Case Studies
Jan 27, 2022

Effect of Compact Residences and Workplaces on Young Adults’ Commuting Behavior: Evidence from Shanghai, China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

Reducing driving among young adults is an important topic because their travel behavior is shaping future travel trends. However, previous studies have paid less attention to the influence of compactness at both residences and workplaces on young adults’ commuting behavior in the Chinese context. Moreover, few studies have examined the influential pathways from compactness to young adults’ commuting behavior. To fill these gaps, based on a post-’80s (people born between 1980 and 1989) survey conducted in Shanghai in 2013, this study employed a generalized structural equation model to examine whether both compact residences and workplaces affect young adults’ choices of commuting mode and, if so, whether or not car ownership and commuting distance are mediators. Results show that compactness at both residences and workplaces is associated with young adults’ commuting behavior, but that the compactness at residences has a higher influence. Moreover, we identify that both car ownership and commuting distance are mediators in the relationship between compact residences and commuting behavior, but not in the relationship between compact workplaces and commuting behavior. This study concludes that applying the compact land-use policy at both residences and workplaces could reduce young adults’ driving behavior in China.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42101184 and 42071210), the Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17ZDA068), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M681227), and the Shanghai Post-doctoral Excellence Program (Grant No. 2020161).

References

Alemi, F., R. M. Berliner, K. Tiedeman, G. Circella, L. Fulton, P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2016. What affects millennials’ mobility? Part I: Investigating the environmental concerns, lifestyles, mobility-related attitudes and adoption of technology of young adults in California. Davis, CA: National Center for Sustainable Transportation, UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies.
Antipova, A., F. Wang, and C. Wilmot. 2011. “Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach.” Appl. Geogr. 31 (3): 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.001
Bayart, C., N. Havet, P. Bonnel, and L. Bouzouina. 2020. “Young people and the private car: A love–hate relationship.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 80:102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102235.
Berliner, R. M., L. Aultman-Hall, and G. Circella. 2018. “Exploring the self-reported long-distance travel frequency of millennials and generation X in California.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (47): 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118798478
Cameron, A. C., and D. L. Miller. 2015. “A Practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference.” J. Hum. Resour. 50 (2): 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
Cao, J., and X. Cao. 2014. “The impacts of LRT, neighbourhood characteristics, and self-selection on auto ownership: Evidence from Minneapolis-St. Paul.” Urban Stud. 51 (10): 2068–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505887
Cao, X., P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. L. Handy. 2009. “Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings.” Transp. Rev. 29 (3): 359–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802539195
Cervero, R. 2002. “Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 7 (4): 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4
Chen, C., H. Gong, and R. Paaswell. 2008. “Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: Additional evidence on the impact of density.” Transportation 35 (3): 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9153-5
Circella, G., F. Alemi, K. Tiedeman, R. M. Berliner, Y. Lee, L. Fulton, P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2017. What affects millennials’ mobility? Part II: The impact of residential location, individual preferences and lifestyles on young adults’ travel behavior in California. Davis, CA: National Center for Sustainable Transportation, UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies.
Ding, C., X. Cao, and Y. Wang. 2018. “Synergistic effects of the built environment and commuting programs on commute mode choice.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 118: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.041.
Ding, C., S. Mishra, G. Lu, J. Yang, and C. Liu. 2017a. “Influences of built environment characteristics and individual factors on commuting distance: A multilevel mixture hazard modeling approach.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 51: 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.002
Ding, C., D. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Zhang, and J. Yang. 2017b. “Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 100: 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.008
Engebretsen, Ø, P. Næss, and A. Strand. 2018. “Residential location, workplace location and car driving in four Norwegian cities.” Eur. Plann. Stud. 26 (10): 2036–2057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1505830
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the built environment.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76 (3): 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2017. “Does compact development make people drive less? The answer is yes.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83 (1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1245112
Ewing, R., and S. Hamidi. 2013. “Measuring urban sprawl and validating sprawl measures.” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 (9): 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Ferrer, H. B., A. Cooper, and S. Audrey. 2018. “Associations of mode of travel to work with physical activity, and individual, interpersonal, organisational, and environmental characteristics.” J. Transp. Health 9: 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.009
Garikapati, V. M., R. M. Pendyala, E. A. Morris, P. L. Mokhtarian, and N. McDonald. 2016. “Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: A generation in transition?” Trans. Rev. 36 (5): 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1197337
Grimal, R. 2020. “Are French millenials less car-oriented? Literature review and empirical findings.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 79: 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102221
Handy, S. 2017. “Thoughts on the meaning of Mark Stevens’s meta-analysis.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83 (1): 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1246379
Hoyle, R. H. 1995. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huang, X., X. Cao, and J. Cao. 2016. “The association between transit access and auto ownership: Evidence from Guangzhou, China.” Transp. Plann. Technol. 39 (3): 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2016.1142223
