Abstract

Public–private partnership (PPP) has been positioned as a relevant contracting method for developing large-scale infrastructure projects that entails potentially high-magnitude negative impacts on the environment. The effectiveness of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) is crucial to achieving sustainable development of these large-scale infrastructure projects. To unravel the drivers for the EIA effectiveness and the multiple combinations built by the complexity of these drivers, this paper analyzes 28 road PPP projects from Colombia employing a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach. This paper decodes conjectural causal links between specific conditions grouped in superordinate clusters (i.e., consultants’ capability, project features, and communities’ participation) and EIA effectiveness dimensions (i.e., normative, procedural, substantive, and transactive). Findings revealed that no single combination of causal conditions ensures multidimensional EIA effectiveness. This study demonstrated that EIA effectiveness relies significantly on the integration of specific features of three external stakeholders: consultants, nonpreferred proponents, and communities. This study constitutes the first empirical multidimensional identification of the combination of conditions that generate EIA effectiveness in road PPPs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Universidad de los Andes under Fondo de Apoyo para Profesores (FAPA).

References

Agarchand, N., and B. Laishram. 2017. “Sustainable infrastructure development challenges through PPP procurement process: Indian perspective.” Int. J. Manage. Project Bus. 10 (3): 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2016-0078.
Aladaǧ, H., and Z. Işik. 2020. “The effect of stakeholder-associated risks in mega-engineering projects: A case study of a PPP airport project.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 67 (1): 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2866269.
Anaya, J. A., V. H. Gutiérrez-Vélez, A. M. Pacheco-Pascagaza, S. Palomino-Ángel, N. Han, and H. Balzter. 2020. “Drivers of forest loss in a megadiverse hotspot on the Pacific coast of Colombia.” Remote Sens. 12 (1235): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081235.
Androulidakis, I., and I. Karakassis. 2006. “Evaluation of the EIA system performance in Greece, using quality indicators.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26 (3): 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.10.001.
Ayres, I., and P. Cramton. 1996. “Deficit reduction through diversity: How affirmative action at the FCC increased auction competition.” Stanford Law Rev. 48 (4): 761–816. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229312.
Azhar, N., Y. Kang, and I. U. Ahmad. 2014. “Factors influencing integrated project delivery in publicly owned construction projects: An information modelling perspective.” Procedia Eng. 77 (Jan): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.019.
Badr, E. A., A. A. Zahran, and M. Cashmore. 2011. “Benchmarking performance: Environmental impact statements in Egypt.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 31 (3): 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.004.
Baker, D. C., and J. N. McLelland. 2003. “Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia’s environmental assessment process for first nations’ participation in mining development.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 23 (5): 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00093-3.
Barker, A., and C. Wood. 1999. “An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 19 (4): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00015-3.
Bazeley, P., and K. Jackson. 2013. Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. London: SAGE.
Befani, B., and F. Sager. 2006. QCA as a tool for realistic evaluations: The case of the Swiss environmental impact assessment, 263–284. Boston, MA: Springer.
Bojórquez-Tapia, L. A., S. Sánchez-Colon, and A. F. Martinez. 2005. “Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis.” Environ. Manage. 36 (3): 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0127-5.
Bond, A., F. Retief, B. Cave, M. Fundingsland, P. N. Duinker, R. Verheem, and A. L. Brown. 2018. “A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 68 (Jan): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.006.
Callens, C., K. Verhoest, and J. Boon. 2021. “Combined effects of procurement and collaboration on innovation in public–private-partnerships: A qualitative comparative analysis of 24 infrastructure projects.” Public Manage. Rev. 24 (6): 860–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1867228.
Caro-Gonzalez, A. L., J. Toro, and M. Zamorano. 2021. “Effectiveness of environmental impact statement methods: A Colombian case study.” J. Environ. Manage. 300 (Dec): 113659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113659.
Casady, C. B., and D. Baxter. 2021. “Procuring healthcare public–private partnerships (PPPs) through unsolicited proposals during the COVID-19 pandemic.” J. Public Procure. 22 (1): 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2020-0061.
