Willingness to Pay for Riparian Zones in an Ozark Watershed
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 143, Issue 5
Abstract
Clear Creek watershed, located in the Ozark Mountain Region of Northwest Arkansas, has experienced ecosystem degradation as a result of increased urbanization. Riparian zones are known to play an integral role in maintaining ecosystem integrity and are often used as management tools for protecting watershed ecosystem services, especially in urbanizing areas. To determine whether residents of the Clear Creek watershed would be in favor of the establishment and maintenance of riparian zones in their region, a mail survey was conducted using contingent valuation methods (CVMs) to elicit local willingness to pay (WTP) for riparian zones. The study found that residents were willing to pay an average of $80.07 in increased state income taxes for the ecological services provided by riparian zones. Bid amount, income, and attitude toward willingness to pay were shown to have the most significant influence on the residents’ overall WTP. Survey results were also used to assess residents’ abilities to perceive ecosystem quality as a factor of WTP but analysis found this perception to be insignificant in affecting respondent WTP.
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
Acknowledgments
Financial support for the bioassessment and survey production and mailing costs was provided in part by the Illinois River Watershed Partnership.
References
Adams, C., Da Motta, R. S., Ortiz, R. A., Reid, J., Aznar, C. E., and de Almeida Sinisgalli, P. A. (2008). “The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro Do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil).” Ecol. Econ., 66(2), 359–370.
Adams, D. C., Allen, D., Borisova, D., Boellstorff, D. E., Smolen, M. D., Mahler, R. L. (2013). “The influence of water attitudes, perceptions, and learning preferences on water-conserving actions.” Nat. Sci. Educ., 42(1), 114–122.
Adams, D. C., Bwenge, A. N., Lee, D. J., Larkin, S. L., and Alavalapati, J. R. R. (2011). “Public preferences for controlling upland invasive plants in state parks: Application of a choice model.” Forest Policy, Econ., 13(6), 465–472.
ADEQ (Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality). (2016). “Category 4A waters: Impaired waterbodies (streams) with completed TMDLs.” ⟨https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/water/planning/integrated/303d/pdfs/2016/public-notice-county-full-list.pdf⟩ (Jul. 8, 2016).
Amigues, J. P., Boulatoff, C., Desaigues, C. G., and Keith, J. E. (2002). “The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: A willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach.” Ecol. Econ., 43(1), 17–31.
ArcView GIS [Computer software]. Esri, Redlands, CA.
Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K., and Yabe, K. (2004). “Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the Greenway System of Sapporo, Japan.” Landsc. Urban Plan., 68(2), 167–182.
Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., and Stribling, J. B. (1999). “Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Barrio, M., and Loureiro, M. L. (2010). “A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies.” Ecol. Econ., 69(5), 1023–1030.
Bockstael, N. E. (1996). “Modeling economics and ecology: The importance of a spatial perspective.” Am. J. Agri. Econ., 78(5), 1168–1180.
Boellstorff, D. E., et al. (2013). “Audience preferences for water resource information from extension and other sources.” Nat. Sci. Educ., 42(1), 123–130.
Borisova, T., et al. (2013). “Differences in opinions about surface water issues in the southern United States: Implications for the watershed planning process.” Nat. Sci. Educ., 42(1), 104–113.
Bowker, J. M., Newman, D. H., Warren, R. J., Henderson, D. W. (2003). “Estimating the economic value of lethal versus nonlethal deer control in suburban communities.” Soc. Nat. Resour., 16(2), 143–158.
Brox, J. A., Kumar, R. C., and Stollery, K. R. (2003). “Estimating willingness to pay for improved water quality in the presence of item nonresponse bias.” Am. J. Agri. Econ., 85(2), 414–428.
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., and Meade, N. F. (2001). “Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence.” Environ. Resour. Econ., 19(2), 173–210.
Castro, A. J., Vaughn, C. C., Garcia-Llorente, M., Julian, J. P., and Atkinson, C. L. (2016). “Willingness to pay for ecosystem services among stakeholder groups in a South-Central U.S. watershed with regional conflict.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., .
CAST (University of Arkansas Center for Advanced Spatial Technology). (2006). “Watershed report: Clear Creek–Illinois River 1111010302.” ⟨http://watersheds.cast.uark.edu/reports/pdf/1111010302pop.pdf⟩ (Mar. 3, 2016).
Cho, S. H., Newman, D. H., and Bowker, J. M. (2005). “Measuring rural homeowners’ willingness to pay for land conservation easements.” Forest Policy Econ., 7(5), 757–770.
Costanza, R., et al. (1997). “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.” Nature, 387, 253–260.
Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., and Hannon, B. (1998). “The value of ecosystem services: Putting the issues in perspective.” Ecol. Econ., 25(1), 67–72.
Cunningham, K., Liechty, H., and Stuhlinger, C. (2009). “Riparian buffers: Functions and values.”, Univ. of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock, AR, 1–4.
Deacon, R. T. and Kolstad, C. D. (2000). “Valuing beach recreation lost in environmental accidents.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 374–381.
DeWalle, D. R. (2008). “Guidelines for riparian vegetative shade restoration based upon a theoretical shaded-stream model.” JAWRA, 44(6), 1373–1387.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., and Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method, 3rd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
Elsin, Y. K., Kramer, R. A., and Jenkins, W. A. (2010). “Valuing drinking water provision as an ecosystem service in the Neuse River basin.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 474–482.
Farber, S., et al. (2006). “Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management.” Bioscience, 56(2), 121–133.
Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., Bordia, P., and Hogg, M. A. (2005). “Explaining landholders’ decisions about riparian zone management: The role of behavioral, normative, and control beliefs.” J. Environ. Manage., 77(1), 12–21.
Grazhdani, D. (2015). “Contingent valuation of residents’ attitudes and willingness to pay for non-point source pollution control: A case study in AL-Prespa, Southeastern Albania.” Environ. Manage., 56(1), 81–93.
Green, D., Jacowitz, K. E., Kahneman, D., and McFadden, D. (1998). “Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods.” Resour. Energy Econ., 20(2), 85–116.
Groves, R. M. (2006). “Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household survey.” Public Opin. Q., 70(5), 646–675.
Halkos, G., and Matsiori, S. (2012). “Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement.” J. Socio. Econ., 41(4), 391–399.
Hanemann, W. M. (1984). “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses.” Am. J. Agri. Econ., 66(3), 332–341.
Hanemann, W. M. (1989). “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: Reply.” Am. J. Agri. Econ., 71(4), 1057–1061.
Holmes, T. P., Bergstrom, J. C., Huszar, E., Kask, S. B., and Orr, F. (2004). “Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration.” Ecol. Econ., 49(1), 19–30.
Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., and Fernández-MaCho, J. (2009). “The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence.” Ecol. Econ., 68(8), 2372–2381.
Ivanova, G., and Tranter, B. (2004). “Willingness to pay for ‘the environment’ in cross-national perspective.” Australasian Political Studies Association Conf., Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Johnson, N. L., and Baltodano, M. E. (2004). “The economics of community watershed management: Some evidence from Nicaragua.” Ecol. Econ., 49(1), 57–71.
Jorgensen, B. S., and Syme, G. J. (2000). “Protest responses and willingness to pay: Attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement.” Ecol. Econ., 33(2), 251–265.
Jorgensen, E. E., Canfield, T. J., and Mayer, P. M. (2002). “Advances in restoration science: Research needs in riparian buffer restoration.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 1–7.
Kaffashi, S., Shamsudin, M. N., Radam, A., Rahim, K. A., and Yacob, M. R. (2015). “Users and non-users of wetland area; Willingness to pay and demand elasticity.” J. Sustain. Develop., 8(8), 56–69.
Kniivilä, M. (2006). “Users and non-users of conservation areas: Are there differences in WTP, motives and the validity of responses in CVM surveys?” Ecol. Econ., 59(4), 530–539.
Kotchen, M. J., and Reiling, S. D. (2000). “Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: A case study involving endangered species.” Ecol. Econ., 32(1), 93–107.
Kreye, M. M., Adams, D. C., and Escobedo, F. J. (2014). “The value of forest conservation for water quality protection.” Forests, 5(5), 862–884.
Kreye, M. M., Adams, D. C., Escobedo, F. J., and Soto, J. R. (2016). “Does policy process influence public values for forest-water resource protection in Florida?” Ecol. Econ., 129, 122–131.
Legesse, B. A. (2015). “Determinants of WTP and WTA in watershed management: For linking land tenure, use and shared prosperity in a PES intervention in the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.” 2015 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Lewis, S., and Popp, J. (2013). “Public perception of ecosystem integrity of an Ozark watershed.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 68(2), 89–98.
Loomis, J. (2006). “Use of survey data to estimate economic value and regional economic effects of fishery improvements.” N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 26(2), 301–307.
Loomis, J. (2014). “2013 WAEA keynote address: Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys.” J. Agr. Resour. Econ., 39(1), 34–46.
Loomis, J., Brown, T., Lucero, B., and Peterson, G. (1996). “Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: Results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay.” Land Econ., 72(4), 450–461.
Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., and Covich, A. (2000). “Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey.” Ecol. Econ., 33(1), 103–117.
