Technical Papers
Jan 12, 2023

Multidirectional Vibroseis Shaking and Controlled Blasting to Determine the Dynamic In Situ Response of a Low-Plasticity Silt Deposit

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 3

Abstract

In this paper, efforts to characterize and compare the full-scale in situ three-dimensional (3D) dynamic response of a low-plasticity silt deposit to multidirectional loading from two different sources, a vibroseis shaker named T-Rex and controlled blasting, are presented. Horizontal vibroseis shaking at a frequency, f, of 10 Hz, produced dynamic responses in the silt that ranged from linear-elastic to nonlinear-inelastic, inducing maximum equivalent direct simple shear (DSS) shear strains, γDSS,max, up to 0.15% and residual excess pore pressure ratios, ru,r, of 14.1%. Blast-induced shear waves with predominant frequencies ranging from 9.6 to 14.6 Hz excited nonlinear-elastic and nonlinear-inelastic responses in the silt deposit, with γDSS,max of 1.14% and maximum ru,r of 61%. Importantly, these responses were observed to be minimally influenced by high frequency compression waves. Multidirectional loading, and excess pore pressure, ue, migration and impedance were identified as the predominant factors for achieving the large ru,r in the silt deposit from these two in situ testing techniques. The cyclic threshold shear strain, γtp, to trigger ru,r observed from the T-Rex shaking equaled 0.007% to 0.011% and varied with the initial soil stiffness. The two testing techniques demonstrated that the in-situ shear modulus, G, reduced to 90% of the maximum shear modulus, Gmax, at γDSS,maxγtp, whereas by γDSS,max1%, G further reduced to 10 to 30% of Gmax corresponding to ru,r of 60%. Changes in soil fabric were quantified using small-strain shear-wave velocity measurements performed before and/or upon initiation and after each stage of dynamic testing, and were linked to the observed increase and decrease in γtp for the shallower and deeper 3D elements, respectively, following T-Rex shaking. The side-by-side comparison of the dynamic responses and soil properties derived from these two distinctly different field-testing techniques validate the use of controlled blasting for quantifying in situ dynamic soil properties and responses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online with funder data retention policies. These data are available at Stuedlein et al. (2021).

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Nos. CMMI 1663654, CMMI 1663531, and CMMI 1520808. The findings presented herein represent that of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of NSF. The authors express their gratitude to the Port of Longview, Longview, Washington, and their employees for providing and coordinating access to the test site.

