Technical Papers
Feb 23, 2023

Rapid Prediction of Flexible Deformations of a Gust Generator Vane Using Data-Driven Approaches

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 3

Abstract

The aeroelastic effect of gust generator vanes with a high aspect ratio is more significant in large-scale wind tunnels. High-fidelity numerical results based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and computational structural mechanics (CSM) coupling methodology have an extremely high computational cost. To this end, a data-driven method for rapidly estimating unsteady flexible deformations of gust generators vanes is developed. The aeroelastic rigid-elastic reduced-order model is built by the dynamic mode decomposition with control and prediction error minimization (DMDcP) methods. For all cases validated with various pitching amplitudes and frequencies of gust vanes, the maximum cumulative errors of DMDcP reduced-order model solutions are all under 2%. The efficiency of the presented method has the potential to fast estimate unsteady flexible deformations and reduce computational cost in the early stages of gust generator design while maintaining adequate accuracy as the CFD-CSM coupling methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant #12072278 and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China #ASFC-201901053001. This work is also supported by AVI C Aerodynamics Research Institute and The First Aircraft Institute.

References

Allen, C., and T. Rendall. 2007. “Unified approach to CFD-CSD interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions.” In Proc., 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 3804. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Allen, N. J., and M. Quinn. 2015. “Development of a transonic gust rig for simulation of vertical gusts on half-models.” In Proc., 31st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conf., 2403. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Badrya, C., A. R. Jones, and J. D. Baeder. 2022. “Unsteady aerodynamic response of a flat plate encountering large-amplitude sharp-edged gust.” AIAA J. 60 (3): 1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060683.
Bateman, D. 2015. “Design and qualification of an upstream gust generator in a low-speed wind tunnel.” M.S. thesis, Ann and H.J. Smead Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, Univ. of Colorado.
Beckert, A., and H. Wendland. 2001. “Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 5 (2): 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01087-7.
Benner, P., C. Himpe, and T. Mitchell. 2018. “On reduced input-output dynamic mode decomposition.” Adv. Comput. Math. 44 (6): 1751–1768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-018-9592-x.
Biler, H., G. Sedky, A. R. Jones, M. Saritas, and O. Cetiner. 2021. “Experimental investigation of transverse and vortex gust encounters at low Reynolds numbers.” AIAA J. 59 (3): 786–799. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059658.
Brzozowski, D., J. Culp, A. Kutay, J. Muse, and A. Glezer. 2008. “Closed-loop aerodynamic flow control of a free airfoil.” In Proc., 4th Flow Control Conf., 4323. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Chowdhury, J., and M. J. Ringuette. 2021. “Effect of a rotating and swept wingtip on streamwise gust alleviation.” AIAA J. 59 (3): 800–811. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059690.
EASA (European Aviation Safety Agency). 2021. “CS 25.341 Gust and turbulence loads. Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large aeroplanes Amendment 27.” Accessed October 1, 2023. https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/certification-specifications/cs-25-amendment-27.
FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). 2015. “§25.341 Gust and turbulence loads.” Accessed February 5, 2015. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25/subpart-C.
Fonte, F., L. Riccobene, S. Ricci, S. Adden, and M. Martegani. 2016. “Design, manufacturing and validation of a gust generator for wind tunnel test of a large scale aeroelastic model.” In Proc., 30th Congress Int. Council of the Aeronautical Science, 25–30. Berlin, Germany: International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.
French, A., W. Friess, A. Goupee, and K. Berube. 2021. “Design, construction and evaluation of an oscillating vane gust generator for atmospheric flow simulation.” Wind 1 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/wind1010004.
Greenblatt, D. 2016. “Unsteady low-speed wind tunnels.” AIAA J. 54 (6): 1817–1830. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054590.
Grissom, D., and W. Devenport. 2004. “Development and testing of a deterministic disturbance generator.” In Proc., 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf., 2956. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Grubb, A. L., A. Moushegian, D. J. Heathcote, and M. J. Smith. 2020. “Physics and computational modeling of nonlinear transverse gust encounters.” In Proc., AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Heinrich, R., and L. Reimer. 2013. “Comparison of different approaches for gust modeling in the CFD code tau.” In Proc., Int. Forum on Aeroelasticity & Structural Dynamics. London: Royal Aeronautical Society.
Hoblit, F. M. 1988. Gust loads on aircraft: Concepts and applications. New York: AIAA.
Jones, A. R., O. Cetiner, and M. J. Smith. 2022. “Physics and modeling of large flow disturbances: Discrete gust encounters for modern air vehicles.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54 (1): 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-031621-085520.