Loomis, J., and Santiago, L. (2013). “Economic valuation of beach quality improvements: Comparing incremental attribute values estimated from two stated preference valuation methods.” Coast. Manage., 41(1), 75–86.
Loomis, J. B. (1996). “Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: Results of a contingent valuation survey.” Water Resour. Res., 32(2), 441–447.
Loomis, J. B. (2000). “Environmental valuation techniques in water resource decision making.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 339–344.
Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S. K., McCutchen, M. D., and Canfield, T. J. (2007). “Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers.” J. Environ. Qual., 36(4), 1172–1180.
Mazor, R. D., Purcell, A. H., and Resh, V. H. (2009). “Long-term variability in bioassessments: A twenty-year study from two northern California streams.” Environ. Manage., 43(6), 1269–1286.
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method, Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, DC.
Mouchet, M. A., Lamarque, P., Martin-Lopez, B., Crouzat, E., Gos, P., Byczek, C., and Lavorel, S. (2014). “An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services.” Global Environ. Change, 28(1), 298–308.
Nelson, N. M., Loomis, J. B., Jakus, P. M., Kealy, M. J., Stackelburg, N. V., and Ostermiller, J. (2015). “Linking ecological data and economics to estimate the total economic value of improving water quality by reducing nutrients.” Ecol. Econ., 118, 1-9.
Nicosia, K., et al. (2014). “Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation.” Ecol. Econ., 104, 145–151.
Ostrom, E. (2000). “Collective action and the evolution of social norms.” J. Econ. Perspect., 14(3), 137–158.
Paradise, T. R. (2005). “Perception of earthquake risk in Agadir, Morocco: A case study from a Muslim community.” Global Environ. Change Pt. B Environ. Hazards, 6(3), 167–180.
Pendleton, L., Martin, N., and Webster, D. (2001). “Public perceptions of environmental quality: A survey study of beach use and perceptions in Los Angeles County.” Marine Poll. Bull., 42(11), 1155–1160.
Pumphrey, R. G., Edwards, J. A., and Becker, K. G. (2008). “Urban and rural attitudes toward municipal water controls: A study of a semi-arid region with limited water supplies.” Ecol. Econ., 65(1), 1–12.
Rosenberger, R. S., and Stanley, T. D. (2006). “Measurement, generalization, and publication: Sources of error in benefit transfers and their management.” Ecol. Econ., 60(2), 372–378.
Ryan, A. M., and Spash, C. L. (2011). “Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values.” J. Econ. Psychol., 32(5), 674–687.
Sabatier, P. A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., and Matlock, M., eds. (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Schläpfer, F. (2009). “Contingent valuation: Confusions, problems, and solutions.” Ecol. Econ., 68(6), 1569–1571.
Silvano, R. A., Udvardy, S., Ceroni, M., and Farley, J. (2005). “An ecological integrity assessment of a Brazilian Atlantic forest watershed based on surveys of stream health and local farmers’ perceptions: Implications for management.” Ecol. Econ., 53(3), 369–385.
Solomon, B. D., and Johnson, N. H. (2009). “Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol.” Ecol. Econ., 68(7), 2137–2144.
Spash, C. L., Urama, K., Burton, R., Kenyon, W., Shannon, P., and Hill, G. (2009). “Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology.” Ecol. Econ., 68(4), 955–964.
Tentes, G., and Damigos, D. (2015). “Discrete choice experiment for groundwater valuation: Case of the Asopos River basin, Greece.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., .
Turpie, J. K. (2003). “The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: How interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay.” Ecol. Econ., 46(2), 199–216.
Urban, M. C., Skelly, D. K., Burchsted, D., Price, W., and Lowry, S. (2006). “Stream communities across a rural-urban landscape gradient.” Divers. Distrib., 12(4), 337–350.
USCB (U.S. Census Bureau). (2015). “Intercensal estimates of the resident population for counties of Arkansas.” ⟨http://www.census.gov/popest/data/historical/index.html⟩ (Mar. 3, 2016).
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2009). “Pathogen TMDLS for Clear Creek 11110103-029 in Arkansas Planning Segment 3J.” ⟨http://www.irwp.org/assets/PDF/Clear-Creek-Pathogens.pdf⟩ (Mar. 9, 2016).
Vásquez, W. F., Mozumder, P., Hernández-Arce, J., and Berrens, R. P. (2009). “Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(11), 3391–3400.
Wainger, L. A., King, D. M., Mack, R. N., Price, E. W., and Maslin, T. (2010). “Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?” Ecol. Econ., 69(5), 978–987.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 143 • Issue 5 • May 2017
Copyright
This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
History
Received: Apr 4, 2016
Accepted: Sep 16, 2016
Published online: Jan 31, 2017
Published in print: May 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.