Technical Paper
Oct 2, 2015

Fluid Motions Associated with Engineered Area Bubble Plumes

Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 2

Abstract

Current bubble oil booms (BOBs) create bubble curtains to protect fixed installations in calm waters such as harbors, but fail in more energetic environments. Field and lab studies reveal that area bubble plumes enable BOB applications in such environments. Area bubble plumes exhibit dynamics distinct from point- or line-source plumes, including thicker and more robust outwelling flows and relatively smaller turbulence scales. Area bubble plume studies broaden our understanding of natural systems, where currents and waves are ubiquitous, leading to a variety of marine applications. Laboratory studies in a large flume have investigated the fluid dynamics of shallow line and area bubble plumes. These studies focused on area-plume application to oil spill response, which, based on preliminary tests, featured improved outflows with a downstream barrier. A range of ambient currents, current–plume angles, and airflows were tested. Key to understanding current–plume interactions was the upstream rotor or near-surface recirculation vortex. The strongest outwelling was for a 0.25ms1 current and 5-sparger plume (∼unity width-to-depth aspect ratio, ε). Owing to acceleration by the rotor, however, the rotor collapsed into this plume at a current of 0.40ms1, destroying plume coherency. The fastest surface outwelling was slightly outside the bubble plume edge, and horizontal profiles were well described by two piecewise exponentials. A 10-sparger plume with ε2 was slower but more robust (thicker), allowing its rotor to survive in stronger currents. Vertical profiles of the outwelling flow were well described by an offset Gaussian (subsurface peak) with significantly lower velocity fluctuations than for line-source plumes. Streamline convergence from the rotor was important in reducing turbulence fluctuations. Oblique angle currents led to greater rotor acceleration with the surface outwelling flow largely perpendicular. However, velocities deeper than the main outwelling flow were deflected downstream, showing a highly nonlinear, helical flow in the rotor. These results highlight the importance of better understanding the complex flow fields of area bubble plumes in natural systems and marine engineering applications. Better characterization of the rotor is needed for a range of ambient conditions to enable BOB design optimization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Research Council of Norway (PETROMAKS Project No. 187376), Statoil ASA, and Eni Norge AS. The project also received support, advice, and technical input from NorLense AS, NOFI Tromsø AS, and the Norwegian Clean Seas Association for Operating Companies (NOFO). The authors wish to thank the staff at Hirtshals.

