TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 30, 2009

Simulating Learning Dynamics in Project Networks

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 10

Abstract

In this paper we develop a multiagent simulation model to explore the impact of learning dynamics on the productive implementation of innovations in project networks comprised of designers and contractors. Though researchers generally agree that when firms form into networks they will gain access to new knowledge, the question of learning beyond the firm at the boundaries between firms or at the level of the project network itself remain less explored. We simulate the impact of task interdependence and relational instability on learning in project networks comprised of multiple specialist firms. We find that relational instability in project networks slows learning and task interdependence moderates the impact of increasing relational instability on network productivity rates. The findings have significant implications for interorganizational learning theory. The simulation results provide insights into appropriate firm-level and project network-level strategies for change.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Appleyard, M. (1996). “How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry.” Strategic Manage. J., 17(S2), 137–154.
Baker, W., Faulkner, R., and Fisher, G. (1998). “Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships.” Am. Sociol. Rev., 63(2), 147–177.
Burton, R., and Obel, B. (1995). “The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model.” Comput. Math. Org. Theory, 1(1), 57–71.
Chinowsky, P., and Taylor, J. (2007). “Project networks: Learning, leadership and development.” Revaluing construction, M. Sexton, ed., International Council for Research and Innovation in Building Construction, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 54–65.
Coase, R. (1937). “The nature of the firm.” Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Demian, P., and Fruchter, R. (2006). “Methodology for usability evaluation of corporate memory design reuse systems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 20(6), 377–389.
Eccles, R. (1981). “The quasifirm in the construction industry.” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 2(4), 335–357.
Fruchter, R. (1999). “A/E/C teamwork: A collaborative design and learning space.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 13(4), 261–269.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). “Interorganizational relations.” Annu. Rev. Sociol., 11(1), 281–304.
Gulati, R. (1995). “Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis.” Adm. Sci. Q., 40(4), 619–652.
Gulati, R., and Gargiulo, M. (1999). “Where do interorganizational networks come from?” Am. J. Sociol., 104(5), 1439–1493.
Hajjar, D., and AbouRizk, S. (2000). “Application framework for development of simulation tools.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 14(3), 160–167.
Harty, C. (2005). “Innovation in construction: A sociology of technology approach.” Build. Res. Inf., 33(6), 512–522.
Hijazi, A., AbouRizk, S., and Halpin, D. (1992). “Modeling and simulating learning development in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(4), 685–700.
Hussein, K., and Peña-Mora, F. (1999). “Frameworks for interaction support in distributed learning environments.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 13(4), 291–302.
Ibrahim, R., and Nissen, M. (2003). “Emerging technology to model dynamic knowledge creation and flow among construction industry stakeholders during the critical feasibility-entitlements phase.” Proc., Joint Symp. on IT in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Lampel, J., and Shamsie, J. (2003). “Capabilities in motion: New organizational forms and the reshaping of the Hollywood movie industry.” J. Manage. Stud. (Oxford), 40(8), 2189–2210.
Luke, R., Begun, J., and Pointer, D. (1989). “Quasi-firms: Strategic interorganizational forms in the health care industry.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(1), 9–19.
Lutz, J., Halpin, D., and Wilson, J. (1994). “Simulation of learning development in repetitive construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(4), 753–777.
Mowery, D., Oxley, J., and Silverman, B. (1996). “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer.” Strategic Manage. J., 17(S2), 77–91.
Nayak, N., and Taylor, J. (2009). “Offshore outsourcing in global design networks.” J. Manage. Eng.25(4), 195–203.
Oglesby, C., Parker, H., and Howell, G. (1988). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ortiz de Orue, D., Taylor, J., Chanmeka, A., and Weerisooriya, R. (2007) “Robust project network design.” Proj. Manage. J., 40(2), 81–93.
Pekericli, M., Akinci, B., and Karaesmen, I. (2003). “Modeling information dependencies in construction project network organizations.” Proc., Towards a Vision for Information Technology in Civil Engineering, Nashville, Tenn., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Powell, W., Koput, K., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). “Technological change and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.” Adm. Sci. Q., 41(1), 116–145.
Powell, W., White, D., Koput, K., and Owen-Smith, J. (2005). “Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences.” Am. J. Sociol., 110(4), 1132–1205.
Rojas, E., and Mukherjee, A. (2005). “Interval temporal logic in general-purpose situational simulations.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 19(1), 83–93.
Rojas, E., and Mukherjee, A. (2006). “Multi-agent framework for general-purpose situational simulations in the construction management domain.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 20(3), 165–176.
Soibelman, L., and Kim, H. (2002). “Data preparation process for construction knowledge generation through knowledge discovery in databases.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 16(1), 39–48.
Taylor, J. (2007). “The antecedents of successful 3D CAD implementation in design and construction networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(12), 993–1002.
Taylor, J., and Bernstein, P. (2009). “Paradigm trajectories of building information modeling practice in project networks.” J. Manage. Eng., 25(2), 69–76.
Taylor, J., and Levitt, R. (2004). “Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries.” Innovations: Project management research 2004, D. Slevin, D. Cleland, and J. Pinto, eds., Project Management Institute, Newton Square, Pa., 83–99.
Taylor, J., and Levitt, R. (2007). “Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: An integrative model for change.” Proj. Manage. J., 38(3), 22–35.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Uzzi, B., and Gillespie, J. (2002). “Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and firms debt performance.” Strategic Manage. J., 23(7), 595–618.
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, MacMillan, New York.
Wright, T. (1936). “Learning curve.” J. Aeronaut. Sci., 3(1), 122–128.
Zucker, L., Darby, M., Brewer, M., and Peng, Y. (1996). “Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: Organizational boundaries as trust production.” Trust in organizations, R. Kramer and T. Tyler, eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 90–113.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135Issue 10October 2009
Pages: 1009 - 1015

History

Received: Jun 25, 2008
Accepted: Mar 8, 2009
Published online: Apr 30, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John E. Taylor, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., Room 618, S.W. Mudd Building, 500 West 120th St., New York, NY 10027 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Raymond Levitt, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Building 550, 416 Escondido Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4020.
Juan Andrei Villarroel
Graduate Student, College of Management of Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL ODY 1.19, Station 5, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share