Jamal, S., and K. B. Newbold. 2020. “Factors associated with travel behavior of millennials and older adults: A scoping review.” Sustainability 12 (19): 8236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198236
Kitamura, R. 1989. “A causal analysis of car ownership and transit use.” Transportation 16 (2): 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163113
Klein, N. J., and M. J. Smart. 2017. “Millennials and car ownership: Less money, fewer cars.” Transp. Policy 53: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.010.
Li, W., C. Yin, Q. Liu, B. Sun, and T. Zhang. 2018. “Does metro proximity promote happiness? Evidence from Shanghai.” J. Transp. Land Use 11 (1): 1271–1285. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1286.
Melia, S., K. Chatterjee, and G. Stokes. 2018. “Is the urbanisation of young adults reducing their driving?” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 118: 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.021
Moore, R. L. 2005. “Generation Ku: Individualism and China’s Millennial Youth.” Ethnology 44 (4): 357–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/3774095
Polzin, S. E., X. Chu, and J. Godfrey. 2014. “The impact of millennials’ travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel.” Energy Strategy Rev. 5: 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.003
Ralph, K., C. T. Voulgaris, B. D. Taylor, E. Blumenberg, and A. E. Brown. 2016. “Millennials, built form, and travel insights from a nationwide typology of U.S. neighborhoods.” J. Transp. Geogr. 57: 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.10.007
Shen, Q., P. Chen, and H. Pan. 2016. “Factors affecting car ownership and mode choice in rail transit-supported suburbs of a large Chinese city.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94: 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.027
Smith, D. P., and J. Sage. 2014. “The regional migration of young adults in England and Wales (2002–2008): A ‘conveyor-belt’ of population redistribution?” Child. Geogr. 12 (1): 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.850850
Stevens, M. R. 2017. “Does compact development make people drive less?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83 (1): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
Sun, B., A. Ermagun, and B. Dan. 2017. “Built environmental impacts on commuting mode choice and distance: Evidence from Shanghai.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 52: 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.001
Sun, B., and C. Yin. 2018. “Relationship between multi-scale urban built environments and body mass index: A study of China.” Appl. Geogr. 94: 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.012
van Acker, V., and F. Witlox. 2011. “Commuting trips within tours: How is commuting related to land use?” Transportation 38 (3): 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9309-6
Wang, D., and T. Lin. 2014. “Residential self-selection, built environment, and travel behavior in the Chinese context.” J. Transp. Land Use 7 (3): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.486
Wang, D., and T. Lin. 2019. “Built environment, travel behavior, and residential self-selection: A study based on panel data from Beijing, China.” Transportation, 46 (1): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9783-1.
Wang, D., and M. Zhou. 2017. “The built environment and travel behavior in urban China: A literature review.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 52: 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.031
Wang, X. 2019. “Has the relationship between urban and suburban automobile travel changed across generations? Comparing Millennials and Generation Xers in the United States.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 129: 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.012.
Xiong, Y., and J. Zhang. 2016. “Effects of land use and transport on young adults’ quality of life.” Travel Behav. Soc. 5: 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2015.10.002
Yang, J., Q. Shen, J. Shen, and C. He. 2012. “Transport impacts of clustered development in Beijing: Compact development versus overconcentration.” Urban Stud. 49 (6): 1315–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011410336
Yang, L., J. A. Hipp, D. Adlakha, C. M. Marx, R. G. Tabak, and R. C. Brownson. 2015. “Choice of commuting mode among employees: Do home neighborhood environment, worksite neighborhood environment, and worksite policy and supports matter?” J. Transp. Health 2 (2): 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.02.003
Zhang, M. 2004. “The role of land use in travel mode choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 70 (3): 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976383
Zhang, Y., S. Zheng, C. Sun, and R. Wang. 2017. “Does subway proximity discourage automobility? Evidence from Beijing.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 52: 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.009
Zhao, P. 2011. “Car use, commuting and urban form in a rapidly growing city: Evidence from Beijing.” Transp. Plann. Technol. 34 (6): 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2011.600049

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 148Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Jun 2, 2021
Accepted: Dec 8, 2021
Published online: Jan 27, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Research Center for China Administrative Division, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; School of urban and regional science, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Future City Lab, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-049X. Email: [email protected]
Urban Planner, Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Institute Company Limited, Shanghai 200092, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]
Bindong Sun [email protected]
Professor, The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Research Center for China Administrative Division, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Institute of Eco-Chongming, Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; School of urban and regional science, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China; Future City Lab, East China Normal Univ., Shanghai 200241, People’s Republic of China. (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Densification and health in China: A U-shaped association between population density and obesity, Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, 10.1177/27541223221111500, 1, 1-2, (135-151), (2022).
  • Residential and workplace neighborhood environments and life satisfaction: Exploring chain-mediation effects of activity and place satisfaction, Journal of Transport Geography, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103435, 104, (103435), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share