Technical Papers
Oct 25, 2022

Practitioners’ Views Concerning the Causal Effects of Project Delivery Methods and Procurement Methods on Construction Projects

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper aims to compare and analyze construction practitioners’ perceptions concerning the influence of project delivery methods (PDMs) and procurement methods (PMs) on various project outcomes, including team chemistry, construction quality, construction productivity, change orders, and overall project success. Using a convenience sampling survey, the research team received 94 responses from industry practitioners. Findings indicated that industry practitioners consider both PDM and PM to contribute significantly to overall construction success, indicating the need for further research regarding the interplay relationship between them. Few studies have examined the combined effects of PDMs and PMs, instead opting to keep one of the variables constant. The findings suggest that the industry lacks precise knowledge of contributions and limitations of the various PDMs and PMs, which warrants further research and highlights the need to develop and disseminate educational materials on the topic.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study either appear in the published article or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abdelrahman, M., T. Zayed, and A. Elyamany. 2008. “Best-value model based on project specific characteristics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (3): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(179).
Alameri, R., and B. Esmaeili. 2021. “Progressive design-build delivery method: Assessment of project performance.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 138 (1): 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1950242.
Alleman, D., A. Antoine, D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar. 2017. “A comparison of qualifications-based selection and best value procurement for construction manager–general contractor highway construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2630 (1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3141/2630-08.
Bogus, S. M., G. C. Migliaccio, and R. Jin. 2013. “Study of the relationship between procurement duration and project performance in design-build projects: Comparison between water/wastewater and transportation sectors.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (4): 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000165.
Boukendour, S., and W. Hughes. 2014. “Collaborative incentive contracts: Stimulating competitive behavior without competition.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 32 (3): 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.875215.
El Asmar, M., A. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
El Wardani, M. A., J. I. Messner, and M. J. Horman. 2006. “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (3): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(230).
Eriksson, P. E., and M. Westerberg. 2011. “Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: A conceptual framework.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (2): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.003.
Esmaeili, B., B. Franz, K. Molenaar, R. Leicht, and J. Messner. 2013. “A review of critical success factors and performance metrics on construction projects.” In Proc., 4th Construction Specialty Conf. Montréal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Esmaeili, B., E. Pellicer, S. Hasanzadeh, K. Molenaar, and A. Sanz. 2015. “Exploring the relationship between project integration and safety performance.” In Proc., ICSC15: The Canadian Society for Civil Eng. 5th Int./11th Constr. Specialty Conf. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Farnsworth, C. B., R. O. Warr, J. E. Weidman, and D. Mark Hutchings. 2016. “Effects of CM/GC project delivery on managing process risk in transportation construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 04015091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091.
Hale, D. R., P. P. Shrestha, G. E. Gibson, and G. C. Migliaccio. 2009. “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (7): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017.
Hasanzadeh, S., and B. Esmaeili. 2021. “Influence of best value procurement on design-build projects: A grounded theory study.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 18 (3): 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1910387.
Hasanzadeh, S., B. Esmaeili, G. M. Gad, and D. D. Ransberg. 2018. “Time of involvement and dispute occurrence in public highway projects.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481295.017.
Ibbs, C. W., Y. H. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. M. Odabasi. 2003. “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (4): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382).
Kelly, D., and B. Ilozor. 2020. “Performance outcome assessment of the integrated project delivery (IPD) method for commercial construction projects in USA.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 2020 (Oct): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1827340.
Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido. 1998. “Comparison of US project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435).
Korkmaz, S., D. Riley, and M. Horman. 2010. “Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195.
Leicht, R. M., K. R. Molenaar, J. I. Messner, B. W. Franz, and B. Esmaeili. 2016. Maximizing success in integrated projects: An owner’s guide. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ. https://dbia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Research-Maximizing-Success-in-Integrated-Delivery-Owners-Guide.pdf.
Mante J., I. Ndekugri, N. Ankrah, and F. Hammond. 2012. “The influence of procurement methods on dispute resolution mechanism choice in construction.” In Proc., 28th Annual ARCOM Conf., 979–988. Edinburgh, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Mehany, M. S., G. Bashettiyavar, B. Esmaeili, and G. Gad. 2018. “Claims and project performance between traditional and alternative project delivery methods.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000266.
Molenaar, K. R., A. D. Songer, and M. Barash. 1999. “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 15 (2): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54).
Molenaar, K. R., and D. Tran. 2015. “Practices for developing transparent best value selection procedures.” Accessed April 22, 2022. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/22192/practices-for-developing-transparent-best-value-selection-procedures.
Nissen, B. 2006. Best value in publicly funded projects: Contractor selection in two county GOB projects. Miami, FL: Center for Labor Research and Studies.
Perkins, R. A. 2009. “Sources of changes in design-build contracts for a governmental owner.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (7): 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:7(588).
Perrenoud, A., B. C. Lines, J. Savicky, and K. T. Sullivan. 2017. “Using best-value procurement to measure the impact of initial risk-management capability on qualitative construction performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000535.
Rojas, E. M., and I. Kell. 2008. “Comparative analysis of project delivery systems cost performance in Pacific Northwest public schools.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (6): 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:6(387).
Shrestha, P. P., J. T. O’Connor, and G. E. Gibson. 2011. “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000390.
Sullivan, J., M. E. Asmar, J. Chalhoub, and H. Obeid. 2017. “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282.
Tran, D. Q., and K. R. Molenaar. 2013. “Impact of risk on design-build selection for highway design and construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000210.
Williams, G. H. 2003. “An evaluation of public construction contracting methods for the public building sector in Oregon using data envelopment analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, System Science, Portland State Univ.
Yu, W. D., and K. W. Wang. 2012. “Best value or lowest bid? A quantitative perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000414.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Feb 1, 2022
Accepted: Jul 26, 2022
Published online: Oct 25, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 25, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638 [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ., 21000 West Ten Mile Rd., Southfield, MI 48075 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638. Email: [email protected]
David Kelly, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Vice President and General Manager, Turner Construction Company, 3601 South Congress, Ste. G100, Austin, TX 78704. Email: [email protected]
Sogand Hasanzadeh, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue Univ., 550 W. Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Estimator I, Fisk Electric Company, E10855 Westview Dr., Houston, TX 77043. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Dispute Avoidance in the Construction Industry: A Perspective of Procurement Methods, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-976, 16, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share