Cashmore, M., E. Christophilopoulos, and D. Cobb. 2002. “An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Thessaloniki, Greece.” J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 4 (4): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333202001121.
Cashmore, M., R. Gwilliam, R. Morgan, D. Cobb, and A. Bond. 2004. “The interminable issue of effectiveness: Substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 22 (4): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154604781765860.
Castelblanco, G., and J. Guevara. 2022a. “Building bridges: Unraveling the missing links between public–private partnerships and sustainable development.” Project Leadersh. Soc. 3 (100059): 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100059.
Castelblanco, G., and J. Guevara. 2022b. “Crisis driven literature in PPPs: A network analysis.” In Proc., IOP Conf. Series Earth Environmental Science. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, and P. Mendez-Gonzalez. 2021a. “Sustainability in PPPs: A network analysis.” In Proc., Interdisciplinary Civil and Construction Engineering Projects ISEC-11, 1–6. Fargo, ND: ISEC Press.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, and P. Mendez-Gonzalez. 2022a. “In the name of the pandemic: A case study of contractual modifications in PPP solicited and unsolicited proposals in COVID-19 times.” Constr. Res. Congr. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483978.006.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, and P. Mendez-Gonzalez. 2022b. “PPP renegotiation flight simulator: A system dynamics model for renegotiating PPPs after pandemic crisis.” Constr. Res. Congr. 3 (100059): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483978.011.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, H. Mesa, and D. Flores. 2020. “Risk allocation in unsolicited and solicited road public–private partnerships: Sustainability and management implications.” Sustainability 12 (11): 4478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114478.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, H. Mesa, and A. Hartmann. 2022c. “Social legitimacy challenges in toll road PPP programs: Analysis of the Colombian and Chilean cases.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001010.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, H. Mesa, and A. Sanchez. 2021b. “Semantic network analysis of literature on public–private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (5): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002041.
Castelblanco, G., J. Guevara, and J. Salazar. 2022d. “Remedies to the PPP crisis in the covid-19 pandemic: Lessons from the 2008 global financial crisis.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001036.
Cave, M., and R. Nicholls. 2016. “The use of spectrum auctions to attain multiple objectives: Policy implications.” Telecomm. Policy 41 (May): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.010.
Cediel, F., and R. P. Shaw. 2019. Geology and tectonics of northwestern South America: The Pacific-Caribbean-Andean junction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Chanchitpricha, C., and A. Bond. 2013. “Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 43 (Nov): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006.
Chanthy, S., and C. M. Grünbühel. 2015. “Critical challenges to consultants in pursuing quality of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIA) in Cambodia.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 33 (3): 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1049488.
Cho, K., S. Ahn, K. Park, and T. W. Kim. 2021. “Schedule delay leading indicators in precast concrete construction projects: Qualitative comparative analysis of Korean cases.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000915.
Cosoy, N. 2015. “Por qué es tres veces más barato mandar un contenedor de Colombia a China que dentro de Colombia.” BBC Mundo, May 20, 2015.
Dagiliute, R., and G. Juozapaitiene. 2018. “Stakeholders in the EIA process: What is important for them? The case of road construction.” Environ. Clim. Technol. 22 (1): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-0005.
Dai, K., S. Li, J. In Kim, and M. Jae Suh. 2021. “Identifying characteristics of PPP projects for healthcare facilities for the elderly based on payment mechanisms in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (6): 05021009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000966.
De Clerck, D., and E. Demeulemeester. 2016. “Creating a more competitive PPP procurement market: Game theoretical analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (6): 04016015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000440.
Delhi, V. S. K., and A. Mahalingam. 2020. “Relating institutions and governance strategies to project outcomes: Study on public–private partnerships in infrastructure projects in India.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 04020076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000840.
Domingues, S., and J. M. Sarmento. 2016. “Critical renegotiation triggers of European transport concessions transport.” Transp. Policy 48 (May): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.02.016.
