A Comparative Study of the DPT and CPT in Evaluating Liquefaction Potential for Gravelly Soil at the Port of Wellington, New Zealand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 11
Abstract
Characterizing gravelly soil using in situ penetration testing procedures is a significant challenge for geotechnical engineers. The interaction between the penetrometer and large gravel particles can obscure the penetration resistance of the soil matrix, which is the target of the investigation, and lead to significant uncertainty regarding the properties of the soil. Hence, the size of the probe relative to the maximum particle size of the soil matrix is an important factor to consider when performing interpreting and penetration tests. In this respect, the standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT) can have potential issues in measuring the penetration resistance in certain cases depending on the size and percentage of gravel particles. Recently, the Chinese dynamic cone penetration test (DPT) consisting of a larger-diameter probe with higher hammer energy has been used to develop probabilistic liquefaction triggering curves for gravelly soil. In the present study, an instructive comparison is presented between the performance of the DPT and CPT in evaluating the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils based on in situ testing at the port of Wellington in New Zealand. Gravelly reclamation fill at the port liquefied during the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake, but only limited parts of the same fill deposits manifested liquefaction during the Cook Strait and Lake Grassmere earthquakes that occurred in 2013. Triggering analyses have been performed using both DPT- and CPT-based triggering procedures to estimate the potential for liquefaction in these gravelly deposits for these three earthquake events. The CPT-based cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) profiles showed several intermittent spikes with depth due to the interaction of the small-diameter cone with large gravel particles. However, the lower range of values excluding the spikes in the CPT-based CRR profiles primarily governed the liquefaction potential of the reclamation fill, and they are in good agreement with the DPT-based CRR profiles. Both the CPT and DPT-based triggering analyses successfully estimated liquefaction manifestation during the Kaikōura event, some liquefaction manifestation during the Cook Strait event and very limited manifestation during the Lake Grassmere event, which is largely consistent with observations.
Practical Applications
This case history clearly shows that sandy gravel can liquefy. In this case, the sand content was high enough () to fill the pore space and reduce the permeability so that it could liquefy. For sandy gravel at Centerport, New Zealand, with (50% finer particle size) between 3 and 10 mm, the ratio of to penetrometer diameter () would occasionally exceed 33% to 50% for the CPT, and some artificial increase in penetration resistance would be expected. In contrast, the to ratio for the DPT would not exceed 15%, and gravel particles would not affect the DPT blow count. This assessment is borne out in the comparison between the CRR from the CPT and DPT. For example, the CRRs from the DPT were relatively constant in the sandy gravel, whereas the CRRs from the CPT showed several spikes with depth, but were otherwise consistent with those from the DPT. In some cases, the CPT cannot penetrate layers with larger or denser gravel particles. The DPT cannot identify nonliquefiable cohesive layers; therefore, samples from a companion borehole are needed to identify them. The good agreement between the CRRs from the CPT and DPT for three earthquakes confirmed the reliability of these two independently developed methods.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These data include electronic versions of DPT profile and DPT-based liquefaction resistance profiles.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by Grant G16AP00108 from the USGS Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program and Grant CMMI-1663546 from the National Science Foundation. This funding is gratefully acknowledged. However, the opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the sponsors. We also express sincere appreciation to Tiffany Krall and Rick Wentz for arranging access for DPT testing at Centerport in Wellington, New Zealand.
References
Andrus, R. D. 1994. “In situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., D. Zekkos, K. M. Rollins, J. Hubler, J. Higbee, and A. Platis. 2019. “Earthquake performance and characterization of gravel-size earthfills in the ports of Cephalonia, Greece, following the 2014 Earthquakes.” In Proc., 7th Intl. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, 1212–1219. London: Taylor and Francis.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Bradley, B. A., H. N. Razafindrakoto, and V. Polak. 2017. “Ground-motion observations from the 14 November 2016 Kaikōura, New Zealand, earthquake and insights from broadband simulations.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 88 (3): 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160225.
Bradley, B. A., L. M. Wotherspoon, A. E. Kaiser, B. R. Cox, and S. Jeong. 2018. “Influence of site effects on observed ground motions in the wellington region from the Kaikōura, New Zealand Earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108 (3B): 1722–1735. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170286.
Bray, J. D., J. D. Zupan, M. Cubrinovski, and M. Taylor. 2014. “CPT-based liquefaction assessments in Christchurch, New Zealand. In Proc., CPT’14: 3rd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, 13–14. Las Vegas: Organizing Committee of International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing.
Cao, Z., T. Youd, and X. Yuan. 2013. “Chinese dynamic penetration test for liquefaction evaluation in gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1320–1333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000857.
Cao, Z., T. L. Youd, and X. Yuan. 2011. “Gravelly soils that liquefied during 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake, .” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (8): 1132–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.001.
Chowdhury, K., E. Dawson, P. E. Camilo Alvarez, and R. B. Seed. 2021. “An end bearing method for evaluating instrumented Becker penetration test data for site characterization.” In Proc., USSD Annual Conf. Aurora, CO: United States Society on Dams.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, C. de la Torre, M. Olsen, B. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, L. Wotherspoon, and T. Krall. 2018. “Liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamations at Centerport, Wellington liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamations at Centerport, Wellington.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108 (3B): 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170246.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, C. De La Torre, M. J. Olsen, B. A. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, and L. Wotherspoon. 2017. “Liquefaction effects and associated damages observed at the Wellington Centerport from the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 50 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.152-173.