References

Adamidis, O., and S. P. G. Madabhushi. 2018. “Experimental investigation of drainage during earthquake-induced liquefaction.” Geotechnique 68 (8): 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.090.
Adamidis, O., U. Sinan, and I. Anastasopoulos. 2019. “Effects of partial drainage on the response of Hostun sand: An experimental investigation at element level.” In Vol. 4 of Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions, 993–1000. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Andrus, R. D., N. P. Mohanan, P. Piratheepan, B. S. Ellis, and T. L. Holzer. 2007. “Predicting shear-wave velocity from cone penetration resistance.” In Proc., Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering—Conf. Presentations CD-ROM, edited by K. D. Pitilakis. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe II. 2000. “Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, S. Bastin, M. Stringer, M. Jacka, and R. Wentz. 2020. “Characterization of silty soil thin layering and groundwater conditions for liquefaction assessment.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (2): 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0287.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. Stringer. 2018. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jul): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Bong, T., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2018. “Effect of cone penetration conditioning on random field model parameters and impact of spatial variability on liquefaction-induced differential settlements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (5): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001863.
Boone, S. J. 2010. “A critical reappraisal of ‘preconsolidation pressure’ interpretations using the oedometer test.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (3): 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-093.
Boulanger, R. W. 1990. “Liquefaction behavior of saturated cohesionless soils subjected to unidirectional and bi-directional static and cyclic loads.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2006. “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165).
Cappa, R., S. J. Brandenberg, and A. Lemnitzer. 2017. “Strains and pore pressures generated during cyclic loading of embankments on organic soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001721.
Cappellaro, C., M. Cubrinovski, J. D. Bray, G. Chiaro, M. F. Riemer, and M. E. Stringer. 2021. “Liquefaction resistance of Christchurch sandy soils from direct simple shear tests.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 141 (Feb): 106489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106489.
Chandrupatla, T. R., A. D. Belegundu, T. Ramesh, and C. Ray. 2002. Vol. 10 of Introduction to finite elements in engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chang, W. J. 2011. “Evaluation of undrained shear strains in multi-directional horizontal shaking.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (7): 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.002.
Chang, W. J., E. M. Rathje, K. H. Stokoe II, K. Hazirbaba. 2007. “In situ pore pressure generation behavior of liquefiable sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (8): 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:8(921).
Cox, B., K. Stokoe, and E. Rathje. 2009. “An in -situ test method for evaluating the coupled pore pressure generation and nonlinear shear modulus behavior of liquefiable soils.” Geotech. Test. J. 32 (1): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101484.
Cox, B. R. 2006. “Development of a direct test method for dynamically assessing the liquefaction resistance of soils in situ.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Cox, B. R., K. A. McLaughlin, S. van Ballegooy, M. Cubrinovski, R. Boulanger, and L. Wotherspoon. 2017. “In-situ investigation of false-positive liquefaction sites in Christchurch, New Zealand: St. Teresa’s school case history.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Cubrinovski, M., D. Henderson, and B. A. Bradley. 2012. “Liquefaction Impacts in Residential Areas in the 2010-2011 Christchurch Earthquakes.” In Proc., One Year after 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake—Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the Giant Earthquake, 811–824. Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. Van Ballegooy. 2019. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Dadashiserej, A., A. Jana, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. M. Evans. 2022a. “Effect of strain history on the monotonic and cyclic response of natural and reconstituted silts.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 160 (Sep): 107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107329.
Dadashiserej, A., A. Jana, A. W. Stuedlein, T. M. Evans, B. Zhang, Z. Xu, K. H. Stokoe II, and B. R. Cox. 2022b. “In-situ and laboratory cyclic response of an alluvial plastic silt deposit.” In Proc., 20th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Perth, WA, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Dahl, K. R., J. T. DeJong, R. W. Boulanger, R. Pyke, and D. Wahl. 2014. “Characterization of an alluvial silt and clay deposit for monotonic, cyclic, and post-cyclic behavior.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (4): 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0057.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
DeJong, J. T., C. P. Krage, B. M. Albin, and D. J. DeGroot. 2018. “Work-based framework for sample quality evaluation of low plasticity soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (10): 04018074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001941.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015. “Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor Kσ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001342.
Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Vol. 138 of Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
Dobry, R., S. Thevanayagam, W. El-Sekelly, T. Abdoun, and Q. Huang. 2019. “Large-scale modeling of preshaking effect on liquefaction resistance, shear wave velocity, and CPT tip resistance of clean sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002080.
El-Sekelly, W., R. Dobry, T. Abdoun, and J. H. Steidl. 2017. “Two case histories demonstrating the effect of past earthquakes on liquefaction resistance of silty sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001654.
