Technical Papers
Mar 3, 2021

Redevelopment Strategies and Building Ages

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

An improved real option pricing model that incorporates the depreciation effect for two-stage redevelopment projects will be demonstrated to estimate the redevelopment project values in a wide range of scenarios. Based on a stochastic differential equation, numerical analyses will focus on new factors that influence the expected exercise time, that is, depreciation rate, the annual increase in average building age, building age of the targeted property, and the average building ages in the same region. The depreciation rate is the most influential factor in this model. More importantly, this study will summarize three exercise strategies that cover all combination of the parameters. In some cases, with a low capital return rate, or high depreciation rate, or both, the traditional simultaneous exercise strategy based on the optimal demolition price-to-cost ratio is not feasible. Instead, either a sequential exercise or simultaneous exercise that is based on the optimal rebuilding price-to-cost ratio is the best choice. Detailed procedures on how to adopt the best strategy will be demonstrated. The acquisition price of the old property proved to be sensitive to the depreciation rate and the capital return rate within a certain range. To apply this model properly, the feasible time interval for the traditional simultaneous exercise strategy and the depreciation rate should be estimated accurately.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ARCADIS. 2016. Construction cost hand book: China & Hong Kong 2016. Hong Kong: Langdon & Seah.
Baum, A., and A. McElhinney. 2000. The causes and effects of depreciation in office buildings: A ten year update. Working Paper. Reading, UK: Univ. of Reading.
Bokhari, S., and D. Geltner. 2018. “Characteristics of depreciation in commercial and multifamily property: An investment perspective.” Real Estate Econ. 46 (4): 745–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12156.
Brueckner, J. K. 1980. “A vintage model of urban growth.” J. Urban Econ. 8 (3): 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90039-X.
Bulan, L., C. Mayer, and C. T. Somerville. 2009. “Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: Evidence from real estate development.” J. Urban Econ. 65 (3): 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.03.003.
Capozza, D. R., and R. W. Helsley. 1990. “The stochastic city.” J. Urban Econ. 28 (2): 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(90)90050-W.
Capozza, D. R., and G. A. Sick. 1991. “Valuing long-term leases: The option to redevelop.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 4 (2): 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173125.
Capozza, D. R., and G. A. Sick. 1994. “The risk structure of land markets.” J. Urban Econ. 35 (3): 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1994.1018.
Capozza, D., and Y. Li. 1994. “The intensity and timing of investment: The case of land.” Am. Econ. Rev. 84 (4): 889–904.
Chan, E. H. W., and E. H. K. Yung. 2004. “Is the development control legal framework conducive to a sustainable dense urban development in Hong Kong?” Habitat Int. 28 (3): 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00040-7.
Chen, J., and R. N. Lai. 2013. “Pricing relocation-redevelopment projects for city expansion: The case in China.” Real Estate Econ. 41 (4): 925–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/reec.12017.
Clapp, J. M., K. S. Bardos, and S. K. Wong. 2012a. “Empirical estimation of the option premium for residential redevelopment.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42 (1–2): 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.08.007.
Clapp, J. M., P. Eichholtz, and T. Lindenthal. 2013. “Real option value over a housing market cycle.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 43 (6): 862–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.07.005.
Clapp, J. M., and C. Giaccotto. 1998. “Residential hedonic models: A rational expectations approach to age effects.” J. Urban Econ. 44 (3): 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2076.
Clapp, J. M., J. B. Jou, and T. Charlene Lee. 2012b. “Hedonic models with redevelopment options under uncertainty.” Real Estate Econ. 40 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00323.x.
Clapp, J. M., T. Lindenthal, and P. Eichholtz. 2010. Real option value and the long term dynamics of house prices in berlin, 1978–2007. Working Paper. Maastricht, Netherlands: Maastricht Univ.
Clapp, J. M., and K. Salavei. 2010. “Hedonic pricing with redevelopment options: A new approach to estimating depreciation effects.” J. Urban Econ. 67 (3): 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.003.
Cunningham, C. R. 2006. “House price uncertainty, timing of development, and vacant land prices: Evidence for real options in Seattle.” J. Urban Econ. 59 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.003.
Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Downing, C., and N. Wallace. 2002. A real options approach to housing investment. AFA 2002 Atlanta Mtgs, FEDS Working Paper No. 2000-30. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Francke, M. K., and A. M. van de Minne. 2017. “Land, structure and depreciation.” Real Estate Econ. 45 (2): 415–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12146.
