Free access
Front Matter
Sep 6, 2024

Front matter for Theory Manual for the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments

Publication: Theory Manual for the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments: A Companion to GeogridBridge 3.0

Abstract

Front matter pages come before the papers or chapters in a published work and include Other Titles of Interest, copyright information, and a table of contents. This publication's front matter also includes a list of notation, acknowledgments, and a preface.

Other Titles of Interest

Instrumentation of Embankment Dams and Levees, adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 26 (ASCE 1999). US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Engineering and Design Guide No. 26 details all aspects of instrumentation of embankment dams and levees, including the traditional geotechnical concepts that must be understood and growing concern regarding rehabilitation, replacement, and maintenance. (ISBN 978-0-7844-0322-8)
Highway 1 Rat Creek Embankment Failure: 2021 Reconnaissance and Analysis, edited by Dimitrios Zekkos, and Timothy D. Stark (ASCE/Geo-Institute 2023). GSP 337 provides an overview of the reconnaissance and analysis done of the embankment failure caused by Rat Creek onto Highway 1 in Northern California. (ISBN 978-0-7844-8457-9)
Remote Sensing for Monitoring Embankments, Dams, and Slopes: Recent Advances, by Timothy D. Stark, Thomas Oommen, and Zhangwei Ning (ASCE/Geo-Institute 2021). GSP 322 provides information on selecting and deploying a remote sensing monitoring network to assess the behavior, geometry, and potential risks of EDS movement on people and infrastructure. (ISBN 978-0-7844-8334-3)
Bearing Capacity of Soils, adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 7 (ASCE 1993). US Army Corps of Engineers Technical Engineering and Design Guide No. 7 provides all the essential guidelines needed to determine allowable and ultimate bearing capacity of soils under shallow and deep foundations. (ISBN 978-0-8726-2997-4)
Monitoring Dam Performance: Instrumentation and Measurements, edited by Kim de Rubertis (ASCE/Energy Division 2018). This report is a handy and comprehensive source of information for dam owners, engineers, and regulators about instrumentation and measurements for monitoring the performance of all types of dams. (ISBN 978-0-7844-8098-4)

Contributors

Michael P. McGuire, Associate Professor, Lafayette College, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Eric M. Hunstein, Graduate Student, Virginia Tech, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Elise G. Hummel, Graduate Student, Virginia Tech, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Joel A. Sloan, Professor, US Air Force Academy, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the work by Dr. George Filz and Dr. Miriam Smith to develop the Load Displacement Compatibility method and the original version of the GeogridBridge 3.0 spreadsheet.
The authors also appreciate the contributions and expert feedback provided by Dr. James Collin and the contributions by students including Luke Socolofsky (USAFA).
The authors are grateful for the support of the ASCE Geo-Institute and Lafayette College's Excel Scholar Program.

Preface

This book provides detailed information on the theory, assumptions, and mathematical execution of the load displacement compatibility (LDC) method for design of column-supported embankments (CSEs) with respect to settlement and mobilization of geosynthetic reinforcement for vertical load transfer. The Theory Manual and the companion resources listed following provide information and tools related to the design and construction of CSEs:
Theory Manual for the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments, GSP 356: This manual provides comprehensive technical information about the LDC method for design of column-supported embankments. Users of the GGB3 spreadsheet should be familiar with the content in the theory manual prior to using the spreadsheet for design. This manual, which is this current book, is available as GSP 356 through the ASCE Library.
Geotechtools.org: This website, which is free to access, provides practical information about column-supported embankments and many other geotechnologies. The information on column-supported embankments provides an excellent primer on the technology and the state of the US practice. The content is periodically updated to reflect advancements in design and construction.
GeogridBridge 3.0 (GGB3) spreadsheet: This spreadsheet implements the LDC method as described in the LDC theory manual. The spreadsheet is available on geotechtools.org.
User’s Manual for GeogridBridge 3.0: A Guide to the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments: This manual provides information on the use of the GGB3 spreadsheet and provides two worked examples.
The original LDC method and GeogridBridge 3.0 spreadsheet were developed by Dr. George Filz and Dr. Miriam Smith. The LDC method was first documented in a report submitted to the Virginia Transportation Research Council (Filz and Smith 2006). The method was revised as part of the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) 2 project and was documented by Schaefer et al. (2017). The authors appreciate the hard work and creativity that went into these efforts.
The Theory Manual and GGB3 spreadsheet reflect the latest version of the LDC method which allows for greater flexibility compared to earlier versions with respect to defining embankment and subsurface stratigraphy, column arrangement, characterization and mobilization of vertical load transfer mechanisms, soil stress history and compressibility, as well as consideration of parameter uncertainty.
The Geosynthetics Technical Committee provided a detailed review of this manual. The suggested revisions stemming from this review have been incorporated into the final version. The authors acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of the committee in making this manual a reality.
Finally, the authors appreciate the support of Lafayette College and the US Air Force Academy during the development of the Theory Manual and GGB3 spreadsheet. This effort was also supported, in part, by a Special Project endorsed by the Geosynthetics Technical Committee and overseen by the Board of Governors of the Geo-Institute of ASCE. The authors also appreciate the support of the Collin Group to make updates to CSE content on geotechtools.org.