Fiegel, G. L., and B. L. Kutter. 1994. “Liquefaction mechanism for layered soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (4): 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:4(737).
Finn, W. D., P. L. Barnaby, and D. J. Pickering. 1970. “Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 96 (6): 1917–1934. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001478.
Gohl, W. B., J. A. Howie, and C. E. Rea. 2001. “Use of controlled detonation of explosives for liquefaction testing.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri-Rolla.
Heelan, P. A. 1953. “Radiation from a cylindrical source of finite length.” Geophysics 18 (3): 685. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437923.
Hsu, C. C., and M. Vucetic. 2006. “Threshold shear strain for cyclic pore-water pressure in cohesive soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (10): 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:10(1325).
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” In Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Isenhower, W. M., and K. H. Stokoe II. 1981. “Strain-rate dependent shear modulus of San Francisco Bay mud.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Int. Conf. Recent Advances Earthquake Engineering Soil Dynamics, 597–602. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri-Rolla.
Ishihara, K. 1968. “Propagation of compressional waves in a saturated soil.” In Proc., Int. Symp. Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties Earth Material, 195–206. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Jana, A. 2021. “Use of controlled blasting to quantify the dynamic, in-situ, nonlinear inelastic response of soils.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
Jana, A., A. M. Donaldson, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. M. Evans. 2021. “Deep, in-situ nonlinear dynamic testing of soil with controlled blasting: Instrumentation, calibration, and example application to a plastic silt deposit.” Geotech. Test. J. 44 (5): 20190426. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20190426.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021a. “Dynamic, in-situ, nonlinear-inelastic response and post-cyclic strength of a plastic silt deposit.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (1): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0652.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021b. “Dynamic in-situ response of a deep, medium dense sand deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (6): 04021039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002523.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021c. “Monotonic, cyclic and post-cyclic response of an alluvial plastic silt deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (3): 04020174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002462.
Kammerer, A. M., J. M. Pestana, and R. B. Seed. 2002. Undrained response of Monterey 0/30 sand under multidirectional cyclic simple shear loading conditions. Berkeley: Univ. of California.
Kim, C. 2012. “Development of the spectral-analysis-of-body-waves (SABW) method for downhole seismic testing with boreholes or penetrometers.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Kishida, T., D. Park, R. L. Sousa, R. Armstrong, and Y. J. Byon. 2020. “Modulus reductions of dam embankment materials based on downhole array time series.” Earthquake spectra 36 (1): 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878182.
Kishida, T., and C. C. Tsai. 2021. “Wave velocities depending on shear strain, directionality, and excess pore water pressure from wildlife liquefaction array.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 19 (6): 2371–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01074-4.
Koester, J. P. 1994. “The influence of fines type and content on cyclic strength.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, 17–33. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kurtulus, A., and K. H. Stokoe. 2008. “In situ measurement of nonlinear shear modulus of silty soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1531–1540. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1531).
Ladd, R. S. 1977. “Specimen preparation and cyclic stability of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (6): 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000435.
Lee, K. L., and H. B. Seed. 1967. “Cyclic stress conditions causing liquefaction of sand.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 93 (1): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000945.
Matsuda, H., T. T. Nhan, and R. Ishikura. 2013. “Prediction of excess pore water pressure and post-cyclic settlement on soft clay induced by uni-directional and multi-directional cyclic shears as a function of strain path parameters.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 49 (Jun): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.010.
Mayne, P. W., 2007. Cone penetration testing: A synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mortezaie, A., and M. Vucetic. 2016. “Threshold shear strains for cyclic degradation and cyclic pore water pressure generation in two clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (5): 04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001461.
Mulilis, J. P., H. B. Seed, C. K. Chan, J. K. Mitchell, and K. Arulanandan. 1977. “Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (2): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000387.
Oda, M., K. Kawamoto, K. Suzuki, H. Fujimori, and M. Sato. 2001. “Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (5): 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(416).
Olson, S. M., S. F. Obermeier, and T. D. Stark. 2001. “Interpretation of penetration resistance for back-analysis at sites of previous liquefaction.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 72 (1): 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.1.46.
Park, T., and M. L. Silver. 1975. Dynamic soil properties required to predict the dynamic behavior of elevated transportation structures. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
Polito, C. P., and J. R. Martin II. 2001. “Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (5): 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408).
Rathje, E., R. Phillips, W. J. Chang, and K. H. Stokoe. 2001. “Evaluating nonlinear response in situ.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Roberts, J. N., K. H. Stokoe, S. Hwang, B. R. Cox, Y. Wang, F. M. Menq, and S. van Ballegooy. 2016. “Field measurements of the variability in shear strain and pore pressure generation in Christchurch soils.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Robertson, P. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065.
