Technical Papers
May 20, 2020

Intact, Disturbed, and Reconstituted Undrained Shear Behavior of Low-Plasticity Natural Silt

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 8

Abstract

This paper presents a laboratory investigation of undrained triaxial shear behavior of a natural low-plasticity silt from Halden, Norway in the intact, disturbed, and reconstituted states. Sherbrooke block sample and reconstituted specimens were subjected to simulated tube sampling in a triaxial stress path cell system prior to reconsolidation and undrained shear to assess the effects of disturbance on undrained shear behavior, undrained shear strength, and effective stress friction angle. Shear stress and pore-pressure development were evaluated relative to that measured for the undisturbed reference state, i.e., that measured on specimens from the intact block sample. Specimens trimmed from fixed-piston tube samples collected from the field site were tested for comparative purposes. Collectively, the results demonstrated that neither the volumetric method of evaluating sample quality for clays nor shear wave velocity tracked sample disturbance well for this low-plasticity silt. Relative to the reference intact block sample tests, simulated tube sampling resulted in an increasingly pronounced dilative-type behavior during postdisturbance undrained shear and a general increase in undrained shear strength. Specimens from the block sample that were subjected to simulated tube sample disturbance had similar stress–strain behavior as that from conventional anisotropically consolidated triaxial compression tests conducted on specimens from the tube samples, suggesting that significant alteration of the intact soil state occurred during tube sampling. Practical suggestions for selection of undrained shear strength for intact low-plasticity silts that exhibit dilative behavior such as the Halden silt are proposed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed primarily by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), the Research Council of Norway (RCN) through project Norwegian GeoTest Sites (NGTS) Grant No. 245650, and the Norway-America Association’s (NORAM) Graduate Study and Research Scholarship Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NGI, RCN, or NORAM. The support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Andresen, A., and P. Kolstad. 1979. “The NGI 54-mm samplers for undisturbed sampling of clays and representative sampling of coarser materials.” In Proc., Int. Symp. of Soil Sampling, State of the Art on Current Practice of Soil Sampling, 13–21. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system. ASTM D2487-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baligh, M. M. 1985. “Strain path method.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1108–1136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:9(1108).
Baligh, M. M., A. S. Azzouz, and C. T. Chin. 1987. “Disturbances due to ‘ideal’ tube sampling.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (7): 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:7(739).
Becker, D. E., J. H. A. Crooks, K. Been, and M. G. Jefferies. 1987. “Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 24 (4): 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-070.
Berre, T. 1982. “Triaxial testing at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.” Geotech. Test. J. 5 (1/2): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10794J.
Blaker, Ø., R. Carroll, P. Paniagua, D. J. DeGroot, and J.-S. L’Heureux. 2019. “Halden research site: Geotechnical characterization of a post glacial silt.” AIMS Geosci. 5 (2): 184–234. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.184.
Börgesson, L. 1981. “Shear strength of inorganic silty soils.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 567–572. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Bradshaw, A. S., and C. D. P. Baxter. 2007. “Sample preparation of silts for liquefaction testing.” Geotech. Test. J. 30 (4): 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ100206.
Brandon, T. L., A. T. Rose, and J. M. Duncan. 2006. “Drained and undrained strength interpretation for low-plasticity silts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(250).
Bray, J. D., et al. 2004. “Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (7): 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(673).
Bray, J. D., and R. B. Sancio. 2006. “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1165).
Carroll, R., and M. Long. 2017. “Sample disturbance effects in silt.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001749.
Casagrande, A. 1936. “The determination of the preconsolidation load and its practical significance.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. SMFE, Graduate School of Engineering, 60–64. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Clayton, C. R. I., D. W. Hight, and R. J. Hopper. 1992. “Progressive destructuring of Bothkennar clay. implications for sampling and reconsolidation procedures.” Géotechnique 42 (2): 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.219.
Clayton, C. R. I., A. Siddique, and R. J. Hopper. 1998. “Effects of sampler design on tube sampling disturbance—Numerical and analytical investigations.” Géotechnique 48 (6): 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.6.847.
DeGroot, D. J., T. Lunne, R. Ghanekar, S. Knudsen, C. D. Jones, and T. I. Yetginer-Tjelta. 2019. “Engineering properties of low to medium overconsolidation ratio offshore clays.” AIMS Geosciences 5 (3): 535–567. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.3.535.
DeJong, J. T., C. P. Krage, B. M. Albin, and D. J. DeGroot. 2018. “Work-based framework for sample quality evaluation of low plasticity soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (10): 04018074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001941.
Dyvik, R., and C. Madshus. 1985. “Lab measurements of Gmax using bender elements.” In Advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions, edited by V. Khosla, 186–196. New York: ASCE.
Fleming, L. N., and J. M. Duncan. 1990. “Stress-deformation characteristics of Alaskan silt.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (3): 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:3(377).
Hight, D. W., R. Böese, A. P. Butcher, C. R. I. Clayton, and P. R. Smith. 1992. “Disturbance of the Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing.” Géotechnique 42 (2): 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1992.42.2.199.
Hight, D. W., and S. Leroueil. 2003. “Characterisation of soils for engineering purposes.” In Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, edited by T. S. Tan, K. K. Phoon, D. W. Hight, and S. Leroueil, 255–360. Lisse, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Høeg, K., R. Dyvik, and G. Sandbækken. 2000. “Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (7): 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(606).
ISO. 2018. Geotechnical investigation and testing—Laboratory testing of soil: Part 12: Determination of liquid and plastic limits. ISO 17892-12. Geneva: ISO.
