Technical Papers
Jul 31, 2013

Quantification of Sustainability Index for Underground Utility Infrastructure Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 12

Abstract

This paper examines environmental impact, costs, and social impacts comparing four construction techniques commonly used in the installation of underground utility infrastructure. The three impact factors are quantified to develop an overall underground sustainability index rating (USIR) for evaluating utility projects with competing installation technologies. The main contribution to the overall body of knowledge is the demonstration of a method for calculating a sustainability index that enables decision makers to quantify public works utility projects with guidance for evaluating proposed technologies based on environmental impact, costs, and social impact criteria. The aim is to help change the myopic thought process of typical public works owners who typically base contractor selection on lowest cost, rather than examining sustainability factors. An emission calculator was used in this research to quantify environmental impact by comparing six airborne emissions: carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur oxide (SOx), and hydrocarbons (HC). Costs were determined by estimating competing technology options including surface restoration. Social impacts were quantified by comparing and rating 13 factors affecting underground utility projects. The approach to calculating the USIR was demonstrated on a case study installation of 313 m (1,026 linear feet) of 400 mm (16 in.) PVC sanitary sewer in a mature neighborhood in Portland, Oregon. The USIRs were compared for open-cut, pilot tube microtunneling, horizontal directional drilling, and vacuum microtunneling technology options.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ariaratnam, S. T., and Milligan, J. (2012). “Vacuum microtunneling case studies in conditions ranging from soft soils to hard rock.” Proc., 30th Int. No-Dig Conf. and Exhibition, International Society for Trenchless Technology, London, U.K., .
Ariaratnam, S. T., Piratla, K., and Cohen, A. (2012). “Field comparison of the axis microtunneling technology vs. open cut excavation in Glenview, Illinois.” Proc., Pipelines 2012 Conf. (CD-ROM), ASCE, Reston, VA.
Ariaratnam, S. T., and Sihabuddin, S. (2009). “Comparison of emitted emissions between trenchless pipe replacement and open cut utility construction.” J. Green Build., 4(2), 126–140.
Balkema, A. J., Preisig, H. A., Otterpohl, R., and Lambert, F. J. D. (2002). “Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater systems.” Urban Water, 4(2), 153–161.
Bartlett, H. V., and Guthrie, P. M. (2005). “Guides to sustainable built environment development.” J. of Engineering Sustainability, 158(ES4), 185.
Bennett, D., and Ariaratnam, S. (2008). Horizontal directional drilling good practices guidelines, 3rd Ed., HDD Consortium, Arlington, VA.
Boschert, J. (2007). “Pilot tube microtunneling explodes in the U.S. using vitrified clay jacking pipe.” Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Dasgupta, S., and Tam, E. K. L. (2005). “Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(1), 30–44.
Fernández-Sánchez, G., and Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). “A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management—Application to infrastructure projects in Spain.” Ecol. Indic., 10(6), 1193–1201.
Filion, Y. R., MacLean, H. L., and Karney, B. W. (2004). “Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(3), 120–130.
Gilchrist, A., and Allouche, E. N. (2005). “Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: State of the art review.” Tunnel. Underground Space Technol., 20(1), 89–104.
Guggemos, A. A. (2003). “Environmental impacts of on-site construction processes: Focus on structural frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Jones, S. A., and Silva, C. (2009). “A practical method to evaluate the sustainability of rural water and sanitation infrastructure systems in developing countries.” Desalination, 248(1–3), 500–509.
Kibert, C. (1994). “Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Sustainable Construction, International Council for Research in Building and Construction, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Koo, D., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2008). “Application of a sustainability model for assessing water main replacement options.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(8), 563–574.
Lewis, P., Frey, H. C., and Rasdorf, W. (2009). “Development and use of emissions inventories for construction vehicles.” Transportation Research Record 2123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 46–53.
