotechnical Association.
Franke, K. W., and K. M. Rollins. 2017. “Lateral spread displacement and bridge foundation case histories from the 1991 M7.6 Earthquake near Limón, Costa Rica.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (6): 05017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001653.
Ghafghazi, M., J. T. DeJong, A. P. Sturm, and C. E. Temple. 2017. “Instrumented Becker penetration test. II: iBPT-SPT correlation for characterization and liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001718.
Gibbs, H. J., and W. C. Holtz. 1957. “Research on determing the density of sands by spoon penetration testing.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 4th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 35. New York: LexisNexis.
Golesorkhi, R. 1989. “Factors influencing the computation determination of earthquake-induced shear stresses in sandy soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of California-Berkeley.
Harder, L. F., and H. B. Seed. 1986. Determination of penetration resistance for coarse-grained soils using the Becker hammer drill. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Hazen, A. 1911. “Discussion of ‘Dams on Sand Foundations by A.C. Koenig’.” Trans. ASCE 73 (11): 199–203.
Hubler, J., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2017. “Monotonic, cyclic and post-cyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001723.
Hubler, J., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2018. “Monotonic and cyclic simple shear response of gravel-sand mixtures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.016.
Idriss, I. M. 1999. “An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential.” In Proc., TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction, Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-165. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1985. “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., 321–376. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema.
Kayen, R., R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. D. Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity–based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Kociu, S. 2004. “Induced seismic impacts observed in coast area of Albania: Case studies.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Kokusho, T., Y. Tanaka, K. Kudo, and T. Kawai. 1995. “Liquefaction case study of volcanic gravel layer during 1993 Hokkaido-Nansei-Oki earthquake.” In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances on Soil Dynamics and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (St. Louis), 235–242. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Kokusho, T., and Y. Yoshida. 1997. “SPT N-value and S-wave velocity for gravelly soils with different grain size distribution.” Soils Found. 37 (4): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.4_105.
Liao, S., and R. V. Whitman. 1986. “Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 112 (3): 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373).
Liao, S. S. C., D. Veneziano, and R. V. Whitman. 1988. “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 114 (4): 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:4(389).
Lin, P., C. Chang, and W. Chang. 2004. “Characterization of liquefaction resistance in gravelly soil: Large hammer penetration test and shear wave velocity approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (9–10): 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.010.
Lopez, S., X. Vera-Grunauer, K. Rollins, and G. Salvatierra. 2018. “Gravelly soil liquefaction after the 2016 Ecuador earthquake.” In Proc., Conf. on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V, 273–285. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Maurenbrecher, P. M., A. Den Outer, and H. J. Luger. 1995. “Review of geotechnical investigations resulting from the Roermond April 13, 1992 earthquake.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 645–652. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
McCulloch, D. S., and M. G. Bonilla. 1970. Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964, on the Alaska Railroad. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Morales, C., C. Ledezma, E. Saez, S. Boldrini, and K. M. Rollins. 2020. “Seismic failure of an old pier during the 2014 Mw 8.2, Pisagua, Chile earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (2): 880–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019891726.
Nikolaou, S., D. Zekkos, D. Assimaki, and R. Gilsanz. 2014. “GEER/EERI/ATC Earthquake Reconnaissance January 26th/February 2nd 2014 Cephalonia, Greece Events, Version 1.” Accessed August 5, 2021. https://www.geerassociation.org/index.php/component/geer_reports/?view=geerreports&id=32.
Pavlides, S., Y. Muceku, A. Chatzipetrow, G. Georgious, I. Lazos, A. Beqiraj, and H. Reçi. 2020. Preliminary report on the ground effects of the November 26, 2019, Albania earthquake Thessaloniki, Greece: Earthquake Geology Research Team, Dept. of Geology, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Rinehart, R., A. Brusak, and N. Potter. 2016. Liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly soils: State-of-the-Art Review. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Reclamation.
Rollins, K. M., S. Amoroso, G. Milan, L. Minerelli, M. Vassallo, and G. Di Giulio. 2020. “Gravel liquefaction assessment using the dynamic cone penetration test based on field performance from the 1976 Friuli earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (6): 04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002252.
Rollins, K. M., C. Ledezma, and G. Montalva, A. Becerra, G. Candia, D. Jara, K. Franke, and E. Saez. 2014. Geotechnical Aspects of April 1, 2014, M8.2 Iquique, Chile Earthquake. Atlanta: Georgia Tech Univ.