References

Abraham, G., Van der Burgh, P., and De Vos, P. (1973). Pneumatic barriers to reduce salt intrusion through locks, Rijkswaterstaat Communications, Rijkswaterstaat, Netherlands, 70.
Asaeda, T., and Imberger, J. (1993). “Structure of bubble plumes in linearly stratified environments.” J. Fluid Mech., 249, 35–57.
Billeter, L., and Fanneløp, T. K. (1989). “Gas concentration over an underwater gas release.” Atmos. Environ., 23(8), 1683–1694.
Bulson, P. S. (1961). “Currents produced by an air current in deep water: Report on recent experiments at Southampton.” The Dock and Harbor Authority, 42, 15–22.
Chapman, J. E., and Douglas, W. S. (2002). “Evaluation of a berth sedimentation control technology in the Kill Van Kull: The airguard pneumatic barrier system.” Dredging'02: Key Technologies for Global Prosperity, ASCE, Orlando, FL, 1–14.
Dhotre, M. T., and Smith, B. L. (2007). “CFD simulation of large-scale bubble plumes: Comparisons against experiments.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(23), 6615–6630.
Eidnes, G., Leirvik, F., McClimans, T. A., Gjøsund, S. H., and Grimaldo, E. (2013). “Containing oil spills by use of air bubbles.” Proc., 23rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., ISOPE, Cupertino, CA, 707–710.
Fanneløp, T. K., Hirschberg, S., and Küffer, J. (1991). “Surface current and recirculating cells generated by bubble curtains and jets.” J. Fluid Mech., 229, 629–657.
Fanneløp, T. K., and Webber, D. M. (2003). “On buoyant plumes rising from area sources in a calm environment.” J. Fluid Mech., 497, 319–334.
Fingas, M. (2000). The basics of oil spill cleanup, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 256.
Fischer, P. J. (1977). “Natural gas and oil seeps, Santa Barbara Basin, California.” California offshore gas, oil, and tar seeps, D. J. Everitts, R. G. Paul, C. F. Eaton, and E. E. Welday, eds., State of California State Lands Commission, Sacramento, CA, 1–62.
Freire, A. P. S., Miranda, D. D. E., Luz, L. M. S., and França, G. F. M. (2002). “Bubble plumes and the Coanda effect.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(8), 1293–1310.
Grace, J., and Sowyrda, A. (1970). “The development and evaluation of a pneumatic barrier for restraining surface oils in a river.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 42(12), 2074–2093.
Grimaldo, E., Leifer, I., Gjøsund, S. H., Larsen, R. B., Jeuthe, H., and Basedow, S. (2010). “Field demonstration of a novel towed, area bubble-plume zooplankton (Calanus sp.) harvester.” Fish. Res., 107(1–3), 147–158.
Houser, J. (1971). “Heavy-duty oil containment systems: Pneumatic barrier system. Part 1.” Contract DOT-CG-00-490-A to Oil Containment Division, Wilson Industries, 578.
Hydrotechnik Lubeck. (2012). “The advantage of pneumatic oil barriers.” Port Technol. Int.http://www.porttechnology.org/images/uploads/technical_papers/PT32-27.pdf
Iguchi, M., Sasaki, K., Nakajima, K., and Kawabata, H. (1998). “Coanda effect on bubble characteristcs in a bubbling jet rising near the side wall of a cylindrical vessel.” Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 38(12), 1297–1303.
Jones, W. T. (1972). “Air barriers as oil spill containment devices.” Soc. Petrol. Eng., J., 12(2), 126–142.
Leifer, I. (1995). A validation study of bubble mediated air-sea gas transfer modeling: Earth and atmospheric Sciences. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 205.
Leifer, I. (2010). “Characteristics and scaling of bubble plumes from marine hydrocarbon seepage in the Coal Oil Point seep field.” J. Geophys. Res., 115, C11014.
Leifer, I., Clark, J. F., and Chen, R. F. (2000). “Modifications of the local environment by natural marine hydrocarbon seeps.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(22), 3711–3714.
Leifer, I., Jeuthe, H., Gjøsund, S. H., and Johansen, V. (2009). “Engineered and natural marine seep, bubble-driven buoyancy flows.” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39(12), 3071–3090.
Leifer, I., and Judd, A. G. (2002). “Oceanic methane layers: The hydrocarbon seep bubble deposition hypothesis.” Terra Nova, 14(6), 417–424.
Leifer, I., Kamerling, M., Luyendyk, B. P., and Wilson, D. (2010). “Geologic control of natural marine hydrocarbon seep emissions, Coal Oil Point seep field, California.” Geo-Mar. Lett., 30(3–4), 331–338.
Leifer, I., Luyendyk, B., and Broderick, K. (2006). “Tracking an oil slick from multiple natural sources, Coal Oil Point, California.” Mar. Pet. Geol., 23(5), 621–630.
Lemckert, C. J., and Imberger, J. (1993). “Energetic bubble plumes in arbitrary stratification.” J. Hydr. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:6(680), 680–703. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:6(680)
Lo, J.-M. (1997). “The effect of air bubble barriers in containing oil-slick movement.” Ocean Eng., 24(7), 645–663.
McClimans, T. (2008). “Improved efficiency of bubble curtains.” Coastal Technology Workshop, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 152–161.
McClimans, T., Leifer, I., Gjøsund, S. H., Grimaldo, E., Daling, P., and Leirvik, F. (2013). “Pneumatic oil barriers: The promise of bubble rafts.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M: J. Eng. Mar. Environ., 227(1), 22–38.
McDougall, T. (1978). “Bubble plumes in stratified environments.” J. Fluid Mech., 85(4), 655–672.
McGinnis, D. F., Lorke, A., Wüest, A., Stöckli, A., and Little, J. C. (2004). “Interaction between a bubble plume and the near field in a stratified lake.” Water Resour. Res., 40(10), W10206.
Milgram, J. H. (1983). “Mean flow in round bubble plumes.” J. Fluid Mech., 133, 345–376.
Rensen, J., and Roig, V. (2001). “Experimental study of the unsteady structure of a confined bubble plume.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 27(8), 1431–1449.
Riess, I. R., and Fanneløp, T. K. (1998). “Recirculating flow generated by line-source bubble plumes.” J. Hydr. Eng., 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:9(932), 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:9(932)
Simiano, M., Zboray, R., de Cachard, F., Lakehal, D., and Yadigaroglu, G. (2006). “Comprehensive experimental investigation of the hydrodynamics of large-scale, 3D, oscillating bubble plumes.” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 32(10–11), 1160–1181.
Singleton, V. L., Gantzer, P., and Little, J. C. (2007). “Linear bubble plume model for hypolimnetic oxygenation: Full-scale validation and sensitivity analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 43(2), W02405.
Solomon, E. A., Kastner, M., MacDonald, I. R., and Leifer, I. (2009). “Considerable methane fluxes to the atmosphere from hydrocarbon seeps in the Gulf of Mexico.” Nat. Geosci., 2, 561–565.
Terrill, E. J., Melville, W. K., and Stramski, D. (2001). “Bubble entrainment by breaking waves and their influence on optical scattering in the upper ocean.” J. Geophys. Res., 106(C8), 16815–16823.
Wüest, A., Brooks, N. H., and Imbolden, D. M. (1992). “Bubble plume modeling for lake restoration.” Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3235–3250.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 142Issue 2March 2016

History

Received: Aug 22, 2013
Accepted: Oct 20, 2014
Published online: Oct 2, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 2, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professional Researcher, Marine Sciences Institute, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
T. A. McClimans
Senior Advisor, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway.
S. H. Gjøsund
Research Manager, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway.
E. Grimaldo
Senior Research Scientist, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share