Abstract

Unbonded posttensioned controlled rocking masonry walls (PT-CRMWs) have been increasingly studied in the last decades due to their promising results regarding seismic resilience. However, implementing posttensioning (PT) has still some drawbacks, such as construction challenges, PT losses, and yielding during a seismic event. In response, this study investigates a newly proposed energy dissipation-controlled rocking masonry wall (ED-CRMW), which eliminates the use of unbonded posttensioned bars and relies instead on gravity loads to self-center the wall to its vertical plumb while incorporating an energy dissipation (ED) device to limit seismic displacements. The study presents a design approach for the proposed system, including the influence of higher mode effects. In this respect, a multispring macro model is developed using OpenSees and validated against recent experimental results by the authors. Next, as no distinct values are yet provided in ASCE 7, the seismic response modification factor is investigated using collapse risk analysis. Specifically, using the validated model, nonlinear static and dynamic analyses are performed to 20 ED-CRMW archetypes with different design configurations. The results demonstrate that the design objectives were achieved and that a seismic response modification factor of 7 assigned to the selected design configurations meets the FEMA P695 acceptance criteria for seismic collapse risk under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this project was provided through the Canadian Concrete Masonry Producers Association (CCMPA), the Canada Masonry Design Centre (CMDC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and the Ontario Centres of Excellence (OCE).

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2009. Requirements for design of a special unbonded post-tensioned precast shear wall satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 & commentary. ACI ITG-5.2-09. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASCE/SEI (ASCE/Structural Engineering Institute). 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE/SEI.
Baker, J. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Buddika, H. A. D. S., and A. C. Wijeyewickrema. 2016. “Seismic performance evaluation of posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame buildings and comparison with shear wall-frame buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (6): 04016021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001466.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2018. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA-P58. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hassanli, R., M. A. ElGawady, and J. E. Mills. 2016. “Experimental investigation of in-plane cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (5): 04015171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001450.
Jalayer, F. 2003. “Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Kalliontzis, D., and A. E. Schultz. 2017. “Improved estimation of the reverse-cyclic behavior of fully-grouted masonry shear walls with unbonded post-tensioning.” Eng. Struct. 145 (Aug): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.011.
Kalliontzis, D., and S. Sritharan. 2020. “Dynamic response and impact energy loss in controlled rocking members.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (4): 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3240.
Kalliontzis, D., S. Sritharan, and A. E. Schultz. 2019. “Improving performance of unbonded post-tensioned masonry walls with the use of rubber interface.” In Proc., 13th North American Masonry Conf. Longmont, CO: Masonry Society.
Kurama, Y. 2005. “Seismic design of partially post-tensioned precast concrete walls.” PCI J. 50 (4): 100–125. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012005.100.125.
Kurama, Y., S. Pessiki, R. Sause, and L. W. Lu. 1999. “Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls.” PCI J. 44 (3): 72–89. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.72.89.
Laursen, P. T., and J. M. Ingham. 2004. “Structural testing of large-scale posttensioned concrete masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (10): 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1497).
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
NIST. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. NIST GCR 10-917-8. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Panagiotou, M., and J. Restrepo. 2009. “Dual-plastic hinge design concept for reducing higher-mode effects on high-rise cantilever wall buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (12): 1359–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.905.
Pennucci, D., G. M. Calvi, and T. J. Sullivan. 2009. “Displacement-based design of precast walls with additional dampers.” Supplement, J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (S1): 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813265.
Priestley, M. J. N., and D. M. Elder. 1983. “Stress-strain curves for unconfined and confined concrete masonry.” ACI J. 80 (19): 192–201.
Priestley, M. J. N., S. Sritharan, J. R. Conley, and S. Pampanin. 1999. “Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test building.” PCI J. 44 (6): 42–67. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67.
Rosenboom, O. A., and M. J. Kowalsky. 2004. “Reversed in-plane cyclic behavior of posttensioned clay brick masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (5): 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(787).
Rutenberg, A. 2013. “Seismic shear forces on RC walls: Review and bibliography.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (5): 1726–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9464-1.
Seo, C., and R. Sause. 2005. “Ductility demands on self-centering systems under earthquake loading.” ACI Struct. J. 102 (2): 275–285.
Smith, B., Y. Kurama, and M. McGinnis. 2012. Hybrid precast wall systems for seismic regions. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame.
TMS (The Masonry Society). 2016. Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures. TMS 402/602-16. Longmont, CO: TMS.
Vamvatsikos, D., and A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Wiebe, L., and C. Christopoulos. 2015a. “A cantilever beam analogy for quantifying higher mode effects in multistorey buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (11): 1697–1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2549.
Wiebe, L., and C. Christopoulos. 2015b. “Performance-based seismic design of controlled rocking steel braced frames. I: Methodological framework and design of base rocking joint.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (9): 04014226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001202.
Wight, G. D., J. M. Ingham, and M. J. Kowalsky. 2006. “Shaketable testing of rectangular post-tensioned concrete masonry walls.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (4): 587–595.
Yassin, A., M. Ezzeldin, T. Steele, and L. Wiebe. 2020. “Seismic collapse risk assessment of posttensioned controlled rocking masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002599.
Yassin, A., M. Ezzeldin, and L. Wiebe. 2021. “Numerical modelling of the seismic performance of controlled rocking masonry walls without post-tensioning.” In Proc., 17th WCEE. Sendai, Japan: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Yassin, A., M. Ezzeldin, and L. Wiebe. 2022. “Experimental assessment of controlled rocking masonry shear walls without post-tensioning.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (4): 04022018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003307.
Zhang, C., T. C. Steele, and L. D. Wiebe. 2018. “Design-level estimation of seismic displacements for self-centering SDOF systems on stiff soil.” Eng. Struct. 177 (Dec): 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.067.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Aug 6, 2021
Accepted: Jan 26, 2022
Published online: Apr 1, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 1, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-9770. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor and Chair in Effective Design of Structures, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-0609. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-1031. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Experimental Assessment of Resilient Controlled Rocking Masonry Walls with Replaceable Energy Dissipation, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11258, 149, 3, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share