Case Studies
Aug 12, 2024

Spatial Quality Optimization Analysis of Streets in Historical Urban Areas Based on Street View Perception and Multisource Data

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150, Issue 4

Abstract

Historic urban areas are unique spaces that carry collective memories and cultural identities, and their spatial quality significantly contributes to urban development and vitality. The sustainable development of these areas is a complex subject that continually garners attention in the field of urban planning. Optimizing their spatial quality necessitates an in-depth understanding of public needs, along with careful consideration of the connection between physical attributes and public perception. Advancements in big data and machine learning have paved the way for the multidimensional evaluation of spatial quality in historic urban areas. In this light, our research proposed a new evaluation system and optimization strategy rooted in the unique attributes and cultural values of these areas. Our empirical research focused on Suzhou Ancient Urban, a representative historic urban area in China. First, we identified six indicators, including appearance, order, atmosphere, and scale, to evaluate the public's perception of the streets in Suzhou Ancient Urban, a place rich with cultural history and local characteristics. This evaluation resulted in a perception map of this area. Second, we explored the unique planning structure, functional distribution, and visual elements of Suzhou Ancient Urban. Using spatial syntax, points of interest (POIs), social media post data processed via natural language processing (SnowNLP), and semantic segmentation methods, we connected the physical attributes of the area with public behavioral preferences and perceptions. This macro-to-micro approach combined subjective and objective evaluations to measure spatial quality. Finally, we established a database for organic urban renewal, which highlights the spatial characteristics of historic urban areas that the public preferred. Our findings indicate that the spaces with higher accessibility in Suzhou Ancient Urban scored better in terms of overall perception. Furthermore, highly distinctive and accessible spaces were the most attractive to the public. Elements such as buildings and walls negatively impacted perception, while infrastructure elements such as roads, pavements, and greenery had a positive effect. This research evaluated the spatial quality of streets in historic urban areas with a special focus on public perception. By combining objective factors such as street accessibility, attractiveness, and visual elements, we discuss the influence of urban structure, function, and components on spatial quality. Our approach, founded on the specific spatial–geographical context of historic urban areas, offered a new methodology for optimizing their quality by integrating subjective and objective factors. Ultimately, our research aimed to foster digital and sustainable development in historic urban areas.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Aman, J., T. C. Matisziw, J. B. Kim, and D. Luo. 2022. “Sensing the city: Leveraging geotagged social media posts and street view imagery to model urban streetscapes using deep neural networks.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 595–604. Hong Kong: Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA).
Biljecki, F., and K. Ito. 2021. “Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review.” Landscape Urban Plann. 215: 104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104217.
Chen, P., H. Tang, and X. Sun. 2022. “Analysis and research on quality overlap of public space in historical and cultural blocks.” Chin. Overseas Archit. 28 (6): 78–84. https://doi.org/10.19940/j.cnki.1008-0422.2022.06.012.
Dai, Z., and C. Hua. 2019. “The improvement of street space quality measurement method based on streetscape.” Planners 35 (9): 57–63.
Han, X., L. Wang, S. H. Seo, J. He, and T. Jung. 2022. “Measuring perceived psychological stress in urban built environments using google street view and deep learning.” Front. Public Health 10: 891736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.891736.
He, H., Y. Fang, T. Zhang, Q. Zhang, M. Li, and C. Su. 2022. “The present and future of street space quality research: Quantitative analysis based on the visualization literature at home and abroad in the past ten years.” Shanghai Urban Plann. Rev. 32 (6): 73–81.
He, H., and M. Wang. 2019. “The spatial perception of micro-transformation in historic district based on visual methodology.” World Reg. Stud. 28 (4): 189–200.
Hillier, B. 2012. “Studying cities to learn about minds: Some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 39 (1): 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34047t.
Hu, Z., and Y. Lin. 2012. Environmental psychology. Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
Jiang, W. 2022. “Historical review and summary of the conservation and development of Suzhou old town.” China City Plann. Rev. 46 (S1): 5–12.
Jin, L., L. Ji, and D. Yang. 2022. “Study on the renewal method of historical and cultural blocks from the perspective of cultural perception.” Urbanism Archit. 19 (21): 158–163. https://doi.org/10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2022.21.33.
Kang, Y., F. Zhang, S. Gao, H. Lin, and Y. Liu. 2020. “A review of urban physical environment sensing using street view imagery in public health studies.” Ann. GIS 26 (3): 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1791954.
Li, D. 1999. Introduction to environmental behavior. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Li, X., Y. Li, T. Jia, L. Zhou, and I. H. Hijazi. 2022. “The six dimensions of built environment on urban vitality: Fusion evidence from multi-source data.” Cities 121: 103482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103482.