Ho, D. C. W., Y. Yau, S. W. Poon, and E. Liusman. 2012. “Achieving sustainable urban renewal in Hong Kong: Strategy for dilapidation assessment of high rises.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 138 (2): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000104.
Ho, D. K. H., E. C. M. Hui, and M. F. B. Ibrahim. 2009. “Asset value enhancement of Singapore’s public housing main upgrading programme (MUP) policy: A real option analysis approach.” Urban Stud. 46 (11): 2329–2361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342451.
Hui, E. C. M., and I. M. Ng. 2008. “A risk-based option pricing strategy for property valuation: An empirical study in Hong Kong.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 13 (1): 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664380810882075.
Hui, E. C. M., I. M. H. Ng, and K. K. Lo. 2011. “Analysis of the viability of an urban renewal project under a risk-based option pricing framework.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (2): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000047.
Hulten, C. R., and F. C. Wykoff. 1981. “The estimation of economic depreciation using vintage asset prices: An application of the Box-Cox power transformation.” J. Econom. 15 (3): 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90101-9.
Jeffrey, F., S. Brent, and S. Jerrold. 2005. “Analysis of economic depreciation or multi-family property.” J. Real Estate Res. 27 (4): 355–370.
Krause, A. 2015. “Piece-by-piece: Low-rise redevelopment in Seattle.” J. Property Res. 32 (3): 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2015.1048705.
Law, C. K., J. C. W. Chan, E. W. T. Chui, Y. C. Wong, K. M. Lee, and F. L. Y. Chau. 2009. Study report on urban renewal policies in Asian cities. Hong Kong: Urban Renewal Strategy Review.
McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. 1986. “The value of waiting to invest.” Q. J. Econ. 101 (4): 707–727. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175.
McMillen, D., and A. O’Sullivan. 2013. “Option value and the price of teardown properties.” J. Urban Econ. 74: 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2012.09.004.
Munneke, H. J. 1996. “Redevelopment decisions for commercial and industrial properties.” J. Urban Econ. 39 (2): 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.0013.
Munneke, H. J., & Womack, K. S. 2013. Valuing real options in real estate: A spatial study of the option to redevelop. Working paper. Athens, GA: Univ. of Georgia.
Øksendal, B. 1998. Stochastic differential equations: An introduction with application. 5th ed. Berlin: Springer.
Quigg, L. 1993. “Empirical testing of real option-pricing models.” J. Finance 48 (2): 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04730.x.
Rating and Valuation Department. 2017. “Property Market Statistics.” Accessed February, 2021. http://www.rvd.gov.hk/en/property_market_statistics/index.html.
Rosen, S. 1974. “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition.” J. Political Econ. 82 (1): 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169.
Rosenthal, S. S., and R. W. Helsley. 1994. “Redevelopment and the urban land price gradient.” J. Urban Econ. 35 (2): 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1994.1012.
S&P Dow Jones Indices. 2017. “S&P Dow Jones indices: Index methodology.” Accessed February, 2021. https://us.spindices.com/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-us-indices.pdf.
Sing, T. F., and C. W. J. Lim. 2004. “Value of collective effort: Redevelopment timing options of enbloc sale sites in Singapore.” Pac. Rim Property Res. J. 10 (2): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2004.11104160.
Titman, S. 1985. “Urban land prices under uncertainty.” Am. Econ. Rev. 75 (3): 505–514.
Urban Redevelopment Authority in Singapore. 2021. “Property Price Index of Private Residential Properties.” Accessed February, 2021. https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Media-Room/Media-Releases/pr21-02.
Wheaton, W. C. 1982. “Urban residential growth under perfect foresight.” J. Urban Econ. 12 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(82)90002-X.
Williams, J. T. 1991. “Real estate development as an option.” J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 4 (2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173124.
Williams, J. T. 1997. “Redevelopment of real assets.” Real Estate Econ. 25 (3): 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00720.
Yau, Y. S., and H. L. Chan. 2008. “To rehabilitate or redevelop? A study of the decision criteria for urban regeneration projects.” J. Place Manage. Dev. 1 (3): 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330810911262.
Zhong, J., and E. C. M. Hui. 2020. “Depreciation, building Age, and market price statistics for reference in urban redevelopment option pricing.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (1): 04019031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000546.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: May 28, 2020
Accepted: Dec 16, 2020
Published online: Mar 3, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 3, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctor, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen Univ., Room D212, Building of Geography and Environment, Guangzhou, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9154-1376. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., 7/F, Block Z, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-891X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share