Janbu, N. 1985. “Soil models in offshore engineering (25th Rankine Lecture).” Géotechnique 35 (3): 241–281. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.3.241.
Lacasse, S., and T. Berre. 1988. “State-of-the-art: Triaxial testing methods for soils.” In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock, ASTM STP 977, edited by R. Donaghe, R. Chaney, and M. M. Silver, 264–289. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Lacasse, S., T. Berre, and G. Lefebvre. 1985. “Block sampling of sensitive clay.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 887–892. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Ladd, C. C., and D. J. DeGroot. 2003. “Recommended practice for soft ground site characterization: Arthur Casagrande lecture.” In Proc., 12th Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, edited by P. J. Culligan, H. H. Einstein, and A. J. Whittle, 1–55. Essen, Germany: Verlag Glückauf.
Ladd, R. 1978. “Preparing test specimens using undercompaction.” Geotech. Test. J. 1 (1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J.
La Rochelle, P., and G. Lefebvre. 1971. “Sampling disturbance in Champlain clays.” In Sampling of soil and rock, STP 483, edited by B. B. Gordon and C. B. Crawford, 143–163. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
LaRochelle, P., J. Sarrailh, F. Tavenas, M. Roy, and S. Leroueil. 1981. “Causes of sampling disturbance and design of a new sampler for sensitive soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 18 (1): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1139/t81-006.
Lefebvre, G., and C. Poulin. 1979. “A new method of sampling in sensitive clay.” Can. Geotech. J. 16 (1): 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1139/t79-019.
Long, M. 2007. “Engineering characterization of estuarine silts.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 40 (2): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/05-061.
Long, M., G. Gudjonsson, S. Donohue, and K. Hagberg. 2010. “Engineering characterisation of Norwegian glaciomarine silt.” Eng. Geol. 110 (3): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.11.002.
Lukas, W. G., D. J. DeGroot, J. T. DeJong, C. P. Krage, and G. Zhang. 2019. “Undrained shear behavior of low-plasticity intermediate soils subjected to simulated tube-sampling disturbance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (1): 04018098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001967.
Lunne, T., T. Berre, K. H. Andersen, S. Strandvik, and M. Sjursen. 2006. “Effects of sample disturbance and consolidation procedures on measured shear strength of soft marine Norwegian clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 43 (7): 726–750. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-040.
Lunne, T., T. Berre, and S. Strandvik. 1997. “Sample disturbance effects in soft low plastic Norwegian clay.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics, edited by M. Almeida, 81–102. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Mesri, G., T. W. Feng, and J. M. Benak. 1990. “Postdensification penetration resistance of clean sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (7): 1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:7(1095).
Mesri, G., and T. M. Hayat. 1993. “The coefficient of earth pressure at rest.” Can. Geotech. J. 30 (4): 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-056.
Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mori, K., and K. Sakai. 2016. “The GP sampler: A new innovation in core sampling.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. Geotechnical and Geophysics Site Char., edited by B. M. Lehane, H. E. Acosta-Martínez, and R. Kelly, 99–124. Sydney, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Nocilla, A., M. R. Coop, and F. Colleselli. 2006. “The mechanics of an Italian silt: An example of ‘transitional’ behaviour.” Géotechnique 56 (4): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.4.261.
Sandbækken, G., T. Berre, and S. Lacasse. 1986. “Oedometer testing at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.” In Consolidation of soils: Testing and evaluation, STP 892, edited by R. N. Yong and F. C. Townsend, 329–353. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Sandven, R. 2003. “Geotechnical properties of a natural silt deposit obtained from field and laboratory tests.” In Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, edited by T. S. Tan, K. K. Phoon, D. W. Hight, and S. Leroueil, 1121–1148. Lisse, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Santagata, M., J. V. Sinfield, and J. T. Germaine. 2006. “Laboratory simulation of field sampling: Comparison with ideal sampling and field data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (3): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:3(351).
Santagata, M. C., and J. T. Germaine. 2002. “Sampling disturbance effects in normally consolidated clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (12): 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:12(997).
Schmertmann, J. H. 1991. “The mechanical aging of soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (9): 1288–1330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1288).
Solhjell, E., S. O. Strandvik, R. Carroll, and G. Håland. 2017. “Johan Sverdrup—Assessment of soil material behaviour and strength properties for the shallow silt layer.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics, 1275–1282. London: SUT.
Stark, T. D., R. M. Ebeling, and J. J. Vettel. 1994. “Hyperbolic stress-strain parameters for silts.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (2): 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:2(420).
Tanaka, H., P. Sharma, T. Tsuchida, and M. Tanaka. 1996. “Comparative study on sample quality using several types of samplers.” Soils Found. 36 (2): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_57.
Tani, K., and S. Kaneko. 2006. “Undisturbed sampling method using thick water-soluble polymer solution.” [In Japanese.] Tsuchi-to-Kiso, 54(4), 145–148.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. New York: Wiley.
Wang, J. L., V. Vivatrat, and J. R. Rusher. 1982. “Geotechnical properties of Alaskan OCS silts.” In Proc., 14th Annual Offshore Technical Conf., 415–420. Dallas, TX: OTC.
Wang, S., R. Luna, and R. W. Stephenson. 2011. “A slurry consolidation approach to reconstitute low-plasticity silt specimens for laboratory triaxial testing.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (4): 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103529.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Oct 14, 2019
Accepted: Mar 4, 2020
Published online: May 20, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 20, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Engineer, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, P.O. Box 3930, Ullevål Stadion, Oslo N-0806, Norway (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-4618. Email: [email protected]
Don J. DeGroot, Sc.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share