Dispute Avoidance in the Construction Industry: A Perspective of Procurement Methods
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
Disputes are inevitable in the construction industry due to the complex characteristics of the construction projects and the involvement of different stakeholders, and they can be considered as a major hindrance obstructing the successful completion of a project. The drawbacks of the dispute resolution mechanisms (DRM) used in projects have directed attention toward dispute avoidance based on the concept of prevention is better than cure. Conversely, previous studies emphasized that disputes in a project are the consequences of procurement approach used to some extent and the likelihood of disputes seems less in the projects procured under collaboration or partnering. Therefore, this study investigates dispute avoidance from the perspective of procurement methods. Following a comprehensive literature synthesis, case study approach was used by selecting one (01) case from four (04) different procurement methods and research data was collected through semistructured interviews. The findings revealed that the highest number of disputes occurred in the traditional method and the lowest in the collaborative approach. The dispute avoidance strategies varied in terms of procurement method adopted, due to their salient features. However, strategies like negotiation, proper tendering process, proper contract preparation and contract administration, and appointment of a third party from the initial stage of the project irrespective of the procurement type were common in all projects. Moreover, the highest number of key features which proactively avoid disputes were identified in the collaborative approach. Therefore, this study recommends collaborative procurement as the most suitable method to avoid potential disputes in a project.
Practical Applications
The main contribution of this study is investigating the dispute avoidance strategies implemented from the perspective of procurement methods in the Sri Lankan construction industry. Further, it provides insight into the current nature of the procurement methods used and key features of procurement methods which avoid disputes. Moreover, it recommends dispute avoidance strategies to be implemented from the initial stage of a project to enhance the success of construction projects. The result of the study will be beneficial for the industry practitioners to ensure the completion of the project while reducing the impacts from disputes in terms of cost, time and quality by identifying the dispute avoidance strategies to be implemented in the basic stages of a project and to select the most suitable procurement method based on its key features on dispute avoidance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Works Cited
Abeynayake, M., and C. Weddikkara. 2013. “Special features and experiences of the full-term dispute adjudication board as an alternative dispute resolution method in the construction industry of Sri Lanka.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Building Resilience, 1–14. Heritance Ahungalla, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Ahamed, A., G. Karunasena, S. Jayasena, and I. Seneviratne. 2010. “Exploring the status of e-procurement: A case of the construction industry in Sri Lanka.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC), 456–465. State College, PA: Northumbria Univ.
Al-Bayati, A., D. Kelly, S. Hasanzadeh, and D. York. 2022. “Practitioners’ views concerning the causal effects of project delivery methods and procurement methods on construction projects.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 28 (1): 04022055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000742.
Ariffin, H. L. T., Z. Aziz, F. M. Raslim, and M. Jaafar. 2016. “Identify disputes in the construction industry: The way forward for innovative procurement system in Malaysia.” Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol. 11 (3): 98–104.
Bryde, D., M. Broquetas, and J. M. Volm. 2013. “The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM).” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (7): 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001.
Chamikara, K., B. Perera, and I. Kurukulasooriya. 2023. “Use of building information modelling to mitigate cost overruns in design and build projects.” In Proc., 11th World Construction Symp., edited by Y. Sandanayake, K. Waidyasekara, T. Ramachandra, and K. Ranadewa, 1104–1115. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2023.88.
Chanudha, R., P. Disaratna, S. Anuruddika, and M. Ariyachandra. 2018. “Procurement system selection model for the Sri Lankan construction industry.” In Proc., 6th World Construction Symp. 2017: What’s New and What’s Next in the Built Environment Sustainability Agenda?, 162–173. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Ceylon Institute of Builders.
CIOB (The Chartered Institute of Building). 2010. “A report exploring procurement in the construction industry.” Accessed December 14, 2010. https://www.ciob.org/sites/default/files/CIOB%20research%20-%20Procurement%20in%20the%20Construction%20Industry%202010_1.pdf.
Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. “Research methods in education.” Accessed June 5, 2020. https://gtu.ge/AgroLib/RESEARCH%20METHOD%20COHEN%20ok.pdf.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. “Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches.” Accessed September 6, 2020. http://englishlangkan.com/produk/E%20Book%20Research%20Design%20Cressweell%202014.pdf.
Dabarera, G., B. Perera, and M. Rodrigo. 2019. “Suitability of public-private-partnership procurement method for road projects in Sri Lanka.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 9 (2): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0007.
