Technical Papers
Dec 20, 2019

Multifidelity Gaussian Process Model Integrating Low- and High-Fidelity Data Considering Censoring

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 3

Abstract

To investigate the behavior of engineering systems in the context of uncertainty propagation, sensitivity analysis, and design optimization, where large numbers of system model evaluations are needed, direct adoption of high-fidelity system models (such as physical experiments or detailed simulations) is impractical. Efficient surrogate models built based on a small number of high-fidelity data have been proposed. However, for many engineering applications, the outputs of high-fidelity models are not always the exact values of the output of interest; rather, censored data, which only provide bounds for the interested output, are given. Surrogate models that can address censored data and make best use of a limited number of high-fidelity data and leverage the information from data with different levels of accuracy are needed. This paper proposes a general multifidelity Gaussian process model integrating low-fidelity data and high-fidelity data considering censoring in high-fidelity data. To alleviate the cost associated with establishing high-fidelity data, the proposed model integrates information from a small number of expensive high-fidelity data and information provided by a large number of cheap low-fidelity data to efficiently inform a more accurate surrogate model. Censored data are explicitly considered in the calibration of the multifidelity Gaussian process model. Posterior distributions of the model parameters are established in the context of Bayesian updating to explicitly take into account the uncertainties in the model parameters and the measurement errors in the data. To address the computational challenges in estimating the likelihood function of model parameters when considering censored data, a data augmentation algorithm is adopted where the censored data are treated as additional uncertain model parameters and closed-form conditional posterior distributions are derived for the model parameters. Gibbs sampling is then used to efficiently generate samples from the posterior distributions for the model parameters, which are used to establish the posterior statistics for the output predictions at new inputs. The effectiveness of the proposed model is illustrated in an example to establish a predictive model for the deformation capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns using a limited number of high-fidelity experimental data (the majority of which are censored data) and a large number of low-fidelity data established from analytical and numerical modeling.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abrahamsen, P., and F. E. Benth. 2001. “Kriging with inequality constraints.” Math. Geol. 33 (6): 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011078716252.
Beers, W. C. M. V., and J. P. C. Kleijnen. 2003. “Kriging for interpolation in random simulation.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54 (3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601492.
Bichon, B. J., M. S. Eldred, L. P. Swiler, S. Mahadevan, and J. M. McFarland. 2008. “Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions.” AIAA J. 46 (10): 2459–2468. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34321.
Bichon, B. J., J. M. McFarland, and S. Mahadevan. 2011. “Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (10): 1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.008.
Bucher, C. G., and U. Bourgund. 1990. “A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems.” Struct. Saf. 7 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E.
Deng, J., D. Gu, X. Li, and Z. Q. Yue. 2005. “Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network.” Struct. Saf. 27 (1): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.004.
De Oliveira, V. 2005. “Bayesian inference and prediction of Gaussian random fields based on censored data.” J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 14 (1): 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186005X27518.
Dubrule, O., and C. Kostov. 1986. “An interpolation method taking into account inequality constraints. I: Methodology.” Math. Geol. 18 (1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897654.
Forrester, A., A. Sobester, and A. Keane. 2008. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gano, S., B. Sanders, and J. Renaud. 2004. “Variable fidelity optimization using a kriging based scaling function.” In Proc., 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf., 4460. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Gano, S. E., J. E. Renaud, J. D. Martin, and T. W. Simpson. 2006. “Update strategies for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 32 (4): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0025-y.
Gardoni, P., A. Der Kiureghian, and K. M. Mosalam. 2002. “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (10): 1024–1038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024).
Gardoni, P., K. M. Mosalam, and A. der Kiureghian. 2003. “Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (1): 79–106.
Gelman, A., H. S. Stern, J. B. Carlin, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D. B. Rubin. 2013. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Ghosh, J., J. E. Padgett, and L. Dueñas-Osorio. 2013. “Surrogate modeling and failure surface visualization for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of highway bridges.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 34 (Oct): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.09.003.
Gomes, H. M., and A. M. Awruch. 2004. “Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf. 26 (1): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00022-5.
Groot, P., and P. Lucas. 2012. “Gaussian process regression with censored data using expectation propagation.” In Proc., 6th European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, 115–122. Granada, Spain: DECSAI.
