Case Studies
Feb 2, 2022

Evaluating the Relationship between Urban Redevelopment of Large Housing Estates and Urban Green Space Based on GIS–MCDM Approach: Empirical Experience from Niš, Serbia

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper will explore whether and how different modes of postsocialist urban transformation of inherited large housing estates (LHE) from the socialist past have influenced quantitative changes in urban green space (UGS) at the neighborhood level. The investigation will be conducted on a representative LHE neighborhood in the city of Niš, Serbia. This paper will introduce the Urban Green Transformation Index (UGTI) that combines five weighted parameters by employing the geographic information system–multicriteria decision-making (GIS–MCDM) method, which uses linear aggregation with a weighted overlay approach. This describes the impact that transformations have on UGSs for their permanency. The results from this paper indicate that the LHE redevelopment processes have caused constant pressure on the UGS throughout the postsocialist period, which has led to their regressive changes. The index presented in this paper could be used as a corrective, or mandatory, or both urban and land use planning and decision-making tool when assessing the degree of environmental and social sustainability of newly planned construction within the LHE neighborhoods.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

One of the authors was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia through the Mathematical Institute SANU.

References

Ahmadpoor, N., and S. Shahab. 2021. “Realising the value of greenspace: A planners’ perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic.” Town Plann. Rev. 92 (1): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.37.
Balian, E., H. Eggermont, and X. Le Roux. 2014. “Nature-based solutions in a BiodivERsA context.” In L-Outcomes of the strategic foresight workshop. Brussels, Belgium: BiodivERsA Report.
Bell, S., A. Montarzino, and P. Travlou. 2007. “Mapping research priorities for green and public urban space in the UK.” Urban For. Urban Green 6 (2): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.005.
Benedict, M. A., and E. T. McMahon. 2006. Green infrastructure. Linking landscapes and communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Bodnar, J. 2001. Fin de Millenaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of urban life. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Bouzarovski, S., J. Salukvadze, and M. Gentile. 2011. “A socially resilient urban transition? The contested landscapes of apartment building extensions in two post-communist cities.” Urban Stud. 48 (13): 2689–2714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010385158.
Brandt, P., M. Kvakić, K. Butterbach-Bahl, and M. C. Rufino. 2017. “How to target climate-smart agriculture? Concept and application of the consensus-driven decision support framework “target CSA”.” Agric. Syst. 151: 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.011.
Brink, E., et al. 2016. “Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas.” Glob. Environ. Change 36: 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003.
Census. 2011. “Census of population, households and dwellings - First result.” Statistical Office of Republic of Serbia. Accessed January 4, 2021. http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi-rezultati.pdf.
Chauhan, N., R. Shukla, and P. K. Joshi. 2020. “Assessing inherent vulnerability of farming communities across different biogeographical zones in Himachal Pradesh, India.” Environ. Dev. 33: 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100506.
De la Barreraa, F., S. Reyes-Paecke, and E. Banzhaf. 2016. “Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings.” Ecol. Indic. 62: 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.027.
Doswald, N., and M. Osti. 2011. Vol. 306 of Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation and mitigation – good practice examples and lessons learned in Europe. BfN-Skripten. Bonn, Germany: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
Dushkova, D., and D. Haase. 2020. “Not simply green: Nature-based solutions as a concept and practical approach for sustainability studies and planning agendas in cities.” Land 9 (1): 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010019.
Dushkova, D., M. Ignatieva, M. Hughes, A. Konstantinova, V. Vasenev, and E. Dovletyarova. 2021. “Human dimensions of urban blue and green infrastructure during a pandemic. Case study of Moscow (Russia) and Perth (Australia).” Sustainability 13 (8): 4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084148.
Fletcher, T. D., et al. 2014. “SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage.” Urban Water J. 12 (7): 525–542.
Foster, C., M. Hillsdon, A. Jones, and J. Panter. 2006. Assessing the relationship between the quality of the urban green space and physical activity. London: CABE.
Gerber, J., T. Hartmann, and A. Hengstermann. 2018. Instruments of land policy: Dealing with scarcity of land. New York: Routledge.
Gidlow, C. J., N. J. Ellis, and S. Bostock. 2012. “Development of the neighbourhood green space tool (NGST).” Landscape Urban Plann. 106 (4): 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007.
