Abstract

During the past decade, the rapid construction of rail transit in developing countries has had a great impact on bus transport, resulting in the waste of public transport resources and ineffective competition between bus and rail transit. Therefore, it is particularly important to explore ways to promote the integrated development of bus and rail transit by combining both the effects of the built environment and their competition. Using Wuhan city in China as a case study, this study develops gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs) to examine the quantified threshold range of the built environment impacts on bus transit trip rates and to further explore the competitive impacts of rail transit on bus transit within these threshold ranges. The threshold range results show that when the number of service point of interests (POIs) within a 500-m radius of the bus stop reaches 350 and the distance to the destination is 5 km, the model split of bus transit is the highest. The competition impact analysis shows that rail transit promotes bus transit trip rates in urban fringe areas and locations, including a high proportion of 3- to 5-km middle-distance trips, but restricts bus transit trip rates in high-density central areas and the regions dominated by short-distance trips of less than 3 km or long-distance trips of more than 5 km. Strategies are proposed to optimize land use and the layout of bus and rail transit stations to mitigate ineffective competition and improve the efficiency of public transit to provide theoretical and technical support for optimizing urban spatial layouts through transit-oriented development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Natural Science Founding of China (Grant Nos. 72131008 and 42071357).

References

Aston, L., G. Currie, M. Kamruzzaman, A. Delbosc, T. Brands, N. Van Oort, and D. Teller. 2021. “Multi-city exploration of built environment and transit mode use: Comparison of Melbourne, Amsterdam and Boston.” J. Transp. Geogr. 95: 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103136.
Calvo, F., L. Eboli, C. Forciniti, and G. Mazzulla. 2019. “Factors influencing trip generation on metro system in Madrid (Spain).” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 67: 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.021.
Cardozo, O. D., J. C. García-Palomares, and J. Gutiérrez. 2012. “Application of geographically weighted regression to the direct forecasting of transit ridership at station-level.” Appl. Geogr. 34: 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.01.005.
Cervero, R. 2002. “Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 7 (4): 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4.
Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
Chatman, D. G. 2003. “How density and mixed uses at the workplace affect personal commercial travel and commute mode choice.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1831 (1): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.3141/1831-22.
Chen, E., Z. Ye, and H. Wu. 2021. “Nonlinear effects of built environment on intermodal transit trips considering spatial heterogeneity.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 90: 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102677.
Ciaffi, F., E. Cipriani, and M. Petrelli. 2012. “Feeder bus network design problem: A new metaheuristic procedure and real size applications.” Procedia Social Behav. Sci. 54: 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.796.
Daganzo, C. F. 2010. “Structure of competitive transit networks.” Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 44: 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.11.001.
Ding, C., X. Cao, and C. Liu. 2019. “How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds.” J. Transp. Geogr. 77: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.04.011.
Ding, C., X. Y. Cao, and P. Næss. 2018a. “Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 110: 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.009.
Ding, C., X. Y. Cao, and Y. Wang. 2018b. “Synergistic effects of the built environment and commuting programs on commute mode choice.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 118: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.041.
Ding, C., X. Wu, G. Yu, and Y. Wang. 2016. “A gradient boosting logit model to investigate driver’s stop-or-run behavior at signalized intersections using high-resolution traffic data.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 72: 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.016.
Enrique Ramos-Santiago, L. 2021. “Towards a better account and understanding of bus / rapid-transit interactions: The case of Los Angeles.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9 (3): 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.005.
Frank, L. D., and G. Pivo. 1995. “Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1466: 44–52. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1994/1466/1466-007.pdf.
Friedman, J. H. 2001. “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine.” Ann. Stat. 29 (5): 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451.
Gan, Z., M. Yang, T. Feng, and H. J. P. Timmermans. 2020. “Examining the relationship between built environment and metro ridership at station-to-station level.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 82: 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102332.
Greenwell, B. M. 2017. “Pdp: An R package for constructing partial dependence plots.” R J. 9 (1): 421–436. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-016.
Guo, Y., and S. Y. He. 2021. “The role of objective and perceived built environments in affecting dockless bike-sharing as a feeder mode choice of metro commuting.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 149: 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.008.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. H. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Hong, J., Q. Shen, and L. Zhang. 2014. “How do built-environment factors affect travel behavior? A spatial analysis at different geographic scales.” Transportation 41 (3): 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9462-9.
Jiao, J., and Y. Chen. 2022. “Is the relationship between bus and light rail transit a competition substitution or a congestion substitution? An empirical study in Seattle.” Public Transp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-022-00294-4.
Kockelman, K. 1997. “Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco bay area.” Transp. Res Rec. 1607 (1): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-16.
Luo, Q., B. Sun, and Y. Zhong. 2010. “Collinear competition between rail transit and bus transit based on population competition model.” In Vol. 3 of 2010 WASE Int. Conf. on Information Engineering, 313–315. New York: IEEE.
Ma, C., Y. Wang, and K. Chen. 2007. “Competition model between urban rail and bus transit.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 7 (3): 140–143. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXT200703024.htm.
