Technical Papers
Jun 21, 2023

Development of Backbone Curve for Reinforced Concrete Frames with Confined Masonry Walls

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

The response of RC frames with confined masonry (CM) walls is governed by the interaction between the surrounding RC frames and the confined masonry panels. This interaction will not only affect the structural integrity of the masonry walls but also significantly affect the failure mode of the RC frames compared to what they were originally designed for. This study investigates a simple engineering tool developed previously for infilled frames that are expressed by the relative stiffness and relative strength. To determine its validity to identify the ultimate failure modes of columns in RC frames with CM walls, the tool was calculated based on 48 laboratory specimens of single-story and single-bay CM frames tested by other researchers. Based on the obtained results, a modification to identify the ultimate failure mode of RC frames with CM walls is suggested. These experimental data were further used to develop a backbone curve of lateral response of CM frames vulnerable to fail in shear. The results of this study indicate that the proposed curve can satisfactorily represent the response of CM frames, with ranges of error in estimating the peak strength, residual strength, drift at peak strength, and drift at residual strength for all considered specimens based on proposed backbone curve of 30% to 33%, 28% to 54%, 45% to 89%, and 35% to 100%, respectively. Moreover, the proposed backbone curve is compared with a curve developed by other researchers, and it was found that the proposed backbone curve can better represent the experimental data. The maximum errors in estimating the peak strength, residual strength, drift at peak strength, and drift at residual strength for three of the specimens based on the proposed backbone curve are 11%, 16%, 67%, and 24%, respectively, while the maximum error in estimating these values based on the other researchers’ curve are 48%, 71%, 69%, and 75%.

