Technical Papers
Jan 20, 2021

Examining Urban Design Characteristics of City Centers Using Walkability Criteria: Case of Turkey

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

This study aims to explore the success in the urban design endeavors of Turkish cities throughout the years, which is mostly distinguished by a variety of city plans. The criteria for walkability will be the focal point in the exploration of urban design success levels. A hybrid [fuzzy logic + space syntax analysis + geographic information system (GIS)] method, which is not commonly used in current research, will be used as the method for this study. Five cities will be selected as samples and an expert group of 49 people formed. The analysis will be according to the determined criteria and various results were obtained. The results show that Turkish cities' success levels in walkability is very low. Therefore, these results show that Turkey should question its spatial planning decisions. The design of cities is shaped according to the needs of motor vehicles and priority for pedestrians is seldom considered. This shows that negative conditions persist in Turkish cities for urban design standards. This study could be applied to different cities with its methodology and content. Therefore, it could contribute to the improvement in the urban design level of cities and help to ensure that walkability becomes the priority in these designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Addy, C. L., D. K. Wilson, K. A. Kirtland, B. E. Ainsworth, P. Sharpe, and D. Kimsey. 2004. “Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior.” Am. J. Public Health 94 (3): 440–443. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.440.
Alfonzo, M. A. 2005. “To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs.” Environ. Behav. 37 (6): 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016.
Al-Harbi, K. M. A. S. 2001. “Application of the AHP in project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1.
Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. toward a general theory of land rent. Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674730854.
Bahrainy, H., and H. Khosravi. 2013. “The impact of urban design features and qualities on walkability and health in under-construction environments: The case of Hashtgerd New Town in Iran.” Cities 31: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.001.
Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. 2001. Travel by design: The influence of urban design on travel. New York: Oxford Univ. Press on Demand.
Boarnet, M. G., A. Forsyth, K. Day, and J. M. Oakes. 2011. “The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: Results of a predictive validity study for the Irvine Minnesota inventory.” Environ. Behav. 43 (6): 735–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510379760.
Bosselmann, P., E. Macdonald, and T. Kronemeyer. 1999. “Livable streets revisited.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 65 (2): 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976045.
CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment). 2002. Paving the way: How we achieve clean, safe and attractive streets. London: Thomas Telford.
Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, and W. L. Rodgers. 1976. The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Carmona, M., T. Heath, S. Tiesdell, and T. Oc. 2003. Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
Cervero, R. 1988. “Land-use mixing and suburban mobility.” Transp. Q. 42 (3): 429–446.
Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
Cervero, R., O. L. Sarmiento, E. Jacoby, L. F. Gomez, and A. Neiman. 2009. “Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogota.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 3 (4): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314.
Christaller, W. 1933. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland (the central places in southern Germany). Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
Clemente, O., R. Ewing, S. Handy, and R. Brownson. 2005. Measuring urban design qualities—An illustrated field manual. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Crawford, J. H. 2000. Car free cities. Utrecht, Netherlands: International Books.
Day, K., M. Boarnet, M. Alfonzo, and A. Forsyth. 2006. “The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure-built environments.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 30 (2): 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017.
Dombi, J., and Z. Gera. 2005. “The approximation of piecewise linear membership functions and Lukasiewicz operators.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 154 (2): 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.02.016.
Ewing, R., and S. Handy. 2009. “Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability.” J. Urban Des. 14 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155.
Ewing, R., S. Handy, R. C. Brownson, O. Clemente, and E. Winston. 2006. “Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability.” J. Phys. Act. Health 3 (s1): S223–S240. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223.
Frank, L., P. Engelke, and T. Schmid. 2003. Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Frank, L., J. Kerr, J. Chapman, and J. Sallis. 2007. “Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth.” Am. J. Health Promot. 21 (4_suppl): 305–311. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.305.
Garcia, R., and J. A. Lara. 2015. “Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality.” Cities 45: 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003.
Gehl, J. 1971. Life between buildings: Using public space. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Architectural Press.
Gehl, J., and L. Gemzoe. 2002. Nuovos Espacios Urbanos. [New urban spaces]. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Gustavo Gili.