Hu, Z., and S. Mahadevan. 2017. “A surrogate modeling approach for reliability analysis of a multidisciplinary system with spatio-temporal output.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 56 (3): 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1737-x.
Huang, Z., C. Wang, J. Chen, and H. Tian. 2011. “Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on kriging surrogate models.” Comput. Struct. 89 (1–2): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.07.010.
Hurtado, J. E. 2004. “An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory.” Struct. Saf. 26 (3): 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2003.05.002.
Hurtado, J. E., and D. A. Alvarez. 2001. “Neural-network-based reliability analysis: A comparative study.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (1–2): 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00248-1.
Jia, G., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2013. “Kriging metamodeling for approximation of high-dimensional wave and surge responses in real-time storm/hurricane risk assessment.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 261 (Jul): 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.012.
Jia, G., A. A. Taflanidis, N. C. Nadal-Caraballo, J. A. Melby, A. B. Kennedy, and J. M. Smith. 2016. “Surrogate modeling for peak or time-dependent storm surge prediction over an extended coastal region using an existing database of synthetic storms.” Nat. Hazard. 81 (2): 909–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2111-1.
Jin, R., W. Chen, and T. W. Simpson. 2001. “Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 23 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4.
Kennedy, M. C., and A. O’Hagan. 2000. “Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available.” Biometrika 87 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.1.1.
Kostov, C., and O. Dubrule. 1986. “An interpolation method taking into account inequality constraints. II: Practical approach.” Math. Geol. 18 (1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897655.
Kuya, Y., K. Takeda, X. Zhang, and A. I. J. Forrester. 2011. “Multifidelity surrogate modeling of experimental and computational aerodynamic data sets.” AIAA J. 49 (2): 289–298. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050384.
Le Gratiet, L. 2013. “Bayesian analysis of hierarchical multifidelity codes.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif. 1 (1): 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1137/120884122.
Militino, A. F., and M. D. Ugarte. 1999. “Analyzing censored spatial data.” Math. Geol. 31 (5): 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007516023962.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Pujol, S. 2002. “Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to displacement reversals.” Ph.D. thesis, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ.
Qian, Z., C. C. Seepersad, V. R. Joseph, J. K. Allen, and C. J. Wu. 2006. “Building surrogate models based on detailed and approximate simulations.” J. Mech. Des. 128 (4): 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2179459.
Qian, P. Z., and C. J. Wu. 2008. “Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low-accuracy and high-accuracy experiments.” Technometrics 50 (2): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017008000000082.
Rasmussen, C. E. 2004. “Gaussian processes in machine learning.” In Advanced lectures on machine learning, 63–71. Berlin: Springer.
Ruszczynski, A., and A. Shapiro. 2003. Stochastic programming, handbooks in operations research and management science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Sacks, J., W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn. 1989. “Design and analysis of computer experiments.” Stat. Sci. 4 (4): 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413.
Simpson, T. W., J. Poplinski, P. N. Koch, and J. K. Allen. 2001. “Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations.” Eng. Comput. 17 (2): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198.
Stein, M. L. 1992. “Prediction and inference for truncated spatial data.” J. Comput. Graphical Stat. 1 (1): 91–110.
Structural Performance Database. 2018. Introduction to structural performance database. Accessed November 11, 2018. https://nisee.berkeley.edu/spd/index.html.
Sudret, B. 2008. “Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (7): 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002.
Sudret, B., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2002. “Comparison of finite element reliability methods.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 17 (4): 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00031-0.
Taflanidis, A. A., G. Jia, and I. Gidaris. 2016. “Natural hazard probabilistic risk assessment through surrogate modeling.” In Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering, 59–86. New York: Springer.
Wang, G. G. 2003. “Adaptive response surface method using inherited Latin hypercube design points.” J. Mech. Des. 125 (2): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1561044.
Xiong, Y., W. Chen, and K.-L. Tsui. 2008. “A new variable-fidelity optimization framework based on model fusion and objective-oriented sequential sampling.” J. Mech. Des. 130 (11): 111401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2976449.
Zhang, J., A. Taflanidis, and J. Medina. 2017. “Sequential approximate optimization for design under uncertainty problems utilizing kriging metamodeling in augmented input space.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 315 (Mar): 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.042.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3March 2020

History

Received: Dec 30, 2018
Accepted: Jul 17, 2019
Published online: Dec 20, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 20, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Min Li, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-8481. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share