Technical Papers
May 8, 2017

CPTu-Based Model Development and Accuracy Assessment for Shear Strength of Clay

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17, Issue 9

Abstract

During the last decade, extensive research has been performed to improve shear strength models. Improvements in accuracy are the result of accounting for measurement errors of the cone penetration test with pore-water pressure measurement (CPTu), reducing uncertainties in testing procedures, applying methods of reliability analysis, and accounting for the variability in the soils. Generalized equations always reflect some error due to site-specific conditions (e.g., stress history, geologic conditions, variability in soils). CPTu data and consolidated undrained triaxial test data were used here to develop a CPTu-based model that can accurately predict the effective shear strength of clay. Measurements of fat clay with Coastal Plain sedimentary origin were used. Two alternative shear strength models were developed: one based on the concepts of the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory, which is referred to as the theoretical model, and one developed for the effective friction angle and the effective cohesion to estimate the shear strength. The second model is referred to as the parametric model. Both shear strength models showed good agreement with the measured data. The data and models were used to develop tolerance limits and confidence intervals for both shear strength alternatives. A comparison of available empirical model forms and the proposed models are also presented. To assess the uncertainty of shear strength estimates, a methodology based on fuzzy logic was used.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2010). AASHTO LFRD Bridge construction specifications, 3rd Ed., Washington, DC.
Ayyub, B. M., and McCuen, R. H. (2011). Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers and scientists, 3rd Ed., CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Becker, D. E., Crooks, J. H. A., Been, K., and Jefferies, M. G. (1987). “Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays.” Can. Geotech. J., 24(4), 549–564.
Bjerrum, L., and Simons, N. E. (1960). “Comparisons of shear strength characteristics of normally consolidated clays.” Proc., Research Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, ASCE, Reston, VA, 711–726.
Chameau, J. L. A., Alteschaeffl, A., Michael, H. L., and Yao, J. T. P. (1983). “Potential applications of fuzzy sets in civil engineering.” Int J. Man Mach. Stud., 19(1), 9–18.
Chen, J. W., and Chen, C. Y. (1997). “A fuzzy methodology for evaluation of the liquefaction potential.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 12(3), 193–204.
Christian, J. T., and Baecher, G. B. (2014). “Geotechnical reliability—Ten unresolved problems….” GEOSTRATA (Jul/Aug), 16–21.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications, Academic, New York.
Elton, D. J., Juang, C. H., and Sukumaran, B. (1995). “Liquefaction susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy sets.” Soils Found., 35(2), 49–60.
Ergun, M. (2007). “Estimation of friction coefficient of asphalt concrete road surfaces using the fuzzy logic approach.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 34(9), 1110–1118.
Fetz, T., et al. (1999). “Fuzzy models in geotechnical engineering and construction management.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 14(2), 93–106.
Fu, K. S., Shimura, M., Tanaka, K., and Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes, Academic, New York.
Holmsgaard, R., Nielsen, B., and Ibsen, L. (2016). “Interpretation of cone penetration testing in silty soils conducted under partially drained conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015064.
Huang, X. H., Gong, W., Juang, C. H., and Khoshnevisan, S. (2014). “Robust geotechnical design of shield-driven tunnels using fuzzy sets.” Proc., Tunneling and Underground Construction, Geo-Shanghai 2014, ASCE, Reston, VA, 184–194.
Huang, X. H., and Juang, C. H. (1996). “Using cone penetration test to determine drained friction angle of sands.” Transportation Research Record, 1526, 57–63.
Juang, C., Huang, X., Holtz, R., and Chen, J. (1996). “Determining relative density of sands from CPT using fuzzy sets.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1–6.
Juang, C., Wey, J., and Elton, D. (1991) “Model for capacity of single piles in sand using fuzzy sets.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1920–1931.
Juang, C. H., Clark, J. E., and Gosh, P. (1993). “Representation processing, and interpretation of fuzzy information in civil engineering.” Transportation Research Record, 1139, 20–27.
Juang, C. H., Huang, X. H., and Elton, D. J. (1992). “Modelling and analysis of non-random uncertainties—Fuzzy-set approach.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 16(5), 335–350.
