Technical Papers
Jan 5, 2024

Multifidelity Constitutive Modeling of Stress-Induced Anisotropic Behavior of Clay

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 3

Abstract

Rigorous modeling of the stress-induced anisotropy of soils with different stress histories and loading conditions typically requires advanced constitutive models. However, calibration of state-of-the-art constitutive models can be expensive due to a large number of parameters and can encounter convergence issues when implemented in finite element codes. To circumvent these limitations, this study combines the well-known modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model with a machine learning-based multifidelity training framework, which is distinctive compared to current modeling approaches. A ‘low-fidelity’ neural network is first trained on synthetic data generated by the MCC model to ‘learn’ the model’s interpretations of critical state soil mechanics. A ‘high-fidelity’ neural network is subsequently trained using limited experimental data to fine-tune predictions of soil behavior. The proposed framework is applied to the prediction of stress-induced anisotropy of lower Cromer till (LCT) clay. The results show that the mechanical behavior of LCT under drained and undrained triaxial compression/extension with different consolidation histories can be accurately predicted by the model. The model is also shown to be insensitive to the exact composition of the synthetic data set, specifically, the base constitutive model and parameter set used. It also shows an ability to generalize unseen data outside of the calibration space due to the underpinning soil mechanics training. Finally, explicit consideration of prediction uncertainty increases the interpretability and reliability of the proposed model toward increasing the likelihood of industry take-up.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available at https://github.com/PinZhang3/MR-NN.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) of China (Grant No. 15220221). The first author is supported by the Royal Society under the Newton International Fellowship. The last author is supported by the Royal Academy of Engineering under the Research Fellowship Scheme.