DeJong, J. T., M. Ghafghazi, A. P. Sturm, D. W. Wilson, J. den Dulk, R. J. Armstrong, A. Perez, and C. A. Davis. 2017. “Instrumented Becker penetration test. I: Equipment, operation, and performance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017062 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001717.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, J. Bray, and C. de la Torre. 2020a. “Liquefaction assessment of reclaimed land at Centerport, Wellington.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 53 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.53.1.1-12.
Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, and J. D. Bray. 2020b. “Geotechnical characterization and liquefaction evaluation of gravelly reclamations and hydraulic fills (Port of Wellington, New Zealand).” Soils Found. 60 (6): 1507–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.10.001.
Green, R. A., M. Cubrinovski, B. Cox, C. Wood, L. Wotherspoon, B. Bradley, and B. Maurer. 2014. “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1193/030713EQS066M.
Harder, L. F. 1997. “Application of the Becker penetration test for evaluating the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils.” In Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Holden, C., A. Kaiser, R. Van Dissen, and R. Jury. 2013. “Sources, ground motion and structural response characteristics in Wellington of the 2013 Cook Strait earthquakes.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 46 (4): 188–195. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.4.188-195.
Iqbal, M. S., P. K. Robertson, and D. C. Sego. 2004. Discrete element modeling of cone penetration testing in coarse grain soils. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Univ. of Alberta.
Japanese Geotechnical Society. 1996. “Geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake.” In Soils and foundations, Special Issue No. 1. Tokyo: Japanese Geotechnical Society.
Kokusho, T., and Y. Yoshida. 1997. “SPT N-value and S-wave velocity for gravelly soils with different grain size distribution.” Soils Found. 37 (4): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.4_105.
Lopez, S., X. Vera-Grunauer, K. Rollins, and G. Salvatierra. 2018. “Gravelly soil liquefaction after the 2016 Ecuador Earthquake.” In Proc., Conf. on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V, 273–285. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Morales, C., C. Ledezma, E. Sáez, S. Boldrini, and K. Rollins. 2020. “Seismic failure of an old pier during the 2014 Mw8.2, Pisagua, Chile earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (2): 880–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019891726.
Morris, G., B. Bradley, A. Walker, and T. Matushka. 2013. “Ground motion and damage observations in the Marlborough region from the 2013 Lake Grassmere earthquake.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 46 (4): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.4.169-187.
Rhinehart, R., A. Brusak, and N. Potter. 2016. Liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly soils: State-of-the-art review. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Reclamation.
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Rollins, K. M., S. Amoroso, G. Milan, L. Minerelli, M. Vassallo, and G. Di Giulio. 2020. “Gravel liquefaction assessment using the dynamic cone penetration test based on field performance from the 1976 Friuli earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviro. Eng. 146 (6): 04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002252.
Rollins, K. M., J. Roy, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, D. Zekkos, S. Amoroso, and Z. Cao. 2021. “New dynamic cone penetration test (DPT)-based procedure for liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (12): 04021141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002686.
Roy, J., and K. M. Rollins. 2022. “Effect of hydraulic conductivity and impeded drainage on the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (11): 1950–1968. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0579.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Seed, H. B., P. P. Martin, and J. Lysmer. 1976. “The generation and dissipation of pore water pressure changes during soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 102 (4): 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000258.
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1985. “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (12): 1425–1445.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Semmens, S., G. D. Dellow, and N. D. Perrin. 2010. It’s our fault–Geological and geotechnical characterization of the Wellington Central Business District,. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences.
Sy, A., and R. G. Campanella. 1994. “Becker and standard penetration tests (BPT–SPT) correlations with consideration of casing friction.” Can. Geotech. J. 31 (3): 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-042.
Tokimatsu, K. 1988. “Penetration tests for dynamic problems.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Penetration Testing; ISOPT-1, 117–136. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2006. Harbor Quays development factual geotechnical report. Auckland, New Zealand: Tonkin & Taylor.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2012. Thorndon container wharf seismic assessment geotechnical factual report. Auckland, New Zealand: Tonkin & Taylor.
Tonkin & Taylor. 2014. Thorndon container wharf seismic assessment geotechnical interpretive report. Auckland, New Zealand: Tonkin & Taylor.
Van Dissen, R., et al. 2013. “Landslides and liquefaction generated by the Cook Strait and Lake Grassmere earthquakes: A reconnaissance report.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 46 (4): 196–200. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.46.4.196-200.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 1, 2022
Accepted: Jul 3, 2023
Published online: Aug 31, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Comparative studies
- Dynamic tests
- Engineering fundamentals
- Field tests
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydraulic structures
- Laboratory tests
- Methodology (by type)
- Penetration tests
- Ports and harbors
- Research methods (by type)
- Sandy soils
- Soil liquefaction
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Soils (by type)
- Tests (by type)
- Water and water resources
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.