Technical Papers
Jan 9, 2024

A Study of the Drained Strength Characteristics of Overconsolidated Clays at Low Effective Stresses

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study to determine the drained strength parameters of overconsolidated clays at low effective stresses. Overconsolidated clays experience dilation when sheared under undrained conditions in conventional triaxial compression (TC) and direct simple shear (DSS) tests. Moreover, the effective stresses at failure can be significantly larger than the preshear stresses. Consequently, interpretation of the results of conventional triaxial and DSS tests to define the failure envelope at low effective stresses involves considerable extrapolation of the data. Therefore, obtaining reliable interpretations of the drained strength parameters at low effective stresses (σv<100  kPa) is difficult. In this study, a new approach in performing TC and DSS tests, which involves shearing anisotropically consolidated specimens by increasing the pore water pressure at a constant shear stress, is presented. This procedure enables a reliable interpretation of the drained strength parameters at effective stresses as low as 10 kPa. This paper presents the conceptual test methodology, typical results of TC and DSS tests, and statistical summaries of the drained strength parameters of inorganic clays determined from numerous tests performed in this study. The results of the tests performed in this manner show consistent mobilization of significant effective cohesion, c, which is related to the preconsolidation stress, σp. Effective cohesion values normalized with respect to the preconsolidation stress (c/σp) generally range from 0.3% to 6.1% for lean clays and from 1.7% to 7.1% for inorganic fat clays. The mean c/σp values determined from triaxial tests were 2.5% for lean clays and 3.4% for fat clays. Similarly, the mean values from the DSS tests were 2.8% for lean clays and 3.5% for fat clays. The effective friction angles for lean and fat inorganic clays ranged between 23° and 37°, with mean values of 31° and 30° from the triaxial and DSS tests, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The strength tests reported herein for the DWR’s ULE program were performed at Fugro’s Houston geotechnical laboratory facility under the direction of Mr. Maurice Morvant. Dr. Jack Germaine, formerly of MIT and currently of Tufts University, and Mr. Richard S. Ladd were instrumental in the early stages of the program in providing guidance for the development of the test procedures for CK0DU triaxial and DSS tests. Mr. Richard S. Ladd also provided quality-control services during the program. However, the success of this testing program is largely attributed to the efforts of Mr. Morvant. His high standards for quality, meticulous attention to every detail, willingness to experiment with new approaches, and untiring efforts and persistence were unprecedented in the author’s experience. The late professor Charles C. Ladd served as a special consultant engaged in providing an independent review of the test procedures and the results of the pilot program and to guide the analysis and interpretation of the data, including an independent analysis of the interpreted drained strength parameters. His encouragement and support, especially during the early stages of the program, and his overall guidance were invaluable for the program’s success. Messrs. Steve Mahnke and Michael Inamine of the DWR are acknowledged with gratitude for their steadfast support and encouragement for the special laboratory strength testing program and for the faith and trust they placed in the author to guide and direct the program. Mr. Richard Millet of URS and many staff members of the California DWR and URS are acknowledged for their unfailing support. Finally, the author would like to acknowledge the contributions of his long-term colleague Karina Karina for her role in the processing and interpretation of the test results and preparation of graphics for the entire study. Mr. Hon Fung Chan prepared the figures that appear in the paper and the calculations in Tables S1S4.

Disclaimer

The opinions and conclusions presented in the paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent, in any way, the opinions of the California Department of Water Resources, its staff, or any of the numerous consultants involved in the DWR’s Urban Levee Evaluation Program.

References

Abdulhadi, N. O., J. T. Germaine, and A. J. Whittle. 2012. “Stress dependent behavior of saturated clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (8): 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-057.
Casey, B., and T. J. Germaine. 2015. “Stress dependence of shear strength of fine grain soils and correlations with liquid limit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (10): 1709–1717. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000896.
COE (Corps of Engineers). 1978. Design and construction of levees. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Engineers.
DeGroot, D. J., and C. C. Ladd. 2012. “Site characterization for cohesive soil deposits using combined in situ and laboratory testing.” In Geotechnical Engineering State of Art and Practice: Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress 2012, Geotechnical Special Publication 226, edited by K. Rollins and D. Zekkos, 565–607. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kulhawy, F. H., and P. W. Mayne. 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Ladd, C. C., and R. Foott. 1974. “New design procedure for stability of soft clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 100 (7): 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000066.
Ladd, C. C., R. Foott, K. Ishihara, F. Schlosser, and H. G. Poulos. 1977. “Stress-deformations and strength characteristics.” In Vol. II of Proc., State of the Art Report. Proc., Session 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 421–494. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Lunne, T., T. Berre, K. H. Andersen, S. Strandvik, and M. Sjursent. 2006. “Effects of sample disturbance and consolidation procedures on measured shear strength of soft marine Norwegian clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 43 (7): 726–750. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-040.
Mesri, G., and M. E. M. Abdel-Ghaffar. 1993. “Cohesion intercept in effective stress-stability analysis.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (8): 1229–1249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:8(1229).
Navfac (Naval Facilities). 1982. Soil mechanics: Design manual - 7.1, 364. Alexandria, VA: US Department of the Navy.
Schmertmann, J. H. 1991. “The mechanical aging of soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (9): 1288–1330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1288).
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 3March 2024

History

Received: Aug 22, 2022
Accepted: Oct 11, 2023
Published online: Jan 9, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 9, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Demetrious C. Koutsoftas, M.ASCE [email protected]
Geotechnical Consultant, 60 Joost Ave., San Francisco, CA 94131. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share