Faith-Ell, C., and J. Arts. 2009. “Public private partnerships and EIA: Why PPP are relevant to practice of impact assessment for infrastructure.” In Proc., 29th Annual Conf. Int. Association Impact Assessment. Fargo, ND: The Leading Global Network on Impact Assessment.
Faubert, K., M. A. Bouchard, M. A. Curtis, and G. M. Hickey. 2010. “Environmental assessment in multilateral development bank intermediary lending.” J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 12 (2): 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333210003565.
Glasson, J., R. Therivel, and A. Chadwick. 2012. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Grimsey, D., and M. Lewis. 2011. “Minimizing collateral damage: Options for financing public–private partnerships in the wake of the financial crisis.” In The financial crisis and the regulation of finance, 249–265. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gross, M. E. 2010. “Aligning public–private partnership contracts with public objectives for transportation infrastructure.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ.
Guevara, J., J. Salazar, and M. J. Garvin. 2020. “Social network analysis of road PPP equity markets in Canada, Chile, and the United States.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000830.
Hanna, K., and B. F. Noble. 2015. “Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness criteria for environmental assessment.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 33 (2): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.992672.
Hansen, E., and G. Wood. 2016. “Understanding EIA scoping in practice: A pragmatist interpretation of effectiveness.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 58 (Apr): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.01.003.
Heinma, K., and T. Põder. 2010. “Effectiveness of environmental impact assessment system in Estonia.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 30 (4): 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.10.001.
Hodge, G., C. Greve, and A. Boardman. 2017. “Public–private partnerships: The way they were and what they can become.” Aust. J. Public Adm. 76 (3): 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12260.
Hodge, G. A., and C. Greve. 2016. “On public–private partnership performance: A contemporary review.” Public Work Manage. Policy 22 (1): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X16657830.
Homayouni, H., C. S. Dossick, and G. Neff. 2021. “Three pathways to highly energy efficient buildings: Assessing combinations of teaming and technology.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (2): 04020110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000883.
Horta, K. 2012. “Public–private partnership and institutional capture: The state, international institutions, and indigenous peoples in Chad and Cameroon.” In The politics of resource extraction, 204–212. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibbs, C. W., Y. H. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. M. Odabasi. 2003. “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (4): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382).
Iyer, K. C., and P. S. Banerjee. 2019. “Identifying new knowledge areas to strengthen the project management institute (PMI) framework.” Organ. Technol. Manage. Constr. 11 (1): 1892–1903. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0014.
Jooste, S. F., R. Levitt, and D. Scott. 2011. “Beyond ‘one size fits all’: How local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development.” Eng. Project Organ. J. 1 (1): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2010.549612.
Jordan, E., M. E. Gross, A. N. Javernick-Will, and M. J. Garvin. 2011. “Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (11): 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.640339.
Kabir, S. M. Z., and S. Momtaz. 2012. “The quality of environmental impact statements and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 30 (2): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.672671.
Kågström, M. 2016. “Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: How consultants guide quality in environmental assessment.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 60 (Sep): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.003.
Kamijo, T., and G. Huang. 2019. Determinants of the EIA report quality for development cooperation projects: Effects of alternatives and public involvement. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis.
Khan, M., and M. N. Chaudhry. 2021. “Role of and challenges to environmental impact assessment proponents in Pakistan.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 90 (May): 106606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106606.
Khan, M., M. N. Chaudhry, S. R. Ahmad, S. Saif, and A. Mehmood. 2020. “Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 81 (May): 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357.
Khan, M., M. Nawaz, S. Rashid, and S. Saif. 2018. “Challenges to EIA consultants whilst dealing with stakeholders in Punjab, Pakistan.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 73 (Sep): 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.09.001.
Korhonen-Kurki, K., J. Sehring, M. Brockhaus, M. Di, J. Sehring, M. Brockhaus, and M. Di. 2014. “Enabling factors for establishing REDD + in a context of weak governance.” Clim. Policy 14 (2): 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.852022.
Kumar, C. 2021. “Impact of contract choice on the public–private partnerships’ performance: A tale of two contracts.” Public Perform. Manage. Rev. 44 (6): 1239–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1985537.