Melia, S., G. Parkhurst, and H. Barton. 2011. “The paradox of intensification.” Transp. Policy 18 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.05.007.
Moilanen, M. 2009. “Matching and settlement patterns: The case of Norway.” Pap. Reg. Sci. 89 (3): 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00264.x.
Pan, H., Q. Shen, and M. Zhang. 2009. “Influence of urban form on travel behaviour in four neighbourhoods of Shanghai.” Urban Stud. 46 (2): 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008099355.
Ridgeway, G. 2019. “Generalized boosted models: A guide to the gbm package.” Compute 1: 1–12. http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk/R/web/packages/gbm/vignettes/gbm.pdf.
Rogerson, P. 2001. Statistical methods for geography. London: Sage.
Shao, Q., W. Zhang, X. Cao, J. Yang, and J. Yin. 2020. “Threshold and moderating effects of land use on metro ridership in Shenzhen: Implications for TOD planning.” J. Transp. Geogr. 89: 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102878.
Stevens, M. R. 2017. “Does compact development make people drive less?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83 (1): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01944363.2016.1240044.
Sun, B., and B. Dan. 2015. “Impact of urban built environment on residential choice of commuting mode in Shanghai.” Acta Geog. Sin. 7 (10): 1664–1674. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-CSFY201903010.htm.
Tamakloe, R., J. Hong, and J. Tak. 2021. “Determinants of transit-oriented development efficiency focusing on an integrated subway, bus and shared-bicycle system: Application of Simar-Wilson’s two-stage approach.” Cities 108: 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102988.
Tao, T., X. Wu, J. Cao, Y. Fan, K. Das, and A. Ramaswami. 2020. “Exploring the non-linear relationship between the built environment and active travel in the Twin Cities.” J. Plan. Educ. Res. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20915765.
Ting, C. J., and P. Schonfeld. 2005. “Schedule coordination in a multiple hub transit network.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131 (2): 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:2(112).
Verma, A., and S. L. Dhingra. 2006. “Developing integrated schedules for urban rail and feeder bus operation.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 132 (3): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:3(138).
Vuchic, V. 2005. Urban transit: Operations, planning and economics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
WHTPI (Wuhan Transportation Development Strategy Insatiate). 2021. Annual report on Wuhan transportation development 2021. Wuhan, China: WHTPI.
Wu, S., Y. Zhuang, J. Chen, W. Wang, Y. Bai, and S. Lo. 2019. “Rethinking bus-to-metro accessibility in new town development: Case studies in Shanghai.” Cities 94: 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.010.
WNRPB (Wuhan Natural Resources and Planning Bureau). 2018. Land use maps of Wuhan. Wuhan, China: WNRPB.
WTRC (Wuhan Transportation Research Center). 2018. Wuhan metro map. Wuhan, China: WTRC.
Yang, J., J. Cao, and Y. Zhou. 2021. “Elaborating non-linear associations and synergies of subway access and land uses with urban vitality in Shenzhen.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 144: 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.11.014.
Yin, C., C. Shao, Z. Huang, X. Wang, and S. Wang. 2021. “Investigating the influences of multi-scale built environment on car ownership behavior based on gradient boosting decision trees.” J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 52 (3): 572–577. https://doi.org/10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200844.
Zhang, J., and T. Li. 2014. “Urban rail transit and bus collinear analysis based on competition model.” J. Transp. Inf. Saf. 4 (32): 108–112.
Zhang, L., A. Nasri, J. H. Hong, and Q. Shen. 2012. “How built environment affects travel behavior: A comparative analysis of the connections between land use and vehicle miles traveled in US cities.” J. Transp. Land Use 5 (3): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v5i3.266.
Zhang, M. 2009. “Bus versus rail: Meta-analysis of cost characteristics, carrying capacities, and land use impacts.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2110 (1): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2110-11.
Zhang, W., Y. Zhao, X. Cao, D. Lu, and Y. Chai. 2020. “Nonlinear effect of accessibility on car ownership in Beijing: Pedestrian-scale neighborhood planning.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 86: 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102445.
Zhang, Y., and A. Haghani. 2015. “A gradient boosting method to improve travel time prediction.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 58: 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.019.
Zhao, L., and L. Shen. 2019. “The impacts of rail transit on future urban land use development: A case study in Wuhan, China.” Transp. Policy 81: 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.004.
Zhao, L., S. Shen, J. Luo, and G. Zhu. 2019. “Solutions for new town development predicaments from a comparison analysis of spatial evolution.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 145 (4): 04019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000524.
Zhao, L., S. Wang, J. Wei, and Z. R. Peng. 2020. “Hierarchical linear model for investigating effect of built environment on bus transit.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (2): 04020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000568.
Zhao, P. 2013. “The impact of the built environment on individual workers’ commuting behavior in Beijing.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp. 7 (5): 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.692173.
Zhou, Y., G. Liu, Y. Chen, and H. Yan. 2021. “A study on cooperative game of metro and bus lines.” J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 21 (3): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2021.03.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 1March 2023

History

Received: Jan 27, 2022
Accepted: Oct 18, 2022
Published online: Dec 22, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 22, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Shuxian Wang [email protected]
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, HuaZhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, HuaZhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-9795. Email: [email protected]
Community and Regional Planning Program, School of Architecture, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-1323. Email: [email protected]
School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking Univ., Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, P.R. China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-3971. Email: [email protected]
Sicheng Liang [email protected]
Wuhan Planning and Design Institute, Wuhan, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share