Rollins, K. M., M. W. Talbot, K. W. Franke, and S. Amoroso. 2018. Evaluation and optimization of dynamic cone penetration test (DPT) for deterministic and performance-based assessment of liquefaction in gravel. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey, External Research Program.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1982. Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph Series. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Seed, H. B., J. Lysmer, and P. P. Martin. 1976. “Pore-water pressure changes during soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. 102 (4): 323–346.
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1985. “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (12): 1425–1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Seed, R. B., et al. 2003. “Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A unified and consistent framework.” In Proc., 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
She, K., D. P. D. P. Horn, and P. Canning. 2006. “Porosity and hydraulic conductivity of mixed sand-gravel sediment.” In Proc., 41st Defra Conf. on Flood and Coastal Risk Management, 16. Wallingford, UK: Hydraulics Research Station.
Sirovich, L. 1996a. “In-situ testing of repeatedly liquefied gravels and liquefied overconsolidated sands.” Soils Found. 36 (4): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.4_35.
Sirovich, L. 1996b. “Repetitive liquefaction at gravelly site and liquefaction in overconsolidated sands.” Soils Found. 36 (4): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.4_23.
Sy, A. 1997. “Twentieth Canadian geotechnical colloquium: Recent developments in the Becker penetration test: 1986–1996.” Can. Geotech. J. 34 (6): 952–973. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-066.
Talbot, M. A. 2018. Dynamic cone penetration test for liquefaction evaluation of gravelly soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Brigham Young Univ.
Tatsuoka, F., J. Koseki, and A. Takahashi. 2017. “Earthquake-induced damage to earth structures and proposal for revision of their design policy—Based on a case history of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake.” J. JSCE 5 (1): 101–112. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.5.1_101.
Tokimatsu, K., and Y. Yoshimi. 1983. “Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content.” Soils Found. 23 (4): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.23.4_56.
Wang, W. S. 1984. “Earthquake damages to earth dams and levees in relation to soil liquefaction and weakness in soft clays.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Case Histories Geotech. Eng., 511–521. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Worden, C. B., D. J. Wald, T. I. Allen, K. Lin, and G. Cua. 2010. “Integration of macroseismic and strong-motion earthquake data in ShakeMap for real-time and historic earthquake analysis.” Accessed August 5, 2021. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/.
Yegian, M. K., V. G. Ghahraman, and R. N. Harutiunyan. 1994. “Liquefaction and embankment failure case histories, 1988 Armenia earthquake.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (3): 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:3(581).
Youd, T. L., et al. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
Youd, T. L., E. L. Harp, D. K. Keefer, and R. C. Wilson. 1985. “The Borah Peak, Idaho Earthquake of October 29, 1983-Liquefaction.” Earthquake Spectra 2 (1): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585303.
Youd, T. L., and S. N. Hoose. 1978. Historic ground failures in Northern California triggered by earthquakes. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (4): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Youd, T. L., and S. K. Noble. 1997. “Liquefaction criteria based on statistical and probabilistic analyses.” In Vol. 22 of Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, NCEER Technical Rep. No: NCEER-97, 201–205. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Jan 8, 2021
Accepted: Jul 28, 2021
Published online: Sep 20, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., 430 Engineering Bldg., Provo, UT 84602 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-6619. Email: [email protected]
Jashod Roy, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., 430 Engineering Bldg., Provo, UT 84602. Email: [email protected]
Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 760 Davis Hall, Berkeley 94720-1710, CA. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 760 Davis Hall, Berkeley 94720-1710, CA. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-3362. Email: [email protected]
Sara Amoroso [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Engineering and Geology, Univ. of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro, 42, Pescara 65129, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Zhenzhong Cao [email protected]
Professor, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin Univ. of Technology, Guilin 541004, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • The Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Performance of Embankment Systems Constructed with Different Sand Gradations, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11501, 149, 10, (2023).
  • Correlation between Shear-Wave Velocity and Dynamic Cone Resistance for Gravelly Soil, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11254, 149, 9, (2023).
  • A Comparative Study of the DPT and CPT in Evaluating Liquefaction Potential for Gravelly Soil at the Port of Wellington, New Zealand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10769, 149, 11, (2023).
  • Improving soil liquefaction prediction through an extensive database and innovative ground motion characterization: A case study of Port Island liquefied site, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107696, 165, (107696), (2023).
  • Explainable machine learning model for liquefaction potential assessment of soils using XGBoost-SHAP, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107662, 165, (107662), (2023).
  • Effect of hydraulic conductivity and impeded drainage on the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 10.1139/cgj-2021-0579, 59, 11, (1950-1968), (2022).
  • Evaluating the applicability of conventional CPT-based liquefaction assessment procedures to reclaimed gravelly soils, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107176, 155, (107176), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share