References

Amorosi, A., F. Rollo, and Y. F. Dafalias. 2021. “Relating elastic and plastic fabric anisotropy of clays.” Géotechnique 71 (7): 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.134.
Basheer, I. A. 2000. “Selection of methodology for neural network modeling of constitutive hystereses behavior of soils.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Inf. 15: 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00206.
Bozinovski, S., and A. Fulgosi. 1976. The influence of pattern similarity and transfer learning upon the training of a base perceptron B2.” In Proc., Symp. Informatica. Bled, Slovenia: Informatica.
Chen, R. P., P. Zhang, X. Kang, Z. Q. Zhong, Y. Liu, and H. N. Wu. 2019. “Prediction of maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling with ANN methods.” Soils Found. 59 (2): 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.11.005.
Ching, J., K. K. Phoon, Y. H. Ho, and M. C. Weng. 2021. “Quasi-site-specific prediction for deformation modulus of rock mass.” Can. Geotech. J. 58: 936–951. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0168.
Dafalias, Y. F. 1986. “Bounding surface plasticity. I: Mathematical foundation and hypoplasticity.” J. Eng. Mech. 112: 966–987. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:9(966).
Dafalias, Y. F., M. T. Manzari, and A. G. Papadimitriou. 2006. “SANICLAY: Simple anisotropic clay plasticity model.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 30: 1231–1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.524.
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. Taiebat. 2013. “Anatomy of rotational hardening in clay plasticity.” Géotechnique 63 (16): 1406–1418. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.197.
Fernández-Godino, M. G., C. Park, N. H. Kim, and R. T. Haftka. 2017. “Review of multi-fidelity models.” Preprint, submitted September 23, 2016. https://arXiv:1609.07196v07193.
Gal, Y., and Z. Ghahramani. 2016. “Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning.” In Proc., 33rd Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 1050–1059. Cambridge, MA: PMLR.
Gens, A. 1982. “Stress–strain and strength of a low plasticity clay.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of London.
Ghaboussi, J., J. Garret, and X. Wu. 1991. “Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks.” J. Eng. Mech. 117 (1): 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132).
Jin, Y.-F., Z.-Y. Yin, S.-L. Shen, and P.-Y. Hicher. 2016. “Selection of sand models and identification of parameters using an enhanced genetic algorithm.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 40 (8): 1219–1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2487.
Karpatne, A., G. Atluri, J. H. Faghmous, M. Steinbach, A. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Shekhar, N. Samatova, and V. Kumar. 2017. “Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data.” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29 (10): 2318–2331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168.
Karstunen, M., and M. Koskinen. 2008. “Plastic anisotropy of soft reconstituted clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (3): 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-073.
Karstunen, M., and Z. Y. Yin. 2010. “Modelling time-dependent behaviour of Murro test embankment.” Géotechnique 60 (10): 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.027.
Lu, L., M. Dao, P. Kumar, U. Ramamurty, G. E. Karniadakis, and S. Suresh. 2020. “Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (13): 7052–7062. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922210117.
Manzari, M. T., and M. A. Nour. 1997. “On implicit integration of bounding surface plasticity models.” Comput. Struct. 63 (3): 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00373-2.
Masi, F., I. Stefanou, P. Vannucci, and V. Maffi-Berthier. 2021. “Thermodynamics-based artificial neural networks for constitutive modeling.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147: 104277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104277.
Moler, C. B. 2004. Numerical computing with MATLAB. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
Oberkampf, W. L., and T. G. Trucano. 2002. “Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38: 209–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2.
Peherstorfer, B., K. Willcox, and M. Gunzburger. 2018. “Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization.” SIAM Rev. 60 (3): 550–591. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1082469.
Pestana, J. M., A. J. Whittle, and A. Gens. 2002. “Evaluation of a constitutive model for clays and sands: Part II—Clay behaviour.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 26 (11): 1123–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.238.
Phoon, K.-K., J. Ching, and T. Shuku. 2021. “Challenges in data-driven site characterization.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2022.2149815.
Roscoe, K., and J. Burland. 1968. “On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of ‘wet’ clay.” In Engineering plasticity, edited by J. Heyman and F. A. Leckie, 535–609. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vlassis, N. N., and W. Sun. 2021. “Sobolev training of thermodynamic-informed neural networks for interpretable elasto-plasticity models with level set hardening.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 377: 113695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113695.
Wheeler, S. J., A. Näätänen, M. Karstunen, and M. Lojander. 2003. “An anisotropic elastoplastic model for soft clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 40 (2): 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-119.
Xu, K., D. Z. Huang, and E. Darve. 2021. “Learning constitutive relations using symmetric positive definite neural networks.” J. Comput. Phys. 428 (Mar): 110072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110072.
Yang, C., D. Sheng, J. P. Carter, and S. W. Sloan. 2015. “Modelling the plastic anisotropy of Lower Cromer till.” Comput. Geotech. 69: 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.013.
Yin, Z. Y., C. S. Chang, M. Karstunen, and P. Y. Hicher. 2010. “An anisotropic elastic–viscoplastic model for soft clays.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 47 (5): 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.11.004.
Yin, Z. Y., Y. F. Jin, S. L. Shen, and H. W. Huang. 2016. “An efficient optimization method for identifying parameters of soft structured clay by an enhanced genetic algorithm and elastic–viscoplastic model.” Acta Geotech. 12 (4): 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0486-0.
Yin, Z.-Y., M. Karstunen, C. S. Chang, M. Koskinen, and M. Lojander. 2011. “Modeling time-dependent behavior of soft sensitive clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (11): 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000527.
Zdravkovic, L., D. M. Potts, and D. W. Hight. 2002. “The effect of strength anisotropy on the behaviour of embankments on soft ground.” Géotechnique 52 (6): 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.6.447.
Zhang, P., Y. F. Jin, and Z. Y. Yin. 2021a. “Machine learning–based uncertainty modelling of mechanical properties of soft clays relating to time-dependent behavior and its application.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 45 (11): 1588–1602. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3215.
Zhang, P., Y.-F. Jin, Z.-Y. Yin, and Y. Yang. 2020a. “Random forest based artificial intelligent model for predicting failure envelopes of caisson foundations in sand.” Appl. Ocean Res. 101 (Aug): 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2020.102223.
Zhang, P., H. N. Wu, R. P. Chen, and T. H. T. Chan. 2020b. “Hybrid meta-heuristic and machine learning algorithms for tunneling-induced settlement prediction: A comparative study.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 99 (May): 103383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103383.
Zhang, P., Z. Y. Yin, and Y. F. Jin. 2021b. “State-of-the-art review of machine learning applications in constitutive modeling of soils.” Arch. Comput. Method Eng. 28 (5): 3661–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09524-z.
Zhang, P., Z. Y. Yin, and Y. F. Jin. 2022a. “Bayesian neural network-based uncertainty modelling: Application to soil compressibility and undrained shear strength prediction.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (4): 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0751.
Zhang, P., Z.-Y. Yin, Y.-F. Jin, J. Yang, and B. B. Sheil. 2022b. “Physics-informed multi-fidelity residual neural networks for hydromechanical modelling of granular soils and foundation considering internal erosion.” J. Eng. Mech. 148 (4): 04022015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002094.
Zhang, P., Z.-Y. Yin, and B. Sheil. 2022c. “A physics-informed data-driven approach for consolidation analysis.” Géotechnique 2023 (Jan): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.22.00046.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 3March 2024

History

Received: Jul 29, 2022
Accepted: Sep 29, 2023
Published online: Jan 5, 2024
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Pin Zhang
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China; Newton International Fellow, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Zhen-Yu Yin [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Brian Sheil
Laing O’Rourke Associate Professor, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share