Evaluation of Potential Transit Signal Priority Benefits along a Fixed-Time Signalized Arterial
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of a study evaluating the potential benefits of implementing transit signal priority along the Columbia Pike arterial corridor, in Arlington, Va. The study uses the INTEGRATION microscopic traffic simulation model to evaluate the impact of a number of alternative priority strategies on both the prioritized buses and general traffic during the morning peak and midday traffic periods. The transit priority strategies considered include providing priority to express buses traveling along Columbia Pike, to both express and regular buses along the arterial, and to all buses within the study corridor. The priority logic that is considered in the study provides simple green extensions and green recalls within a fixed-time traffic signal control environment. The simulation results indicate that the buses provided with priority would typically benefit from transit priority, but that these benefits may be obtained at the expense of the overall traffic, particularly when traffic demand is high. However, it is also found that in periods of lesser demand, the overall negative impacts could be negligible due to the availability of spare capacity at the signalized intersections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ahn, K., Rakha, H., Trani, A. A., and Van Aerde, M.(2002). “Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(2), 182–190.
Al-Sahili, K. A., and Taylor, W. C. (1995). “Evaluation of bus priority signal strategies in Ann Arbor, Michigan.” Transportation Research Record 1554, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 74–49.
Chang, G.-L., Vasudevan, M., and Su, C. C. (1995). “Bus preemption under adaptive control environments.” Transportation Research Record 1494, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 146–154.
Dion, F., Rakha, H., and Kang, Y.-S. (2004). “Comparison of delay estimates at undersaturated and oversaturated pretimed signalized intersections.” Transportation Research B, in press.
Evans, H., and Skiles, G.(1970). “Improving public transit through bus preemption of traffic signals.” Traffic Q., 24(4), 531–543.
Garrow, M., and Machemehl, R. (1997). “Development and evaluation of transit signal priority strategies.” Research Rep. SWUTC/97/472840-00068-1, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
Hunt, P. B., Robertson, D. I., Bretherton, R. D., and Vinton, R. I. (1981). “SCOOT—A traffic responsive method of coordinating signals.” TRRL Rep. LR1014, Crowthorne, U.K.
ITS America. (2002). An overview of transit signal priority, Advanced Traffic Management System and Advance Public Transportation System Committees, Washington, D.C.
M. Van Aerde and Associates. (1998). QueensOD release 2.10—user’s guide: Estimating origin destination traffic demands from link flow counts, Blacksburg, Va.
M. Van Aerde and Associates. (2001). INTEGRATION release 2.30 for Windows, user’s guides, Kingston, Canada.
Rakha, H., and Ahn, K.(2004). “The INTEGRATION modeling framework for estimating mobile source emissions.” J. Transp. Eng., 130(2), 183–194.
Rakha, H., Kang, Y., and Dion, F. (2001). “Estimating vehicle stops at undersaturated and oversaturated fixed-time signalized intersections.” Transportation Research Record 1776, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 128–137.
Rakha, H., and Zhang, Y. (2003). “Sensitivity analysis of transit signal priority impacts on operation of isolated signalized intersections.” Proc., 2003 Summer Computer Simulation Con., Montreal.
Sunkari, S. R., Beasley, P. S., Urbanik, T., and Fambro, D. B. (1995). “Model to evaluate the impacts of bus priority on signalized intersections.” Transportation Research Record 1494, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 117–123.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual 2000, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Van Aerde, M., Rakha, H., and Paramahamsan, H. (2003). “Estimation of O-D matrices: the relationship between practical and theoretical considerations.” Proc., 82nd Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 6, 2002
Accepted: May 29, 2003
Published online: Apr 15, 2004
Published in print: May 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.