Lewis, P., Leming, M., and Rasdorf, W. (2012). “Impact of engine idling on fuel use and CO2 emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment.” J. Manage. Eng., 28(1), 31–38.
Lueke, J., and Olson, M. (2012). “Instrumenting and monitoring of pilot tube microtunneling installations.” Proc., 2012 No-Dig Show, Paper F-2-05, North American Society for Trenchless Technology, Liverpool, NY.
Matthews, J. C., and Allouche, E. N. (2010). “A social cost calculator for utility construction projects.” Proc., 2010 No-Dig Show, Paper F-4-03, North American Society for Trenchless Technology, Liverpool, NY.
Mosley, E. (2006). “Developing a sustainability rating tool for wastewater systems.” Proc., Water Environment Federation Conf. (WEFTEC 2006), Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA, 6283–6303.
Najafi, M., and Kim, K. O. (2004). “Life-cycle-cost comparison of trenchless and conventional open-cut pipeline construction projects.” Proc., 2004 Pipelines Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Okon, B. B., and Elhag, T. S. M. (2012). “The sustainable infrastructure management model (SIMM).” Proc., World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2012, Vol II, WCECS 2012, International Association of Engineers, Hong Kong.
Piratla, K. R., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2012a). “Estimation of CO2 emissions from the life cycle of a potable water pipeline project.” J. Manage. Eng., 28(1), 22–30.
Piratla, K. R., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2012b). “Reliability based optimal design of water distribution networks considering life cycle components.” Urban Water J., 9(5), 305–316.
Pucker, J., Allouche, E. N., and Sterling, R. L. (2006). “Social costs associated with trenchless projects: Case histories in North America and Europe.” Proc., 2006 No-Dig Conference, Paper C-4-04, North American Society for Trenchless Technology, Liverpool, NY.
Rasdorf, W., Frey, H. C., Lewis, P., Kim, K., Pang, S-H., and Abolhassani, S. (2010). “Field procedures for real-world measurements of emissions from diesel construction vehicles.” J. Infrastr. Syst., 16(3), 216–225.
Shen, L. Y., Wu, Y. Z., Chan, E. H. W., and Hao, J. L. (2005). “Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects.” J. Zheijang Univ. Sci. A, 6A(4), 339–349.
Sihabuddin, S., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2009). “Methodology for estimating emissions in underground utility construction operations.” J. Eng. Des. Technol., 7(1), 37–64.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., and Dikshit, A. K. (2009). “An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies.” Ecol. Indic., 9(2), 189–212.
Tighe, S., Lee, T., McKim, R., and Haas, R. (1999). “Traffic delay cost savings associated with trenchless technology.” J. Infrastr. Syst., 5(2), 45–51.
Tighe, S., Knight, M., Papoutsis, D., Rodriguez, D., and Walker, C. (2002). “User cost savings in eliminating pavement excavations through employing trenchless technologies.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 29(5), 751–761.
Ugwu, O. O., and Haupt, T. C. (2007). “Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability: A South African construction industry perspective.” Build. Environ., 42(2), 665–680.
World Bank. (2006). “Infrastructure at the crossroads: Lessons from 20 years of World Bank experience.” Washington, DC, 1–9, 65–80.
Wu, W., Simpson, A. R., and Maier, H. R. (2010). “Accounting for greenhouse gas emissions in multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., 136(2), 146–155.
Yigitcanlar, T., and Dur, F. (2010). “Developing a sustainability assessment model: The sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model.” Sustainability, 2(1), 321–340.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 12December 2013

History

Received: Dec 17, 2012
Accepted: Jun 20, 2013
Published online: Jul 31, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 31, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Samuel T. Ariaratnam [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor and Construction Engineering Program Chair, School of Sustainable Engineering and The Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 870204, Tempe, AZ 85287-0204 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kalyan Piratla [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634; E-mail: [email protected]
Aaron Cohen [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Sustainable Engineering and The Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 870204, Tempe, AZ 85287-0204. E-mail: [email protected]
Matthew Olson [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Sustainable Engineering and The Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 870204, Tempe, AZ 85287-0204. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share