De Alwis, I., M. Abeynayake, and M. Francis. 2016. “Dispute avoidance model for Sri Lankan construction industry.” In Proc., 5th World Construction Symp. 2016: Greening Environment, Eco Innovations and Entrepreneurship, 162–173. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Elhag, T., S. Eapen, and T. Ballal. 2020. “Moderating claims and disputes through collaborative procurement.” Constr. Innovation 20 (1): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2019-0020.
Erlingsson, C., and P. Brysiewicz. 2013. “Orientation among multiple truths: An introduction to qualitative research.” Afr. Fed. Emergency Med. 3 (2): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2012.04.005.
Farooqui, R. U., F. Masood, and F. Saleem. 2012. “Key causes of construction disputes in Pakistan.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCDC-III), 72–79. Loveland, CO: Associated Schools of Construction.
Farooqui, R. U., M. Umer, and S. Azhar. 2014. “Key causes of disputes in the Pakistani construction: Assessment of trends from the viewpoint of contractors.” In Proc., 50th ASC Annual Int. Conf., 1–8. Washington, DC: Associated Schools of Construction.
Francis, M., T. Ramachandra, and S. Perera. 2017. “Revisiting causes of disputes: Perspectives of project participants, phases of project and project characteristics.” In Proc., 6th World Construction Symp. 2017: What’s New and What’s Next in the Built Environment Sustainability Agenda?, 368–376. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Ceylon Institute of Builders.
Francis, M., T. Ramachandra, and S. Perera. 2022. “Disputes in construction projects: A perspective of project characteristics.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (2): 04522007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000535.
Gunawardhane, K., and G. Karunasena. 2016. “Gaps in public procurement process in Sri Lankan construction industry.” In Proc., 5th World Construction Symp. 2016: Greening Environment, Eco Innovations and Entrepreneurship, 231–240. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuea.
Hayati, K., and Y. Latief. 2019. “Risk analysis and prevention system to minimize claim and dispute on construction projects.” Proc., IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 365 (1): 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/365/1/012030.
Hettiaarachchige, N., A. Rathnasinghe, K. Ranadewa, and N. Thurairajah. 2022. “Lean integrated project delivery for construction procurement: The case of Sri Lanka.” Buildings 12 (5): 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050524.
Illankoon, I. M., V. W. Tam, K. N. Le, and K. A. Ranadewa. 2019. “Causes of disputes, factors affecting dispute resolution and effective alternative dispute resolution for Sri Lankan construction industry.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616415.
Jamil, A. H., and M. S. Fathi. 2018. “Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: A systematic review.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 8 (4): 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2017-0131.
Jayasuriya, S., and R. Rameezdeen. 2011. “Is construction procurement method selection habitual?” In Proc., Pacific Association of Quantity Surveyors 15th Annual Congress. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuea.
Joseph, A. L., and H. S. Jayasena. 2008. “Impediments to the development of design and build procurement system in Sri Lanka.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Building Education and Research, Building Resilience, 1566–1575. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Kodippili, T., G. Karunasena, B. Mallawarachchi, and S. Jayakodi. 2023. “Strategies to create an enabling environment for public private partnership (PPP) projects in Sri Lanka.” In Proc. 11th World Construction Symp., edited by Y. Sandanayake, K. Waidyasekara, T. Ramachandra, and K. Ranadewa, 973–984. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuea. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2023.78.
Kosala, H., M. Francis, and D. Sirimewan. 2021. “Applicability of blockchain technology to manage financial issues in the Sri Lankan construction industry.” In Proc., 9th World Construction Symp., edited by Y. Sandanayake, S. Gunatilake, and K. Waidyasekara, 86–97. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuea. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2021.8.
Loosemore, D. J. 2009. “Briefing: Challenges to ADR in the UK and internationally—A personal view.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Manage. Procure. Law 162 (Feb): 95–96. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.2009.162.3.95.
Mante, J. 2015. “Resolving infrastructure-related construction disputes in developing countries: The Ghana experience.” In Proc., 31st Annual Association of Researches in Construction Management Conf. (ARCOM), 73–82. Dearborn, MI: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Mante, J., I. Ndekugri, N. Ankrah, and F. Hammond. 2012. “The influence of procurement methods on dispute resolution mechanism choice in construction.” In Proc., 28th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conf., edited by S. Smith, 979–988. Edinburgh, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
McDermotti, P., and M. Khalfan. 2012. “Achieving supply chain integration within construction industry.” Constr. Econ. Build. 6 (2): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v6i2.2983.
McGeorge, D., et al. 2007. “Dispute avoidance and resolution: A literature review.” Accessed January 7, 2020. http://www.construction-innovation.info/images/pdfs/Literature_Review.pdf.