Practical Applications

The shear failure observed in CM frames after earthquakes encouraged researchers to investigate the reasons of this brittle type of failure. Development of an engineering tool is essential to identify when shear failure can occur based on the geometry, material properties, and reinforcement detailing, and this was previously developed for infilled RC frames. This research modified this tool to be used for CM frames based on an experimental database. It is also vital to evaluate and predict the CM frames’ behavior under lateral loads. The proposed backbone curve is effective because it allows for the assessment of existing CM frames or the design of new confined buildings taking into consideration the gravity and lateral loads to determine the strength, deformation capacity, and ultimate failure modes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2011. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-11. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Aguilar, G., R. Meli, R. Diaz, and R. Vázquez-del-Mercado. 1996. “Influence of horizontal reinforcement on the behavior of confined masonry walls.” In Proc., Eleventh World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Alcocer, S., J. Ruiz, J. Pineda, and J. Zepeda. 1996. “Retrofitting of confined masonry walls with welded wire mesh.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1209. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Ali, Q., Y. I. Badrashi, N. Ahmad, B. Alam, S. Rehman, and F. A. S. Banori. 2012. “Experimental investigation on the characterization of solid clay brick masonry for lateral shear strength evaluation.” Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 5 (4): 782–791.
Allouzi, R. 2015. “Seismic in-plane response of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls.” Ph.D. thesis, Purdue Univ. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/410/.
Allouzi, R., and A. Irfanoglu. 2018. “Development of new nonlinear dynamic response model of reinforced concrete frames with infill walls.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 21 (14): 2154–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218768915.
Allouzi, R., and A. Irfanoglu. 2019. “Failure mode identification of masonry infilled RC frames.” Emir. J. Eng. Res. 24 (1): 1.
Amouzadeh Tabrizi, M., and M. Soltani. 2017. “In-plane response of unreinforced masonry walls confined by reinforced concrete tie-columns and tie-beams.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 20 (11): 1632–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216689569.
Belghiat, C., A. Messabhia, J.-P. Plassiard, M. Guenfoud, O. Plé, and P. Perrotin. 2018. “Experimental study of double-panel confined masonry walls under lateral loading.” J. Build. Eng. 20: 531–543.
Borah, B., et al. 2021. “Assessment of seismic design provisions for confined masonry using experimental and numerical approaches.” Eng. Struct. 245: 112864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112864.
Borah, B., H. B. Kaushik, and V. Singhal. 2020. “Finite element modelling of confined masonry wall under in-plane cyclic load.” In Vol. 936 of Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012020. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/936/1/012020.
Bourzam, A., T. Goto, and M. Miyajima. 2008. “Shear capacity prediction of confined masonry walls subjected to cyclic lateral loading.” Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A 64 (4): 692–704. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceja.64.692.
Brzev, S., and R. Meli. 2012. “International guideline for seismic design of low-rise confined masonry buildings in regions of high seismic risk.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Cruz, A. I., J. J. Pérez-Gavilán, and L. Flores. 2019. “Experimental study of in-plane shear strength of confined concrete masonry walls with joint reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 182 (Mar): 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.040.
El-Diasity, M., H. Okail, O. Kamal, and M. Said. 2015. “Structural performance of confined masonry walls retrofitted using ferrocement and GFRP under in-plane cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 94 (Jul): 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.035.
Elwood, K. J. 2003. Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Eshghi, S., and K. Pourazin. 2009. “In-plane behavior of confined masonry walls–with and without opening.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 7 (1): 49–60.
Eshghi, S., and B. Sarrafi. 2009. Effects of construction methods on seismic behavior of confined masonry walls-an experimental study. Kanpur, India: Indian Institute of Technology.
Fiorato, A. E., M. A. Sozen, and W. L. Gamble. 1970. An investigation of the interaction of reinforced concrete frames with masonry filler walls. Technical Rep. No. UILU-ENG70-100. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Gavilan, J. P. 2021. “Seismic performance of confined masonry walls with joint reinforcement and aspect ratio: An experimental study.” Eng. Struct. 242 (Sep): 112484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112484.
Ghorbani, R. 2014. “Context-sensitive seismic strengthening and repair of substandard confined masonry.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina.
Hossein, M., and T. Kabeyasawa. 2004. “Effect of infill masonry walls on the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to the 2003 Bam earthquake strong motion: A case study of Bam telephone center.” Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. 79 (3–4): 133–156.
Irimies, M. 2002. “Confined Masonry Walls: The influence of the tie-column vertical reinforcement ratio on the seismic behaviour.” In Proc., 12th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. London: Barbicon Centre.
Jain, S., S. Brzev, L. K. Bhargava, D. Basu, I. Ghosh, D. C. Rai, and K. V. Ghaisas. 2015. Confined masonry for residential construction. Gandhinagar, India: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar.
Jasiński, R. 2018. “Comparisons of confined and different types of reinforcement on the behavior of masonry shear walls.” ce/papers 2 (4): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.873.
Kumar, M., and P. K. Navin. 2018. “Study of the seismic behaviour of confined masonry structure.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) RTCEC 6 (11). https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTCONV6IS11013.
Kumazawa, F., and M. Ohkubo. 2000. “Nonlinear characteristics of confined masonry wall with lateral reinforcement in mortar joints.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Kuroki, M., K. Kikuchi, H. Nonaka, and M. Shimosako. 2012. “Experimental study on reinforcing methods using extra RC elements for confined masonry walls with openings.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Marinilli, A., and E. Castilla. 2004. “Experimental evaluation of confined masonry walls with several confining-columns.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Marques, R., and P. B. Lourenço. 2019. “Structural behaviour and design rules of confined masonry walls: Review and proposals.” Constr. Build. Mater. 217 (Aug): 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.266.