Sahadewa, A., D. Zekkos, R. D. Woods, and K. H. Stokoe. 2015. “Field testing method for evaluating the small-strain shear modulus and shear modulus nonlinearity of solid waste.” Geotech. Test. J. 38 (4): 20140016–20140441. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140016.
Sanin, M. V., and D. Wijewickreme. 2006. “Cyclic shear response of channel-fill Fraser River Delta silt.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 854–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.006.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Eng. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Seed, H. B., G. R. Martin, and R. M. Pyke. 1978. “Effect of multidirectional shaking on pore pressure development in sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 104 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000575.
Stokoe K. H., and J. C. Santamarina. 2000. “Seismic-wave-based testing in geotechnical engineering.” In Proc., GeoEngineering 2000, 1490–1536. Melbourne, Australia: Technomic.
Stokoe, K. H., II, B. R. Cox, P. Clayton, and F. M. Menq. 2017. “NHERI@UTEXAS experimental facility: Large-scale mobile shakers for natural-hazards field studies.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. San Jose, CA: Curran Associates.
Stokoe, K. H., II, S. K. Hwang, J. K. Lee, and R. D. Andrus. 1995. “Effects of various parameters on the stiffness and damping of soils at small to medium strains.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Int. Symp., Pre-Failure Deformation of Geomaterials. Hokkaido, Japan: Sapporo.
Stuedlein, A., M. Evans, A. Dadashiserej, and A. Jana. 2021. “Oregon state university blast array with T-Rex.” In Collaborative research: Bridging the in-situ and elemental cyclic response of transitional soils. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-c74j-e947.
Stuedlein, A. W., A. Dadashiserej, A. Jana, and T. M. Evans. 2023. “Liquefaction susceptibility and cyclic response of intact nonplastic and plastic silts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 149 (1): 04022125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002935.
Vaid, Y. P. 1994. “Liquefaction of silty soils.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, GSP No. 44, 1–16. New York: ASCE.
Vardanega, P. J., and M. D. Bolton. 2013. “Stiffness of clays and silts: Normalizing shear modulus and shear strain.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (9): 1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000887.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1991. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).
Vucetic, M., and K. Tabata. 2003. “Influence of soil type on the effect of strain rate on small-strain cyclic shear modulus.” Soils Found. 43 (5): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.5_161.
Wang, B., C. Yao, Z. Liu, H. Fan, and H. Xiao. 2019. “Development of an energy-based EPWP generation model under different drainage conditions.” Earth Environ. Sci. 304 (2): 022053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/304/2/022053.
Wang, Y., and K. H. Stokoe. 2022. “Development of constitutive models for linear and nonlinear shear modulus and material damping ratio of uncemented soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (3): 04021192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002736.
Wijewickreme, D., A. Soysa, and P. Verma. 2019. “Response of natural fine-grained soils for seismic design practice: A collection of research findings from British Columbia, Canada.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.053.
Yniesta, S., and M. Janati-Idrissi. 2021. “Integration of viscoplastic effects in a one-dimensional constitutive model for ground response analysis.” Can. Geotech. J. 58 (4): 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0717.
Yost, K. M., B. R. Cox, L. Wotherspoon, R. W. Boulanger, S. van Ballegooy, and M. Cubrinovski. 2019. “In situ investigation of false-positive liquefaction sites in Christchurch, New Zealand: Palinurus road case history.” In Geo-congress 2019: Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, 436–451. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zeghal, M., and A. W. Elgamal. 1994. “Analysis of site liquefaction using earthquake records.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (6): 996–1017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(996).
Zhang, B. 2020. “Improvements to field liquefaction testing with large mobile shakers.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Zhang, B., et al. 2021. “Collaborative study on dynamic response of transitional soils.” In Collaborative research: Bridging the in-situ and elemental cyclic response of transitional soils. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-81g3-ef87.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 3March 2023

History

Received: Sep 6, 2021
Accepted: Jul 25, 2022
Published online: Jan 12, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amalesh Jana
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Ali Dadashiserej
Research Assistant, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Benchen Zhang
Senior Staff Engineer, Beyond Engineering and Testing, 3801 Doris Lane Suite B, Round Rock, TX 78664.
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6265-9906. Email: [email protected]
T. Matthew Evans, M.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Kenneth H. Stokoe II, Dist.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.
Brady R. Cox, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Flowability of Saturated Sands under Cyclic Loading and the Viscous Fluid Flow Failure Criterion for Liquefaction Triggering, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11872, 150, 1, (2024).
  • Postliquefaction Reconsolidation Settlement of a Soil Deposit Considering Spatially Variable Properties and Ground Motion Variability, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11768, 150, 3, (2024).
  • Discussion of “A New -Based Liquefaction-Triggering Procedure for Gravelly Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11311, 149, 7, (2023).
  • On the In Situ Cyclic Resistance of Natural Sand and Silt Deposits, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10784, 149, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share