Naji, K. K., M. M. Mansour, and M. Gunduz. 2020. “Methods for modeling and evaluating construction disputes: A critical review.” IEEE Access 8 (Feb): 45641–45652. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976109.
Omondi, O. J., S. Diang, A. Gwaya, and R. Onyanyo. 2017. “Effects of procurement processes on successful completion of construction projects in Uasin Gishu county.” IOSR J. Bus. Manage. (IOSR-JBM) 19 (12): 42–50. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1912074250.
Oyegoke, A. S., M. Dickinson, M. M. Khalfan, P. McDermott, and S. Rowlinson. 2009. “Construction project procurement routes: An in-depth critique.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 2 (3): 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910971018.
Pawar, O. A., and R. S. Patil. 2014. “Conflicts and disputes in construction projects.” Int. J. Innovations Eng. Technol. (IJIET) 3 (3): 48–53.
Rameezdeen, R., and S. De Silva. 2002. “Trends in construction procurement systems in Sri Lanka.” Built Environ. Sri Lanka 02 (02): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.4038/besl.v2i2.7631.
Ratnasabapathy, S., and R. Rameezdeen. 2007. “A decision support system for the selection of best procurement system in construction.” Built Environ. Sri Lanka 7 (2): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.4038/besl.v7i2.1943.
Ratnasabapathy, S., R. Rameezdeen, and D. Amaratunga. 2005. “Macro analysis of construction procurement trends in Sri Lanka.” In Proc., 5th Int. Postgraduate Research Conf. (IPRC), 525–536. Manchester, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Rosayuru, H. D. R. R., K. G. A. S. Waidyasekara, and M. K. C. S. Wijewickrama. 2019. “Sustainable BIM based integrated project delivery system for construction industry in Sri Lanka Sustainable BIM based integrated project delivery system for construction.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (5): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1645263.
Ruparathna, R., and K. Hewage. 2013. “Review of contemporary construction procurement practices.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000279.
Senarath, P. A. N. B., and M. Francis. 2021. “Dispute avoidance from the perspective of procurement methods: A conceptual focus.” In Proc., 9th World Construction Symp., edited by Y. Sandanayake, S. Gunatilake, and K. Waidyasekara, 256–267. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2021.22.
Smith, P. 2014. “BIM implementation - Global strategies.” Procedia Eng. 85 (Jun): 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.575.
Taherdoost, H. 2016. “Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research.” Int. J. Acad. Res. Manage. (IJARM) 5 (2): 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
Taylan, O., A. O. Bafail, R. M. Abdulaal, and M. R. Kabli. 2014. “Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies.” Appl. Soft Comput. J. 17 (Sep): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003.
Thusharika, A., and M. Abeynayake. 2016. “Framework for mitigating contractual disputes in the Sri Lankan construction industry.” In Proc., 5th World Construction Symp. 2016: Greening Environment, Eco Innovations and Entrepreneurship, 221–230. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Wahyuni, D. 2012. “The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies.” J. Appl. Manage. Account. Res. 10 (1): 69–80.
Wang, K. W., Y. Y. Hsu, W. D. Yu, and S. T. Cheng. 2018. “Determination of project procurement method with a graphical analytic model.” Sustainability 10 (10): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103583.
Weerasekaraa, D., V. Disaratna, K. Withanage, and B. Perera. 2023. “Procurement management in the foreign-funded construction projects implemented in Sri Lanka.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 23 (7): 1118–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1956674.
Wijewardana, C., H. S. Jayasena, and K. Ranadewa. 2013. “Impact of government policies and regulations when adopting alternative procurement methods.” In Proc., Second World Construction Symp. 2013: Socio-Economic Sustainability in Construction, 253–260. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Wimalasena, N. N., and S. Gunatilake. 2018. “The readiness of construction contractors and consultants to adopt e-tendering—The case of Sri Lanka.” Constr. Innovation 18 (3): 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2017-0025.
Yin, R. K. 2018. “Case study research and applications: Design and methods.” Accessed September 6, 2020. https://www.pdfdrive.com/case-study-research-andapplications-design-and-methods-d183933688.htm.
Yusof, A. M., S. Ismail, and L. S. Chin. 2011. “Procurement method as conflict and dispute reduction mechanism for construction industry in Malaysia.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Construction and Project Management, 215–219. Singapore: International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology Press.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 3 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 8, 2022
Accepted: Dec 22, 2023
Published online: May 8, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 8, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.