References

Filz, G. M., and M. E. Smith. 2006. “Design of bridging layers in geosynthetic-reinforced, column-supported embankments.” VTRC 06-CR12. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Schaefer, V. R., R. R. Berg, J. G. Collin, B. R. Christopher, et al. 2016. “Ground modification methods reference manual—Volume II.” Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 13. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.

Notation

A
Unit cell area
Ac
Area of column in a unit cell; the cross-sectional area of the column or cap
Arectangular
Unit cell area in a rectangular array
As
Portion of the unit cell area occupied by soil at the elevation of the reinforcement
As1
Tributary area of unit cells along span c1
As2
Tributary area of unit cells along span c2
Atriangular
Unit cell area in a triangular array
a
Equivalent square width of the column or pile cap
as
Area replacement ratio; the ratio of the area of column in a unit cell, Ac, to the unit cell area, A
AR
Arching ratio used in the concentric arches and Hewlett and Randolph models
AVG, x¯
Average parameter value
B
Ratio of the area of soil in a unit cell to the perimeter of the column
BAT
Bilinear adapted Terzaghi method for modeling arching mobilization
c
The total cohesion or adhesion
c
Effective cohesion
c1, c2
Clear spans used in the parabolic method, over which the vertical load is uniformly distributed; c1c2
c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7
Coefficients used to predict the arching ratio
Cεc
Compression ratio; the slope of the rebound portion of the consolidation curve on a log-stress versus strain diagram
Cεr
Recompression ratio; the slope of the virgin portion of the consolidation curve on a log-stress versus strain diagram
cv
Coefficient of consolidation
CA
Concentric arches model
COV
Coefficient of variation
d, dc
Column diameter
dcap
Pile cap diameter
DSb,d
Largest differential settlement at the base of the embankment
DSb,d,yield
Displacement at which arching becomes fully mobilized
dw
Depth below the base of the embankment to the groundwater table
dz
Vertical thickness of an increment used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
d1
Maximum deflection of the reinforcement across the c1 span
d2
Maximum deflection of the reinforcement across the c2 span
dσz
Effective pressure of the increment used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
E
Value of efficacy used in the calculation of the SRR according to the HR model
Ea
Young's modulus of the arching soil
Ec
Young's modulus of the column and pile cap
Es
Young's modulus of the sand layer
Fr (T)
Infinite series used in calculating the Janbu degree of consolidation, Ur
f’c
Compressive strength of concrete
fs
Shape factor for the strain distribution used in time rate of consolidation calculations
GGB
GeogridBridge
GRC
Ground reaction curve
H, Hemb
Total embankment height
Ha
Height of arching used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi method
Hcap
Height of the pile cap
Hcol
Length of the column
Hcrit
Critical height of the embankment; the minimum embankment height at which differential settlement at the base of the embankment will not produce differential settlement at the surface of the embankment
Hdr
Maximum drainage path
Hq
Height above arching used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi method
HR
Hewlett and Randolph model
i
Reference to the current increment used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
J
Combined long term tensile stiffness of the geosynthetic across each span between columns
J1
Tensile stiffness of the geosynthetic along the c1 span
J2
Tensile stiffness of the geosynthetic along the c2 span
K
Lateral earth pressure coefficient for evaluating load transfer by soil arching or drag force
Ko
At-rest earth pressure coefficient
Kp
Rankine passive earth pressure coefficient
k
Coefficient relating DSb,d to the average of the midspan deflections, generally equal to 1
k1
Coefficient for span c1 used in the parabolic method
k2
Coefficient for span c2 used in the parabolic method
LB
Lower bound of a distribution used in an MCS
LDC
Load displacement compatibility
LTP
Load transfer platform
LTM
Load transfer mat
Mc
One-dimensional elastic compression modulus of the column and pile cap
Ms
One-dimensional elastic compression modulus of the sand
MCS
Monte Carlo Simulation
m
Slope of the deflected shape of the reinforcement
N
Number of trials to be run in an MCS
n
Total number of increments used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
OCM
Overconsolidation margin
OCR
Overconsolidation ratio
Pa
Atmospheric pressure
Pexceed
Probability of serviceability failure
Pbottom
Effective normal force acting upward on the bottom of the increment used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
Ptop
Effective force acting on top of an increment because of overburden used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
p
Perimeter of the column or pile cap
P
Preload during construction
q
Postconstruction surface loading
RFCR,5%
Reduction factor for creep at 5% strain
RFCR,ult
Reduction factor for creep at the ultimate strain
RFD
Reduction factor for durability
RFID
Reduction factor for installation damage
r
Coefficient that alters the shape of the strain profile used in the time rate of consolidation calculations
Sb,c
Settlement at the base of the embankment directly over the column
Sb,d