Golubchikov, O., A. Badyina, and A. Makhrova. 2014. “The hybrid spatialities of transition: Capitalism, legacy and uneven urban economic restructuring.” Urban Stud. 51 (4): 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493022.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., and D. N. Barton. 2013. “Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning.” Ecol. Econ. 86: 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
Goodspeed, R., and C. Hackel. 2019. “Lessons for developing a planning support system infrastructure: The case of Southern California's Scenario Planning Model.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46 (4): 777–796.
Greenhalgh, L., and A. Parsons. 2006. Raising the standard: The Green Flag Award guidance manual (updated 2004). London: CABE.
Green Surge Project. 2015. “A typology of urban green spaces, ecosystem services provisioning services and demands.” Report D3.1. Accessed July 10, 2018. https://assets.centralparknyc.org/pdfs/institute/p2p-pelp/1.004_Greensurge_A+Typology+of+Urban+Green+Spaces.pdf.
Gupta, K., P. Kumar, S. K. Pathan, and K. P. Sharma. 2012. “Urban Neighborhood Green Index – A measure of green spaces in urban areas.” Landscape Urban Plann. 105 (3): 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.003.
Haase, D., et al. 2014. “A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation.” Ambio 43 (4): 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
Haozhi, P., S. Chen, Y. Gao, B. Deal, and J. Liu. 2020. “An urban informatics approach to understanding residential mobility in Metro Chicago.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 47 (8): 1456–1473.
Hartmann, T., and M. Jehling. 2019. “From diversity to justice – Unraveling pluralistic rationalities in urban design.” Cities 91: 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.009.
Hess, D. B., and T. Tammaru (eds). 2019. Housing estates in the baltic countries. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hess, D. B., T. Tammaru, and M. van Ham (eds). 2018. Housing estates in Europe - poverty, ethnic segregation and policy challenges. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hirt, S. 2012. Iron curtains: Gates, suburbs and privatization of space in the post-socialist city. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kovácz, Z., and G. Herfert. 2012. “Development pathways of large housing estates in post-socialist cities: An international comparison.” Hous. Stud. 27 (3): 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.651105.
Li, X., Q. Meng, W. Li, C. Zhang, T. Jancso, and S. Mavromatis. 2014. “An explorative study on the proximity of buildings to green spaces in urban areas using remotely sensed imagery.” Ann. GIS 20 (3): 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2014.945482.
Liu, Y., Q. Meng, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, T. Jancso, and R. Vatseva. 2016. “An effective Building Neighborhood Green Index model for measuring urban green space.” Int. J. Digital Earth 9 (4): 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2015.1037870.
Mandić, S. 2001. “Residential mobility versus “in-place” adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society ‘in transition’.” Hous. Stud. 16 (1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030020015128.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium assessment report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Munang, R., I. Thiaw, K. Alverson, M. Mumba, J. Liu, and M. Rivington. 2013. “Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: A new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts.” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability. 5 (1): 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.001.
Naumann, S., T. Kaphengst, K. McFarland, and J. Stadler. 2014. Nature-based approaches for climate change mitigation and adaptation. The challenges of climate change – partnering with nature. Bonn, Germany: German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Ecologic Institute.
Nedovic-Budic, Z. 2012. “Planning institutions: Post-socialist home.” In International encyclopaedia of housing and home, edited by J. S. Smith, 202–208. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pauleit, S., T. Zölch, R. Hansen, T. B. Randrup, and C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch. 2017. “Nature-based solutions and climate change – Four shades of green.” In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas - Linkages between science, policy and practice, edited by N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, and A. Bonn. Berlin: Springer Open.
Petrovic, M. 2001. “Post-socialist housing policy transformation in Yugoslavia and Belgrade.” Int. J. Hous. Policy 1 (2): 211–231.
Randall, T. A., C. J. Churchill, and B. W. Baetz. 2003. “A GIS-based decision support system for neighbourhood greening.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 30 (4): 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12970.
Rogers, K., M. B. Andreucci, N. Jones, A. Japelj, and P. Vranic, et al. 2017. “The value of valuing: Recognising the benefits of the urban forest.” In Vol. 7 of The urban forest. future city, edited by D. Pearlmutter. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Sallis, J., R. Cervero, W. Ascher, K. A. Henderson, M. K. Kraft, J. Kerr. 2006. “An ecological approach to creating active living communities.” Annu Rev Public Health 27: 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100.