Lawrence, D. P. 1997. “The need for EIA theory-building.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 17 (2): 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)00030-9.
Liu, K. F. R., and J. H. Lai. 2009. “Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (3): 5119–5136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.045.
Loomis, J. J., and M. Dziedzic. 2018. “Evaluating EIA systems’ effectiveness: A state of the art.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 68 (Jan): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.005.
Lyhne, I., F. van Laerhoven, M. Cashmore, and H. Runhaar. 2017. “Theorising EIA effectiveness: A contribution based on the Danish system.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 62 (Jan): 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.12.002.
Marcellino, M., G. Castelblanco, and A. De Marco. 2022a. “Contract renegotiation in PPPs: Evidence from Italy.” In Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Marcellino, M., G. Castelblanco, and A. De Marco. 2022b. “Multiple linear regression model for project’s risk profile and DSCR.” In Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Marx, A., and A. Dusa. 2011. “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification.” Methodol. Innov. Online 6 (2): 103–148. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0037.
Momtaz, S., and S. M. Z. Kabir. 2013. Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries, 171–187. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Morrison-Saunders, A., and M. Bailey. 2009. “Appraising the role of relationships between regulators and consultants for effective EIA.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 29 (5): 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.006.
Moschouli, E., R. M. Soecipto, T. Vanelslander, and K. Verhoest. 2018. “Factors affecting the cost performance of transport infrastructure projects.” Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 18 (4): 535–554. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2018.18.4.3264.
Nguyen, D. A., M. J. Garvin, and E. E. Gonzalez. 2018. “Risk allocation in U.S. public–private partnership highway project contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (5): 04018017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001465.
Nijsten, R., J. Arts, and P. Sandee. 2010. “Buying the best: State of the art in combining IA and infra-development.” In Proc., 30th Annual Meeting Int. Association Impact Assessment, 1–6. Fargo, ND: The Leading Global Network on Impact Assessment.
Noble, B. F. 2002. “The Canadian experience with SEA and sustainability.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 22 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00093-2.
Osei-kyei, R., and A. P. C. Chan. 2018. “Motivations for adopting unsolicited proposals for public–private partnership project implementation a survey of international experts.” J. Financ. Manage. Prop. Constr. 23 (2): 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-06-2017-0020.
Paliwal, R., and L. Srivastava. 2012. “Adequacy of the follow-up process in India and barriers to its effective implementation.” J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 55 (2): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.588063.
Pappas, I. O., and A. G. Woodside. 2021. “Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing.” Int. J. Inf. Manage. 58 (Feb): 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310.
Priemus, H., B. Flyvbjerg, and B. van Wee. 2008. Decision-making on mega-projects: Cost-benefit analysis, planning and innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C., T. Patros, S. I. Strand, and C. Rubinson. 2017. User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. Irvine, CA: Univ. of Arizona.
Reeves, E. 2013. “The not so good, the bad and the ugly: Over twelve years of PPP in Ireland.” Local Gov. Stud. 39 (3): 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.781023.
Rihoux, B., and B. Lobe. 2012. “The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison.” In SAGE handbook of. case-based methods. London: SAGE.
Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2009. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Rodríguez-Zapata, M. A., and C. A. Ruiz-Agudelo. 2021. “Environmental liabilities in Colombia: A critical review of current status and challenges for a megadiverse country.” Environ. Challenges 5 (Nov): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100377.
Rojas, R., G. Bennison, V. Gálvez, E. Claro, and G. Castelblanco. 2020. “Advancing collaborative water governance: Unravelling stakeholders’ relationships and influences in contentious river basins.” Water 12 (3316): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123316.
Ruhlandt, R. W. S., R. Levitt, R. Jain, and D. Hall. 2020a. “Drivers of data and analytics utilization within (smart) cities: A multimethod approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (2): 04019050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000762.
Ruhlandt, R. W. S., R. Levitt, R. Jain, and D. Hall. 2020b. “One approach does not fit all (smart) cities: Causal recipes for cities’ use of ‘data and analytics.” Cities 104 (Sep): 102800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102800.
