Innovation District Space and Element Identification Framework: Empirical Research from Shenzhen, China
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 1
Abstract
Science and technology and skills have increasingly become the driving force to lead the development of knowledge economy. With the changes in the demand for knowledge workers and the location of enterprises, a new type of innovation space—innovation districts—has emerged. Countries have begun to identify and nurture innovation districts. Therefore, how to accurately identify innovation districts in cities has become an important research topic. The existing research on identifying innovation districts is mainly based on a qualitative description method at the element level. However, whether there are other potential innovation districts in urban space can be identified by quantitative identification. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to establish an innovation district identification framework and a case study of the framework. The identification framework includes spatial identification and factor identification. In spatial identification, the identification index system is constructed based on the spatial location, range limit, and the surrounding area of innovative assets. In factor identification, the identification index system is constructed based on innovative assets, physical assets, and network assets, and Kendall Square and Boston innovation districts are used as the reference basis to determine whether the identified districts meet the standards of the constructed innovation districts. In empirical case research, spatial identification identified the Gaoxin South District (GXSD) spatial range. In factor identification, it was found that GXSD does not fully meet the standard of innovation district identification. This paper argues that the framework is essential for urban managers, planners, and urban designers to identify and evaluate high-quality innovation districts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous referee for the useful suggestions. This paper received support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFB210310-3).
References
Adu-McVie, R., T. Yigitcanlar, I. Erol, and B. Xia. 2021. “Classifying innovation districts: Delphi validation of a multidimensional framework.” Land Use Policy 111: 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105779.
Alvarez, M., B. Durmaz, S. Platt, and T. Yigitcanlar. 2010. “Creativity, culture tourism and place-making: Istanbul and London film industries.” Int. J. Cult. Tourism Hospitality Res. 4 (3): 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506181011067592.
Anne. 2016. “Oklahoma city innovation district: Ecosystem audit.” https://www.pps.org/projects/oklahoma-city-innovation-district.
Arnault, M., and B. Carmelina. 2019. “Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: The case of Chattanooga’s innovation district.” Urban Res. Pract. 12 (4): 472–492.
Bell, T. 2014. “Elements of an innovation ecosystem.” http://thatcherbell.vc/elements-of-an-innovation-ecosystem/.
Carlino, G. A., R. M. Hunt, J. Carr, and T. E. Smith. 2012. The Agglomeration of R & D Labs, 1-45. Philadelphia, PA: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Carrillo, F. J., and T. Yigitcanlar. 2009. “Planning for knowledge-based urban development: Global perspectives.” J. Knowl.Manage. 13 (5): 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910988051.
Carrillo, F. J., T. Yigitcanlar, B. Garcia, and A. Lonnqvist. 2014. Knowledge and the city: Concepts, applications and trends of knowledge-based urban development. London: Routledge.
Castells, M. 1991. “The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process.” Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1 (1): 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1991.11.
Chapple, K., S. Jackson, and A. J. Martin. 2010. “Concentrating creativity: The planning of formal and informal arts districts.” City Cult. Soc. 1 (4): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2011.01.007.
Crowley, L. 2011. Streets ahead: What makes a city innovative. London: The Work Foundation.
Engel, J. S., and I. Del-Palacio. 2011. “Global clusters of innovation: The case of Israel and Silicon Valley.” Calif. Manage. Rev. 53 (2): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.2.27.
Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2018. “Place quality in innovation clusters: An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney.” Cities 74: 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.017.
Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., T. Yigitcanlar, M. Kamruzzaman, and M. Guaralda. 2020. “Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper.” Land Use Policy 90: 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104166.
EC (European Commission). 2013. “European capital of innovation award.” http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/icapital/poster.pdf.
Evans, G. 2009. “Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy.” Urban Stud. 46 (5–6): 1003–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009103853.
Florida, R. 2014. Startup city: The urban shift in venture capital and high technology. Toronto: Martin Prosperity Institute.
Florida, R., P. Adler, and C. Mellander. 2017. “The city as innovation machine.” Res. Urban Sociol. 6 (1): 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-0042(01)80014-3.
Forsyth, A. 2014. “Alternative forms of the high-technology district: Corridors, clumps, cores, campuses, subdivisions, and sites.” Environ. Plann. C: Gov. Policy 32 (5): 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1267r.
Hanna, K. 2016. Spaces to think: Innovation districts and the changing geography of London’s knowledge economy. London: Centre for London.
Hsieh, H.-N., T.-S. Hu, P.-C. Chia, and C.-C. Liu. 2014. “Knowledge patterns and spatial dynamics of industrial districts in knowledge cities: Taiwan, Hsinchu.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (12): 5587–5596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.009.
Hu, L., S. Zhang, and J. Chen. 2016. “Research on innovation agglomeration model of anchored + innovation district.” Stud. Sci. Sci. 34 (12): 1886–1896.
Huggins, R. 2008. “The evolution of knowledge clusters: Progress and policy.” Econ. Dev. Q. 22 (4): 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408323196.
