Technical Papers
Jun 13, 2013

Energy-Related Risk Management in Integrated Project Delivery

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 12

Abstract

Developing energy-efficient commercial buildings requires the use of an energy-related risk management practice that can increase the chance of achieving intended lifecycle financial goals. This paper suggests a management practice that deals with such energy-related risk, namely, project cost risk and performance risk. A prerequisite to applying the suggested management practice is a high level of collaboration among different disciplines during design development as promoted, for example, when using integrated project delivery (IPD). As a case study to validate the management practice, this paper presents a California hospital project where the unique features of IPD helped the project team apply the management practice in the course of managing the energy-related uncertainties of an energy-efficiency measure. This paper illustrates the detailed design decision-making process of the team that used Target Value Design, a lean design management method. As a contribution to the body of knowledge, the purposes of this study are to present the case study that serves to validate the suggested practice and to show that the IPD application contributed to the capability and effectiveness of the practice in increasing the reliability of achieving the target lifecycle financial values while reducing system complexity and overdesign.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the Owner and the IPDT for their support in this case study. Research for this paper was in part supported by gifts made to the Project Production Systems Laboratory (P2SL) at the University of California at Berkeley. All support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of contributors to P2SL.

References

7group, and Reed, B. G. (2009). The integrative design guide to green building: Redefining the practice of sustainability, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
American Institute of Architects. (2007). “Integrated project delivery: A guide.” Washington, DC.
Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
Ballard, G. (2008). “The lean project delivery system: An update.” Lean Constr. J., 1–19.
Ballard, G. (2011). “Target Value Design: Current benchmark (1.0).” Lean Constr. J., 79–84.
Browning, T. R., Deyst, J. J., Eppinger, S. D., and Whitney, D. E. (2002). “Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 49(4), 443–458.
Choi, C. (2009). “Removing market barriers to green development: Principles and action projects to promote widespread adoption of green development practices.” J. Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 107–138.
Cohen, J. (2010). “Integrated project delivery: Case studies.” American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC.
Crozier, B. (2000). Enhancing the performance of oversized plant, Building Services Research and Information Association, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Davies, A., Gann, D., and Douglas, T. (2009). “Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5.” California Manage. Rev., 51(2), 101–125.
DOE. (2010). Guide to determining climate regions by county, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
DOE. (2011). 2011 buildings energy data book, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(4), 532–550.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). “Five misunderstandings about case-study research.” Qual. Inq., 12(2), 219–245.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2004). LEED cost study: Final report, Washington, DC.
Glavinich, T. E. (2008). Contractors guide to green building construction: Management, project delivery, documentation, and risk reduction, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Hawken, P., Lovins, A., and Lovins, L. H. (2008). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution, Back Bay Books, New York.
Jackson, J. (2009). “How risky are sustainable real estate projects? An evaluation of LEED and ENERGY STAR development options.” J. Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 91–106.
Kats, G. (2003). Greening our built world: Costs, benefits, and strategies, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Keeler, M., and Burke, B. (2009). Fundamentals of integrated design for sustainable building, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Kent, D. C., and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2010). “Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 136(8), 815–825.
Knight, I., and Dunn, G. (2004). “Size does matter.” Build. Serv. J., 34–36.
Lee, H. W. (2012). “Application of Target Value Design to energy efficiency investments.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Lee, H. W., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. D. (2012a). “Developing a target value design protocol for commercial energy retrofits. II.” Proc., 2012 Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1720–1729.
Lee, H. W., Tommelein, I. D., and Ballard, G. (2012b). “Design of an infrastructure project using a point-based methodology.” J. Manag. Eng., 28(3), 291–299.
Matthews, O., and Howell, G. A. (2005). “Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting.” Lean Constr. J., 2(1), 46–61.
Matthiessen, L. F., and Morris, P. (2007). “The cost of green revisited.” Davis Langdon, Sacramento, CA.
Modera, M., et al. (1999). “Efficient thermal energy distribution in commercial buildings.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA.
Smith, N. J., Merna, T., and Jobling, P. (2006). Managing risk: In construction projects, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Sobek, D. K., and Smalley, A. (2008). Understanding A3 thinking: A critical component of Toyota’s PDCA management system, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
Torcellini, P. A., et al. (2004). “Lessons learned from field evaluation of six high-performance buildings.” Proc., Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, 1–13.
Whelton, M., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. D. (2002). “A knowledge management framework for project definition.” ITcon J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 7, 197–212.
White House. (2011). “President Obama’s plan to win the future by making American businesses more energy efficient through the Better Buildings Initiative.” 〈http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/03/president-obama-s-plan-win-future-making-american-businesses-more-energy〉 (Nov. 15, 2011).
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 12December 2013

History

Received: Dec 12, 2012
Accepted: Jun 10, 2013
Published online: Jun 13, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hyun Woo Lee [email protected]
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Iris D. Tommelein [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering; and Director, Project Production Systems Laboratory, 212 McLaughlin Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712. E-mail: [email protected]
Glenn Ballard [email protected]
Research Director, Project Production Systems Laboratory, 214 McLaughlin Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share