Matošević, D., V. Sigmund, and I. Guljaš. 2015. “Cyclic testing of single bay confined masonry walls with various connection details.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (Feb): 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9627-8.
Medeiros, P., G. Vasconcelos, P. B. Lourenço, and J. Gouveia. 2013. “Numerical modelling of non-confined and confined masonry walls.” Constr. Build. Mater. 41 (Apr): 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.013.
Mehrabi, A. B., P. B. Shing, M. P. Schuller, and J. L. Noland. 1994. Performance of masonry-infilled RIC frames under in-plane lateral loads. Boulder, CO: Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado.
Meli, R. 1973. “Behavior of masonry walls under lateral loads.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Fifth World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 853–862. Paris: French Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Meli, R., and G. Salgado. 1969. Comportamiento de muros de mamposterı´a sujetos a carga lateral [Seismic behavior of masonry walls subjected to lateral loading]. Mexico City: Instituto de Ingenierı´a UNAM.
Naseer, A. 2009. Performance behavior of confined brick masonry buildings under seismic demand. Peshawar, Pakistan: NWFP Univ. of Engineering and Technology.
Nguyen, L. 2014. “Confined masonry: Theoretical fundamentals, experimental test, finite element models, and future uses.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder.
Okail, H., et al. 2019. “Experimental and analytical investigation of the lateral load response of confined masonry walls.” HBRC J. 12 (1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.09.004.
Okail, H., A. Abdelrahman, A. Abdelkhalik, and M. Metwaly. 2016. “Experimental and analytical investigation of the lateral load response of confined masonry walls.” HBRC J. 12 (1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.09.004.
Perez Gavilan, J., L. Flores, and S. Alcocer. 2015. “An experimental study of confined masonry walls with varying aspect ratios.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (2): 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1193/090712EQS284M.
Perez-Gavilan, J., and A. Manzano. 2012. “Shear-moment interaction of earthquake resistance confined masonry walls.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Pérez-Gavilán, J. J. 2020. “The effect of shear-moment interaction on the shear strength of confined masonry walls.” Constr. Build. Mater. 263 (Dec): 120087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120087.
Quiroz, L. G., Y. Maruyama, and C. Zavala. 2014. “Cyclic behavior of Peruvian confined masonry walls and calibration of numerical model using genetic algorithms.” Eng. Struct. 75 (Sep): 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.035.
Reese, A., and A. Stavridis. 2014. “A simplified method for the estimation of the seismic resistance of RC frames with weak infill panels.” In Proc., 10th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Riahi, Z. 2007. “Performance-based seismic models for confined masonry walls.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Riahi, Z., K. J. Elwood, and S. M. Alcocer. 2009. “Backbone model for confined masonry walls for performance-based seismic design.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (6): 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000012.
Salinas, R., and F. Lazares. 2008. “Seismic performance of confined masonry buildings with tubular bricks in developing areas. In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Irvine, CA: Univ. of California.
San Bartolomé, A., D. Quiun, K. Barr, and C. Pineda. 2012. “Seismic reinforcement of confined masonry walls made with hollow bricks using wire meshes.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Sarrafi, B., and S. Eshghi. 2012. “Experimental study on lateral strength of confined masonry walls.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Shakib, H., S. Dardaei, M. Mousavi, and M. K. Rezaei. 2016. “Experimental and analytical evaluation of confined masonry walls retrofitted with CFRP strips and mesh-reinforced PF shotcrete.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (6): 04016039 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000885.
Sigmund, V., and D. Matosevic. 2012. “Testing of confined masonry walls with different connection details.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Stavridis, A. 2009. Analytical and experimental study of seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry walls. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Suarjana, M., D. Kusumastuti, and K. Pribadi. 2012. “An experimental study on the effect of opening on confined masonry wall under cyclic lateral loading.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Tizapa, S. S. 2009. Experimental and numerical study of confined masonry walls under in-plane loads: Case: Guerrero State (Mexico). Paris: Université Paris-Est.
Tomaževič, M., and I. Klemenc. 1997. “Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (10): 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199710)26:10%3C1059::AID-EQE694%3E3.0.CO;2-M.
Tripathy, D., and V. Singhal. 2019. “Estimation of in-plane shear capacity of confined masonry walls with and without openings using strut-and-tie analysis.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Jun): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.002.
Wijaya, W., D. Kusumastuti, M. Suarjana, and K. Pribadi. 2011. “Experimental study on wall-frame connection of confined masonry wall.” Procedia Eng. 14 (Jan): 2094–2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.263.
Yoshimura, K., K. Kikuchi, M. Kuroki, H. Nonaka, K. T. Kim, R. Wangdi, and A. Oshikata. 2004. “Experimental study for developing higher seismic performance of brick masonry walls.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: 13 WCEE Secretariat.
Yoshimura, K., K. Kikuchi, T. Okamoto, and T. Sanchez. 1996. “Effect of vertical and horizontal wall reinforcement on seismic behavior of confined masonry walls.” In Proc., 11th WCEE. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 4November 2023

History

Received: Jul 11, 2022
Accepted: Mar 26, 2023
Published online: Jun 21, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 21, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Bayan Abu Al-Ata [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan. Email: [email protected]
Amer Alkloub [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-9587. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effect of Various Parameters on Seismic Response of CBM Structures: A Numerical Investigation, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1507, 29, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share