Technical Papers
Mar 3, 2021

Evaluating the Impact Index of Key Barriers to Public-Private Partnership Transportation Projects in Vietnam: Comparison between Selected Asian Countries

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

In the Asian region, the financial burden for the development of transportation infrastructure is always a huge challenge for the government. Therefore, private investment was encouraged to attend the public-private partnership form. This study aims to evaluate the impact level of key barriers to Public-Private Partnership (PPP) transportation projects based on the perceptions of respondents in Vietnam. Twenty-nine key barriers were selected and classified into six barrier groups, namely social and political barrier (b1), legal barrier (b2), financial market (b3), procurement process (b4), implementation risk (b5), and management (b6). The fuzzy synthetic evaluation model was then used to assess the impact of key barriers on the success of PPP transportation projects. The result showed that project management and social and political barriers are the two most important barrier groups influencing PPP projects. Along with this, the overall index is between medium and high with a value of 3.51. Notwithstanding, investment in PPP transportation projects in Vietnam still contains risk. A comparison between Vietnam and selected Asian countries was conducted to provide a better understanding of obstacles to PPP projects in the Asia area. It helps investors make good decisions to avoid risky projects and prompts governments to reduce constraints in PPP projects in order to attract private investment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study would like to thank the practitioners of the Ministry of Construction, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Planning and Investment, Board of Project Management Cuu Long, Board of Project Management No. 7, private developers, and consultant companies who have contributed their opinions in accomplishing the survey questionnaires in this research.

