Technical Papers
Jul 27, 2023

The Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Performance of Embankment Systems Constructed with Different Sand Gradations

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 10

Abstract

A broad range of coarse-grained soils that vary in gradation uniformities, maximum particle sizes, and absolute densities are prone to liquefaction during earthquake shaking. However, clean, poorly graded sands form much of the liquefaction case-history database, with these soils often serving as the basis for analysis procedures. This paper presents a centrifuge testing program studying if the liquefaction triggering and deformation performance of embankment systems constructed with poorly graded sands universally applies to well-graded soils. Two soils were used in this study, named 100A and 25ABCD, had variations in maximum particle sizes, coefficients of uniformity (Cu), and void ratio extremes. Dense arrays of in-situ porewater pressure transducers and accelerometers indicate that liquefaction was triggered at near unity in the different soils. The 25ABCD soil, with its larger Cu and lower void ratio indices, exhibited stronger dilative tendencies, better preservation of the long period energy of the input motion, and more rapid dissipation of excess porewater pressures. The 25ABCD embankments had lower overall levels of strain at initial liquefaction triggering and accumulated less strain during cyclic mobility. While the two soils were pluviated to the same relative density and subjected to the same level of shaking, the slope surface displacements in the 25ABCD embankments were 60%–70% less than the displacements measured in the comparable 100A embankments. These results support the hypothesis that liquefaction and deformation behaviors depend on soil gradation, and findings from this experimental program can be leveraged for more accurate performance predictions of levees and earthen dams.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw and processed data generated during this study is available via NEHRI DesignSafe-CI in the following database (PRJ-3224). The CGM data reports by Carey et al. (2021b, 2022b) provide summary figures for all sensors and shaking events for each centrifuge model test. The Python processing code generated or used during this study is available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded this work under Grant No. CMMI-1916152 and provided financial support through the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) for the shared use centrifuge facility at the University of California at Davis under Grant No. CMMI-1520581. The authors would also like to thank Professors Alejandro Martinez and Katerina Ziotopoulou, Drs. Daniel Wilson, Anna Chiaradonna, Francisco Humire, Sheikh Sharif Ahmed, Ms. Rachel Reardon, and Mr. Mandeep Singh Basson, for their help with centrifuge testing, insights during data processing, and recommendations during the development of this manuscript. The assistance of the staff at the UC Davis CGM is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

