Pretreatments and Intermediate Hybrid Treatments for the Improvement of the Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge: Preliminary Results
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9
Abstract
Waste activated sludge (WAS) is commonly treated by using anaerobic digestion (AD), which has the advantage of reducing sludge volumes and generating methane. However, the sludge structure limits the efficiency of these AD processes. In fact, most of the organic substance found in sludge is surrounded by cell walls or bound in complex structures [extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)] and can only be made ready for digestion after intense hydrolysis processes. This paper presents the preliminary results of tests carried out to compare the performances of pretreatments and intermediate treatments. They were both performed using a hybrid modality, that is, by combining an alkali agent and heat. Hybrid treatments at low doses [4–8% of the total soid (TS) matrix] of NaOH and were carried out on WAS and on already digested sludge. Batch mesophilic digestion tests were used to assess the methane specific production of samples of WAS and digestate before and after lysis treatment. Digestibility tests revealed a specific methane yield of respectively 0.166 and for raw WAS and digestate. The production of methane for the WAS sample increased by 40 and 66% when it was treated at 70 and 90°C, respectively, in combination with a NaOH dose of TS. Intermediate treatments carried out under the same operating conditions caused increases in the specific production of methane of 31% (70°C) and 54% (90°C), respectively, for the samples of already digested sludge. Using these results, it was calculated that if the digestion process was carried out in two steps, with a duration of 10 days each, the production of methane could increase by 27 and 17% (at 70 and 90°C), respectively, compared with the scenario that only used the pretreatment processes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Giuseppe Genon, who passed away on June 24, 2016. SMAT, Società Metropolitana Acque Torino, is gratefully acknowledged for funding the experimentation presented in this paper. The authors wish also to thank the support of Massimiliano Bolettieri and Simone Morra in the experimental activities. Giovanna Zanetti is also kindly acknowledged for performing CHNS sludge characterization.
References
Alexandropoulou, M., Antonopoulou, G., and Lyberatos, G. (2016). “Food industry waste’s exploitation via anaerobic digestion and fermentative hydrogen production in an up-flow column reactor.” Waste Biomass Valorization, 7(4), 711–723.
APHA, AWWA, and WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). (2012). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 22nd Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1360.
Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., and Dewil, R. (2008). “Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge.” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34(6), 755–781.
Calabrò, P. S., Greco, R., Evangelou, A., and Komilis, D. (2015). “Anaerobic digestion of tomato processing waste: Effect of alkaline pretreatment.” J. Environ. Manage., 163, 49–52.
Collivignarelli, M. C., Castagnola, F., Sordi, M., and Bertanza, G. (2015). “Treatment of sewage sludge in a thermophilic membrane reactor (TMR) with alternate aeration cycles.” J. Environ. Manage., 162, 132–138.
Dohányos, M., Zábranská, J., and Jeníček, P. (1997). “Enhancement of sludge anaerobic digestion by use of a special thickening centrifuge.” Water Sci. Technol., 36(11), 145–153.
Donoso-Bravo, A., Pérez-Elvira, S., Aymerich, E., and Fdz-Polanco, F. (2011). “Assessment of the influence of thermal pre-treatment time on the macromolecular composition and anaerobic biodegradability of sewage sludge.” Bioresour. Technol. 102(2), 660–666.
El Achkar, J. H., et al. (2016). “Anaerobic digestion of grape pomace: Biochemical characterization of the fractions and methane production in batch and continuous digesters.” Waste Manage., 50, 275–282.
Eskicioglu, C., Prorot, A., Marin, J., Droste, R. L., and Kennedy, K. J. (2008). “Synergetic pretreatment of sewage sludge by microwave irradiation in presence of for enhanced anaerobic digestion.” Water Res., 42(18), 4674–4682.
Eskicioglu, C., Terzian, N., Kennedy, K. J., Droste, R. L., and Hamoda, M. (2007). “Thermal microwave effects for enhancing digestibility of waste activated sludge.” Water Res., 41(11), 2457–2466.
Evangelou, A., Calabrò, P. S., Greco, R., Sánchez, A., and Komilis, D. (2016). “Biodegradation activity of eight organic substrates: A correlation study of different test methods.” Waste Biomass Valorization, 7(5), 1067–1080.