Jennifer, C., H. Hsin-I, and J. P. Walsh. 2010. “A typology of ‘innovation districts’: What it means for regional resilience.” Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 3 (1): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp034.
Jolly, D., and F. Zhu. 2012. “Chinese science and technology parks: The emergence of a new model.” J. Bus. Strategy 33 (5): 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661211282740.
Julie, W., K. Bruce, and T. Osha. 2019. “The evolution of innovation district.” https://www.giid.org/the-evolution-of-innovation-districts/.
Karen, C., J. Shannon, and M. Anne. 2010. “Concentrating creativity: The planning of formal and informal arts districts.” City Cult. Soc. 1 (4): 225–234.
Katz, K., and J. Wagner. 2014. The rise of innovation districts: A new geography of innovation in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Khorramshahgol, R., and V.-S. Moustakis. 1988. “Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 37 (3): 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90197-X.
Kim, M. 2013. Spatial qualities of innovation districts: How third places are changing the innovation ecosystem of Kendall Square. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kovács, I., and I. Petruska. 2014. “Operational characteristics of Hungarian innovation clusters as reflected by a qualitative research study.” Period. Polytech Social Manage. Sci. 22 (2): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7138.
Mafi-Gholami, D., J. Feghhi, A. Danehkar, and N. Yarali. 2015. “Classification and prioritization of negative factors affecting on mangrove forests using Delphi method (a case study: Mangrove Forests of Hormozgan Province, Iran).” Adv. Biores. 6: 3.
Markusen, A. 1996. “Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts.” Econ. Geogr. 72 (3): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402.
Metaxiotis, K., T. Yigitcanlar, and F. J. Carrillo. 2010. Knowledge-based development for cities and societies: Integrated multi-level approaches. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Morisson, A. 2017. A framework for defining innovation districts- case study from 22@ Barcelona. Rochester, NY: Social Science Electronic Publishing.
Norouzian-Maleki, S., S. Bell, S.-B. Hosseini, and M. Faizi. 2015. “Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia.” Ecol. Indic. 48: 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.033.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2007. “Attracting and retaining knowledge workers in knowledge cities.” J. Knowl. Manage. 11 (5): 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710819762.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2015. “Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: Insights from European best practices.” Int. J. Knowl.-Based Dev. 6 (3): 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2017. “Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 146: 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2018. “Does place quality matter for innovation districts? Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts.” Land Use Policy 79: 734–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.016.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, M. Guaralda, and F. Phillips. 2019a. “Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 146: 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014.
Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, M. Guaralda, and F. Phillips. 2019b. “Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 146: 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014.
Rabelo, R. J., and P. Bernus. 2015. “A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems.” In Proc., 15th IFAC Symp. on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Sandel, D. 2017. “Connected innovation neighborhoods and innovation districts.” In Smart economy in smart cities, edited by T. Vinod Kumar. Singapore: Springer.
Schaffers, H., N. Komninos, M. Pallot, B. Trousse, M. Nilsson, and A. Oliveira. 2011. “Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation.” In The Future Internet Assembly, 431–446. Berlin: Springer.
Scott, H., and H. Jung Han. 2017. “Innovation districts and urban heterogeneity: 3D mapping of industry mix in downtown Sydney.” J. Urban Des 22 (5): 568–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1301203.
SGS. 2020. From alleys to valleys: Creating innovation precincts through inclusive policy. Sydney: SGS.
Taylor, J. 2014. Boston main streets 2.0: Spreading Boston’s innovation economy from the innovation district to the neighborhoods. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
van der Veer, M. 2016. Developing successful innovation districts. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Univ. of Technology.
van Winden, W., L. van den Berg, and P. Pol. 2007. “European cities in the knowledge economy: Towards a typology.” Urban Stud. 44 (3): 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601131886.
Wagner, J. 2018. In St. Louis, a gateway to innovation and inclusion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Wagner, J., J. S. Vey, J. Hachadorian, S. Andes, and N. Storring. 2018. Assessing your innovation district: A how-to guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Wagner, J., B. Katz, and T. Osha. 2019. The evolution of innovation districts: The new geography of global innovation. New York: The Global Institute on Innovation Districts.
Yigitcanlar, T. 2014. “Position paper: Benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (12): 5549–5559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.032.
Yigitcanlar, T., R. Adu-McVie, and I. Erol. 2020. “How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature.” Land Use Policy 95: 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595.
Yigitcanlar, T., and F. Dur. 2013. “Making space and place for knowledge communities: Lessons for Australian practice.” Australas. J. Reg. Stud. 19 (1): 36–63.
Yigitcanlar, T., T. Inkinen, and T. Makkonen. 2015. “Does size matter? Knowledge-based development of second-order city-regions in Finland.” disP 51 (3): 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2015.1093352.
Yigitcanlar, T., K. Velibeyoglu, and C. Martinez-Fernandez. 2008. “Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts.” J. Knowl. Manage. 12 (5): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810902902.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149 • Issue 1 • March 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 10, 2021
Accepted: Jun 27, 2022
Published online: Oct 27, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 27, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.