Case Studies
Jul 11, 2023

Implementing Technical Communication Instruction in a Civil Engineering Course: The Value of Knowledge Surveys and Peer Review

Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

There is a growing need for engineers to be effective communicators, yet professional skills often are underdeveloped by college-level engineering curricula and undervalued by engineering students. To improve communication skills, we integrated a technical communication block of instruction into a civil engineering (CE) computer applications course. Applying strategies from self-regulated learning theory, we used self-assessments to measure effectiveness of the instruction. Specifically, we used a pre-course and multiple post-assignment knowledge surveys (KS) that comprised competency statements aligned with the learning outcomes for each assignment. We also reviewed scores students received on their technical writing assignment submissions. Then we compared students’ KS assessments against instructor scores on each of the five writing assignments. Overall, the technical communication was deemed to be effective, as demonstrated by improved student technical writing competencies, including creating more-audience-centered, -accessible, and -usable deliverables. Results from KS demonstrated that self-assessments became better aligned with instructor’s grades, indicating that students improved their ability to self-assess their own capabilities. This study reinforces the benefit of integrating technical communication instruction, even on a small scale, and highlights the usefulness of KS for self-assessment and learning. Recommendations for integrating peer review, in terms of both frequency and type, also are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Specifically, anonymized student self-assessment data, writing assignment scores, and survey results on peer-review methods are available.

Acknowledgments

We thank Patrick Albritton for his insight in identifying a need for technical communication in the civil engineering course and helping to develop the curriculum. We also acknowledge Lauren Scharff, who helped us generate the first iteration of the knowledge survey used in the Fall 2021 Computer Applications course. We also thank the anonymous peer reviewers who provided thoughtful feedback that contributed to a better manuscript.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.