Fiore, S., Ruffino, B., Campo, G., Roati, C., and Zanetti, M. C. (2016). “Scale-up evaluation of the anaerobic digestion of food-processing industrial wastes.” Renewable Energy, 96, 949–959.
Jang, J. H., and Ahn, J. H. (2015). “High-temperature microwave NaOH pretreatment of waste-activated sludge for anaerobic digestion.” J. Environ. Eng., 06015002.
Li, H., Zou, S., Li, C., and Jin, Y. (2013). “Alkaline post-treatment for improved anaerobic digestion.” Bioresour. Technol., 140, 187–191.
Nielsen, H. B., Thygesen, A., Thomsen, A. B., and Schmidt, J. E. (2011). “Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge—Comparison of thermal pretreatments with thermal inter-stage treatments.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 86, 238–245.
Ortega-Martinez, E., Sapkaite, I., Fdz-Polanco, F., and Donoso-Bravo, A. (2016). “From pre-treatment toward inter-treatment: Getting some clues from sewage sludge biomethanation.” Bioresour. Technol., 212, 227–235.
Panepinto, D., Fiore, S., Zappone, M., Genon, G., and Meucci, L. (2016). “Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy.” Appl. Energy, 161, 404–411.
Roati, C., Fiore, S., Ruffino, B., Marchese, F., Novarino, D., and Zanetti, M. C. (2012). “Preliminary evaluation of the potential biogas production of food-processing industrial wastes.” Am. J. Environ. Sci., 8(3), 291–296.
Rodriguez, C., Alaswad, A., Mooney, J., Prescott, T., and Olabi, A. G. (2015). “Pre-treatment techniques used for anaerobic digestion of algae.” Fuel Process Technol., 138, 765–779.
Roeleveld, P. J., and van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2002). “Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterisation in the Netherlands.” Water Sci. Technol., 45(6), 77–87.
Ruffino, B., et al. (2015). “Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant by means of mechanical and thermal pre-treatments: Performance, energy and economical assessment.” Bioresour. Technol., 175, 298–308.
Ruffino, B., et al. (2016). “Preliminary technical and economic analysis of alkali and low temperature thermo-alkali pretreatments for the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge.” Waste Biomass Valorization, 7(4), 667–675.
Ruffino, B., Campo, G., Zanetti, M. C., and Genon, G. (2014). “Improvement of activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Thermal and economical perspectives.” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 190, 979–991.
Shana, A. D., Ouki, S., Asaadi, M., and Pearce, P. (2015). “The impact of intermediate thermal hydrolysis process and conventional thermal hydrolysis process on biochemical composition during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge.” Proc., 20th European Biosolids and Organic Resources Conf. and Exhibition, N. J. Horan, ed., Manchester, U.K., 1–15.
Teo, C. W. (2016). “Unified theory and model for anaerobic hydrolysis in municipal wastewater treatment: Review of enzymological aspects and hydrolysis assessments.” J. Environ. Eng., 04016041.
Traversi, D., Romanazzi, V., Degan, R., Lorenzi, E., Carraro, E., and Gilli, G. (2015). “Microbial-chemical indicator for anaerobic digester performance assessment in full-scale wastewater treatment plants for biogas production.” Bioresour. Technol., 186, 179–191.
van Lier, J. B., Mahmoud, N., and Zeeman, G. (2008). “Anaerobic wastewater treatment.” Chapter 16, Biological wastewater treatment: Principles, modeling and design, M. Henze, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, G. A. Ekama, and D. Brdjanovic, eds., IWA Publishers, London.
VDI Standard. (2006). “VDI 4630 fermentation of organic materials.” ⟨http://www.vdi.eu/guidelines⟩ (Feb. 20, 2017).
Williams, T. O., Burrowes, P., Fries, K., Newbery, C., and Whitlock, D. (2015). “Treatment of WAS with thermal hydrolysis and mesophilic anaerobic digestion.” Proc., 20th European Biosolids and Organic Resources Conf. and Exhibition, Manchester, U.K., 1–8.
Zhang, Q., Hu, J., and Lee, D. J. (2016). “Biogas from anaerobic digestion processes: Research updates.” Renewable Energy, 98, 108–119.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 143 • Issue 9 • September 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 30, 2016
Accepted: Feb 24, 2017
Published online: May 19, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.