Technical Papers
Jul 2, 2024

A New Perspective on Assessing the Real Water Savings Resulting from Irrigation Technology Interventions

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150, Issue 9

Abstract

Poor water resource management is a major cause of water loss and exacerbates water shortages. In order to avoid some misconceptions and misunderstandings associated with irrigation efficiency, the term real water savings (RWS) has been introduced in contrast to apparent water savings (AWS). In this study, irrigation technology interventions were evaluated in terms of return flow and water saving in the Qazvin Plain irrigation network in Iran. This was accomplished using the REWAS tool developed by FAO to evaluate the effects of technological and management interventions on the RWS at the macro level (network, basin, etc.). According to the results, switching the irrigation system from furrow to center pivot with height-regulated sprinklers (Scenario A), center pivot with height-fixed sprinklers (Scenario B), linear-move irrigation system (Scenario C), and solid-set sprinkler irrigation (Scenario D), results in RWS of 390, 383, 326, and 331 mm, respectively. In turn, as a result of applying scenarios A, B, C, and D, the AWSs at the field scale were determined to be 90%, 88%, 75%, and 76%, respectively, while the RWS at the irrigation network scale was determined to be 19%, 19%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. Due to the influence of nonrecoverable return flows, the RWS is much lower than expected. In conclusion, the RWS can only be increased by preventing nonrecoverable return flows. The assessment of RWS can assist decision-makers in choosing sustainable interventions to improve agricultural water productivity by providing insight into field flows, irrigation networks, and basin scales.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements: FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Davarpanah, R., and S. H. Ahmadi. 2021. “Modeling the effects of irrigation management scenarios on winter wheat yield and water use indicators in response to climate variations and water delivery systems.” J. Hydrol. 598 (Aug): 126269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126269.
Droogers, P., and C. Carpenter. 2020. Supporting adaptation decision-making for climate-resilient investments: Good practice guide. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Elliot, R. L., and W. R. Walker. 1982. “Field evaluation of furrow percolation and advance functions.” Trans. ASAE 25 (2): 396–400.
Ha, V. T. T., V. T. Quoc, and L. Ribbe. 2017. “Reuse potential of return flow for irrigating paddy farms in the Vu Gia Thu Bon Delta.” J. Int. Sci. Publ. 5 (1000023): 346–360.
Jägermeyr, J., D. Gerten, J. Heinke, S. Schaphoff, M. Kummu, and W. Lucht. 2015. “Water savings potentials of irrigation systems: Global simulation of processes and linkages.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 (7): 3073–3091. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3073-2015.
Jensen, M. E. 1980. Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
Kanani, E., H. Dehghanisanij, and S. Akhavan. 2022. “Variation in actual corn (Zea mays L.) evapotranspiration, single, and dual crop coefficient under different point source irrigation systems in a semiarid region.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 148 (1–2): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-03932-w.
Kanani, E., B. Nazari, and H. Dehghanisanij. 2024. “A new framework for evaluating water use reduction strategies using an integrated, holistic, and transparent approach (Urmia Lake basin case study).” J. Cleaner Prod. 434: 140193.
Karimov, A., D. Molden, T. Khamzina, A. Platonov, and Y. Ivanov. 2012. “A water accounting procedure to determine the water savings potential of the Fergana Valley.” Agric. Water Manage. 108 (Jun): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.010.
Kaune, A., P. Droogers, J. V. Opstal, P. Steduto, and C. Perry. 2020. REWAS: Real water saving tool: Technical document. Québec City: Food and Agriculture Organisation and Future Water Publication.
Keller, A. A., and J. Keller. 1995. Effective efficiency: A water use efficiency concept for allocating freshwater resources. Little Rock, AR: Center for Economic Policy Studies.
Kulkarni, S. 2011. “Innovative technologies for water saving in irrigated agriculture.” Int. J. Water Resour. Arid Environ. 1 (3): 226–231.