Runhaar, H., F. van Laerhoven, P. Driessen, and J. Arts. 2013. “Environmental assessment in the Netherlands: Effectively governing environmental protection? A discourse analysis.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 39 (Feb): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.05.003.
Sandham, L. A., and H. M. Pretorius. 2008. “A review of EIA report quality in the northwest province of South Africa.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (4–5): 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.002.
Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2007. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2010. “Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets.” Comp. Sociol. 9 (3): 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793.
Sedlin, T., V. Beckmann, and R. Tan. 2020. “Public participation and airport development: The case of the site selection for berlin Brandenburg airport (BER) in Germany.” Sustainability 12 (24): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410535.
Shepard, R. B. 2005. Quantifying environmental impact assessments using fuzzy logic/Richard B. Shepard. New York: Springer.
Shrestha, B. K., J. O. Choi, Y. H. Kwak, and J. S. Shane. 2021. “Recipes for standardized capital projects’ performance success.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000926.
Sinha, A. K., and K. Neeraj Jha. 2020. “Environmental laws and their compliance in road projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 04519050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000354.
Soecipto, R. M., and K. Verhoest. 2018. “Contract stability in European road infrastructure PPPs: How does governmental PPP support contribute to preventing contract renegotiation?” Public Manage. Rev. 20 (8): 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428414.
Soria-Lara, J. A., L. Batista, M. Le Pira, A. Arranz-López, R. M. Arce-Ruiz, G. Inturri, and P. Pinho. 2020. “Revealing EIA process-related barriers in transport projects: The cases of Italy, Portugal, and Spain.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 83 (Jul): 106402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106402.
Thomann, E., J. Ege, and E. Paustyan. 2022. “Approaches to qualitative comparative analysis and good practices: A systematic review.” Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 28 (Dec): 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12503.
Tzoumis, K. 2007. “Comparing the quality of draft environmental impact statements by agencies in the United States since 1998 to 2004.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 27 (1): 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.08.003.
Uttam, K., C. Faith-ell, and B. Balfors. 2012. “EIA and green procurement: Opportunities for strengthening their coordination.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 33 (1): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.007.
van Doren, D., P. P. J. Driessen, B. Schijf, and H. A. C. Runhaar. 2013. “Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: Towards a better understanding.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 38 (Jan): 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.07.002.
Verweij, S. 2015. “Producing satisfactory outcomes in the implementation phase of PPP infrastructure projects: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 27 road constructions in the Netherlands.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8): 1877–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.006.
Vink, M. P., and O. V. A. N. Vliet. 2009. “Not quite crisp, not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA.” Field Methods 21 (3): 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09332633.
World Bank. 2016. Colombia—4th generation toll road program. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zvijáková, L., M. Zeleňáková, and P. Purcz. 2014. “Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Slovakia.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 32 (2): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.893124.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39Issue 2March 2023

History

Received: Apr 6, 2022
Accepted: Oct 27, 2022
Published online: Jan 11, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin 10129, Italy (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-6644. Email: [email protected]
Jose Guevara [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota 111711, Colombia. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota 111711, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-9508. Email: [email protected]
Koen Verhoest [email protected]
Research Professor, Research Group on Politics and Public Governance, Dept. of Political Science, Univ. of Antwerp, Antwerp 2000, Belgium. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Influence of Stakeholder Identities on Unfairness Perception of Local Residents toward Public Facilities: Neurocognition Evidence from the Case of Waste-to-Energy Projects in China, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5647, 40, 5, (2024).
  • Stakeholder Dynamics: Rethinking Roles and Responsibilities in User-Pay Transport PPP Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14477, 150, 8, (2024).
  • Role of Shapley Additive Explanations and Resampling Algorithms for Contract Failure Prediction of Public–Private Partnership Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5492, 39, 5, (2023).
  • Building Information Modeling for Risk Management: A Literature Review, Digitalisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Business, 10.1007/978-3-031-26953-0_1, (3-10), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share