References

ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2022. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2019–2020. Criterion 3. Student outcomes.” Accessed June 17, 2022. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3.
ASCE. 2019. Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future. 3rd ed. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychol. Rev. 84 (2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Beauregard, M. S., J. A. Sloan, and M. Brannon. 2019. “Summarizing the use of knowledge surveys to inform effective learning and teaching practices.” In Proc., Rocky Mountain Section of the American Society for Engineering Education’s Annual Conf. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 1989. “Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings.” Higher Educ. 18 (5): 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746.
Bowers, N., M. Brandon, and C. D. Hill. 2005. “The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course.” Cell Biol. Educ. 4 (4): 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-11-0056.
Brown, G. T. L., H. L. Andrade, and F. Chen. 2015. “Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research.” Assess. Educ. 22 (4): 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523.
Bughin, J., E. Hazan, S. Lund, P. Dahlstrom, A. Wiesinger, and A. Subramaniam. 2019. A skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. Brussels, Belgium: McKinsey Global Institute.
Carlson, C. H., and C. W. Wong. 2020. “If engineers solve problems, why are there still so many problems to solve? Getting beyond technical ‘solutions’ in the classroom.” In Proc., 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conf. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Carpretz, L., and F. Ahmed. 2018. “A call to promote soft skills in software engineering.” Psychol. Cognit. Sci. 4 (1): e1–e3. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.01819.
Clauss, J., and K. Geedey. 2010. “Knowledge surveys: Students ability to self-assess.” J. Scholarship Teach. Learn. 10 (2): 14–24.
Dannels, D. P., and A. L. H. Gaffney. 2009. “Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy.” Commun. Educ. 58 (1): 124–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802527288.
Dent, A. L., and A. C. Koenka. 2016. “The Relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 28 (Sep): 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8.
Double, K. S., J. A. McGrande, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2020. “The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies.” Educ. Psychol. Rev. 32 (Jun): 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3.
Ehrlinger, J., A. L. Mitchum, and C. S. Dweck. 2016. “Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment.” J. Exp. Social Psychol. 63 (Jun): 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.001.
Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks.” Rev. Educ. Res. 70 (3): 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287.
Foong, C. C., N. L. B. Ghouse, A. J. Lye, N. A. K. A. Holder, V. Pallath, W.-H. Hong, and J. Vadivelu. 2021. “A qualitative study on self-regulated learning among high performing medical students.” BMC Med. Educ. 21 (1): 320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02712-w.
Frary, M. 2009. Knowledge surveys. Boise, ID: Boise State Univ.
Greenwood, M. R. C., and D. G. Riordan. 2001. “Civic scientist/civic duty.” Sci. Commun. 23 (May): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023001003.
Hall, K. D., D. G. Linzell, B. S. Minsker, J. F. Jajjar, and C. M. Saviz. 2020. Education summit: Mapping the future of civil engineering education. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hoo, H.-T., C. Deneen, and D. Boud. 2022. “Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions.” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 47 (3): 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871.
Huisman, B., N. Saab, J. van Driel, and P. van den Broek. 2018. “Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance.” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 43 (6): 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.
Jamshidi, R., K. Wright, and P. E. Slaboch. 2020. “Enhancement of students’ technical writing through a combination of classroom activities.” In Paper Presented at 2020 American Society of Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conf. Content Access. Washington, DC: American Society of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34567.
Jensen, W., and B. Fischer. 2005. “Teaching technical writing through student peer-evaluation.” J. Tech. Writ. Commun. 35 (1): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.2190/MBYG-AK7L-5CT7-54DU.
Kang, S. H. K. 2016. “Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction.” Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 3 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624708.
Kim, H. Y., and G. U. Kim. 2018. “The effect of self-directedness in learning on employment readiness of undergraduates in South Korea.” J. Educ. Learn. 7 (3): 125–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p125.
Leshner, A. I. 2007. “Outreach training needed.” Science 315 (5809): 161. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138712.
Lew, M. D. N., W. A. M. Alwis, and H. G. Schmidt. 2009. “Accuracy of students’ self-assessment and their beliefs about its utility.” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 35 (2): 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802687737.
Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2015. “Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings.” Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 41 (2): 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746.
Linvill, D. L., M. Tallapragada, and N. B. Kaye. 2019. “Engineering identity and communication outcomes: Comparing integrated engineering and traditional public-speaking courses.” Commun. Educ. 68 (3): 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1608367.
Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment.” Teach. Higher Educ. 11 (3): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582.
Masduki, M., and N. Zakaria. 2020. “Fulfilling the demand for workplace communication skills in the civil engineering industry.” Social Sci. Humanit. 28 (4): 3069–3087. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.28.4.32.
Matturro, G., F. Raschetti, and C. Fontan. 2019. “A systematic mapping study on soft skills in software engineering.” J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 25 (1): 16–41. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-025-01-0016.
Nelson, S. 2000. “Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates.” In Proc., 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conf., Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. New York: IEEE.