Lancelot, P. M., J. Sodja, N. P. Werter, and R. D. Breuker. 2017. “Design and testing of a low subsonic wind tunnel gust generator.” Adv. Aircr. Spacecraft Sci. 4 (2): 125. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.2.125.
Mannarino, A., and E. H. Dowell. 2015. “Reduced-order models for computational-fluid-dynamics-based nonlinear aeroelastic problems.” AIAA J. 53 (9): 2671–2685. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053775.
Nguyen, N. T., J. Xiong, and N. B. Cramer. 2020. “Simulation and modeling of flow generated by gust generator in a wind tunnel.” In Proc., AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Perrotta, G. M., and A. R. Jones. 2016. “Transient aerodynamics of large transverse gusts and geometrically similar maneuvers.” In Proc., 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Pohl, J. E., R. Radespiel, B. Herrmann, S. L. Brunton, and R. Semaan. 2022. “Gust mitigation through closed-loop control. I. Trailing-edge flap response.” Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (6): 024705. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.024705.
Pratt, K. G. 1953. A revised formula for the calculation of gust loads. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Proctor, J. L., S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz. 2016. “Dynamic mode decomposition with control.” SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 15 (1): 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1013857.
Quan, E., M. Xu, D. Xie, and G. Li. 2018. “Efficient nonlinear reduced-order model for computational fluid dynamics-based aeroelastic analysis.” AIAA J. 56 (9): 3701–3717. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057145.
Ricci, S., and A. Scotti. 2008. “Wind tunnel testing of an active controlled wing under gust excitation.” In Proc., 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., 1727. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Roadman, J., and K. Mohseni. 2009. “Gust characterization and generation for wind tunnel testing of micro aerial vehicles.” In Proc., 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 1290. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Saddington, A., M. Finnis, and K. Knowles. 2015. “The characterisation of a gust generator for aerodynamic testing.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 229 (7): 1214–1225.
Schmid, P. J. 2010. “Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data.” J. Fluid Mech. 656 (5): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010001217.
Singh, R., and J. D. Baeder. 1997. “Direct calculation of three-dimensional indicial lift response using computational fluid dynamics.” J. Aircr. 34 (4): 465–471. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2214.
Tang, D. M., P. G. A. Cizmas, and E. H. Dowell. 1996. “Experiments and analysis for a gust generator in a wind tunnel.” J. Aircr. 33 (1): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46914.
Wales, C., D. Jones, and A. Gaitonde. 2015. “Prescribed velocity method for simulation of aerofoil gust responses.” J. Aircr. 52 (1): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032597.
Wang, Y., M. Xu, and H. Chen. 2018. “Design and development of parallel computation software for aerothermoelasticity.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Computer Science and Application Engineering. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Wei, N. J., J. Kissing, T. T. B. Wester, S. Wegt, K. Schiffmann, S. Jakirlic, M. Hölling, J. Peinke, and C. Tropea. 2019. “Insights into the periodic gust response of airfoils.” J. Fluid Mech. 876 (Mar): 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.537.
Wood, K. T., R. C. Cheung, T. S. Richardson, J. E. Cooper, O. Darbyshire, and C. Warsop. 2017. “A new gust generator for a low speed wind tunnel: Design and commissioning.” In Proc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Wu, Z., G. Bangga, T. Lutz, G. Kampers, and M. Hölling. 2020. “Insights into airfoil response to sinusoidal gusty inflow by oscillating vanes.” Phys. Fluids 32 (12): 125107. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023297.
Yang, S. B., W. Y. Hu, L. Yong, and L. B. Wang. 2022. “Investigation of flow field characteristics of gust generator.” J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aviat. 54 (1): 95–108.
Yao, W., and S. Marques. 2017. “Nonlinear aerodynamic and aeroelastic model reduction using a discrete empirical interpolation method.” AIAA J. 55 (2): 624–637. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055143.
Zhao, D., Z. Yang, X. Zeng, J. Yu, Y. Gao, and G. Huang. 2022. “Wind tunnel test of gust load alleviation for a large-scale full aircraft model.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2022 (Jun): 24.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36Issue 3May 2023

History

Received: May 12, 2022
Accepted: Nov 23, 2022
Published online: Feb 23, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical Univ., Xi’an 710072, Shaanxi, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-3737. Email: [email protected]
Min Xu
Professor, School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical Univ., Xi’an 710072, Shaanxi, China.
Dongqiang Zhao
Researcher, Dept. of Classified, The First Aircraft Institute of Aviation Industry of China, Xi’an 710089, Shaanxi, China.
Guoning Huang
Researcher, Dept. of Classified, The First Aircraft Institute of Aviation Industry of China, Xi’an 710089, Shaanxi, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Data-Driven Method for Real-Time Reconstruction of the Structural Displacement Field, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-5370, 37, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share