Settlement at the base of the embankment at a distance s′ from the edge of the nearest column or pile cap
Sc
Settlement at the embankment surface directly over the column
Sd
Settlement at the embankment surface at a distance s′ from the edge of the nearest column or pile cap
Ss
Total uniform settlement at the embankment surface
Ss,pc
Total postconstruction settlement at the embankment surface
Su
Undrained strength
SD, σ
Standard deviation
SGRC
Simplified ground reaction curve
SGRC-ACA
Simplified ground reaction curve estimated using the approximate concentric arches model
SGRC-AHR
Simplified ground reaction curve estimated using the approximate Hewlett and Randolph model
SRR
Stress reduction ratio
SRRemb
Stress reduction ratio associated with load transfer by arching within the embankment
SRRfndn
Stress reduction ratio associated with load transfer by arching within the embankment and tension developed in the geosynthetic
SRRpeak
Value of SRRemb at peak arching
SRRterm
Value of SRRemb at terminal arching
s
Greatest distance a location within the unit cell can be from the edge of the closest column, as represented using a circular cross section
s1, s2
Center-to-center spacing between the columns. s1s2
Tv
Dimensionless time factor used in the time rate of consolidation calculations
T
Tension in the geosynthetic reinforcement
T1
Tension developed within the reinforcement across the c1 span per unit width
T2
Tension developed within the reinforcement across the c2 span per unit width
Tx,1
Horizontal component of T1
Tx,2
Horizontal component of T2
Tz,1
Vertical component of T1
Tz,2
Vertical component of T2
T5%,LT
Long-term tensile strength at 5% strain
T5%,ST
Short-term tensile strength at 5% strain
t
Time available for consolidation prior to post-construction surface loading
Ur
Janbu degree of consolidation
U0
Terzaghi degree of consolidation
UB
Upper bound of a distribution used in an MCS
UGRC
User-defined ground reaction curve
V
Vertical shear force between moving and fixed portions of the increment used in the incremental form of the adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
W
Effective weight of the increment used in the incremental form of the Adapted Terzaghi (AT) method
w1
Magnitude of the uniform vertical line load across the c1 span
w2
Magnitude of the uniform vertical line load across the c2 span
znp
Depth below the embankment surface to the neutral plane
α
Factor used to scale undrained strength to soil-column adhesion in α-Method
γ
Material unit weight
γtotal
Total unit weight
γ
Effective unit weight
γwater
Unit weight of water
δ
Interface friction angle
Δσz
Change in total stress in compressible layer owing to excavation or filling
εs
Strain at the top of the clay layer
εd
Difference between the strain at the top and the bottom of the clay layer
εs,ult
Ultimate strain in a sand increment
ε1
Average strain in the geosynthetic reinforcement along span c1
ε2
Average strain in the geosynthetic reinforcement along span c2
νa
Poisson's ratio of the arching soil
νc
Poisson's ratio of the column and pile cap
νs
Poisson's ratio of the sand layer
σc
Vertical stress in the column
σcol,geobot
Stress acting on the columns owing to the embankment load considering both soil arching and the tensioned geosynthetic (if present) for load transfer
σcol,geotop
Stress acting on the columns owing to the embankment load considering exclusively load transfer through soil arching
σnet
Average net vertical pressure carried by the reinforcement
σo
Initial vertical effective stress in the foundation soils based on the effective overburden stress prior to loading from the embankment or surface loading and including any stress adjustment
σp
Preconsolidation stress
σs
Final vertical effective stress in the soil after embankment construction and application of surface considering the effects of vertical load transfer
σs,i
Vertical stress at the base of each foundation soil increment above the neutral plane
σsoil,geobot
Stress acting on the foundation soil owing to the embankment load considering both soil arching and the tensioned geosynthetic (if present) for load transfer
σsoil,geotop
Stress acting on the foundation soil owing to the embankment load considering exclusively load transfer through soil arching
σz,a
Vertical effective stress calculated after embankment construction without considering any load transfer to the columns; equivalent to the average vertical stress within the unit cell with load transfer to the columns
σz,adjust
Adjustment to the effective vertical stress based on the profile before embankment and surface loading to obtain the initial vertical effective stress
σz,b
Effective vertical stress in the soil based on the profile before the loading from the embankment and surface loading and without any stress adjustment
σz,base
Vertical effective stress imposed on the base of the embankment without considering load transfer
φ
Effective internal friction angle

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

homepage Books cover image
Theory Manual for the Load Displacement Compatibility Method (LDC) for Design of Column-Supported Embankments: A Companion to GeogridBridge 3.0
Pages: i - xviii
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8562-0

History

Published online: Sep 6, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael P. McGuire, Ph.D., P.E.
Joel A. Sloan, Ph.D., P.E.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share