Merrian, J., M. Shearer, and C. Burt. 1980. “Evaluating irrigation systems and practices.” In Design and operation of field irrigation systems. ASAE monograph no. 3, edited by M. E. Jensen, 721–760. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
Merrian, J. L., and J. Keller. 1978. Field irrigation system evaluation: A guide for management, 1–271. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Mokari Ghahroodi, E., H. Noory, and A. M. Liaghat. 2015. “Performance evaluation study and hydrologic and productive analysis of irrigation systems at the Qazvin irrigation network (Iran).” Agric. Water Manage. 148 (Apr): 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.003.
Nazari, B., E. Kanani, and S. Sepehri. 2023. “Assessment of water productivity improvement strategies using system dynamics approach.” Appl. Water Sci. 13 (12): 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02044-8.
Parhizkari, A., and M. M. Mozafari. 2016. “Assessment the effects of greenhouse gases emission and climate change on supply and demand of irrigation water and agricultural products in watersheds of Qazvin Province.” [In Persian.] JWMR 7 (14): 151. https://doi.org/10.29252/jwmr.7.14.15.
Perry, C., and P. Steduto. 2017. Does improved irrigation technology save water? A review of the evidence. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35540.81280.
Raeisi, L. G., S. Morid, M. Delavar, and R. Srinivasan. 2019. “Effect and side-effect assessment of different agricultural water saving measures in an integrated framework.” Agric. Water Manage. 223 (Aug): 105685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105685.
Scott, C., S. Vicuña, I. Blanco-Gutiérrez, F. Meza, and C. Varela-Ortega. 2014. “Irrigation efficiency and water-policy implications for river basin resilience.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18 (4): 1339–1348. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1339-2014.
Seckler, D. 1999. Revisiting the ‘IWMI paradigm:’ Increasing the efficiency and productivity of water use. Giza, Egypt: International Water Management Institute.
Sinha, P., E. Rollason, L. J. Bracken, J. Wainwright, and S. M. Reaney. 2020. “A new framework for integrated, holistic, and transparent evaluation of inter-basin water transfer schemes.” Sci. Total Environ. 721 (Apr): 137–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137646.
Törnqvist, R., and J. Jarsjö. 2012. “Water saving through improved irrigation techniques: Basin-scale quantification in semi-arid environments.” Water Resour. Manage. 26 (4): 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9819-9.
Van Opstal, J., P. Droogers, A. Kaune, P. Steduto, and C. Perry. 2021. Vol. 46 of Guidance on realizing real water saving with crop water productivity interventions. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Walker, W. R., and G. V. Skogerboe. 1987. “Furrow irrigation.” In Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ward, F. A., and M. Pulido-Velazquez. 2008. “Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (47): 18215–18220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805554105.
Wu, D., Y. Cui, and Y. Luo. 2019. “Irrigation efficiency and water-saving potential considering reuse of return flow.” Agric. Water Manage. 221 (Sep): 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.021.
Yargholi, B., E. Kanani, and S. Sepehri. 2023. “A long-term assessment of the effectiveness of a semi-artificial wetland in removing organic materials and nutrients from agricultural drainage water.” J. Water Process. Eng. 55 (Apr): 104117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104117.
Zhong, A. C., B. R. Hu, C. M. Wang, D. W. Xue, and E. L. He. 2020. “The impact of urbanization on urban agriculture: Evidence from China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 276 (Aug): 122686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122686.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Nov 10, 2023
Accepted: Apr 2, 2024
Published online: Jul 2, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 2, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Bijan Nazari [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Water Sciences and Engineering, Imam Khomeini International Univ., P.O. Box 3414896818, Qazvin, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Graduate, Dept. of Water Sciences and Engineering, Imam Khomeini International Univ., P.O. Box 3414896818, Qazvin, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-7109. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, P.O. Box 31585-845, Karaj Alborz, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-8430. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share