References

Aalam, M., R. Jadaun, R. K. Mehta, M. Rai, M. S. Siddiquee, and O. P. Yadav. 2017. “Modelling of barriers of PPP in infrastructure.” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 4 (7): 3474–3482.
ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2018. “Public-private partnership development in Southeast Asia.” https://doi.org/10.22617/WPS189496-2.
Akintoye, A., M. Beck, and C. Hardcastle. 2003. Public-private partnerships: Managing risks and opportunities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Ameyaw, E. E., and A. P. C. Chan. 2015. “Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public–private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.” Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (12): 5102–5116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.041.
Babatunde, S. O., S. Perera, L. Zhou, and C. Udeaja. 2015. “Barriers to public–private–partnership projects in developing countries. A case of Nigeria.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (6): 669–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2014-0159.
Chan, A. P. C., P. T. I. Lam, D. W. M. Chan, E. Cheung, and Y. Ke. 2010. “Potential obstacles to successful implementation of public–private partnerships in Beijing and the Hong Kong special administrative region.” J. Manage. Eng. 26 (1): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2010)26:1(30).
Chan, A. P. C., R. Osei-Kyei, Y. Hu, and Y. Le. 2018. “A fuzzy model for assessing the risk exposure of procuring infrastructure mega–projects through public–private partnership: The case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge.” Front. Eng. Manage. 5 (1): 64–67. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018067.
Chan, A. P. C., J. F. Yeung, C. C. P. Yu, S. Q. Wang, and Y. Ke. 2011. “Empirical study of risk assessment and allocation of public-private partnership project in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (3): 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049.
Cheung, E., and A. P. C. Chan. 2011. “Risk factors of public–private partnership projects in China: Comparison between the water, power, and transportation sectors.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 137 (4): 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000086.
Deshpande, P., and S. Rokade. 2017. “Assessment of risks in public–private partnership highway projects in India using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 8 (11): 401–413.
EPU (Economic Planning Unit). 2010. “Tenth Malaysia Plan 2011–2015.” Accessed October 20, 2019. https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/RMK/RMK10_Eds.pdf.
Field, A. P. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
Grimsey, D., and M. K. Lewis. 2002. “Evaluating the risks of public-private partnerships for infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (2): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5.
Hair, J. F., W. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. London: Pearson.
Heravi, G., and Z. Hajihosseini. 2012. “Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects in developing countries: Case study of the Tehran-chalus toll road.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (3): 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000090.
Hwang, B. G., W. Zhao, and S. Y. Ong. 2015. “Value management in Singaporean building projects: Implementation status, critical success factors, and risk factors.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04014094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000342.
Hwang, B. G., X. Zhao, and S. J. S. Gay. 2013. “Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from perspective of contractors.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.003.
Ibrahim, A. D., A. D. F. Price, and A. R. J. Dainty. 2006. “The analysis and allocation of risks in public-private partnerships in infrastructure projects in Nigeria.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 11 (13): 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664380680001086.
IMF (Indonesian Ministry of Finance). 2016. State budget FY 2016. Bahasa, Indonesia: IMF.
Islam, M. S., M. P. Nepal, M. Skitmore, and M. Attarzadeh. 2017. “Current research trend and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to risk assessment of construction projects.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 33: 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001.
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency). 2017. “The last report of VGF investigation for PPP projects in Vietnam.” Accessed October 15, 2019. https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12292850.pdf.
Ke, Y., S. Q. Wang, A. P. C. Chan, and E. Cheung. 2011. “Understanding the risks in China’s PPP projects: Ranking of their probability and consequence.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 18 (5): 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111165176.
Kim, S. Y., and L. D. Thuc. 2020. “Sustainable location selection for investing in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: From a developing country’s perspective.” Sustainability 12 (15): 5914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155914.
Kwak, Y. H., Y. Y. Chih, and C. W. Ibbs. 2009. “Towards a comprehensive understanding of public–private–partnerships for infrastructure development.” Calif. Manage. Rev. 51 (2): 51–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166480.
Likhitruangsilp, V., T. D. Sy, and M. Onishi. 2017. “A comparative study on the risk perceptions of the public and private sectors in public–private–partnetship (PPP) transportation projects in Vietnam.” Eng. J. 21 (7): 213–231. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.7.213.
Lingard, H., and S. Rowlinson. 2006. “Letter to the editor.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 24 (11): 1107–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190601001620.
Liu, J., Q. Li, and Y. Wang. 2013. “Risk analysis in ultra deep scientific drilling project—A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.015.
Mahalingam, A. 2010. “PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers, and the way forward.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000130.
NDA (National Development Agency). 2014. 2015–2019 national development agenda. Bahasa, Indonesia: NDA.
Ng, A., and M. Loosemore. 2007. “Risk allocation in the private of provision of public infrastructure.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.005.
Otairu, A., A. A. Umar, N. A. A. Zawawi, and A. H. K. Pakir. 2013. “Public sector perception of barriers to the use of public-private partnerships (PPP) in Nigeria-findings from a questionnaire survey.” Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5 (9): 2809–2820. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4810.
Ott, R. L., M. Longnecker, and S. O. Ogunlana. 2001. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury, MA: Pacific Grove.
Oyedele, L. O. 2013. “Avoiding performance failure payment deductions in PFI/PPP projects: Model of critical success factors.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 27 (3): 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000367.
Pallant, J. 2001. SPSS survival manual. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Pedrycz, W., P. Ekel, and R. Parreiras. 2011. Fuzzy multicriteria decision–making: Models, methods and applications. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Sachs, T., R. Tiong, and S. Q. Wang. 2007. “Analysis of political risks and opportunities in public private partnerships (PPP) in China and selected Asian countries.” Chin. Manage. Stud. 1 (2): 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506140710758026.
Shan, M., A. P. Chan, Y. Le, B. Xia, and Y. Hu. 2015. “Measuring corruption in public construction projects in China.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (4): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000241.
Sy, T. D., V. Likhitruangsilp, M. Onishi, and T. P. Nguyen. 2017. “Impacts of risk factors on the performance of public-private partnership transportation projects in Vietnam.” ASEAN Eng. J 7 (2): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v7.15520.
Tah, J. H. M., and V. Carr. 2000. “A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 18 (4): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024905.
Tam, C. M. 1999. “Build-operate-transfer model for infrastructure developments in Asia: reasons for success and failures.” Int. J. Proj. Manage. 17 (6): 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00061-1.
Weththasinghe, K. K., T. Gajendran, and G. Brewer. 2016. “Barriers in proper implementation of public–private partnerships (PPP) in Sri Lanka.” In Proc., Conf. of the 40th Australia Universities Bulding Education Association. Australia: Central Queensland University.
Xu, Y., J. F. Y. Yeung, A. P. C. Chan, D. W. M. Chan, S. Q. Wang, and Y. Ke. 2010. “Developing a risk assessment model for PPP in China—A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.” Autom. Constr. 19 (7): 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.006.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zhang, S., A. P. C. Chan, Y. Feng, H. Duan, and Y. Ke. 2016. “Crirical review on PPP research—A search from the Chinese and international journals.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (4): 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.008.
Zhang, X. 2005a. “Paving the way for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(71).
Zhang, X. 2005b. “Critical success factors for public-private partnerships in infrastrucutre development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(3).
Zhao, X., B. G. Hwang, and Y. Gao. 2016. “A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: A case of Singapore’s green projects.” J. Cleaner Prod. 115: 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.042.
Zhao, X., B. G. Hwang, and S. P. Low. 2014. “Investigating enterprise risk management maturity model for construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (8): 05014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000873.
Zimmermann, H. J. 2001. Fuzzy set theory and its application. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Mar 17, 2020
Accepted: Nov 16, 2020
Published online: Mar 3, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 3, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Soo Yong Kim [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Pukyong National Univ., Busan 48513, Korea. Email: [email protected]
Thuc Dinh Le, Ph.D. [email protected]
Faculty of Transport and Economics, Campus in Ho Chi Minh City, Univ. of Transport and Communications, Ho Chi Minh City 71207, Vietnam (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share