Handy, S. L. 1996. “Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1552 (1): 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155200119.
Hess, P. M., A. Vernez Moudon, M. Catherine Snyder, and K. Stanilov. 1999. “Site design and pedestrian travel.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1674 (1): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/1674-02.
Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Isaacs, R. 2000. “The urban picturesque: An aesthetic experience of urban pedestrian places.” J. Urban Des. 5 (2): 145–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713683961.
Jabbari, M., F. Fonseca, and R. Ramos. 2018. “Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: The case of Oporto.” J. Urban Des. 23 (1): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1343087.
Jacobs, A. 1996. Great streets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Kim, S., S. Park, and J. S. Lee. 2014. “Meso- or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction.” Transp. Res. Part D Trans. Environ. 30: 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.005.
Klir, G., and B. Yuan. 1995. Vol. 4 of Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leyden, K. M. 2003. “Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods.” Am. J. Public Health 93 (9): 1546–1551. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546.
Liberatore, M. J., and R. L. Nydick. 2008. “The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189 (1): 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001.
Marshall, S. 2005. Streets and patterns. New York: Spon Press.
Moudon, A. V. 1987. Public streets for public use, with a foreword by Donald Appleyard. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pikora, T., B. Giles-Corti, F. Bull, K. Jamrozik, and R. Donovan. 2003. “Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling.” Soc. Sci. Med. 56 (8): 1693–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6.
Powell, K. E., L. M. Martin, and P. P. Chowdhury. 2003. “Places to walk: Convenience and regular physical activity.” Am. J. Public Health 93 (9): 1519–1521. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1519.
PPS (Project for Public Spaces). 2008a. Great corridors, great communities. New York: PPS Publication.
PPS (Project for Public Spaces). 2008b. Streets as places: Using streets to rebuild communities. New York: PPS Publication.
PPS (Project for Public Spaces). 2008c. A citizen’s guide to better streets: How to engage your transportation agency. New York: PPS Publication.
Pucher, J., and L. Dijkstra. 2003. “Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: Lessons from the Netherlands and Germany.” Am. J. Public Health 93 (9): 1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1509.
Rapoport, A. 1987. Pedestrian street use: Culture and perception. In Public streets for public use, edited by A. V. Moudon, 80–94. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.
Rapoport, A. 1990a. The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Rapoport, A. 1990b. History and precedent in environmental design. New York: Plenum Press.
Rapoport, A. 2005. Culture, architecture and design. Chicago, UK: Locke Science Publishing.
Rogers, S. H., J. M. Halstead, K. H. Gardner, and C. H. Carlson. 2011. “Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales.” Appl. Res. Qual. Life 6 (2): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4.
Saaty, T. L. 1970. Optimization in integers and related extremal problems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sadek, S., M. El-Fadel, and F. Freiha. 2006. “Compliance factors within a GIS-based framework for landfill siting.” Int. J. Environ. Stud. 63 (1): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230600562213.
Southworth, M. 2005. “Designing the Walkable City.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (4): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
Speck, J. 2012. Walkable city, how downtown can save America. One step at a time. New York: MacMillan.
Stamps, A. E. 1997. “Some streets of San Francisco: Preference effects of trees, cars, wires, and buildings.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 24 (1): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240081.
State Planning Organization (Turkey). 1985. Fifth Five Year Development Plan, 1985–1989. Republic of Turkey Prime, State Planning Organization, Turkey.
Steiner, F. R., K. Butler, and American Planning Association. 2012. Planning and urban design standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Van De Water, H., and J. De Vries. 2006. “Choosing a quality improvement project using analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 23 (4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610657602.
Van Holle, V., B. Deforche, J. Van Cauwenberg, L. Goubert, L. Maes, N. Van de Weghe, and I. De Bourdeaudhuij. 2012. “Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: A systematic review.” BMC Public Health 12 (1): 807. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-807.
Wey, W. M., and Y. H. Chiu. 2013. “Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development.” Habitat Int. 38: 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.004.
Whyte, W. H. 1980. The social life of small urban spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Information and control.” Fuzzy Sets 8 (3): 338–353.
Zoellner, J., J. L. Hill, K. Zynda, A. D. Sample, and K. Yadrick. 2012. “Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention.” Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 147Issue 2June 2021

History

Received: Feb 8, 2020
Accepted: Oct 20, 2020
Published online: Jan 20, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Erciyes Univ., 38039 Kayseri, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6283-528X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share