Adalier, K., and A. Elgamal. 2004. “Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns.” Eng. Geol. 72 (3–4): 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.11.001.
Andrus, R. 1994. In situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe II. 2000. “liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
Arulanandan, K., and R. Scott, eds. 1993. “Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
Ashford, S. A., K. M. Rollins, and J. D. Lane. 2004. “Blast-induced liquefaction for full-scale foundation testing.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(798).
ASTM. 2017. Practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. Stringer. 2018. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jun): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures, 138. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2015. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Boulanger, R. W., M. W. Meyers, L. H. Mejia, and I. M. Idriss. 1998. “Behavior of a fine-grained soil during the Loma Prieta earthquake.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (1): 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-078.
Brandenberg, S. J., D. W. Wilson, and M. M. Rashid. 2010. “Weighted residual numerical differentiation algorithm applied to experimental bending moment data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (6): 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000277.
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2017. “6th Ishihara lecture: Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102 (Aug): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.026.
Bray, J. D., and F. R. Olaya. 2022. “Examination of the volumetric strain potential of liquefied soil with a database of laboratory tests.” In Geo-Congress 2022: Geophysical and Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Geotechnical Special Publication 334, edited by A. Lemnitzer and A. W. Stuedlein, 495–505. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Cao, Z., T. Leslie Youd, and X. Yuan. 2011. “Gravelly soils that liquefied during 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake, Ms = 8.0.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (8): 1132–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.001.
Carey, T., N. Love, D. Wilson, and J. DeJong. 2023. “Multi-sensor data fusion procedure for composite time history measurements in physical models.” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech.
Carey, T. J., A. Chiaradonna, N. Love, J. T. DeJong, and K. Ziotopoulou. 2021a. The effect of gradation on the response of saturated sands when subjected to seismic loading: A centrifuge test. Niagara Falls, ON, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Carey, T. J., A. Chiaradonna, N. C. Love, J. T. DeJong, K. Ziotopoulou, and A. Martinez. 2021b. Effect of soil gradation on the response of a submerged slope when subjected to shaking–centrifuge data report for TJC01, 80. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Carey, T. J., A. Chiaradonna, N. C. Love, D. W. Wilson, K. Ziotopoulou, A. Martinez, and J. T. DeJong. 2022a. “Effect of soil gradation on embankment response during liquefaction: A centrifuge testing program.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 157 (Aug): 107221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107221.
Carey, T. J., and B. L. Kutter. 2022. “Validation of models used to predict the effects of lateral spreading by comparison of experimental and numerical response surfaces.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 163 (Aug): 107379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107379.
Carey, T. J., N. C. Love, J. T. DeJong, K. Ziotopoulou, and A. Martinez. 2022b. Effect of soil gradation on the response of a submerged slope when subjected to shaking—Centrifuge data report for TJC02, 67. Davis, CA: Univ. of California, Davis.
Chapuis, R. P. 2021. “Analyzing grain size distributions with the modal decomposition method: Literature review and procedures.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80 (9): 6649–6666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02328-w.
Coulter, H. W., and R. R. Migliaccio. 1966. Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964, at Valdez, Alaska. Reston, VA: USGS.
Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, C. De La Torre, M. J. Olsen, B. A. Bradley, G. Chiaro, E. Stocks, and L. Wotherspoon. 2017. “Liquefaction effects and associated damages observed at the Wellington CentrePort from the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 50 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.50.2.152-173.
Evans, M. D., and S. Zhou. 1995. “Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (3): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:3(287).
Garnier, J., C. Gaudin, S. M. Springman, P. J. Culligan, D. Goodings, D. Konig, B. Kutter, R. Phillips, M. F. Randolph, and L. Thorel. 2007. “Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modeling.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 7 (3): 01–23. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070301.
Gerolymos, N., and G. Gazetas. 2005. “Constitutive model for 1-D cyclic soil behaviour applied to seismic analysis of layered deposits.” Soils Found. 45 (3): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.3_147.
Ghafghazi, M., and J. T. DeJong. 2016. A review of liquefaction case histories in gravelly soils using SPT-based triggering curves, 8. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Hatanaka, M., A. Uchida, and J. Ohara. 1997. “Liquefaction characteristics of A gravelly fill liquefied during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake.” Soils Found. 37 (3): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.3_107.
Horikoshi, K., A. Tateishi, and T. Fujiwara. 1998. “Centrifuge modeling of a single pile subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading.” Soils Found. 38 (May): 193–208. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.Special_193.
Howell, R., E. M. Rathje, R. Kamai, and R. Boulanger. 2012. “Centrifuge modeling of prefabricated vertical drains for liquefaction remediation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (3): 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000604.
Hubler, J. F., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2018. “Monotonic and cyclic simple shear response of gravel-sand mixtures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Aug): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.016.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K., and M. Yoshimine. 1992. “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
Kamai, R., and R. Boulanger. 2009. “Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analyses of instrumentation arrays.” In Meso-scale shear physics in earthquake and landslide mechanics, edited by I. Vardoulakis, 219–238. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kokusho, T., T. Hara, and R. Hiraoka. 2004. “Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (6): 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:6(621).