Juang, C. H., Lee, K., and Chen, J. W. (1994). “New approach for sitting landfills using fuzzy sets.” J. Civ. Eng. Syst., 12, 85–103.
Kim, D., Shin, Y., and Siddiki, N. (2010). “Geotechnical design based on CPT and PMT.” Final Rep. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2010/07, SPR-3106, Indiana DOT, Indianapolis.
Kim, K., Prezzi, M., and Salgado, R. (2006). “Interpretation of cone penetration tests in cohesive soils.” Final Rep. FHWA/JTRP-2006/22, SPR-2632, Indiana DOT, Indianapolis.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Mayne, P. W. (1990). “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design.” Rep. EPRI EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Masood, T., and Mitchell, J. (1993). “Estimation of in-situ lateral stresses in soils by cone penetration test.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1624–1639.
Mayne, P., and Stewart, H. (1988). “Pore pressure behavior of Ko-consolidated clays.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1340–1346.
Mayne, P. W. (2007). Cone penetration testing—NCHRP synthesis 368. A synthesis of highway practice, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Mayne, P. W., and Campanella, R. G. (2005). “Versatile site characterization by seismic piezocone.” Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 2, Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 721–724.
McCuen, R. H. (2003). Modeling hydrologic change: Statistical methods, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Mesri, G., and Abdel-Ghaffar, M. (1993). “Cohesion intercept in effective stress stability analysis.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1229–1249.
Momeni, M., Shafiee, A., Heidari, M. K., Jafari, M. K., and Mahdavifar, M. R. (2011). “Application of fuzzy set theory in evaluation of soil collapse potential.” Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. B, 35(C2), 271–275.
Nguyen, V. U. (1985). “Some fuzzy set applications in mining geomechanics.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech., 22(6), 369–379.
Ni, S. H., Lu, P. C., and Juang, C. H. (1996). “A fuzzy neural network approach to evaluation of slope failure potential.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(1), 59–66.
Robertson, P. K., and Cabal, K. L. (2007). Guide to cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering, 2nd Ed., Gregg Drilling Testing, Inc., Signal Hill, CA, 1–113.
Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1983). “Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part II: Clay.” Can. Geotech. J., 20(4), 734–745.
Robinson, S., and Brown, M. J. (2013). “Rate effects at varying strain levels in fine grained soils.” Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, CFMS, Rueil-Malmaison.
Senneset, K., Sandven, R., and Janbu, N. (1989). “Evaluation of soil parameters from piezocone tests.” Transportation Research Record, 1235, 24–37.
Senneset, K., Sandven, R., Lunne, T., By, T., and Amundsen, T. (1988). “Piezocone tests in silty soils.” Penetration testing, Vol. 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 955–974.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 549.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). “Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision process.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., SMC-3(1), 28–44.
Zhang, Z. (1994). “Use of uncertainty methodology in identification and classification of soils based upon CPT.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
Zhang, Z., and Tumay, M. (1999). “Statistical to fuzzy approach toward CPT soil classification.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 179–186.
Zhang, Z., and Tumay, M. T. (1996). “The reliability of soil classification derived from cone penetration test.” Proc., ASCE Specialty Conf.: Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice, ASCE, Reston, VA, 383–408.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17Issue 9September 2017

History

Received: May 20, 2016
Accepted: Feb 6, 2017
Published online: May 8, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 8, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behzad Amir-Faryar, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Chief Engineer, Fairfax County Dept. of Public Works & Environmental Services, Land Development Services, Site Development and Inspections Division, 12055 Government Center Parkway, Suite 535, Fairfax, VA 22035; Adjunct Professor, Univ. of Maryland, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College Park, MD 20742-3021 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Richard H. McCuen, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
The Ben Dyer Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742-3021. E-mail: [email protected]
M. Sherif Aggour, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742-3021. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share