Sandström, G. U. 2002. “Green infrastructure planning in urban Sweden.” Plann. Pract. Res. 27 (4): 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450216356.
Shahab, S., T. Hartmann, and A. Jonkman. 2021. “Strategies of municipal land policies: Housing development in Germany, Belgium, and Netherlands.” Eur. Plann. Stud. 29 (6): 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1817867.
Šimáček, P., Z. Szczyrba, I. Andráško, and J. Kunc. 2015. “Twenty-five years of humanising post-socialist housing estates: From quantitative needs to qualitative requirements.” Geog. Pol. 88 (4): 649–668. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0038.
Singh, R. P., and H. P. Nachtnebel. 2016. “Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 55: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138.
Stanilov, K. 2007. “Housing trends in Central and Eastern European cities during and after the period of transition.” In The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformation in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism, edited by K. Stalinov, 173–190. London: Springer.
Swanwick, C., N. Dunnett, and H. Woolley. 2003. “Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview.” Built Environ. 29 (2): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.29.2.94.54467.
Szafrańska, E. 2014. “Transformations of large housing estates in post-socialist city: The case of Łódź, Poland.” Geog. Pol. 87 (1): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2014.5.
Tosics, I. 2004. “Determinants and consequences of spatial change in Post-Socialist cities.” In Paper presented at the Conf.: Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-Communist Cities. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Tsenkova, S. 2006. “Beyond transitions: Understanding urban change in postsocialist cities.” In The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe, edited by S. Tsenkova and Z. Budic-Nedovic, 21–50. Heidelberg: Springer.
Van Kempen, R., K. Dekker, S. Hall, and I. Tosics. 2005. Restructuring large housing estate in Europe - Restructuring and resistance inside the welfare industry. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, Univ. of Bristol.
Vasilevska, L., D. Milanovic, M. Nikolic, P. Vranic, and A. Milojkovic. 2015. “Garage capitalism” as a form and process of post-socialist urban changes: Its pace, intensity and structural characteristics. A case study of Nis, Serbia.” Habitat Int. 48: 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.022.
Vasilevska, L., P. Vranic, and A. Marinkovic. 2014. “The effects of changes to the post-socialist urban planning framework on public open spaces in multi-story housing areas: A view from Nis, Serbia.” Cities 36: 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.10.004.
Vasilevska, L., J. Zivkovic, M. Vasilevska, and K. Lalovic. 2020. “Revealing the relationship between city size and spatial transformation of large housing estates in post-socialist Serbia.” J. Hous. Built Environ. 35 (4): 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09734-8.
Vasilevska, M., and L. Vasilevska. 2019. “Benefits of synergy of urban green infrastructure and integrated stormwater management approaches: Theoretical perspective and examples from Vienna.” Fac. Univ. Series: Arch. Civ. Eng. 17 (2): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE190312008V.
Vranic, P., L. Vasilevska, and T. Haas. 2016. “Hybrid spatialities: Multi-storey extensions of socialist blocks of flats under post-socialist transition in Serbia, the case of Nis.” Urban Stud. 53 (6): 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015571887.
Wustemann, H., and D. Kalisch. 2016. Towards a national indicator for urban green space provision and environmental inequalities in Germany: Method and findings. SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2016-022. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.
Zhang, X., Z. Wang, and J. Lin. 2015. “GIS based measurement and regulatory zoning of urban ecological vulnerability.” Sustainability 7 (8): 9924–9942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7089924.
Zhu, Z., W. Lang, X. Tao, J. Feng, and K. Liu. 2019. “Exploring the quality of urban green spaces based on urban Neighborhood Green Index—A case study of Guangzhou City.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195507.
Zyoud, S. H., and D. Fuchs-Hanusch. 2017. “A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques.” Expert Syst. Appl. 78: 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Mar 17, 2021
Accepted: Aug 13, 2021
Published online: Feb 2, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ljiljana Vasilevska, D.Sc. [email protected]
Full Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Univ. of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000, Niš, Serbia. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Mathematical Institute SANU, Kneza Mihaila 36, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-992X. Email: [email protected]
Magdalena Vasilevska [email protected]
Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Univ. of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • The Potential of GIS Tools for Diagnosing the SFS of Multi-Family Housing towards Friendly Cities—A Case Study of the EU Member State of Poland, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14116642, 14, 11, (6642), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share