Kokusho, T., Y. Tanaka, K. Kudo, and T. Kawai. 1995. “Liquefaction case study of volcanic gravel layer during 1993 Hokkaido-Nansei-Oki Earthquake.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 9. St. Louis: Univ. of Missouri—Rolla.
Kutter, B. L. 1992. “Dynamic centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1336 (Oct): 24–30.
Kutter, B. L. 1995. Recent advances in centrifuge modeling of seismic shaking, 927–942. St. Louis: Univ. of Missouri—Rolla.
Kutter, B. L., et al. 2018. “LEAP-GWU-2015 experiment specifications, results, and comparisons.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Feb): 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.018.
Kutter, B. L., et al. 2020a. “LEAP-UCD-2017 V. 1.01 model specifications.” In Model tests numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading, edited by B. L. Kutter, M. T. Manzari, and M. Zeghal, 3–29. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Kutter, B. L., M. T. Manzari, and M. Zeghal. 2020b. Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading. Berlin: Springer.
Kutter, B. L., and D. W. Wilson. 1999. “De-liquefaction shock waves.” In Proc., 7th US–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures against Soil Liquefaction, 295–310. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo.
Lin, P.-S., C.-W. Chang, and W.-J. Chang. 2004. “Characterization of liquefaction resistance in gravelly soil: Large hammer penetration test and shear wave velocity approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (9–10): 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.010.
Manzari, M. T., et al. 2018. “Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP): Summary of observations from the planning phase.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Aug): 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015.
McCulloch, D. S., and M. G. Bonilla. 1970. Effects of the earthquake of March 27, 1964, on the Alaska railroad. Reston, VA: USGS.
Moss, R. E., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
Nagase, H., and K. Ishihara. 1988. “Liquefaction-induced compaction and settlement of sand during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 28 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.65.
Pires-Sturm, A. P., and J. T. DeJong. 2022. “Influence of particle size and gradation on liquefaction potential and dynamic response.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (6): 04022045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002799.
Robertson, P. K., et al. 2000. “The CANLEX project: Summary and conclusions.” Can. Geotech. J. 37 (3): 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-046.
Rollins, K. M., J. Roy, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, D. Zekkos, S. Amoroso, and Z. Cao. 2021. “A new dynamic cone penetration test–based procedure for liquefaction triggering assessment of gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (12): 04021141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002686.
Rollins, K. M., J. Roy, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, D. Zekkos, S. Amoroso, Z. Cao, G. Milana, M. Vassallo, and G. Di Giulio. 2022. “A new Vs-based liquefaction-triggering procedure for gravelly soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (6): 04022040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002784.
Roy, J., and K. M. Rollins. 2022. “Effect of hydraulic conductivity and impeded drainage on the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (11): 1950–1968. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0579.
Ruttithivaphanich, P., and I. Sasanakul. 2022. “Liquefaction evaluation of a gravel-sand mixture using centrifuge tests.” In Geo-Congress 2022: Geophysical and Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Geotechnical Special Publication 334, edited by A. Lemnitzer and A. W. Stuedlein, 288–296. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Santamarina, J. C. 2003. “Soil behavior at the microscale: Particle forces.” In Soil behavior and soft ground construction, 25–56. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., I. M. Idriss, and I. Arango. 1983. “Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data.” J. Geotech. Eng. 109 (3): 458–482. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:3(458).
Seed, H. B., K. L. Lee, I. M. Idriss, and F. I. Makdisi. 1975. “The slides in the san fernando dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101 (7): 651–688. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000178.
Siddiqi, F. 1984. “Strength evaluation of cohesionless soil with oversize particles.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis.
Stanier, S. A., J. Blaber, W. A. Take, and D. J. White. 2016. “Improved image-based deformation measurement for geotechnical applications.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (5): 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0253.
Sturm, A. 2019. “On the liquefaction potential of gravelly soils: Characterization, triggering and performance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis.
Vaid, Y. P., J. M. Fisher, R. H. Kuerbis, and D. Negussey. 1990. “Particle gradation and liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (4): 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:4(698).
White, D. J., W. A. Take, and M. D. Bolton. 2003. “Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry.” Géotechnique 53 (7): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.619.
Whitman, R. V. 1971. “Resistance of soil to liquefaction and settlement.” Soils Found. 11 (4): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1960.11.4_59.
Wong, R. T., H. B. Seed, and C. K. Chan. 1974. Liquefaction of gravelly soils under cyclic loading conditions, 48. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Xu, D., H. Liu, R. Rui, and Y. Gao. 2019. “Cyclic and postcyclic simple shear behavior of binary sand-gravel mixtures with various gravel contents.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 123 (Sep): 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.030.
Youd, T. L., E. L. Harp, D. K. Keefer, and R. C. Wilson. 1985. “The Borah Peak, Idaho Earthquake of October 28, 1983—Liquefaction.” Earthquake Spectra 2 (1): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585303.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 10October 2023

History

Received: Nov 22, 2022
Accepted: May 12, 2023
Published online: Jul 27, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 27, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-6884. Email: [email protected]
Nathan C. Love [email protected]
Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-955X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share