Teaching BIM and Its Impact on Young Professionals
Publication: Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Volume 146, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper reports a 6-year experience teaching building information modeling (BIM) methodology in the undergraduate/graduate architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) program at the Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Brazil. This work is part of the long-term goal of developing a new BIM AEC-based curriculum track for engineering and architecture students at this university. The paper also reports the results of a survey on the student’s perception on how this knowledge has affected their way of working with other disciplines and how it has influenced their professional lives. The adopted approach involved theoretical lectures, computer laboratory practice, student oral presentations, and the complete project of an enterprise. The lectures delivered by specialists with practical experience in the subject exposed the students to BIM concepts. In the laboratory, students were trained in the software tools that enables BIM activity. To develop the project, multidisciplinary teams of students were formed and each team was challenged to emulate the change in process that BIM implies. The task was to develop the complete project of an enterprise considering all different specialties involved in its design, detailing, and planning. More specifically, these specialties consisted of architecture, structural engineering, mechanical and electrical systems, and BIM management. The teams made oral presentations to the client (the professor) and consultants roughly on a weekly basis. In each year, the students´ performance was evaluated in several ways. In particular, a 360° evaluation tool was used, which was crucial to provide feedback to each team member during the exercise. The culmination of this experience is the elaboration of this article that aims to describe the challenges and the successes of the adopted approach.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2007. “Integrated project delivery: A guide.” Accessed March 2, 2019. http://info.aia.org/SiteObjects/files/IPD_Guide_2007.pdf.
Barison, M. B., and E. T. Santos. 2015. “Percepções de Professores quanto à Introdução de BIM no currículo.” [In Portuguese.] In Vol. 2.2 of Blucher Engineering Proc., 549–561. São Paulo, Brazil: Blucher Engineering Proceedings.
Bruner, J. 1977. The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CIB (International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction). 2009. White paper on IDDS—Integrated design and delivery solutions. Edited by Robert Owen. Netherlands: CIB.
Cohen, J. 2010. Integrated project delivery: Case studies.
Dermidoven, J. 2015. “An interdisciplinary approach to integrate BIM in the construction management and engineering curriculum.” In Proc., 9th BIM Academic Symp. and Job Task Analysis Review, 112–119. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida College of Design, Construction and Planning.
Eastman, C., P. Teichols, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2011. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Garber, R. 2014. Vol. 2 of BIM design: Realising the creative potential of building information modelling. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Jin, R., T. Yang, P. Piroozfar, B. Kang, D. Wanatowski, C. M. Hancock, and L. Tang. 2018. “Project-based pedagogy in interdisciplinary building design adopting BIM.” Eng. Constr. Architect. Manage. 25 (10): 1376–1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2017-0119.
Krosnick, J. A. 1991. “Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys.” Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 5 (3): 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.
Krosnick, J. A. 1999. “Survey research.” Ann. Rev. Psychol. 50 (1): 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537.
NATSPEC (National Building Specification). 2013. NATSPEC BIM paper NPB 001: BIM and LOD—Building information modelling and level of development. Sydney, NSW: Construction Information Systems Limited.
Poirier, E. A., D. Forgues, S. Staub-Fench, and L. Newton. 2017. “Workshop on BIM in Canadian research and education.” In Proc., 11th BIM Academic Symp. and Job Task Analysis Review. Montreal: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Succar, B., and S. Willy. 2014. “A competency knowledge-base for BIM learning.” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. –Conf. Ser. 2 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb-cs.v2i2.3883.
Suwal, S., and V. Singh. 2018. “Assessing student’s sentiments towards the use of a building information modelling (BIM) learning platform in a construction project management course.” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 43 (4): 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1287667.
Tourangeau, R., L. J. Rips, and K. Rasinski. 2000. The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zou, P. X. W., X. Xu, R. Jin, N. Painting, and B. Li. 2019. “AEC students’ perceptions of BIM practice at Swinburne University of Technology.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 145 (3): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000410.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 29, 2019
Accepted: Mar 4, 2020
Published online: May 19, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.