Li, X., D. Wu, L. Li, and X. Wang. 2021. “Research on visual perception evaluation of urban riverside greenway landscape based on deep learning.” J. Beijing For. Univer. 42 (12): 93–104.
Liu, X., and W. Hu. 2018. “Attention and Sentiment of Chinese Public Toward Green Buildings Based on Sina Weibo.” Sustain. Cities Soc. 44(10): 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.047.
Lynch, K. 2008. The image of the city. Publication of the joint center for urban studies. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Ma, S., C. Qian, and Y. Zhou. 2022. “Research on public space evaluation of historical blocks in Southern Jiangsu under mixed reality environment.” Contemp. Archit. 3 (11): 61–66.
Ma, X., C. Ma, C. Wu, Y. Xi, R. Yang, N. Peng, C. Zhang, and F. Ren. 2021. “Measuring human perceptions of streetscapes to better inform urban renewal: A perspective of scene semantic parsing.” Cities 110: 103086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103086.
Sheng, J., and K. Xu. 2022. “Systematic and integral conservation and cultural inheritance of historic urban areas under the background of transformation.” China City Plann. Rev. 46 (S1): 28–38+57.
Shi, Y., L. Xiao, L. Yang, and J. Li. 2023. “Review and prospect of Chinese and western historical and cultural city preservation process, theory, and method.” Planners 39 (01): 56–65.
Tan, L. 2020. “Construction of consensus map of residents” perception of tourism development in historical and cultural districts.” J. Southwest China Norm. Univer. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 45 (12): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2020.12.015.
Tang, J., and Y. Long. 2019. “Measuring visual quality of street space and its temporal variation: Methodology and its application in the Hutong area in Beijing.” Landscape Urban Plann. 191: 103436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.015.
Tong, X. 2021. “Research on street greening in Suzhou ancient city based on Baidu street view data.” City and House 28 (11): 50–53.
Wang, H. 2022. “Research on space quality evaluation of historic districts based on PSPL: A case of Shaocheng District in Chengdu.” Urbanism Archit. 19 (20): 185–187. https://doi.org/10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2022.20.53.
Wang, L., X. Han, J. He, and T. Jung. 2022a. “Measuring residents’ perceptions of city streets to inform better street planning through deep learning and space syntax.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 190: 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.06.011.
Wang, M., Y. He, H. Meng, Y. Zhang, B. Zhu, J. Mango, and X. Li. 2022b. “Assessing street space quality using street view imagery and function-driven method: The case of Xiamen, China.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 11 (5): 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050282.
Xu, F., A. Jin, X. Chen, and G. Li. 2021. “New data, integrated methods and multiple applications: A review of urban studies based on street view images.” In Proc., 2021 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., 6532–6535. New York: IEEE
Xu, L., and G. Yang. 2002. Environmental psychology. Shanghai, China: Tongji University Press.
Yang, C., F. Xu, L. Jiang, R. Wang, L. Yin, M. Zhao, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Approach to quantify spatial comfort of urban roads based on street view images.” J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 23 (05): 785–801.
Yao, Y., Z. Liang, Z. Yuan, P. Liu, Y. Bie, J. Zhang, R. Wang, J. Wang, and Q. Guan. 2019. “A human–machine adversarial scoring framework for urban perception assessment using street-view images.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 33 (12): 2363–2384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1643024.
Ye, Y., L. Zhang, W. Yan, and W. Zeng. 2018. “Measuring street greening quality from humanistic perspective: A large-scale analysis based on Baidu street view images and machine learning algorithms.” Landscape Archit. 25 (08): 24–29. https://doi.org/10.14085/j.fjyl.2018.08.0024.06.
Zhai, Y., and L. Xu. 2016. “Review of measurement tools of urban design quality.” Time Archit. 33 (2): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.13717/j.cnki.ta.2016.02.020.
Zhang, F., B. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Liu, H. H. Fung, H. Lin, and C. Ratti. 2018. “Measuring human perceptions of a large-scale urban region using machine learning.” Landscape Urban Plann. 180: 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.020.
Zhao, H., J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, and J. Jia. 2017. “Pyramid scene parsing network.” In Proc., 2017 IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6230–6239. New York: IEEE.
Zhou, M., and H. Wei. 2022. “The evaluation on the perceived quality of urban design in street space of historical and cultural blocks: A case of Shichahai historical and cultural district.” Urbanism Archit. 19 (19): 32–37. https://doi.org/10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2022.19.07.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150Issue 4December 2024

History

Received: Jun 20, 2023
Accepted: Feb 21, 2024
Published online: Aug 12, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 12, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Heifei 230000, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4176-4102. Email: [email protected]
Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Heifei 230000, China. Email: [email protected]
Xuhuanxin Zuo [email protected]
Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Heifei 230000, China. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National Univ., Daegu 41566, South Korea (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share