Nuhfer, E. 1993. “Bottom-line disclosure and assessment.” Teach. Professor 7 (7): 8.
Nuhfer, E., C. Cogan, S. Fleisher, E. Gaze, and K. Wirth. 2016. “Random number simulations reveal how random noise affects the measurements and graphical portrayals of self-assessed competency.” Numeracy 9 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.9.1.4.
Nuhfer, E., and D. Knipp. 2003. “The knowledge survey: A tool for all reasons.” Improv. Acad. 21 (1): 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2003.tb00381.x.
Nuhfer, E. B. 1996. “The place of formative evaluations in assessment and ways to reap their benefits.” J. Geosci. Educ. 44 (4): 385–394. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-44.4.385.
Ohtani, K., and T. Hisasaka. 2018. “Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance.” Metacognition Learn. 13 (Aug): 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8.
Patel, R., C. Tarrant, S. Bonas, J. Yates, and J. Sandars. 2015. “The struggling student: A thematic analysis from the self-regulated learning perspective.” Med. Educ. 49 (4): 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12651.
Pujol-Ferran, A., and O. Farrerons-Vidal. 2020. “Self-assessment in industrial engineering. Pilot test in graphic engineering at the Polytechnic University of Catalunya-BarcelonaTech.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on The Digital Transformation in the Graphic Engineering, edited by F. Cavas-Martínez, et al. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41200-5_38.
Rayner, G., and T. Papakonstantinou. 2016. “The nexus between STEM qualifications and graduate employability: Employers’ perspectives.” Int. J. Innovation Sci. Math. Educ. 24 (3): 1–13.
Redaelli, J. C., and O. F. Lima. 2012. “Application of self-regulated learning strategies in undergraduate, graduate and specialization students in civil engineering.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Interactive Collaborative Learning. Villach, Austria: IEEE.
Richardson, M., C. Abraham, and R. Bond. 2012. “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Psychol. Bull. 138 (2): 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.
Ross, J. A. 2006. “The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 11 (10): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65.
Schraw, G., K. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning.” Res. Sci. Educ. 36 (Mar): 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2012. “Self-regulation and learning.” In Handbook of psychology, educational psychology, 2nd ed., edited by I. B. Weiner, G. E. Miller, and W. M. Reynolds, 59–78. New York: Wiley.
Sheth, T. D. 2015. “Communication skill: A prerequisite for engineers.” Int. J. Stud. English Lang. Lit. 3 (7): 51–54.
Shuy, T. 2010. “Self-regulated learning.” US Department of Education. Accessed June 17, 2022. https://lincs.ed.gov/sites/default/files/3_TEAL_Self%20Reg%20Learning.pdf.
Sloan, J., K. L. Becker, and T. Frank. 2022. “Integrating technical communication block in a computer applications course: Lessons learned.” In Proc., ASEE Annual Conf. & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society of Engineering Education.
Sloan, J. A., and L. F. Scharff. 2022. “Student self-assessment: Relationships between accuracy, engagement, perceived value, and performance.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 148 (3): 04022004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000063.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2022. “How to become a civil engineer.” Accessed June 17, 2022. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/civil-engineers.htm#tab-4.
Virtanen, P., A. Nevgi, and H. Niemi. 2014. “Self-regulation in higher education: Students’ motivational, regulational and learning strategies, and their relationships to study success.” Stud. Learn. Soc. 3 (May): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/sls-2013-0004.
Vrugt, A., and F. J. Oort. 2008. “Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement.” Metacognition Learn. 3 (May): 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4.
Wirth, K. R., E. B. Nuhfer, R. M. Watson, S. C. Fleisher, and R. Bailey. 2021. “Knowledge surveys: Supporting students along pathways to self-directed learning with self-assessment.” In Self-directed learning: An imperative for education in a complex society, edited by E. Mentz, D. Laubscher, and J. Olivier, 127–164. Cape Town, South Africa: AOSIS.
Wu, S., S. Zha, and S. Mattson. 2020. “Integrating team-based learning modules to improve civil engineering students’ technical writing skills.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 146 (3): 04020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000016.
Yalch, M. M., E. M. Vitale, and J. K. Ford. 2019. “Benefits of peer review on students’ writing.” Psychol. Learn. Teach. 18 (3): 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719835070.
Yusof, N., and M. S. Misnan. 2019. “Restriction factors to implement safety practices in small grade contractors.” Int. J. Built Environ. Sustainability 6 (1–2): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n1-2.378.
Zheng, B., and Y. Zhang. 2020. “Self-regulated learning: The effect on medical student learning outcomes in a flipped classroom environment.” BMC Med. Educ. 20 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02023-6.
Zimmerman, B. J. 1990. “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview.” Educ. Psychol. 25 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2.
Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective.” In Handbook of self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., and D. H. Schunk. 2008. “Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning.” In Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 1–30. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 149Issue 4October 2023

History

Received: Oct 4, 2022
Accepted: May 3, 2023
Published online: Jul 11, 2023
Published in print: Oct 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Director, Communication Strategies Center, Academic Success Center, US Air Force Academy, 2354 Fairchild Dr., CO 80840. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-7925. Email: [email protected]
Permanent Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, US Air Force Academy, 2354 Fairchild Dr., CO 80840 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-3048. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Use of a Gamified Platform to Improve Scientific Writing in Engineering Students, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci13121164, 13, 12, (1164), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share